10/26/2019 A 'radical alternative': how one man changed the perception of Los Angeles | Cities | The Guardian

A 'radical alternative': how one man changed the perception

of Los Angeles
In the 1960s, British architectural critic Reyner Banham declared his love for the city that his fellow intellectuals
hated. What Banham wrote about Los Angeles redefined how the world perceived it but what would he think of
LA today?

Cities is supported by
About this content
Colin Marshall
Wed 24 Aug 2016 12.57 BST

“N
ow I know subjective opinions can vary,” the journalist Adam Raphael wrote in the
Guardian in 1968, “but personally I reckon LA as the noisiest, the smelliest, the most
uncomfortable and most uncivilised major city in the United States. In short, a stinking
sewer ...”

Three years later, Raphael’s words appeared in print again as an epigraph of Reyner Banham’s Los Angeles:
The Architecture of Four Ecologies – the most exuberantly pro-Los Angeles book ever written. Ever since
publication, it has shown up on lists of great books about modern cities – even those drawn up by people
who consider Los Angeles anything but a great American city.

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/aug/24/radical-alternative-reyner-banham-man-changed-perception-los-angeles 1/9
10/26/2019 A 'radical alternative': how one man changed the perception of Los Angeles | Cities | The Guardian

Somehow, this book that drew so much of its initial publicity with shock value (“In Praise (!) of Los
Angeles”, sneered the New York Times review’s headline) has kept its relevance through the decades, such
that newly arrived Angelenos still read it to orient themselves. But what can it teach us about the Los
Angeles of today?

An architectural historian a decade into his career when he first visited, Banham knew full-well that his
fellow intellectuals hated Los Angeles. How and why he himself came so avidly to appreciate it constitutes
the core question of his work on the city, which culminated in this slim volume.

The “many who were ready to cast doubt on the worth of the enterprise”, he reflected in its final chapter,
included a “distinguished Italian architect and his wife who, on discovering that I was writing this book,
doubted that anyone who cared for architecture could lower himself to such a project and walked away
without a word further.”

The project began when Banham “brought his shaggy beard and wonky teeth to Los Angeles and declared
that he loved the city with a passion”, in the words of novelist and Bradford-born Los Angeles expat Richard
Rayner. Teaching at the University of Southern California, who put him up in the Greene brothers’
architecturally worshipped Gamble House in Pasadena, “Banham had a privileged base from which to
explore. But what he went looking for, and the way he wrote about what he saw and felt, redefined the way
the intellectual world – and then the wider world – perceived the city.”

Reyner Banham with his ‘shaggy beard and wonky teeth’ in 1968.
Photograph: Peter Johns/The Guardian

Not that he declared his love right there on the tarmac at LAX. “Banham initially found the city
‘incomprehensible’ – a response shared by many critics,” wrote Nigel Whiteley in the study Reyner Banham:
Historian of the Immediate Future.

Banham first attempted to publicly explain this cutting-edge metropolis, saturated across its enormous
space with electronic devices, synthetic chemicals and televisions, in four 1968 BBC radio talks. He told of
how he came to grips with LA’s embodiment of the experimental: its experimental shape and infrastructure,
the combinations of cultures it accommodated, and the experimental lifestyles to which it gave rise.

But even an appreciator like Banham had his qualms with the result. “In Los Angeles you tend to go to a
particular place to do a particular thing, to another to do another thing, and finally a long way back to your
home, and you’ve done 100 miles in the day,” he complained in the third talk. “The distances and the
reliance on mechanical transportation leave no room for accident – even for happy accidents. You plan the
day in advance, programme your activities, and forgo those random encounters with friends and strangers
that are traditionally one of the rewards of city life.”

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/aug/24/radical-alternative-reyner-banham-man-changed-perception-los-angeles 2/9
10/26/2019 A 'radical alternative': how one man changed the perception of Los Angeles | Cities | The Guardian

Nevertheless, to Banham this un-city-like city held out a promise: “The unique value of Los Angeles – what
excites, intrigues and sometimes repels me – is that it offers radical alternatives to almost every urban
concept in unquestioned currency.”

In his subsequent landmark book, Banham enumerated Los Angeles’ departures from traditional urbanism,
as well as from “all the rules for ‘civilised living’ as they have been understood by the pundits of
modernity”, with evident delight. It seemed to legitimise a model he had already, in a 1959 article, proposed
to replace the old conception of a single dense core surrounded by a wall.

‘Civilised living’ in suburban LA. Photograph: University of Southern

California/Corbis via Getty Images

Banham foresaw “the city as scrambled egg”, its shell broken open, its business yolk mixed with its
domestic white, and everything spread across the landscape, its evenness disturbed only by occasional
“specialised sub-centres”. A visitor to Los Angeles today might hear the city explained in just the same way:
as a network of nodes, a constellation of urban villages, an exercise in postmodern polycentrism.

Banham put another finger in the eye of traditionalists who insisted that a city should have just one strong
centre with his short chapter A Note on Downtown, which opens with the words, “... because that is all
downtown Los Angeles deserves.”

From its fetishised structures such as the Bradbury Building and Cathedral of Saint Vibiana to its brand new
office towers “in their standard livery of dark glass and steel”, Banham wrote that everything “stands as an
unintegrated fragment in a downtown scene that began to disintegrate long ago – out of sheer irrelevance,
as far as one can see.”

The book’s contrarianism reflects the contrarianism of Los Angeles itself, which, insofar as it “performs the
functions of a great city, in terms of size, cosmopolitan style, creative energy, international influence,
distinctive way of life, and corporate personality [proves that] all the most admired theorists of the present
century, from the Futurists and Le Corbusier to Jane Jacobs and Sibyl Moholy-Nagy, have been wrong.”

Filled with photographs and diagrams, Banham’s book on Los Angeles divides its subject up into the four
“ecologies” of its subtitle: the beaches and beach towns of Surfurbia; the Foothills with their ever more
elaborate and expensive residences; the utilitarian Plains of Id (“the only parts of Los Angeles flat enough
and boring enough to compare with the cities of the Middle West”) and the famous, then infamous, freeway
system he dubbed Autopia: a “single comprehensible place, a coherent state of mind” in which Angelenos
“spend the two calmest and most rewarding hours of their daily lives”.

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/aug/24/radical-alternative-reyner-banham-man-changed-perception-los-angeles 3/9
10/26/2019 A 'radical alternative': how one man changed the perception of Los Angeles | Cities | The Guardian

The 1893 Bradbury Building in downtown LA was an ‘unintegrated

fragment’ in Banham’s eyes. Photograph: Michele and Tom Grimm/Alamy

Between chapters on the city’s ecologies, Banham examined the buildings found in them. Populist,
stylistically promiscuous, tradition-agnostic and often deliberately impermanent, Los Angeles’ architecture
has, of all the city’s elements, drawn distain the longest. “There is no reward for aesthetic virtue here, no
punishment for aesthetic crime; nothing but a vast cosmic indifference,” wrote the novelist James M. Cain
in 1933.

More than 40 years later, Banham saw a stylistic bounty of “Tacoburger Aztec to Wavy-line Moderne, from
Cape Cod to unsupported Jaoul vaults, from Gourmet Mansardic to Polynesian Gabled and even – in
extremity – Modern Architecture.”

He discussed at length the LA building known as the “dingbat” – a “two-storey walk-up apartment-block ...
built of wood and stuccoed over”, all identical at the back but cheaply, elaborately, decorated up-front,
emblazoned with an aspirational name such as the Capri or the Starlet.

In defining dingbats as “the true symptom of Los Angeles’ urban id, trying to cope with the unprecedented
appearance of residential densities too high to be subsumed within the illusions of homestead living,”
Banham diagnosed the central and persistent tension, then as now, between wanting to grow outward and
needing to grow upward.

Banham drew out the meaning of Los Angeles’ ostensibly disposable buildings not by venerating them, nor
denigrating them, but simply by seeing them as they were. Robert Venturi, Denise Scott Brown and Steven
Izenour would advocate the same approach in their own urban classic, Learning from Las Vegas, published
the following year: “Withholding judgment may be used as a tool to make later judgment more sensitive.
This is a way of learning from everything.”

Still, even appreciators of Los Angeles might take issue with this method when Banham’s non-judgmental
attitude – at least toward the aesthetics of American commercial culture – starts to look like advocacy for
bad taste.

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/aug/24/radical-alternative-reyner-banham-man-changed-perception-los-angeles 4/9
10/26/2019 A 'radical alternative': how one man changed the perception of Los Angeles | Cities | The Guardian

The ‘self-absorbed and perfected’ Watts Towers. Photograph: Hulton

Archive/Getty Images

Non-appreciators of Los Angeles certainly did. The painter and critic Peter Plagens, author of an 11,000-
word excoriation in Artforum magazine entitled The Ecology of Evil, went so far as to label Banham’s book
dangerous: “The hacks who do shopping centres, Hawaiian restaurants and savings-and-loans, the dried-up
civil servants in the division of highways, and the legions of showbiz fringies will sleep a little easier and
work a little harder now that their enterprises have been authenticated. In a more humane society where
Banham’s doctrines would be measured against the subdividers’ rape of the land and the lead particles in
little kids’ lungs, the author might be stood up against a wall and shot.”

Uncowed, Banham followed the book by starring in Reyner Banham Loves Los Angeles, a 1972 television
documentary that followed him through one day in the city that “makes nonsense of history and breaks all
the rules”, and inspired within him “a passion that goes beyond sense or reason”. Stops on the tour
included Simon Rodia’s handmade Watts Towers (a “totally self-absorbed and perfected monument”) to Los
Angeles’ characteristic “fantasy of innocence” (prominently marked on all the maps in his book); the
overgrown sections of the old Pacific Electric Railway’s “rusting rails that once tied the whole huge city
together”; the decrepit canals and beachside bodybuilding facilities of Venice; and a Sunset Boulevard
drive-in burger joint.

There, Banham asked the painter Ed Ruscha, plainspoken and painstaking observer of American urban
banality, what public buildings a visitor should see. Ruscha recommended gas stations.

Banham pre-empted objections to Los Angeles’ urban form by claiming “the form matters very little”,
having already written that “Los Angeles has no urban form at all in the commonly accepted sense”. Yet
whatever it does have, he argued, has produced a fascinating, and sometimes even efficient, set of emergent
urban phenomena.

“Come the day when the smog doom finally descends,” he narrated over aerial shots of Wilshire Boulevard’s
double row of towers and frame-filling neighbourhoods of detached houses, “... when the traffic grinds to a
halt and the private car is banned from the street, quite a lot of craftily placed citizens will be able to switch
over to being pedestrians and feel no pain.”

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/aug/24/radical-alternative-reyner-banham-man-changed-perception-los-angeles 5/9
10/26/2019 A 'radical alternative': how one man changed the perception of Los Angeles | Cities | The Guardian

Cyclists on Venice Beach ... though much of LA is not bike-friendly.

Photograph: Alamy

The end of the car in Los Angeles? Bold words for the man who called Wilshire Boulevard “one of the few
great streets in the world where driving is a pleasure” – after having, “like earlier generations of English
intellectuals who taught themselves Italian in order to read Dante in the original”, learned to drive “in order
to read Los Angeles in the original”.

But just as the languages heard on the streets of Los Angeles have multiplied, the language of mobility has
changed there, as has much else besides. How legible would Banham, who died in 1988, now find it?

The smog – that supposed bane of the city’s postwar decades which he always downplayed – has all but
vanished. The time of “apparently unlimited space” to gratify an “obsession with single-family dwellings”
has given way to one of construction cranes sprouting to satisfy the new demand for high-density vertical
living. They stand not just over a downtown risen miraculously from the dead, but the specialised sub-
centres scattered all over greater Los Angeles.

Though the ban on private cars hasn’t come yet, no recent development astonishes any Angeleno who was
there in the 1970s more than the city’s new rail transit network, which started to emerge almost 30 years
after the end of the Pacific Electric. It ranks as such as a success of funding, planning and implementation
(at least by the globally unimpressive American standard) that the rest of the country now looks to Los
Angeles as an example of how to build public transportation and, increasingly, public space in general.

Readers might scoff at Banham calling the Los Angeles freeway network “one of the greater works of man” –
but he has demonstrated more of an ability to see beyond it than many current observers of Los Angeles.
“Even though it is vastly better than any other motorway system of my acquaintance,” he wrote, “it is
inconceivable to Angelenos that it should not be replaced by an even better system nearer to the perfection
they are always seeking.”

Banham felt downtown Los Angeles only deserved a short chapter

dedicated to it. Photograph: Alamy

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/aug/24/radical-alternative-reyner-banham-man-changed-perception-los-angeles 6/9
10/26/2019 A 'radical alternative': how one man changed the perception of Los Angeles | Cities | The Guardian

Banham also foresaw the rise of the self-driving car, so often mooted these days as an alternative solution to
Los Angeles’ traffic woes. But cars that drive themselves (as distinct from “Baede-kar” – a then-fantastical
voice navigation system dreamed up for Banham’s TV doc, that bears an uncanny resemblance to those
every American driver uses today) come with problems that Banham also predicted all those years ago.
“The marginal gains in efficiency through automation,” he wrote, “might be offset by the psychological
deprivations caused by destroying the residual illusions of free decision and driving skill.”

Under each outwardly celebratory page of Banham’s book lies the notion of change as Los Angeles’ only
constant: no matter how excitingly modern the car and the freeway, their day will come to an end; no
matter how comfortably idyllic the detached house, it too must fall out of favour, or into impracticality,
sooner or later.

Some of the elements that drew Banham’s attention have, after their own periods of disrepute, turned
fashionable again. Even the humble dingbat has found a place in the future of the city, becoming the object
of critical study and architectural competition.

Banham also saw the future of Los Angeles in other unprepossessing buildings, especially one “striking and
elegantly simple” stucco box on La Cienega Boulevard. Its architect? A certain Frank Gehry, then almost
unknown but now one of the most powerful influencers of the built environment in not just Los Angeles
(his current high-profile project involves re-making the city’s famously dry, concrete-encased river), but
other cities as well. The Toronto-born “starchitect” became his adopted hometown’s architectural emissary
– just one of the myriad ways in which Los Angeles has influenced the rest of the urban world.

These days, the rest of the urban world also influences Los Angeles. No longer labouring under the
delusions of total exceptionalism that prevailed in Banham’s day, it has, with its towers, trains, parks and
even bike-share systems, made strides toward the “liveability” so demanded by 21st-century urbanists. It
now even resembles (if faintly) New York, Boston, London, and Paris – those thoroughly planned, non-
experimental cities where, Banham lamented, “warring pressure groups cannot get out of one another’s
hair because they are pressed together in a sacred labyrinth of cultural monuments and real estate values”.

In its impressive bid to incorporate older metropolitan virtues and play by the rules of good urban design,
modern Los Angeles ignores the possibility of becoming a similarly sacred labyrinth at its peril. Keeping
Banham’s Los Angeles: the Architecture of Four Ecologies on its syllabus will hopefully protect against the
dire fate of losing its rule-breaking experimental urban spirit.

The engineering-trained author regarded Los Angeles as a kind of machine. Though it has come in for a
badly needed overhaul of its interface in recent years, nobody has yet written a user’s manual more engaged
in the city on its own terms as Banham did 45 years ago.

Follow Guardian Cities on Twitter and Facebook to join the discussion

As the climate crisis escalates...

... the Guardian will not stay quiet. This is our pledge: we will continue to give global heating, wildlife
extinction and pollution the urgent attention and prominence they demand. The Guardian recognises the
climate emergency as the defining issue of our times.

Our independence means we are free to investigate and challenge inaction by those in power. We will
inform our readers about threats to the environment based on scientific facts, not driven by commercial or
political interests. And we have made several important changes to our style guide to ensure the language
we use accurately reflects the environmental catastrophe.

The Guardian believes that the problems we face on the climate crisis are systemic and that fundamental
societal change is needed. We will keep reporting on the efforts of individuals and communities around the
world who are fearlessly taking a stand for future generations and the preservation of human life on earth.

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/aug/24/radical-alternative-reyner-banham-man-changed-perception-los-angeles 7/9
10/26/2019 A 'radical alternative': how one man changed the perception of Los Angeles | Cities | The Guardian

We want their stories to inspire hope. We will also report back on our own progress as an organisation, as we
take important steps to address our impact on the environment.

You’ve read 5 Guardian articles in the last two months – made possible by our choice to keep Guardian
journalism open to all. We do not have a paywall because we believe everyone deserves access to factual
information, regardless of where they live or what they can afford.

We hope you will consider supporting the Guardian’s open, independent reporting today. Every
contribution from our readers, however big or small, is so valuable. Support us from as little as £1 – and it
only takes a minute. Thank you.

Support The Guardian

Topics
Cities

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/aug/24/radical-alternative-reyner-banham-man-changed-perception-los-angeles 8/9
10/26/2019 A 'radical alternative': how one man changed the perception of Los Angeles | Cities | The Guardian

Los Angeles
Architecture
California
features

https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/aug/24/radical-alternative-reyner-banham-man-changed-perception-los-angeles 9/9