Professional Documents
Culture Documents
B2.1 Writing Assessment 1 An Epic Match PDF
B2.1 Writing Assessment 1 An Epic Match PDF
B2.1 Writing Assessment 1 An Epic Match PDF
|WRITING ASSESSMENT 1
An epic match!
Communicative goals:
Write a concise summary of the main ideas of a longer structured text.
Write a report, if provided with a model.
Summarize in writing different points of view.
1. Think about…
2. Words matter!
To do well in this lesson you need to become familiar with a number of words.
Complete the following exercise to learn more vocabulary.
2.1. Underline the expression that best matches the idea of the boldfaced word or
phrase. Have a dictionary at hand.
1. You definitely have to watch the clash between Federer and Nadal next weekend in
the Wimbledon Final.
- Confrontation - Meeting
2. They are always bringing up the debate of who is the best tennis player.
- Provoke - Elevate.
2.2. Match the word on the left with the meaning on the right. Write in the parenthesis
the corresponding letter.
EXPRESSION MEANING
1 Take your hat off ( ) A Used to indicate that a particular fact does
not make the rest of the sentence untrue
2 Even though ( ) B To provide or supply
3 Due to ( ) C To praise a remarkable action
4 To fuel ( ) D One after the other
5 Head-to-head record ( ) E The moment when a situation starts to
change in an important way
6 In a row ( ) F Because of
7 Turning point ( ) G The history of confrontation
3. Read a bit!
Firstly, the author quotes former legends such as Jhon McEnroe and Bjorg Borg who took
their hats off before the talent and skill displayed by the two players during the match
which made them consider that they were witnessing the best tennis.
Secondly, the article indicates that the match was very special for both players because there
was lots of history between the two players and because a lot of emotions were fueling their
bodies before, during, and after the match. On one hand, it was the third final in a row that
they were playing against each other on* the tournament. Federer had won the previous two
in 2006 and 2007, but, on the other hand, Nadal had the better head-to-head against
Federer and had beaten him in their last encounters that year. For this reason, the author
argues that the two players felt they had something to prove to themselves and each other.
Thirdly, the author illustrates in detail the development of the match, exemplifying the high
level strategies used by Nadal, noting Federer’s brilliance and magic, and describing the
turning points that led to the conclusion of the event.
To conclude, the article suggests that the mythic quality of the match was also granted by
the effect it had on the public and their reaction when Nadal won.
Bull, A. (2018). Federer v Nadal 2008: Wimblendon’s greatest final a decade on. The Guardian. Retieved August 06, 2018,
from: https://www.theguardin.com/sport/2018/jul/01/roger-ferderer-rafael-nadal-wimbelndons-greatest-final-a-decade-on
In this session, you will find grammar elements and composition strategies that will
help you improve your writing skills. Read the explanation, this is important for the
next step!
1
At the beginning of your summary, you should clearly state the type of work you are going to summarize, its
title, its author and its main point. This statement should be written in Simple Present Tense.
Example: In the article “Federer v Nadal 2008: Wimbledon’s greatest final a decade on”, published on The
Guardian, the author, Andy Bull, brings up the magnitude of the epic clash that took place ten years ago
between two of the greatest tennis players in the sport history.
Check your outline and the original to make sure you have covered the important points.
By Rory Smith
July 13, 2018
That assessment may not last, of course: once we have all had a chance to reflect, it may
not quite live up to the standards of the 1982 tournament, most people’s market leader
whenever this conversation arises.
Regardless of its exact place in the hierarchy, the effusive discussion itself will be of
considerable relief to FIFA, which hitched its fortunes to President Vladimir V. Putin of
Russia, for better or for worse. When international soccer is being outflanked in so many
ways by the club game, when it can appear to be such an afterthought, when the next
edition, in 2022 will be held in December and the next, in 2026, will expand to 48 teams
from 32, these five weeks needed to be a success.
Have they gone well enough to carry FIFA and the World Cup through the next eight years
of upheaval without suffering considerable damage? Certainly, this has not only been an
enjoyable tournament, but a significant one; one whose broader consequences may
echo for a few years. In more than one way, Russia 2018 really was a game-changer.
Smith, R. (July, 2018). Was Russia 2018 the Greatest of All World Cups? The New York Times. Retrieved September 11, 2018,
from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/13/sports/world-cup/greatest-russia-history.html
TITLE
AUTHOR
SOURCE
MAIN POINT
To identify them, try to read the text several times, highlight important information and take notes.
EX: “The special Ex: The author brings up EX: “There was lots
characteristics of the magnitude of the epic of history between
the match.” clash that took place ten the two players.”
years ago between two of
the greatest tennis players
in the sport history.
(
4.2. Using the article you chose for the previous exercise, fill the missing information
in the next graphic.(
(
(KEY SUPPORTING
POINT)
Do not add anything that does not appear in the original text and avoid including your own opinions or
interpretations. You will need to be neutral and choose your words carefully.
EX:
4.3. Paraphrase the main point and one supporting point of the article you chose.