Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Regulation of Kidney Function and Metabolism: A Question of Supply and Demand
Regulation of Kidney Function and Metabolism: A Question of Supply and Demand
118, 2007
LA JOLLA, CALIFORNIA
ABSTRACT
Kidney blood flow and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are maintained
relatively constant by hormonal influences and by efficient autoregulation.
However, the kidney remains at risk for ischemia and acute kidney injury.
Increases in kidney blood flow cause parallel increments in GFR, thereby
dictating tubular reabsorption and increased oxygen/metabolic demands.
Coordination between kidney blood flow and GFR with tubular reabsorp-
tion is maintained by the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) system
whereby delivery of NaCl to the macula densa varies inversely with
nephron GFR. Metabolic products, ATP and adenosine, are the mediators
of TGF via afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction, and nitric oxide; COX-2
products and angiotensin II are modulators of acute TGF responses and
temporal adaptation of TGF. Oxygen requirements and metabolic effi-
ciency of Na transport in the kidney are significant variables that are
regulated by both mediators and modulators of TGF. These metabolic and
hormonal substances efficiently regulate both kidney supply and demand.
Introduction
The kidney must be normally viewed as the champion among organs
of the body when it comes to stability of organ blood flow and, in the
case of the organ itself, stability of glomerular filtration rate. This
regulation is normally attributed to a) highly efficient autoregulation
of kidney blood flow in response to normal variations in systemic blood
pressure (1), b) a multiplicity of complex interacting humoral vasocon-
strictor and vasodilator influences (2,3) and, c) tubuloglomerular feed-
back system, an intrinsic system which interrelates tubular reabsorp-
tion and the rate of glomerular filtration via regulation of kidney
vascular resistances (4 – 6). In spite of this plethora of regulatory
devices, the kidney remains at risk of ischemia and persistent high
likelihood of clinical acute kidney injury (AKI) or acute renal failure.
From the University of California, San Diego and VASDHS, La Jolla, CA.
Correspondence: Roland C. Blantz, M.D., UCSD & VASDHS, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive
(111-H), San Diego, CA 92161. 858-552-7528; 858-552-7549 fax; rblantz@ucsd.edu
23
24 ROLAND C. BLANTZ, M.D. ET AL
Methods
Studies were performed in Wistar and Wistar Frömter rats, the
latter with surface glomeruli and raised in a colony at the San Diego
VA Animal Research Facility. These studies were conducted in con-
formance with the local VA/UCSD IACUC protocol (A3659-01) dated
November 5, 2005.
General micropuncture. Under terminal Inactin anesthesia, the kid-
ney is placed in a cup and covered with saline solution, and the
configuration of distal tubules is identified by inserting a micropipette
(1–3 m tip) into urinary space of surface glomeruli to inject small
boluses of stained artificial tubular fluid (ATF). A pipette is inserted
into the last proximal or first distal accessible tubular loop to perform
26 ROLAND C. BLANTZ, M.D. ET AL
FIG. 2. The signal transduction mechanism for transmission of the macula densa
tubuloglomerular feedback signal to the afferent arteriole and glomerulus. Increased
delivery of fluid to the macula densa promotes increased NaCl reabsorption. NaCl
reabsorption causes the immediate release of ATP, which is degraded extracellularly to
AMP and, specifically, further degraded by ecto-5⬘-nucleotidase (e-5⬘-NT) and to aden-
osine, a substance which is a vasoconstrictor at the afferent arteriole. Increased NaCl
reabsorption in the macula densa cell also causes generation of nitric oxide and may
release prostaglandins via COX-2. In addition to acting as primary vasodilators which
counteract the effects of adenosine and ATP, NO also inhibits e-5⬘-NT thereby reducing
the generation of adenosine. NaCl transport at the macula densa also modifies the
generation of angiotensin II (AII) via renin. NO and COX-2 are also modulators of AII
generation. ATP and adenosine mediators of the acute tubuloglomerular feedback re-
sponse, and NO, prostaglandins from COX-2, and AII are further modulators of the
tubuloglomerular feedback response and contribute to resetting or adaptation of tubu-
loglomerular feedback.
TGF curve to generate complete TGF curves, and to predict the impact
which a primary change in tubular reabsorption will have on SNGFR
by altering the TGF stimulus.
TGF range and operating point SNGFR. SNGFRmax refers to
SNGFR during perfusion of Henle’s loop at 8 nl/min. SNGFRmin refers
to SNGFR during perfusion at 40 nl/min. SNGFRmax minus SNG-
FRmin equals the range. SNGFR at the TGF operating point is deter-
mined by collection from the early distal tubule and is referred to as
SNGFRd. SNGFR at the inflection point of the sigmoid TGF curve is
simply the average of SNGFRmax and SNGFRmin or SNGFRmid. As
an index of TGF activation, SNGFRd is compared with SNGFRmid.
SNGFRd-SNGFRmid will increase when conditions external to the
juxtaglomerular apparatus (JGA) influence SNGFRd to increase or
when conditions within the JGA influence TGF to reset downward.
Measurement of TGF efficiency in free-flowing nephrons. Ambient
proximal flow and the fractional compensation for perturbations in
ambient flow are measured in free-flowing late proximal nephrons
(6,34 –36). Tubular flow is measured by a non-invasive optical tech-
nique videometric flow velocitometry (VMFV). A Hample nanoliter
pump is employed to perturb flow. Tubular flow, VM, is measured just
upstream from the pump pipette. Perturbations, VH, are applied by
adding or subtracting fluid in the following sequence: VH(nl/min) ⫽ 0,
⫺4, ⫹4, ⫺8, ⫹8, and 0. Each perturbation is for three minutes and
data are collected over the last 60 seconds. VM is expressed as a
function of VH by polynomial curve fitting or linear regression and
fractional compensation at the operating point is calculated from C ⫽
(⫺dVM/dVH) for VH ⫽ 0.
Videometric flow velocitometry (VMFV). Small boluses of artificial
tubular fluid containing rhodamine B dextran as a fluorescent marker
are injected into the proximal tubule by a pneumatic microinjection
pump. The dye is excited by a laser reflected onto the kidney surface.
The image of the kidney surface is filtered to maximize resolution of
emitted fluorescence and monitored with a video microscope. The
intensity of the video image is monitored at two points downstream
along the nephron. The time required for fluid to traverse the two
points is calculated by cross-correlating the video densities. Geometry
of the tubular segment is measured from digitized images. Tubular
fluid flow rate, VM, is calculated from the cross-correlations and the
geometry of the tubule.
Enzyme assays for 5⬘-NT. A sieving technique is used to separate the
glomeruli from the tubules by gently pressing the cortex through a 106
m stainless steel sieve. The passed through suspension is forced
KIDNEY FUNCTION AND METABOLISM 29
mal tubule may help explain why patients receiving inhibitors of AII as
therapy, but are noncompliant with dietary NaCl restriction, still
appear to benefit from this therapy in terms of both natriuresis and
blood pressure control. AII also functions as an important modulator of
TGF by both influencing the magnitude of TGF during temporal ad-
aptation and the stability of proximal reabsorption and tubular flow
rates.
FIG. 4. The hormonal control of kidney oxygen supply and demand: Prevention of
ischemia. Both oxygen and substrate supply and oxygen and substrate utilization or
demand are controlled by a variety of hormonal and metabolic factors. There is a general
pattern that substances which decrease supply tend to increase demand at the level of
tubular epithelium, either by increasing reabsorption or increasing oxygen required for
sodium transport. Such a relationship is logical from the standpoint of evolutionary
biology in that metabolic and hormonal regulators will modify both supply and demand.
The balance of these forces determines the threshold of kidney ischemia.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
These studies were supported through funding supplied by the National Institutes of
Health (DK 28602, DK 56248, T32HL 007261) and from funds derived from the Research
Service of the Dept. of Veterans Affairs.
REFERENCES
1. Guyton AC, Langston JB, Navar G. Theory for renal autoregulation by feedback at
the juxtaglomerular apparatus. Circ Res 1964;15187–97.
2. Blantz RC. Pathophysiology of pre-renal azotemia. Nephrology forum, Kidney Int
1997;53:512–523.
3. Tucker BJ, Blantz RC. Analysis of the determinants of nephron filtration rate. Am J
Physiol 1977;232:F269 –F273.
4. Thurau K, Schnermann J. Die Natrium-Konzentration an den macula densa zellen
als regulierender Factor für das Glomerulumfiltrat. (Mikropunktionsversuche). Klin
KIDNEY FUNCTION AND METABOLISM 39
Wochenschr 1965;43:410 – 413.
5. Schnermann J, Levine DZ. Paracrine factors in tubuloglomerular feedback: adeno-
sine, ATP, and nitric oxide. Ann Rev Physiol 2002;65:501–529.
6. Thomson SC, Blantz RC. Homeostatic efficiency of tubuloglomerular feedback in
hydropenia, euvolemia, and acute volume expansion. Am J Physiol 1993;264:F930 –
F936, 1993.
7. Blantz RC, Weir M. Are the oxygen costs of kidney function highly regulated? Curr
Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2004;13:67–71.
8. Schurek HJ. Kidney medullary hypoxia: a key to understanding acute renal failure?
[in German]. Klin Wochenschr 1988;66:828 – 835.
9. Brenner BM, Troy JL, Daugharty TM, Deen WM, Robertson CR. Dynamics of glo-
merular ultrafiltration in the rat. II. Plasma-flow dependence of GFR. Am J Physiol
1972;223:1184 –90.
10. Schurek HJ, Jost U, Baumgartl H, Bertram H, Heckmann U. Evidence for a pre-
glomerular oxygen diffusion shunt in rat renal cortex. Am J Physiol 1990;259:F910 –
F915.
11. Welch WJ, Baumgartl H, Lubbers D, Wilcox CS. Nephron PO2 and renal oxygen
usage in the hypertensive rat kidney. Kidney Int 2001;59:230 –237.
12. Brezis M, Heyman SM, Dinour D, Epstein FH, Rosen J. Role of nitric oxide in renal
medullary oxygenation. Studies in isolated and intact rat kidneys. J Clin Invest
1991;88:390 –395.
13. Palm F, Cederberg J, Hansell P, Liss P, Carlsson PO. Reactive oxygen species cause
diabetes-induced decrease in renal oxygen tension. Diabetologia 2003;46:1153– 60.
14. Thomson SC, Bao D, Deng A, Vallon V. Adenosine formed by 5⬘-nucleotidase medi-
ates tubuloglomerular feedback. J Clin Invest 2000;106:289 –298.
15. Sun D, Samuelson LC, Yang T, et al. Mediation of tubuloglomerular feedback by
adenosine: Evidence from mice lacking adenosine 1 receptors. PNAS 2001;98:9983–
9988.
16. Nishiyama A, Navar LG. ATP mediates tubuloglomerular feedback. Am J Physiol
2002;283:R273–R275.
17. Thomson SC, Bachmann S, Bostanjoglo M, et al. Temporal adjustment of the jux-
taglomerular apparatus during sustained inhibition of proximal reabsorption. J Clin
Invest 1999;104:1149 –1158.
18. Brown R, Ollerstam A, Persson AEG. Neuronal nitric oxide synthase inhibition
sensitizes the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism after volume expansion. Kid-
ney Int 2004;65:1349 –1356.
19. Deng A, Hammes JS, Thomson SC. Hemodynamics of early tubuloglomerular feed-
back resetting during reduced proximal reabsorption. Kidney Int 2002;62:2136 –
2143.
20. Thomson SC, Deng A, Wead L, Richter K, Blantz RC, Vallon V. An unexpected role
for angiotensin II in the link between dietary salt and proximal reabsorption. J Clin
Invest 2006;116:1110 – 6.
21. Deng A, Wead LM, Blantz RC. Temporal adaptation of tubuloglomerular feedback:
effects of COX 2. Kidney Int 2004;66:1– 6.
22. Deetjen P, Kramer K. The relation of O2 consumption by the kidney to Na re-
resorption. Pflugers Arch 1961;273:636 – 650.
23. Thurau K. Renal Na⫹ reabsorption and O2 uptake in dogs during hypoxia and
hydrocholorothiazide infusion. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1961;106:714 –717.
24. Laycock SK, Vogel T, Forfia PR, et al. Role of nitric oxide in the control of renal
oxygen consumption and the regulation of chemical work in the kidney. Circ Res
1998;82:1263–1271.
40 ROLAND C. BLANTZ, M.D. ET AL
64. Thomson SC, Deng A, Komine N, Hammes JS, Blantz RC, Gabbai FB. Early diabetes
as a model for testing the regulation of juxtaglomerular NOS1. Am J Physiol
2004;287:F732–F738.
65. Miracle CM, Deng A, Blantz RC, Thomson SC. NOS-1 tonically suppresses oxygen
consumption in the diabetic rat kidney. FASEB 2005;19:A155.
66. Deng Aihua, Thomson SC, Blantz RC. Oxygen consumption in 5/6th nephrectomized
kidney: Effects of ANG II. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; Abstract, In press.
DISCUSSION
Mitch, Houston: Thank you. I was just wondering if you factored the increase in
oxygen consumption with diabetes or even with the remnant kidney, which is growing
rapidly in the proximal tubule. What is the contribution of protein synthesis and/or
breakdown in those organs in those parts of the kidney?
Blantz, La Jolla: We factored it both by sodium transport, and as you have percep-
tively picked up, there are other functions that may be reabsorptive functions, such as
protein absorption and things like that. Whether we factor it by sodium reabsorption or
whether we factor it by protein content or even DNA, it is still elevated and there is quite
a bit of variation from animal to animal, but the net average is high. As I remember, one
of your ex-faculty, Harold Franch, did some elegant studies about protein synthesis in
early diabetes. As I recall, protein synthesis actually was only amplified for the first few
days after creating diabetes and the rest of the increase in protein was due to decreased
degradation. In other words, there were lysosomal disposal problems of protein in
diabetes that I think accounted for the extra protein. Right now, I’d say we don’t know,
and it is, I’m sure, of interest to the diabetologists as well as why the kidney as a peculiar
organ seems to be inefficient in oxygen utilization. We’ve also noted, as Sharon Anderson
at University of Oregon, the dominant NOS isoform in the diabetic kidney is actually
brain NOS or NOS 1, which is not the case in normal kidney. Interestingly, the diabetic
kidney does not allow for resetting or TGF adaptation. So, it already has a peculiar
behavior when one changes salt intake as we’ve observed in other publications.
Luke, Cincinnati: I think you’re suggesting a role, in that there have been a lot of
papers recently saying that even a 0.3 or 0.4 increase in serum creatinine in the ICU
after an MI or after an invasive procedure confers greater, or is associated with greater
morbidity and mortality subsequently. Is the kidney just acting as a sensor for reactive
oxygen species in that setting? I mean, you’ve just eluded to that.
Blantz: Well your statement is certainly true and we’ve got some studies that I didn’t
have a chance to mention that even cytokinemia or having more cytokines around, early
sepsis before your kidney actually fails, the oxygen consumption by the kidney almost
doubles, and this is not related to NO. We are trying to figure why in the world that
occurs, but certainly, several of the acute kidney injury centers that are developing and
sponsored by NIH are now interested in basically why this phenomenon of having a prior
hit seems to set you up for progressive renal disease. I think that what we haven’t taken
serious consideration, is there a metabolic component that causes transformation or
rather epithelial mesenchymal transformation of cells that derives from some kind of
insult that led to a metabolic defect? All I am trying to say is that nephrologists, for 40
or 50 years, have been concerned about supply of blood to the kidney. I think now we
ought to start thinking about what are the regulators that dictate the oxygen demands
of the kidney, and are they factors that we can predict in particular problem patients as
a consequence of the ICU setting.
Willerson, Houston: As a cardiologist, Roland, where is endothelin’s role in the
KIDNEY FUNCTION AND METABOLISM 43
vasoregulatory cascade you’ve shown us; and Robin, I wondered where it was on your
slides too?
Blantz: Well this wasn’t a question of lack of loyalty. We just don’t have a grant on
endothelin. But endothelin is obviously one of the more potent vasoconstrictors, but it
becomes a really complicated issue to study, and we haven’t studied it yet because, as
you well know, endothelin has a couple of different receptors, one of which liberates
nitric oxide; and the question is: is all nitric oxide created equal? No, it isn’t! It depends
on which nitric oxide you are generating, and we also have some interest in what role the
NMDA receptor has in the proximal tubule in regulating NO. It’s hard to imagine that
NO was primarily a metabolic regulator, but I think that nitric oxide and endothelin may
have preceded the cardiovascular system, and that means preceded cardiologists, I
presume. So, I don’t know whether the biologic functions for having nitric oxide and
endothelin might have derived from metabolic origins. Certainly, these substances,
adenosine and NO, occurred before kidneys and cardiovascular systems.
Luke: Perhaps the cardiologists and nephrologists can continue this debate outside.
The President’s address is not allowed to be questioned, Dr. Willerson.