MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Master Teacher I-IV

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Means of Verification Mid-year Review / Rating

MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Ratee( Teacher) Rater( Principal) Mid-year Review Form Result
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic Education 1. Content 1. Modeled effective Quality
Services Knowledge and applications of content
Pedagogy knowledge within and 1. Classroom Observation
across curriculum Tool (COT) rating sheet
teaching areas. and observation notes

2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs used in
7.5% demonstration

3. Instructional materials Efficiency

developed highlighting
effective application
of content knowledge within
and
across subject areas

Timeliness
Basic Education 2. Collaborated with Quality
Services colleagues in the
conduct and
application of research
to enrich knowledge of
content and
Copy of the research
pedagogy.
proposal focused on
enriching knowledge of
content and pedagogy
 proposal focused on
enriching knowledge of
content and pedagogy

7.5%

Proof of participation and

contribution in research
Efficiency

Timeliness
 Means of Verification Mid-year Review / Rating Mid-year Review Form Result
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Ratee( Teacher) Rater( Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic Education 1. Content 3. Developed and a 1. COT observation and Quality #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Knowledge and applied effective rating sheet about using
Pedagogy teaching strategies to
promote critical and
effective teaching strategies
creative thinking, as to promote critical thinking.
well as other higher-
order thinking skills. 2. DLL used in the
demonstration teaching
highlighting different
teaching strategies.
3.
Performance test used in
the demonstration teaching.

7.5%

Basic Education 2. Learning 4. Worked with
Services Environment and colleagues to model
Diversity of and share effective
Learners techniques in the
management of
classroom structure to
engage learners,
individually or in
groups, in meaningful
exploration, discovery
7.5%
and hands-on
activities within a
range of physical
learning
environments.environ
ments.
Efficiency
Timeliness
1. COT observation and rating Quality
sheet about sharing effective
techniques in the management of
classroom.
2. DLL used in the
demonstration teaching
highlighting effective classroom
management that engaged
learners in activities .
3.
Instructional materials used in the
demonstration teaching Efficiency
Timeliness
 Means of Verification Mid-year Review / Rating Mid-year Review Form Result
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Ratee( Teacher) Rater( Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic Education 2. Learning 5. Exhibited effective Quality #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Environment and and constructive
Diversity of behavior management
Learners skills by applying
positive and non-
violent discipline to Classroom observation tool
ensure learning- (COT) rating sheet about
focused environments. effective learner behavior using:

7.5%

1. Providing motivation Efficiency

2. Giving positive feedback
3. Setting guidelines

Timeliness
Basic Education 6. Worked with Lesson plan/DLL highlighting Quality #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services colleagues to share strategies on differentiated and
differentiated, developmentally appropriate
developmentally opportunities to address learner's
appropriate differences.
opportunities to
Efficiency
address learners’ 7.5%
differences in gender,
needs, strengths,
interests and
experiences.

Timeliness
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 7. Developed and 1. Classroom observation tool Quality
Services Planning applied effective (COT) rating sheet about using
strategies in the effective strategies in
planning and implementing developmentally
management of sequenced teaching and learning
Services Planning applied effective (COT) rating sheet about using
strategies in the effective strategies in
planning and implementing developmentally
management of sequenced teaching and learning
developmentally process.
sequenced teaching
and learning
processes to meet
curriculum 7.5%
requirements and 2. Results of learners' Efficiency
varied teaching assessment during the actual
contexts. teaching.
3. DLL used in the
demonstration teaching
highlighting developmentally
equenced teaching and learning
process.
Timeliness
 Means of Verification Mid-year Review / Rating Mid-year Review Form Result
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Ratee( Teacher) Rater( Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic Education 3. Curriculum and 8. Reviewed with #VALUE! Quality #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services Planning colleagues, teacher
and learner feedback
to plan, facilitate and
enrich teaching
practice.

7.5% Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic Education 9. Advised and guided 1. Teaching and learning Quality #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
Services colleagues in the Resources 2.
selection, Lesson plans by colleagues and
organization, critiqued on terms of the
development and use alignment of the teaching and
of appropriate learning resources to the
teaching and learning indicated learning goals and
resources, including appropriateness to the target
ICT, to address learners.
specific learning goals. 7.5%

Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic Education 4. Assessment 10. Worked 1. Any proof of collaborative Quality
Services and Reporting collaboratively with review if the test is designed
colleagues to review based on its purpose
the design, selection, ( diagnostic, formative, and
organization and use summative)
of a range of effective
diagnostic, formative
colleagues to review
the design, selection,
organization and use
of a range of effective
diagnostic, formative 7.5%
and summative
assessment strategies
consistent with
curriculum
requirements.
lesson plan b. summative test
based on its purpose
( diagnostic, formative, and
summative)
2. Any proof of collaborative Efficiency
review of the alignment of the
test with the curriculum a.
formative test attached to the
with TOS Timeliness
 Means of Verification Mid-year Review / Rating Mid-year Review Form Result
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Performance Ratee( Teacher) Rater( Principal)
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic Education 4. Assessment 11. Interpreted 1. Collaborative interpretation of Quality
Services and Reporting collaboratively the index of mastery obtained
monitoring and from 1 class
evaluation strategies 2. Collaborative
of attainment data to interpretation of item analysis of
support learner quarterly examinations
7.5%
progress and
achievement.
Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic Education 12. Applied skills in the 1. Sample of learner's test results Quality
Services effective signed by parents
communication of 2. Learner's performance record
learner needs,
progress and
achievement to key
stakeholders,
including 7.5%
parents/guardians.

Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic Education 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed various 1. Observed classes of Teachers
Services related works/activities I-III
that contribute to the 2.
teaching-learning Served as reliever of classes in
process. the absence of teachers
10% 3. Certificate of
training

Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory NAME OF THE TEACHER NAME OF THE RATER NAME OF THE APPROVING AUTHORITY
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority