INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)

Name of Employee: REMY ALSON ALIB Name of Rater: DOMINICA G. ANAS

Position: TEACHER I Position: ASSISTANT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL II
Review Period: JUNE 2018- APRIL 2019 Date of Review: APRIL 05, 2019
School: BANCAL NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Division: Schools Division of Iloilo
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULTS RATING SCORE MOVs
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per
KRA QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave
Basic 1.Teaching- 1.a. Prepared June 2018- 15% 5- DLL/DLP contained 5- 85-100 % of the 5- 85-100 % of the Q- 5 Indicators 5 4 5 4.66 0.69 Contextualiz
Education
Learning and utilized April 2019 the ff. indicators: activities is competencies were (Contextualized, Localized ed DLL,
Services
Process daily lesson a. Contextualized contextualized and delivered accurately Materials, developed 21st appropriate
(40 %) plans/daily b. Localized/ used localized/ following the CG timeline century skills, Used and updated
lesson logs of Indigenous indigenous materials 4- 75-84 % of the appropriate materials, instructional
activities materials 4- 75-84 % of the competencies were aligned with the activity and materials
including c. Developed 21st activities is delivered accurately assessment tools) were
appropriate, century skills contextualized and following the CG timeline present
adequate and d. Used appropriate used localized/ 3- 55-74 % of the
updated instructional indigenous materials competencies were E-75-84 % of the
instructional materials 3- 55-74 % of the delivered accurately competencies were
materials e. aligned with the activities is following the CG timeline delivered accurately
activity and contextualized and 2- 35-54 % of the following the CG timeline
assessment tools used localized/ competencies were
f. Used differentiated indigenous materials delivered accurately T- 75-84 % of the
instruction 2- 35-54 % of the following the CG timeline competencies were
g. Promoted gender- activities is 1- Below 35% of the delivered accurately
equality contextualized and competencies were following the CG timeline
4- Only 5 indicators used localized/ delivered accurately
were present indigenous materials following the CG timeline
3- Only 4 indicators 1- Below 35 % of the
were present activities is
2- Only 3 indicators contextualized and
were present used localized/
1- Only 1-2 indicator/s indigenous materials
was/were present
1.b. Initiated June 2018- 5% 5- Discipline among 5- There was 0-1 case 5- Classroom Q – 4 indicators ( Agreed 5 4 4 4.33 0.21 Classroom
classroom April 2019 students was evident in of problematic students management was classroom rules and rules posted
management 5 or more of the sent to the guidance initiated since the regulations, well-structured inside the
following indicators: office and board of opening of classes classroom conducive for classroom,
a. Agreed classroom discipline for proper 3- Classroom learning, organized well-
rules and action management was classroom Officers, structured
regulations 4- There were 2-3 cases initiated onset of the first Functional routinary classroom,
b. Well- structured of problematic students semester activities) were present. Organized
classroom sent to the guidance 1-Classroom E – There were 2- 3 cases and
conducive for office and board of management was never of problematic students sent functional
learning discipline for proper observed to the guidance office and classroom
c. Organized action board of discipline for proper officers.
Classroom/ 3-There were 4-5 cases action.
Homeroom of problematic students T – Classroom management
Officers sent to the guidance was initiated onset of the
d. Functional office and board of first semester.
Routinary discipline for proper
Activities action
e. Well disciplined 2- There were 6-7 of
4- Only 4 indicators problematic students
were present sent to the guidance
3- Only 3 indicators office and board of
were present discipline for proper
2- Only 2 indicators action
were present 1-There were 8 or more
1- Only 1 of the cases of problematic
indicator was present students sent to the
guidance office and
board of discipline for
proper action
1. c. Monitored June 2018- 15% 5- If all of the indicators 5- 85-100% of students 5-students’ attendance is Q – All indicators ( Class 4 4 4 4 0.6 Class
students’ April 2019 were evident: showed increase in their monitored daily or five record every subject Every Record
attendance a. Class Record attendance times in a week subject attendance) are
(Report on Daily 4- 75-84% of students 4-students’ attendance is present.
Attendance of showed increase in their monitored four times in a
Learners) attendance week E – 85 – 100% os students
b. Every Subject 3- 55-74% of students 3-students’ attendance is showed increase in their
Attendance showed increase in their monitored trice in a week attendance.
c. Provide seat plan attendance 2-students’ attendance is
3- Only 2 indicators 2-35-54% of students monitored twice in a T – Student’s attendance is
were present showed increase in their week monitored daily or five times
1-Only 1 indicator is attendance 1-students’ attendance is in a week
present 1-below 35% of students monitored once in a
showed increase in their week
attendance

1.d Observed June 2018- 5% 5- If all of the given 5-Below 5% of the 5- Security and safety in Q – Only 3 indicators (Well- 5 5 5 5 0.25 Well
security and April 2019 indicators were students are absent and school was observed at structured classroom, structured,
safety observed in the with reported cases all times conducive for learning, child- safe and
classroom: related to hazard and 3- Security and safety in friendly classroom) were secured
a. well-structured safety in schools school was observed observerd. classroom
classroom 4- 6-10% of the students occasionally
b. safety disaster are absent and with 1-Security and safety in E – Below 5% of the
risk measures plan reported cases related school was rarely students are absent and
c. conducive for to hazard and safetyin observed with reported cases related
learning schools to hazard and safety in
d. caters learners’ 3- 11-15% of the schools
diversity students are absent and
e. child- friendly with reported cases T – Security and safety in
3- Only 3 indicators related to hazard and school was observed at all
were observed safetyin schools times.
1- only 2 indicators 2- 14-20% of the
were observed students are absent and
with reported cases
related to hazard and
safetyin schools
1- 21% and above of the
students are absent and
with reported cases
related to hazard and
safety in schools
2.Student 2.a. Monitored June 2018- 10% 5- If the following 5- 85-100% of students 5- Monitored and Q – Only 3 indicators ( E- 4 4 4 4 0.40 E-class
Outcomes and evaluated April 2019 indicators were all showed increase in their evaluated students’ class record, class record) record
(30%) students’ utilized and updated to performance progress weekly were utilized and updated.
progress monitor and evaluate 4- 75- 84% of students 4- Monitored and
students’ progress: showed increase in their evaluated students’ E - 75- 84% of students
a. E-Class Record/ performance progress monthly showed increase in their
Grading sheets 3- 55-74% of students 3- Monitored and performance
b. Class Record ( showed increase in their evaluated students’
Report on assessment) performance progress every two T - Monitored and evaluated
2- 35-54% of students months students’ progress monthly
c. F-137 (Student’s showed increase in their 2-Monitored and
Permanent Record) performance evaluated students’
d.Student’s Progress 1- below 35% of progress quarterly
Report students showed 1- Monitored and
e. Exams with TOS increase in their evaluated students’
4- only 3 indicators performance progress by semester
were utilized and
updated
3- only 2 indicators
were utilized and
updated
2- only 1 indicator was
utilized and updated
1- None of the indicator
was utilized and
updated
2.b. Conducted June 2018- 5% 5- 5 or more of the 5- 85-100% of students 5- Conducted Q – Only 1 indicator ( 5 5 5 5 0.25 Attendance
remediation/ April 2019 following indicators who underwent remediation/enrichment attendance sheet) was sheet of
enrichment were present: remediation/ enrichment to students five times in a present participants
programs to a. remediation or program showed quarter
improve enrichment plan of increase in their E - 75-84% of students who
performance action performance 4- Conducted underwent remediation/
indicators b. appropriate 4-75-84% of students remediation/enrichment enrichment program showed
assessment tools who underwent to students four times in increase in their
c. complete sets of remediation/ enrichment a quarter performance
exercises program showed
d. attendance sheets increase in their 3- Conducted
of student performance remediation/enrichment T - Conducted
participants 3- 55-74% of students to students thrice in a remediation/enrichment to
e. parental consent who underwent quarter students five times in a
f. follow-up notes to remediation/ enrichment 2- Conducted quarter
the advisers or other program showed remediation/enrichment
teachers increase in their to students twice in a
g. Home Visitation performance quarter
forms 2- 35-54% of students 1- Conducted
h. profiling who underwent remediation/enrichment
4- only 4 indicators remediation/ enrichment to students once in a
were present program showed quarter
3- only 3 indicators increase in their
were present performance
2- only 2 indicators 1- Below 35% of
were present students who underwent
1- only 1 indicator was remediation/ enrichment
present program showed
increase in their
performance
 2.c. Maintained June 2018- 15% 5- Students’ school 5- Students’ school 5- Accomplished Q - Only 4 indicators (class 4 4 4 4 0.6
updated April 2019 records are maintained records show the students’ school record ,anecdotal,SPR, E-
students’ school and updated in all of the following indicators: records a week before class record) were
records indicators below: a. accuracy the schedule accom,plished.
a. Class record b. orderliness 4- Accomplished
b. Anecdotal c. organization students’ school records E - Students’ school records
recordrs d. cleanliness within the schedule show the following
c. Students 3- only 2-3 indicators 3- Accomplished indicators:
Progress Report were shown students’ school records a. accuracy
d. E-class eecord 1-only 1 indicator was a day after the schedule b. orderliness
4-only 4 indicators were shown 2- Accomplished c. organization
accomplished students’ school records d. cleanliness
3- only 3 indicators 2-3 days after the
were accomplished schedule T - Accomplished students’
2- only 2 indicators 1- Accomplished school records within the
were students’ school records schedule
accomplished a week after the
1- only 1 indicator schedule
wasaccomplished

3.Professio 3.a Participated June 2018- 15% 5- attended 5 or more 5- echoed 4 or more 5- attended 5 seminars, Q - attended 1 seminar, 4 4 4 4 0.6 Attendance,
nal Growth in seminars, April 2019 seminars, training, seminars, training, training, workshops, and training, workshop, and Certificate of
and training, workshops, and workshops, and conferences within the conference related to one’s training
Developme workshops, and conferences related to conferences attended rating period functions and duties
nt conferences one’s functions and during faculty/staff 4- attended 4 seminars,
(15%) duties meetings/ school- training, workshops, and E - echoed 1 seminar,
4- attended 4 seminars, based/INSET conferences within the training, workshop, and
training, workshops, training/LAC sessions rating period conference attended during
and conferences related 4- echoed 3 seminars, 3- attended 3 seminars, faculty/staff meetings/
to one’s functions and training, workshops, and training, workshops, and school-based/INSET
duties conferences attended conferences within the training/LAC sessions
3- attended 3 seminars, during faculty/staff rating period
training, workshops, meetings/ school- 2- attended 2 seminars, T - attended 1 seminar,
and conferences related based/INSET training, workshops, and training, workshop, and
to one’s functions and training/LAC sessions conferences within the conference within the rating
duties 3- echoed 2 seminars, rating period period
2- attended 2 seminars, training, workshops, and 1- attended 1 seminar,
training, workshops, conferences attended training, workshop, and
and conferences related during faculty/staff conference within the
meetings/ school- rating period
 to one’s functions and based/INSET
duties training/LAC sessions
1- attended 1 seminar, 2- echoed 1 seminar,
training, workshop, and training, workshop, and
conference related to conference attended
one’s functions and during faculty/staff
duties meetings/ school-
based/INSET
training/LAC sessions
1- did not echo any
seminars, training,
workshops, and
conferences attended
during faculty/staff
meetings/ school-
based/INSET/ LAC
sessions

4.Community 4.a Conducted June 2018- 10% 5- PTA meetings/ 5- 75- 100% of parents 5- At least 75% of Q - PTA meetings/ 5 5 5 5 0.5 Minutes of
Involvement PTA meetings/ April 2019 conferences was attended the PTA parents arrive 15 minutes conferences was conducted meetings,
(15%) conferences conducted with the meetings/ conferences in advance of the with the following MOV’s: attendance
following MOV’s: 3- only 50% of the scheduled time a. minutes of meetings sheets,
a. minutes of parents attended the 3-50% of parents arrive b. attendance sheets pictures,
meetings meetings/ conferences within the scheduled time c. pictures/ program
b. attendance sheets 1-below 50% of the 1- below 50% of parents documentation
c. pictures/ parents attended the arrive 15 minutes after d. program
documentation meetings/ conferences the scheduled time
d. program E - 75- 100% of parents
3- only two MOV’s were attended the PTA meetings/
present conferences
1- only one MOV was
present T - At least 75% of parents
arrive 15 minutes in
advance of the scheduled
time

4.b. Conducted June 2018- 2% 5- Conducted home 5-actively conducted 5- Conducted Home Q – Attained 1 indicator 1 1 1 1 0.02 Letter to
Home Visitation April 2019 visitation with 90%-100% home visitation every month (letter to parents) parents
indicators. visitation to identified 4- Conducted Home
a. Home visitation students at risk of failing visitation every quarter E - actively conducted 50-
form 59% home visitation to
 b. Principal's or dropping out 3- Conducted Home identified students at risk of
permission for Home (SARDO) visitation thrice a year failing or dropping out
Visitation/letter to 4- actively conducted 2- Conducted Home (SARDO)
parents 80-89% home visitation visitation once or twice a
c. Updated anecdotal to identified students at year T - Never conducted Home
record risk of failing or dropping 1-Never conducted visitation
d. Documentation out (SARDO) Home visitation
e. Narrative report 3- actively conducted
f. Permission from 70-79 % home visitation
the Barangay Captain to identified students at
(4) attained 4 indicators risk of failing or dropping
(3) Attained 3 indicators out (SARDO)
(2) attained 2 indicators 2- actively conducted
(1) attained 1 indicator 60-69% home visitation
to identified students at
risk of failing or dropping
out (SARDO)
1-actively conducted 50-
59% home visitation to
identified students at
risk of failing or dropping
out (SARDO)

4.c. June 2018- 3% 5- Participated and 5-Joined in 5 or more 5- Participated and Q – Only 4 indicators ( Alay 5 5 5 5 0.15 Attendance
Participated April 2019 attended in 6 of the activities, programs and attended 100% in the Lakad, Municipal/Annual sheets,
and attended in following community projects with less duration of activities, Fiesta, Independence day, pictures
the community related activities: extravagance programs and projects of Municipal meet, clean and
related a. Alay Lakad 4- Joined in 4 activities, the community. green campaign) were
activities (Parades) programs and projects 4- Participated and participated/attended.
b. Fun Run/Walk with less extravagance attended 85% in the
c. Municipal/ 3-Joined in 3 activities duration of activities, E - Joined in 4 activities,
Annual/ Religious with less extravagance programs and projects of programs and projects with
Fiesta 2-Joined in 2 activities the community. less extravagance
d. Outreach with less extravagance 3- Participated and
Programs 1- Joined in at least 1 attended 75% in the T - Participated and
e. Clean and Green activity with less duration of activities, attended 100% in the
Campaign extravagance programs and projects of duration of activities,
f. Tree Planting the community. programs and projects of the
g. Independence 2. Participated and community.
Day attended 50% in the
duration of activities,
 h. Zonal/ Municipal programs and projects of
Meets the community.
4- Only 5 community 1-Participated and
related activities were attended below 50% in
participated/ attended the duration of activities,
3- Only3- 4 community programs and projects of
related activities were the community.
participated/ attended
2- Only 2 community
related activities were
participated/ attended
1-Only 1-2 community
related activities was
participated/ attended
Overall Rating for
4.27
Accomplishments

RATINGS:
4.500 - 5.000 ---- Outstanding
3.500 - 4.499 ---- Very Satisfactory
2.500 - 3.499 ---- Satisfactory
1.500 - 2.499 ---- Unsatisfactory
Below 1.499 ----- Poor

LEONA A. QUIBLATIN REMY A. ALIB DOMINICA G. ANAS

Head Teacher I Teacher I Asst. School Principal II
RATER RATEE Approving Authority

DEPED RPMS form - Teachers