CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

NOTICE DEMANDING EMPLOYER TO CEASE AND DESIST

SENDING PERSONAL PROPERTY TO CHILD SUPPORT

AGENCY UNLESS IT CAN PROVIDE PROOF OF A WARRANT

AS PROTECTED AND GUARANTEED BY THE 4TH

AMENDMENT AND PROVIDE THE LAW THAT REQUIRES

THIS EMPLOYER TO BREACH ITS CONTRACT WITH

EMPLOYEE BY SEIZING PERSONAL PROPERTY IN

EXCHANGE FOR LABOR AS HELD BY THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT DECISION [Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1

(1915)]

1. THE WAGES OF EVERY EMPLOYEE IS THEIR PROPERTY

PROTECTED BY THE 4TH AMENDMENT THIS IS AN

UNDISPUTED FACT AND ANY LAW IN VIOLATION OF

THIS FACT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND WILL NEVER

HOLD UP IN COURT FOR LOWER COURT DECISIONS

MUST BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SUPREME COURT

OF THE UNITED STATES [Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1

(1915)]

1
1
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

2. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES CAN THIS EMPLOYER

SEIZE THIS PROPERTY AND SEND ANYWHERE WITHOUT

PERMISSION BY THE EMPLOYEE UNLESS EMPLOYER IS

SERVED WITH A WARRANT UNDER THE 4TH

AMENDMENT AS REQUIRED BY DUE PROCESS OF LAW.

ANY PURPORTED LAW THAT DOES NOT ORIGINATE

FROM CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS IS A FICTIONAL

LAW WITHOUT VALIDITY.

3. IT IS PROHIBITED UNDER DUE PROCESS OF LAW AND

EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW UNDER THE 4TH AND 5TH

AMENDMENTS FOR AN EMPLOYER TO ACCEPT INCOME

OR WAGE GARNISHMENTS AS WARRANTS SENT BY A

COMMERCIAL DEBT COLLECTOR CHILD SUPPORT

ENFORCMENT AGENCY THAT IS NOT AUTHORIZED TO

ISSUE WARRANTS

4. A WARRANT MUST ORIGINATE FROM A COURT OF

COMPETENT JURISDICTION WITHIN THE JUDICIARY

BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT AND NOT FROM A STATE OR

GOVERNMENT AGENCY WITHIN EXECUTIVE BRANCH

2
2
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

OF GOVERNMENT WHICH IS A CLEAR VIOLATION OF

THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE

5. WHEREBY THE ALLEGED GARNISHMENT ORDERS ARE

INCOMPLETE WRITTEN INSTRUMENTS OR FORGERIES

AND CANNOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES DEPRIVE

EMPLOYEE A MAN; A LIVING AND BREATHING SOUL, A

CREATION WITH ENDOWED RIGHTS FROM HIS

CREATOR: AN AMERICAN [Your Name/Upper and lower

case] INALIENABLE RIGHTS TO PROPERTY AS

PROTECTED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION

BILL OF RIGHTS

6. IT IS THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT WHO

STATED THE CONTRACT BETWEEN EMPLOYER AND

EMPLOYEE IS THAT OF PERSONAL EMPLOYEMENT BY

WHICH LABOR AND OTHER SERVICES ARE EXCHANGED

FOR MONEY OR OTHER FORMS OF PROPERTY Coppage v.

Kansas, 236 U.S. 1 (1915)

3
3
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

7. EMPLOYER CANNOT WITHHOLD WAGES BY DENYING

EMPLOYEE EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW UNDER THE

5TH AMENDMENT

8. EMPLOYER CANNOT DENY DUE PROCESS OF LAW BY

SEIZING AND SENDING PROPERTY WITHOUT A

WARRANT UNDER 4TH AMENDMENT. ANY PURPORTED

LAW THAT DOES NOT ORIGINATE FROM

CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS IS A FICTIONAL LAW

WITHOUT VALIDITY.

9. THEREFORE, IF THE ANTICIPATED RESPONSE FROM

THIS EMPLOYER WILL LIKELY BE “WE ARE SORRY TO

INFORM YOU THAT THE LAW REQUIRES THAT WE SEND A

PORTION OF YOUR WAGES IN RESPONSE TO COURT

ORDER ” THERE ARE NO LAWS OR COURT ORDERS

THAT CAN DENY A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

REQUIRING A WARRANT TO SEIZE PROPERTY,

THEREFORE, IF THIS EMPLOYER IS COMPLYING WITH

AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAW (PURPORTED LAW OR

PRESUMPTION) IT DOES SO WITH THE GUARANTEE

4
4
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

THAT A TRESPASS UPON RIGHTS UNDER 18 USC 242, AND

42 USC SECTIONS 1983 AND 1986 THAT WILL BE

BROUGHT IN A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION

DEMANDING DAMAGES FROM THIS EMPLOYER FOR

THE CONTINUED ACTS OF SEIZING PERSONAL

PROPERTY BY THE INTENTIONAL ACT OF DENYING

PROTECTION UNDER THE 4TH AND 5TH AMENDMENTS

EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW REQUIRING THIS

EMPLOYER TO TAKE CORRECTIVE ACTION AGAINST

THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS

AND PROPERTY BY FORGED INSTRUMENTS ALLEGING

TO BE WARRANTS FROM A COMMERCIAL DEBT

COLLECTION AGENCY AFTER BEING COMMANDED BY

THE OWNER OF THE PERSONAL PROPERTY, WHO IS

THE OWNER OF THIS PROPERTY, NOT THE EMPLOYER

10. LETS BE CLEAR THAT A CONTRACT BETWEEN

EMPLOYER AND EMPLOYEE IN EXCHANGE FOR LABOR

RESULTS IN PAY OF MONEY, THAT BECOMES THE

PERSONAL PROPERTY OF THE LABORER, OR

5
5
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

EMPLOYEE, WHEREBY THIS NOTICE TO CEASE

DEPRIVING PROPERTY AND SENDING TO A THIRD

PARTY/LEGAL ENTITY IS UNLAWFUL.

11. A MAN; [Your Name/Upper and lower case] THE OWNER OF

THIS PROPERTY WHO IS STANDING UPON THE BILL OF

RIGHTS OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IS

HEREBY COMMANDING THE EMPLOYER TO CEASE

SEIZING PROPERTY WITHOUT A WARRANT AS

PROTECTED BY THE 4TH AMENDMENT; A PROTECTION

OF INALIENABLE RIGHTS AGAINST THE DEPRIVATION

OF PROPERTY WITHOUT DUE PEOCESS AND WITHOUT

THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW The Supreme Court of the

United States Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1 (1915) defines labor in

exchange for employment is personal property whereby employer is

forbidden to enter into contract with child support agency by sending

employee’s personal property for it is not the employer’s property to

honor a contract to send any where without consent by employee.

“Chief among such contracts is that of personal employment by

6
6
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

which labor and other services are exchanged for money or other

forms of property” Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1 (1915)

NOTICE TO EMPLOYER [NAME OF EMPLOYER] FROM A MAN;

A LIVING AND BREATHING SOUL, A CREATION WITH

ENDOWED RIGHTS FROM HIS CREATOR: AN AMERICAN [Your

Name/Upper and lower case] WITH INALIENABLE RIGHTS

PROTECTED BY THE UNITED STATES CONSTITITION BILL OF

RIGHTS REQUIRES [NAME OF EMPLOYER] TO CEASE THE

ACT OF WITHHOLDING WAGES AND SENDING TO CHILD

SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATION [ADD NAME OF

THE CHILD SUPPORT AGENCY ON WITHHOLDING ORDER]

FOR THIS WAGE GARNISHMENT DOCUMENT IS NOT A

WARRANT ISSUED BY A COURT OF COMPETENT

JURISDICTION WITHIN JUDICIAL BRANCH [WHICH SHOULD

BE THE FIRST INDICATION TO THIS EMPLOYER THAT THE

WAGE GARNISHMENT IS NULL AND VOID FOR BEING A

VIOLATION OF THE SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE AND

NOT A WARRANT AS REQUIRED BY 4TH AMENDMENT] FOR

7
7
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

PROPERTY CAN ONLY BE SEIZED BY A WARRANT SIGNED BY

A JUDGE BASED UPON PROBABLE CAUSE AND SWORN

AFFIRMATION AS REQUIRED BY THE 4TH AMENDMENT BILL

OF RIGHTS WHEREBY ANY EMPLOYER POLICY IN

VIOLATION OF THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN THE

5TH AMENDMENT IS AN INTENTIONAL ACT OF

DISCRIMINATION AND AN ACT OF TRESPASS UPON RIGHTS.

DEFINITIONS FROM ETYMOLOGY.COM

1. Warrant "defender; surety, pledge; justifying evidence"

2. Wages "salary paid to a provider of service,"

3. Property "possession, thing owned"

4. Garnishee "one who owes debts and has been warned legally to not

pay money or transfer property which has been awarded to his

creditor," 1620s, from garnish (v.) in the legal sense

5. Policy "way of management," late 14c., policie, "study or practice

of government; good government;" from Old French policie (14c.)

"political organization, civil administration," from Late Latin

politia "the state, civil administration,"

8
8
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

6. fraudulent "cheating, deceitful, dishonest," from stem of fraus

"deceit"

DECLARATION OF LAWS REQUIRING THE PROPERTY OF A

MAN; [Your Name/Upper and lower case] TO REMAIN FREE FROM

SEIZURE UNLESS A WARRANT SIGNED BY A JUDGE OF A

COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION HAS BEEN SERVED

UPON THIS EMPLOYER AS PROTECTED BY THE UNITED

STATES CONSTITUTION BILL OF RIGHTS 4TH AND 5TH

AMENDMENTS

[Your Name/Upper and lower case] is an American: a living, breathing,

flesh-and-blood man with inalienable rights that are protected by the United

States Constitution Bill of Rights, whose wages are from the fruit of his

labor by employment for this employer.

Please understand that I am not unhappy being employed by this employer. I

am unhappy with the employer’s policy of accepting and honoring wage

garnishment as a warrant that is not in accordance with the 4th Amendment

and is clearly not a court order from a court of competent jurisdiction.

9
9
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

Why would a court of competent jurisdiction not send a court order writ of

garnishment directly to the employer of a man or woman ordering the

employer to send wages to child support enforcement agency to satisfy a

commercial debt?

Answer, administrative procedures are a method by which support orders

are made and enforced by an executive agency rather than by courts and

judges. The child support enforcement agency within the executive branch

of government then sends an administrative order common term income

deduction/wage deduction orders illegally ordering the employer to seize

wages called wage garnishment.

An income deduction/wage deduction order on its face is clearly without

judicial signature. This act is fundamentally adverse to due process of law

and should be an indication that income/wage garnishments are not legally

enforceable and must be ignored. Any purported law that does not originate

from Constitutional due process is a fictional law without validity.

EMPLOYER MUST PROVIDE EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW BY

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF CONSTITUTIONALLY PROTECTED

GUARANTEES FOR ALL MEN AND WOMAN EMPLOYED AND

RECEIVING WAGES IN EXCHANGE FOR LABOR [The Supreme

10
10
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

Court of the United States Coppage v. Kansas, 236 U.S. 1 (1915)]

1. AMENDMENT 4 The right of the people to be secure in their

persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches

and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but

upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and

particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or

things to be seized.

2. AMENDMENT 5 No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or

property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be

taken for public use, without just compensation.

PLEASE READ COMMON CHILD SUPPORT GLOSSARY TERMS

TO CORROBORATE PROOF THAT WAGE GARNISHMENT

ORDERS DO NOT ORIGINATE FROM A COURT OF

COMPETENT JURISDICTION A VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS

OF LAW

GLOSSARY OF COMMON CHILD SUPPORT TERMS U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families

Office of Child Support Enforcement

11
11
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

1. Administrative Procedure Page 6 A method by which support orders

are made and enforced by an executive agency rather than by courts

and judges.

2. Order/Notice to Withhold Child Support Page 20 The form to be

used by all states that standardizes the information used to request

income withholding for child support by an employer from a

noncustodial parent’s earnings.

3. Judgment Page 16 The official decision or finding of a judge or

administrative agency hearing officer upon the respective rights and

claims of the parties to an action; also known as a decree or order. It

may include the “ findings of fact and conclusions of law.”

4. Income Withholding Page 15 An order that requires an employer to

withhold support from a noncustodial parent’s wages and transfer

that withholding to the appropriate agency (the Centralized

Collection Unit, the State Disbursement Unit or tribal child support

agency.) Sometimes referred to as a wage withholding or

garnishment.

5. Direct Income Withholding Page 15 A procedure, whereby an

income withholding order from one state can be sent directly to the

12
12
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

noncustodial parent’s employer in another state , without the need to

use the child support agency or court system in the noncustodial

parent’s state. [COMPLETELY UNCONSTITUTION AND

DEPRIVATION OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW]

6. Immediate Wage Withholding Page 15 An automatic deduction from

income that starts as soon as the order for support is established and

an income withholding order/notice is received and implemented by

the noncustodial parent’s employer.

7. Quasi-Judicial Page 23 A framework or procedure under the

auspices of a state’s judicial branch or tribal court in which court

officers other than judges process, establish, enforce and modify

support orders, usually subject to judicial review. The court officer

may be a magistrate, a clerk, master, or court examiner. He or she

may or may not have to be an attorney, depending on the state or

tribal law.

8. Wage Withholding Page 27 A procedure by which scheduled

deductions are automatically made from wages or income to pay an

obligation, such as child support. The provision dictates that an

employer must withhold support from a noncustodial parent’s wages

13
13
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

and transfer that withholding to the appropriate agency (the

Centralized Collection Unit or State Disbursement Unit). Also

known as income withholding.

9. Wage Attachment Page 26 An involuntary transfer of a portion of

an employee’s wage payment to satisfy a debt. In some states this

term is used interchangeably with Wage or Income Withholding; in

other states there are distinctions between an attachment and

withholding. The most common terms used are Wage or Income

Withholding.

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/child_support_glo

ssary.pdf

PRESUMPTIONS ARE NOT FACTS NOR EVIDENCE AND

CANNOT BE USED TO AVOID PROCEDURAL CONSTITUTIONAL

DUE PROCESS OF LAW. ANY PURPORTED LAW THAT DOES

NOT ORIGINATE FROM CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS IS A

FICTIONAL LAW WITHOUT VALIDITY.

1. This wage garnishment arises from the presumption that a man; [Your

Name/Upper and lower case] owes a debt for child support without

showing actual physical evidence to support claim that a debt is owed

14
14
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

for child support.

2. This wage garnishment relies on the presumption that a court order

from a court of competent jurisdiction ordered child support debt

repayment, whereby without physical proof of a court order this is not

accurate and completely false.

3. I do not owe a commercial debt for child support and object to wage

garnishments because they are without facts or evidence and do not

comply with my inalienable rights protected by the United States

Constitution Bill of Rights.

4. Support Orders are not legally enforceable and is issued in violation

of due process of law depriving trial by jury under 7th Amendment and

issued without judicial signature and entry with clerk of county clerks

office, thus is null and void. Please refer to the 7th Amendment and 28

USC section 1691 to corroborate this assertion of rights.

I implore this organization to examine this wage garnishment and reconsider

its policy of accepting incomplete written instruments on its face as true and

accurate and perform due diligence in demanding proof the employee owes a

commercial debt of child support and the wage garnishment documents are

from a court of competent jurisdiction.

15
15
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

There are many small business owners who do not comply with wage

garnishment orders without being fined or penalized.

Therefore, there are no legal ramifications by disregarding wage

garnishment notice document(s) and throwing in trash can where it belongs

because these illegal documents are causing irreversible harm and damages.

The wage garnishments are incomplete written instruments without legal

force because they were made in violation of very basic due process of law

protections under 4th, 5th, 7th, and 9th Amendments.

The Supreme Court of the United States has held any order or judgment

from a court or administrative proceedings made in violation of due process

of law or by an unconstitutional law(s) is null and void.

This employer, beyond the rate of pay and work rules and policies during

working hours, cannot withhold wages to send to a child support

enforcement agency. This employer, by honoring an incomplete written

document, that on its face, is clearly not issued by a court of competent

jurisdiction within judicial branch of government and is an incomplete

written instrument by it clearly being without a judicial signature by a Judge

and Clerk of the Court.

In the Wage Garnishment or Income Withholding document there is a box

16
16
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

requiring the name of the issuing judicial official, and there may be a name

in the box of judicial officer issuing, but in most instances its either blank or

it's the child support enforcement agency or a representative, which is not a

judicial official, therefore incomplete written instrument also known as a

forgery under criminal definitions.

Pursuant due process of law, unless there is a judge or clerk signature

[deputy clerks and lawyers are not authorized to issue writs under 28 USC

section 1691] it is neither accurate nor legally enforceable, therefore this

employer cannot under no circumstances be penalized nor fined!

When this organization pays its employees wages in exchange for labor, the

wages immediately become the property of the American wage earner.

An example of the degree of difficulty in levying wages can be found in IRS

Code 6331(a) where only the Secretary of Treasury is authorized to issue

levies for taxes, which has been found to mean only the Secretary of treasury

is authorized to issue a levy for wages. Therefore, if the Secretary of

Treasury is required by law to issue a tax levy on wages, then how can a

wage garnishment be issued by a child support enforcement agency within

the executive branch of government without any judicial signature or clerk

stamp from the court of issuance as stated in section 303(b)(1)(A) of 15 USC

17
17
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

section 1671?

THE FEDERAL WAGE GARNISHMENT LAW

15 U.S.C. 1671

302. Definitions

For the purposes of this title:

(a) The term “earnings” means compensation paid or payable for personal

services, whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, bonus, or

otherwise, and includes periodic payments pursuant to a pension or

retirement program.

(b) The term “disposable earnings” means that part of the earnings of any

individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of any amounts

required by law to be withheld.

(c) The term “garnishment” means any legal or equitable procedure through

which the earnings of any individual are required to be withheld for payment

of any debt.

303. Restriction on garnishment

(b)(1) The restrictions of subsection (a) do not apply in the case of

(A) any order for the support of any person issued by a court of competent

18
18
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

jurisdiction or in accordance with an administrative procedure, which is

established by State law, which affords substantial due process, and which is

subject to judicial review. [This phrase requires administrative procedure

without judicial review is invalid and without legal force]

Factually the wage earner is a human being man or woman who has

inalienable rights protected by the United States Constitution Bill of Rights.

What this means is wages are property and property is a fundamental right

protected by the 4th, 5th, and 7th Amendments.

Child support income or wage withholding orders/notices are not legally

enforceable and violate very basic property protections provided in the Bill

of Rights, whereby this company by honoring an incomplete written

instrument called income or wage garnishment for child support debts is

unwittingly violating a man; [Your Name/Upper and lower case] property

rights also referred to as civil rights.

Please before honoring any wage or income garnishment validate by

demanding a true copy of a court order for support affixed with judicial

signature as required by 28 USC section 1691 section 303(b)(1)(A).

This company by acceptance of this notice is at this moment noticed by a

man; [Your Name/Upper and lower case] that child support wage, or income

19
19
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

withholdings are unlawful and must immediately cease for the following

reasons:

1. Income or Wage garnishment is without due process of law by a

judgment rendered without a trial by jury as required by the 7th Amendment.

2. Income or Wage Garnishment is without due process of law for it is not a

warrant issued by a court of competent jurisdiction as required by the 4th

amendment.

3. Income or Wage Garnishment is without due process of law by not being

signed by a judicial actor and not issued by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Pursuant 28 USC section 1691 Seal and Teste of Process requires all writs

coming from a court within the United States must be signed by Clerk of

Court, and be advised deputy clerks do not qualify as a judicial signature.

4. Income and Wage Garnishment must be accompanied by a court

judgment rendered in accordance with due process of law as required by law

15 USC section 1671 section 303(b)(1)(A) “any order for the support of any

“person” issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or in accordance with

an administrative procedure, which is established by State law, which

affords substantial due process, and which is subject to judicial review..”

5. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

20
20
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

Administration for Children and Families of Child Support Enforcement

Glossary of Common Child Support Terms explains in plain English without

room for interpretation that support orders are not made in a court of

competent jurisdiction but made by an executive agency which any first year

law student will recognize as a blatant violation of separation of powers

doctrine whereby an executive branch agency is prohibited from issuing

warrants under the 4th amendment of the Bill of Rights. Administrative

Procedure a method by which support orders are made and enforced by an

executive agency rather than by courts and judges. [Page 6 of U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Administration

for Children and Families of Child Support Enforcement Glossary of

Common Child Support Terms

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/child_support_gloss

ary.pdf ]

6. Income and Wage Garnishment is without proof of validation of debt

whereby this company is depriving wages by honoring hearsay without

proof of a court judgment from a court of competent jurisdiction that is

causing serious financial harm to its employee a man; [Your Name/Upper

and lower case] who cannot meet his/her financial obligations.

21
21
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

7. Income and Wage Garnishments rely heavily upon presumptions and the

receivers of these garnishment request to not validate these presumptions.

8.Whereby presumptions cannot be confused with physical evidence and a

man; [Your Name/Upper and lower case] is respectfully demanding physical

evidence of a court order from a court of competent jurisdiction ordering the

wage or income withholding of a man; [Your Name/Upper and lower case]

MOTIVES FOR AGGRESSIVE WAGE OR INCOME

WITHHOLDING ORDERS

If the wage or income withholding order was not legal, then why would the

child support commercial debt collection organization risk sending illegal

incomplete written instruments?

The answer is simple; wage garnishment notices is based upon presumptions

that rarely get rebutted by the employer and the employer sends the wages

without performing basic due diligence as is required under equal protection

of law under the 4th and 5th Amendments.

The employer is required by law to ensure protection of employees’ rights

under the United States Constitution Bill of Rights and be observed as

guaranteed by employer’s policies.

MOTIVES FOR WAGE GARNISHMENT WITHHOLDINGS IS FOR

22
22
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

FEDERAL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT INCENTIVE

FUNDS UNDER 42 USC SECTION 658A TITLE IV-D PAID TO

STATES AT 66% FOR EVERY DOLLAR COLLECTED

The motive or incentive for wage and income withholding is due to states of

the United States having become reliant upon federal funds for child support

commercial debt collection called Title IV-D funds under 42 USC section

658a which can be 66% for every dollar collected. These funds are

responsible for helping to balance state budgets, but it comes at the expense

of an innocent man who does not owe any debts but is presumed to owe

debts based on a legal person/Ens legis, a STRAWMAN an ALL-CAPS

NAME spelled [PUT YOUR STRAWMAN NAME HERE], which is

similar to the real, living, breathing, flesh-and-blood man with Creator

endowed rights under “Natural Law,” [Your Name/Upper and lower case].

Presumptions are not facts and stand as facts until rebutted. Consider this

notice as a man; [Your Name/Upper and lower case] rebuttal to the

presumption that a debt is owed for an alleged child support debt.

These “Title IV-D” funds are for state budgets, for these federal incentive

funds under Title IV-D can be used by the state to help balance its state

budgets.

23
23
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

The state can utilize title IV-D funds for any purpose, whereby aggressive

collection practices are employed, and as in my matter, due process of law

was deprived by a commercial debt collection agency issuing its own

version of a warrant when it is not authorized under the basic protections

provided by the 4th Amendment.

Consider every “pay day” in the united States of America where wages are

deducted honoring these incomplete written instruments and sent to state

child support debt collection agencies where 66% of these funds are awarded

to the states collecting these wages, we are looking at billions of federal

funds paid to the state collecting these wages and income. This is an

incentive or motive and reason for very aggressive collection practices

where mistakes are made all the time causing severe financial harm.

UNLAWFUL WAGE AND INCOME WITHHOLDINGS CAN ONLY

BE SUCCESSFUL IF THE RECEIVERS DO NOT DEMAND PROOF

TO INSURE WAGE GARNISHMENTS ARE LEGAL AND

CONSTITUTIONAL

These illegal commercial debt collection practices can only be achieved if

the receivers of these wage and income withholdings do not require proof or

question the legal authenticity of the document(s) by calling for evidence of

24
24
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

an order from a court of competent jurisdiction.

Many employers are financially compensated for aiding in wage

garnishments for child support under 42 USC 666(b)(6)(i)(I).

The people sending these documents demand that you accept the wage

garnishments on its face, but this is entirely adverse to a man; [Your

Name/Upper and lower case] protected inalienable rights by the United

States Constitution and Bill of Rights

There are no legal ramifications or penalties if these wage and incomplete

written instruments are thrown in the trash where they belong!

Lastly, I do not wish to anger nor insult any member of this great

organization, and I enjoy working here, but I am being harmed by the policy

of accepting a wage or income garnishment on it's face for on it's face this

document is without a judges' signature as required on all warrants seizing

property by the 4th Amendment.

I wish for the employer to respect my inalienable rights and equal protection

of the law and investigate these facts, and if there is but a 1% chance of

doubt the wage or income withholding order is unconstitutional, inaccurate,

or without legal force, then it is the employer’s responsibility to cease

honoring wage or income garnishments until it has been proven 100%

25
25
 CERTIFIED MAIL#________________________________________________________

constitutional, correct and a warrant under the 4th Amendment.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NON WAIVED

________________________________, sui juris

A man; [Your Name/Upper and lower case]: an American
(Secured party/Creditor/Holder-in-due-course)
[Address, City, State and zip code in brackets]

26
26