Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S9 - Conjoint Analysis
S9 - Conjoint Analysis
S9 - Conjoint Analysis
Saravana Jaikumar
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
Recap!
Cases
SouthWest Airlines
Ontela PicDeck (A)
Virgin Mobiles
Gaming the Gamers
Scrub Daddy
Personas
Experience Maps
Conclusive Research
Descriptive (surveys) and Causal (experiments)
Recap!
Conditions for Causality
Time precedence
Correlation / Association
Isolation
Recap!
Simple Linear Regression
Types of data
Recap!
t-tests – Independent samples and paired sample
ANOVA
Regression
Questionnaire Design
Reliability and Validity
Marketing Scales
Handouts
t-test
ANOVA
Correlation
Once clusters were identified, demographics was used to define each cluster
How clusters are formed
A dendogram shows the dissimilarity between clusters.
consumer needs
Choice overload
Chair
New Coke
Perils of introspection
Conjoint Analysis
Different Perspectives, Different Goals
Buyers want all of the most desirable features at lowest possible price
Credit Card:
Mobile:
How important is it that you get the <<brand, interest rate, annual fee, credit
limit>> that you want?
Stated Importances
Importance Ratings often have low discrimination:
Brand 6.7
0 5 10
Stated Importances
Answers often have low discrimination, with most answers falling in
“very important” categories
If choose left, you prefer Power. If choose right, you prefer Fuel Economy
Rather than ask directly whether you prefer Power over Fuel Economy, we present
realistic tradeoff scenarios and infer preferences from your product choices
What’s So Good about Conjoint?
When respondents are forced to make difficult tradeoffs, we learn what
they truly value
Conjoint Analysis
Each level is assumed to be mutually exclusive of the others (a product has one
and only one level of that attribute)
Rules for Formulating Attribute Levels
Levels are assumed to be mutually exclusive
level 1: Sunroof
level 2: GPS System
level 3: Video Screen
If levels are defined in this way, you cannot determine the value of providing
two or three of these features at the same time
Rules for Formulating Attribute Levels
Levels should have concrete/unambiguous meaning
There is a well-known bias in conjoint analysis called the “Number of Levels Effect”
Holding all else constant, attributes defined on more levels than others will be biased
upwards in importance
For example, price defined as ($10, $12, $14, $16, $18, $20) will receive higher relative
importance than when defined as ($10, $15, $20) even though the same range was measured
The Number of Levels effect holds for quantitative (e.g. price, speed) and categorical (e.g.
brand, color) attributes
Conjoint Analysis
An airline wants to figure out the best snack bundle and price for its
consumers
Attributes
Drink
Mini Candy
Spread
Salty Snack
Price
Conjoint Analysis
Levels
Drink (Apple Juice, Coke, Fanta) - 3
Mini Candy (M&Ms, Tobelrone) – 2
Spread (Peanut butter, Nutella, Honey) - 3
Salty Snack (Pretzels, Chips) - 2
Price ($4, $5, $6) – 3
Conjoint Analysis
Product Profiles
3 x 2 x 3 x 2 x 3 – 108 profiles
Difficult task
Conjoint Analysis
Product Profiles can be cut down using simple methods (under few
assumptions)
Enter data
Eg. Drink – 3 Levels
Categorical variable
Create 2 dummy variables
Based on the respondents‟ evaluations of the product concepts, we figure out how much
unique value (utility) each of the features added
(Regress dependent variable on independent variables; betas equal part worth utilities.)