Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Economics
Economics
Economics
-> Ashok Dalwai committe -> doubling farmers income (demand for keeping agriculture
marketing in concurrent list -> MS swaminathan
-> APLM -> reform in APMC -> agri produce and Levilhood markeitng
-> NWR -> Negotiatible warehouse receipts -> through web portal -> 2011 direct not
thuru Web portal -> further auctionable or used for collateral
elasticity supply and price volatility reduced
-> National HEalth policy 2017 -> public expenditure -> 2.5% of GDP
-> PJ Nayak committee -> role of chairman and MD to be separated for banks
Uday kotak committee -> similar provision for listed companies
-> Headwinds mentioned by the economic survey are the backlash against
globalization which reduces exporting opportunities, the difficulties of
transferring resources from low productivity to higher productivity sectors
(structural transformation), the challenge of upgrading human capital to the
demands of a technology-intensive workplace, and coping with climate change-induced
agricultural stress.
-> The Global Innovation Index (GII) is an annual ranking of countries by their
capacity for, and success in, innovation.
It is published by Cornell University, INSEAD, and the WIPO, in partnership
with other organisations and institutions, and is based on both subjective
and objective data derived from several sources, including the International
Telecommunication Union, WB, WEF
The index was started in 2007 by INSEAD and World Business, a British magazine.
The GII is commonly used by corporate and government officials to compare
countries by their level of innovation.
-> India has been ranked 132nd among 152 nations in a new index tracking commitment
to reducing income inequality, Sweden led the index while Nigeria remained the
worst performer
The index and the inequality report was released by the international NGO Oxfam
and Development Finance International.
It measures the efforts of governments that had pledged to reduce inequality as
part of the SDG
The index mainly focuses on redistributive actions governments can take, rather
than those that would prevent rising inequality in the first
place
-> The New International Economic Order (NIEO) was a set of proposals put forward
during the 1970s by some developing countries through the United Nations
Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) to promote their interests by
improving their terms of trade, increasing development assistance, developed-
country tariff reductions
-> 1. Drain of wealth is a concept before independence.
2. Western paradigm model shows dependence on foreign nations for everything
from teachers, science and Machines.
3. Population explosion reduced availability of resources per capita and
agriculture could not sustain demand due to its low elasticity of income
demand
-> Capital gains tax will boost consumption in present as savings will be taxed
later and also slow down investments.
1. Y=C+S. therefore, if consumption increases saving would fall.
2. Also S=I so investments would also reduce.
The intuition behind the idea that capital incomes should not be taxed is a simple
one. There are two main insights. First, taxes on capital incomes will encourage
people to switch from future consumption to current consumption. The savings rate
will fall as a result�and so will the economic growth needed to create jobs. After
all, savings are nothing but future consumption.
-> On the financial front, there has been divergence on both income and
consumption.
There is convergence i.e. that IMR and life expectancy are trending towards
similar goals in various states in India.
This is due to catching up of education and health parameters in various
states.
-> NBFC
1. cannot outsource core management functions only. But they are allowed to
outsource other aspects
2. NBFCs can outsource various functions such as treasury, cash management etc
3. NBFCs do not form part of the payment and settlement system and cannot issue
cheques drawn on itself
4. Deposit insurance facility of Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee
Corporation is not available to depositors of NBFCs, unlike in case of
banks
SEBI introduced the measure to keep a tab on securities that witness an abnormal
price rise that is not commensurate with financial health and fundamentals of the
company such as earnings, book value, price to earnings ratio among others.
It was introduced by SEBI to check for fraudulent practices.
issued a notification that if such price movements were found the companies would
be classified as shell companies and money laundering provisions could be initiated
against such companies
-> RR -> only interest payment while CR (assests creation and loss)-> repayment of
loans
Disinvestment -> CR
-> G-Sec have coupon (earlier fixed coupon and now even flexible)
T-bill no coupons -> redeem at par
Way and other means -> RBI lends to govt
-> MCLR -> benchmark system based upon formula decided by RBI (92%* Cost of lending
funds + 8% return on Assests)
1. no lending below this rate -> revised every 3 months
2. earlier system was discretionary -> internal benchmark and no lending below
it with few exceptions
-> D-SIBS -> domestic systematic important banks ( teir 1 capital -> share
capital )
1. assests >= 2% of GDP
2. categorisied under 5 bucket list -> Additional Common Equity Teir 1 as a
percentage of Risk Weighted Assets (RWAs)
3. domestically identified by Central Banks of a country and globally by BASEL
committee on banking supervision
-> Public credit registry -> credit information -> managed by RBI
1. database of credit information which is accessible by all the stakeholders.
2. It generally captures all the relevant information in one large database on
the borrower.
3. It will be managed by a public authority as RBI and the lenders will have to
mandatorily report the loan details.
-> NBFC -> deposits and non deposits type -> no demand deposit
1. company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 engaged in the business of
loans and advances, acquisition of securities issued by
Government, insurance business, chit business etc. but does notinclude any
institution whose principal business is that of agriculture activity,
industrial activity, purchase or sale of any goods (other than securities)
or providing any services and sale/purchase/construction of
immovable property.
2. They are regulated by and are registered with RBI under Section 45-IA of the
RBI Act, 1934.
-> Chit funds -> concurrent -> RBI (just guidance to states)/SEBI ( CIS only) no
regulation for Chit funds
1. RBI does not regulate the chit fund business. However, RBI can provide
guidance to state governments on regulatory aspects like creating
rules or exempting certain chit funds.
2. SEBI regulates collective investment schemes. However, the SEBI Act
specifically excludes chit funds
-> Maharaja Bond (read for reason of masala bonds-> way to transfer risk of holding
forex to investor from RBI) both maharaja and masala bonds
1. It is rupee-denominated bond launched by IFC for issuances in India�s
domestic capital markets
2. NHAI masala bonds -> LSE
3. NBFCs -> RBI allowed NBFCs to sell masala bonds to FII abroad
4. They are rupee-denominated bonds issued by Indian entities in the overseas
market to raise funds.
5. As of now, it is being traded only at the LSE
6. Masala bonds -> named so by the IFC an investment arm of the WB which issued
these bonds to raise money for infrastructure projects in India.
7. They protect investors from exchange rate fluctuations as opposed to ECB
that have to be raised and repaid in dollar. ( check it seems wrong)
as per my understanding it protect reserves of RBI as well as risk of
holding currency as ruppee may depreciate when outflow of loan repay
loans in dollar and thereafter payment through ECB increases dollar
denominated loans -> if ER fluctuations will affects this ( risk on investor)
can reduce money supply in economy on payment of loans
RBI will find difficult to maintain ER for exporters competitiveness and
import -> inflation
-> Green bonds (1st issued by European Investment bank and WB -> 2007 and 1st green
bond issued by Yes bank 2015 and masala green bond)
1. debt instrument issued by an entity for raising funds from investors for
financing �green� projects, such as renewable energy, low carbon
transport, sustainable water management, climate change adaptation, energy
efficiency, sustainable waste management, BD conservation
2. Help in achieving INDC by 2030
-> IRFC -> non deposit NBFC and infrastructure finance company
1. dedicated financing arm of the Indian Railways for mobilizing funds from
domestic as well as overseas Capital Markets.
2. It is a Schedule �A� Public Sector Enterprise and registered as Systemically
Important Non�Deposit taking NBFC and Infrastructure Finance
Company with RBI
-> Rural Electrification Corporation�s first green bond has opened for trading at
the London Stock Exchange.
1. It is a Climate Bonds Initiative certified green bond (a non-profit
international organisation that mobilizes debt capital markets for climate
friendly projects and initiatives)
-> ETF -> Index Funds attempt to replicate the performance of a particular index
such as the BSE Sensex or the NSE Nifty.
1. Exchange Traded Funds are index funds that offer the security of a fund and
liquidity of stock.
2. Much like index funds they mirror the index, commodity, bonds or basket of
assets.
3. Their price changes daily as they are traded throughout the day
-> Bharat 22
1. comprise 22 stocks including those of CPSEs, PSB and GOI�s holdings under
the Specified Undertaking of Unit Trust of India (SUUTI).
2. ETF -> disinvestment to raise funds from markets -> 72500 cr
3. The sector wise weightage in the Bharat 22 Index is basic materials (4.4%),
energy (17.5%), finance (20.3%), FMCG (15.2%), industrials (22.6%), and utilities
(20%).
-> Commodity options ( read options -> call(gives owner rights) and put
option(Seller)/ in futures obligations while in options no such restraints)
gold -> 1st commodity and guar -> 1st agricommodity
1. Gold options -> 1st time in India on Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX) becoming
the 1st commodity that the SEBI has approved for options trading
in 14 years.
2. National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange Ltd. unveiled India�s first
agricommodity option in guar seed designed as a hedge for farmers to
safeguard their price risk
-> Sovereign gold bank -> sovereign backing with 2.5% fixed interest rate / part of
SLR / gold denominated tradable
-> Insider trading (T Vishwanathan committe RBI -> for regulation and prevention)
1. It is the buying or selling of a security by someone who has access to
material nonpublic information about the security.
2. Insider trading can be illegal or legal depending on when the insider makes
the trade. It is illegal when the material information is still
nonpublic.
-> Financial Sector Assessment Programme (FSAP) (read about WB and IMF from Vision
365 good info)
1. IMF and WB -> Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) and Financial
Sector Assessment (FSA) for the Indian financial system
2. Comprehensive and indepth analysis of indian financial system ( in 1999
launched -> in response to Asian finacial crisis )
-> FRBM ( Target RD/FD/ Tax to gdp ratio/Total public liablities reduction -> 2008-
9 target for RD -> zero)
1. revenue expenditure (education and health) is as important as capital
expenditure -> same contribution to productivity
Human capital and phyical infrastructure
2. the Medium-term Fiscal Policy Statement
The Fiscal Policy Strategy Statement
The Macroeconomic Framework Statement
-> National investment fund (2005 -> disinvestment proceedings -> NIF / 75% for
social sector scheme and 25% for Capital investment )
1. �Public Account� under the Government Accounts and the funds would remain
there until withdrawn/invested for the approved purposes.
2. The corpus of NIF was to be of a permanent nature and NIF was to be
professionally managed to provide sustainable returns to the
Government, without depleting the corpus.
3. Selected Public Sector Mutual Funds were entrusted with the management of
the NIF corpus.
4. 75% of the annual income of the NIF was to be used for financing selected
social sector schemes which promote education, health and
employment. The residual 25% of the annual income of NIF was to be used to
meet the capital investment requirements of profitable
and revivable PSUs.
5. equity infusion or recapitalization
-> FSDC and FDMC ( amendment required in RBI act and payment act for sharing
information)
-> Reverse Charge Mechanism ( liablity on recipient rather than supplier -> as
supplier is unregistered party)
1. Under this mechanism the liability to pay tax is of the recipient of goods &
services rather than the supplier when the goods or services have been
received from an unregistered person.
2. Usually, the supplier is liable to pay tax and avail input tax credit, if
applicable, but in this case the mechanism is reversed.
3. Also, the GST Council has specified 12 categories of services for reverse
charge that include radio taxi, services provided by an individual advocate
or firm of advocates etc.
4. Also A four-slab structure of GST - 5% (on basic necessities), 12%, 18% and
28% (on luxury goods) has been decided.
-> GST
1. tax buoyancy
2. no cascading effect
3. reduce tax evasion -> self policing feature
4. gdp will increase and impact on consumer
issues
Issue of Parliamentary and Legislative autonomy:
GST Council (an executive body) will finalize a vote by a majority of not less
than three-fourths of weighted votes of members present and voting
(Centre to have 33% and states to have 66% weight of the total votes cast).
Urban local bodies will have to deal with a huge fiscal gap once local body
tax, octroi and other entry taxes are scrapped for GST system.
List of Exclusions & different rates � Many exclusions like petroleum products,
diesel, petrol, aviation turbine fuel, alcohol & different rates are
undermining the principle of One Country, One Tax.
-> NAA
1. Standing Committee, Screening Committees in every State and the Directorate
General of Safeguards in the CBEC have also been instituted under
antiprofiteering measures.
2. If the undue benefit cannot be passed on to the recipient, it can be ordered
to be deposited in the Consumer Welfare Fund.
3. In extreme cases, the NAA can impose a penalty on the defaulting business
entity and even order the cancellation of its registration
under GST.
->Consumer Welfare Fund -> under dept of reveneu but operated by ministry of
consumer affairs
1. It has been set up by the Department of Revenue and, is being operated by the
Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution,
and Department of Consumer Affairs.
2. Its objective is to provide financial assistance to promote and protect the
welfare of the consumers and strengthen the consumer
movement in the country.
-> E-way bill (10 KM -> currently increased to 50 KM and monetary value > 50000 ;
self generated with time duration
1. document required to be carried by a person in charge of the conveyance
carrying any consignment of goods of value exceeding Rs. 50,000 for sales
beyond 10 km in the new GST regime.
2. It will eliminate the need of a separate transit pass in each state for
movement of good.
3. generated from the GST Common Portal by registered persons or transporters
before commencement of movement of goods of consignment.
-> capital gains tax (36 month for listed and 24 months for not listed)
Profits or gains arising from transfer of a capital asset are called �Capital
Gains� and are charged to tax under the head �Capital Gains�.
1. direct tax levied on capital gains, profits an investor realizes when he
sells a capital asset for a price that is higher than the purchase price.
2. Capital gains taxes are only triggered when an asset is realized, not while it
is held by an investor.
3. India classifies this tax into short term (capital gains made within 36
months) and long-term capital gains (made beyond 36 months).
4. Finance minister in his Budget 2018 speech has proposed to re-introduce
long-term capital gains tax on gains arising from the transfer of
listed equity shares.
5. STT is a type of direct tax payable on thevalue of taxable securities
transaction done through a recognized stock exchange in the country.
6. The securities on which STT is applicable are shares, bonds, debentures,
derivatives, units issued by any collective investment scheme, equity based
government rights or interests in securities and equity mutual funds.
7. Off-market share transactions are not covered under STT.
-> MAT and AMT -> minimum alternative tax ( any companies (domestic or foreign with
profits) -> MAT) read arthapedia
1. exemption of few companies retrospective from ambit of MAT
-> Project insight -> widen and deepen tax base through data mining
technical infrastructure will also be leveraged for implementation of Foreign
Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) and
Common Reporting Standard (CRS).
-> APAs and MAP are alternative tax dispute mechanism in matters involving transfer
pricing.
-> MAP
1. way by which taxpayer can seek relief in his country of residence when he
feels that he is not being taxed according to the terms of the bilateral
treaty between the two countries.
2. Prior to the recent relaxation, Income Tax Department was open to receiving
bilateral APAs and MAP only in case of existence of
�corresponding adjustment� clause in the double tax avoidance agreement
(DTAA) with the concerned countries.
3. The �corresponding adjustment� clause in transfer pricing matters provides
that if tax demand is raised on a company by a DTAAsignatory
country, the revenue authorities in India would reduce the tax liability of
the parent company based in India.
-> WTO (read scheme notes well explained + these below pt as additional things
mentioned)
1. Public stock holding
2. Agreement on Agriculture -> India want to extend limit as unable to provide
domestic support ( MSP - international price)
Under Agreement on Agriculture (AoA), developing countries can give
agricultural subsidies or aggregate measurement support
(AMS) up to 10% of the value of agricultural production and developed
countries give up to 5% (production taking 1986-88 as base year).
3. Peace clause -> 2013 WTO members agreed to refrain from challenging any
breach in prescribed ceiling by a developing nation at the dispute
settlement forum of the WTO. This clause will be there till a permanent
solution is found to the food stockpiling issue
4. WTO Nairobi Ministerial Conference, 2015 (Nairobi package) concluded that
export subsidies will be eliminated by developed countries immediately,
except for a handful of agriculture products, while developing countries have no
time period to do so.
5. No agreement was reached on the work programme on special safeguard
mechanism (SSM): a tool agreed in Doha round that
allows developing countries to raise tariffs temporarily to deal with
import surges or price falls.
2. Credit-to-GDP gap (credit gap) is difference between credit-to-GDP ratio and the
long term trend value of credit-to-GDP ratio at any point in time ->
countercyclical capital buffer (CCCB)
5. RRBs-> NABARD -> PCA for RRBs (SCB -> 50% centre + 15 % state + 35% banks) ->
prudential requirements relating to capital adequacy, net non- performing
assets (NNPAs) and return on assets (ROA) through self-corrective actions
Capital to Risk-Weighted Asset Ratio (CRAR): between 6-9%, between 3-6% and
less than 3%
NPAs:-> NNPAs between 10-15% (for RRBs having retained profit) or Gross NPAs
(GNPAs) between 10-15% (for RRBs having accumulated losses)
NNPAs of 15% and above (for RRBs having retained profit) or GNPAs of 15% (for
RRBs having accumulated losses).
ROA: falls below 0.25%
7. From FY 2018-19 the foreign banks with 20 branches and above will have to ensure
that:
1. minimum 8% of Adjusted Net Bank Credit (ANBC) or Credit Equivalent Amount of
Off-Balance Sheet Exposure (CEOBE), whichever is higher, is earmarked for
lending to the small and marginal farmers.
2. minimum 7.5 per cent of ANBC or CEOBE, whichever is higher, is earmarked for
lending to micro-enterprises.
3. The loan limits per borrower for Micro/ Small and Medium Enterprises
(Services) has been removed for classification under priority sector.
8. FPI relaxation of norms due to poor bond market health -> read must
10. Bond Yield: As investors sell bonds, prices drop and yields increase (inversely
proportional). A higher bond yield indicates greater risk. If the yield
offered by a bond is much higher than what it was when issued there is a chance
that the company or government that issued it is financially stressed and may
not be able to repay the capital
Besides, the Ministry is keen to take the ETF route to sell off government shares
held through SUUTI in private firms � ITC, Axis Bank and L&T, an official said. The
government, in November, introduced Bharat-22 ETF comprising shares of 22 firms,
including PSUs, public sector banks, ITC, Axis Bank and L&T. The fund had garnered
bids to the tune of Rs. 32,000 crore, although the government retained only Rs.
14,500 crore.
IMF report
1) World economic outlook
WB rport
1) global economic prospects
2) world financial development report
3) World development report
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
# Economics Survey Vol 1
Chap-1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
Chap -3
1. Declining trend of GDS (Gross domestic saving) and GFCF(GDP climed to 10 % real
in 2007) in india from 2007
2003 -> 2007(boom) -> 2017(Bust) -> no other economy observed such a swing
except Brazil and India during same period
Not even in BoP crisis 1991 or Asian Financial crisis 1997
Note -> 1. World bank published World Development Indicators
2. CSO publishes data of Saving and Investment and data from
National Account Statisitcs
3. Way to examine saving and investment slowdown cycle and its impact and reversal
1. standard determinant of economic growth -> greater investment, export and
competitive Exchange rate
2. Rodrik conclusion -> economic growth driven by providing incentives for
investment and production rather than savings
3. Counting incidence of investment and saving slowdown (based upon threshold
difference in last 5 years average and subsequent 2 years
within bracket of 2%, 3% and 4%)
4. incidence are more for investment than saving ; slowdown in both unusual
5. magnitude and time duration of slowdown higher for investment than savings
6. but drag in low savings for duration is higher if event occur than
investment
6. Effect on India
1. 1st time in history such incident occur India as India escaped slowdown
during Lost decade 90s, AFC 97, BoP 91 crisis
2. Investment slowdown : duration -> 5 years till 2016 and magnitude reduced by
21%
3. saving slowdown -> 2010
7. Consequence
1. deciding priorities and policies to boost investment (physical
infrastructure/ MII) or savings (in LR both are important)
2. Rodrik argument -> 1. Higher savings or higher saving transition does not
gurantee sustained high growth
2. Higher sustained growth transitions
gurantee higher savings transition
Argues for more emphasis on investment than savings(corporates profit or
HH savings)
g = s/ Cr => profit is important for sustained investment -> investment is
based upon profit expectation or savings (Harrod Domar model
somewhat confusing as against Rodrik argument)
3. investment slowdown has more pronounced effect on growth rate than savings
-> govt to focus on investment incentives
conclusion derived from East Asian Crisis; ambiguous effect of savings on
growth rates from slowdown incidents
4. India less affect by investment slowdown comparing other countries (India
above line from regression)
5. existence of episode of investment slowdown followed by saving slowdown and
without savings slowdown
6. 60% of episode of slowdown due to private investment slowdown in investment
8. Recovery
1. investment slowdown -> 1. higher duration, lower in magnitude and from
higher initial boom value
2. balance sheet related slowdown ->
stressed finance and unable to service debt due to economic downturn
2. Balance sheet slowdowns
1. Balance sheet slowdowns has more effect on investment in terms of
duration and magnitude -> difficult to reverse them
2. Investment decline larger in magnitude in India comparing other
countries
3. Countries with similar declines ( fall of 8.5% in 9 years for T+11, T+14,
T+17)
reversal of about 2.5% possible in median and if upper quartile than 4%
which is unlikely as India below it
4. per capita GDP fall is less comparing other countries
9. Conclusion
1. Balance growth theory seems wrong for higher savings required for higher
growth (growth constrained by savings)
indivisiblity of production, savings and demand (big push model) -> Ragnar
Nurkse, Arthur Lewis and Roseinstein and Rodan
vicious cycle of poverty or low equilibrium trap
2. reviving investment >>> savings( anti-corruption and unearthing black
money; financial savings, shift to market instrument)
3. Balance sheet induced slowdown -> long duration and higher magnitude -> no
automatic correction/ bouncebacks with few exception
4. raising public investment + Cost of doing business to be reduced + stable
tax and regulatory environment
5. incentiving small industries to revive private investment
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
Chap-5 Late convergence
1. economic convergence
-> faster growth rate in low income countries >> than higher income ->
(diminishing return to capital)
this pit the gap of rich and poor -> capital accumulation -> rise in
productivity and rise in output but population rise and depreciation reduce
rate of growth as existing and augmenting capital is not sufficient to keep
capital/labour ratio constant reducing productivity of capital
Technology factor leds to differences in production function for two countries
Broadening -> % of countries growing faster than US -> frontier countries
acceleration -> average excess growth rate over the US
both factor more in 1980-2017 than 1960-1980
2. spread and backlash effect -> affecting the convergence and trap
4. Backlash reason
1. end to hyperglobalisation -> reduced export opportunities
2. difficult to transfer resources from low productivity to higher productivity
(transfer of capital) and structural reforms
3. challenge in upgrading human capital to the demand fo technology intensive
workplace
4. coping with the climate-induced agricultural stress
5. Case India
1. Low income country in 1960 (6% of US PCY) -> low middle income in 2008 ( 12%
US PCY) -> upper middle income in 2020s (if 6.5% growth)
8. 1980 to 1997 -> the era of (divergence) in which low-income countries fell
further behind
1998 to 2007 -> an early period of (convergence) running from the East Asian
financial crisis until the Global Financial Crisis
poorest grown faster than lower middle countries
faster than upper middle income countries
2008 to 2017 -> the most recent period of �late convergence.�
13. Reasons
1. hyper-globalization repudiation
2. thwarted/impeded structural transformation
3. human capital regression induced by technological progress
4. climate change-induced agricultural stress
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
# Explanation for important topics
Normally, rich countries have high capital-labour ratio and high levels of output
per worker. By contrast, low income countries have low capital-labour ratios and
low levels of output per worker. We also assume that two groups of countries are
the same in all other respects such as saving rates, population growth rates and
the production function.
If this is true then the Solow model predicts that, in spite of any differences in
initial capital-labour ratios, all these countries will ultimately attain the same
steady state. Differently put, if countries have the same fundamental
characteristics, capital-labour ratios and living standards will uncon�ditionally
converge, even though some countries may start from way behind.
Even if countries differ in their saving rates, population growth rates and
production functions (due to unequal access to technology) they will converge to
different steady state with different capital-labour ratios and different standards
of living in the long run. If countries differ in the fundamental characteristics,
the Solow model predicts conditional convergence.
This means that standards of living will converge only within groups of countries
having similar characteristics. For example, if there is conditional convergence, a
low income country with a low saving rate may catch up, one day or the other, a
richer country that also has a low saving rate, but it will never catch up a rich
country that has a high saving rate.
One reason for this is that poor countries have less capital per worker and thus
higher marginal products of capital than do rich countries. So savers in all
countries will be able to earn the highest return by investing in poor countries.
Eventually, borrowing abroad will allow initially poor countries� capital-labour
ratios and output per worker to be the same as in initially rich countries.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
# Economic Survey Vol-II
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
# Chap-5
-> UN SDG (17 SDG with 169 targets to be acheieved by 2030) inclusive of
elimination of extreme poverty
-> Voluntary National Review (VNRs) 2017 on SDG implementation at High level
Political Forum at UN, New york
1. report based upon programmes and initatives analysis
2. 7 SDG in focus -> 1. No poverty
2. Zero Hunger
3. Good health and well being
4. Gender equality
5. Industry, innovation and infrastructure
6. Life below water
7. Partnership for goals
3. MOSPI -> National draft for SDG as per UN statistical commission
inputs from various ministries and NITI aagog collect, validate and
document best practices
4.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
# Buyer's credit (LoU) between importer bank and exporter bank) is cheap but ban by
RBI lead to costly alternative bank gurantees and letters of credit)
---------------------------------------------------
# debate of job calculation through EPFO data using big data analytics by Pulak
ghosh
---------------------------------------------------
# Dec, 2017
-> Indian Resource Efficiency Programme ( NITI aayog with UNEP, launched by MoEFCC
and Indian Resource Panel (Internation RP too))
1. IREP recommended the development of Strategy on Resource Efficiency for
enhancing resource-use efficiency in Indian economy and industry.
2. The strategy focuses on abiotic material resources, excluding fossil fuels,
of two strategic sectors- Construction & Mobility (these sectors
have witnessed high growth rate, are biggest consumers of materials, contribute
significantly to GDP and employment in the country).
-> FDRI (bank and insurance companies and other financial corporation)
1. establish resolution corporation replacing existing deposit insurance and
credit guarantee Corporation
2. Resolution Corporation will monitor the financial firms such as banks and
insurance companies, anticipate their risk of failure, take
corrective action, and resolve them in case of such failure. The
Corporation will also provide deposit insurance up to a certain limit, in case
of bank failure.
3. The Corporation will also classify financial firms on their risk of failure
�
low, moderate, material, imminent, or critical and take over the
management of a company once it is deemed critical and resolve the firm
within one year (may be extended by another year).
4. Resolution may be undertaken using methods including:
i) merger or acquisition
ii) transferring the assets, liabilities and management to a temporary
firm
iii) liquidation
If resolution is not completed within a maximum period of two years, the
firm will be liquidated.
The Bill also specifies the order of distributing liquidation proceeds.
5. It provides for a wide range of resolution instruments such as bail-in,
bridge institution, and run-off entity for insurance.
These are in addition to the existing tools used such as merger and sale.
Bridge institution � It is a bridge service provider, a company limited by
shares, created by the corporation for the purpose of resolving a
specified service provider.
Run-off entity � An insurance entity under resolution is classified as
run-off entity to allow the present insurance policies to run to their
expiration dates.
6. It further provides for the designation of certain financial service
providers as �systemically important financial institutions� (SIFIs) by the
central government, the failure of which may disrupt the entire financial system,
given their size, complexity, and inter-connectedness with other
financial entities
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
# National Anti-profiteering authority
Under this scheme, a taxpayer will pay tax as a percentage of his/her turnover
during the financial year without the benefit of Input Tax Credit. The floor rate
of tax for CGST and SGST shall not be less than 1%. A taxpayer opting for
composition scheme will not collect any tax from his/her customers.
When the eligible taxpayer is opting for the Composition Scheme under GST, a
taxpayer has to file a summarized returns on a quarterly basis, instead of three
monthly returns (as is applicable for normal businesses).
Key Features
Eligibility: Turnover must be below Rs. 75 lakhs (Rs. 50 Lakhs for North-Eastern
States)composition scheme
Tax rate: Fixed tax rate on the total sales turnover
Input Tax Credit: Not eligible for Input Tax Credit
Place of supply: Applies only to the Intra-State supplies
Return: No monthly filing, only Quarterly returns
Billing: Issues Bill of Supply & not tax invoice
Who can avail composition scheme?
Only those persons who fulfill all the following are eligible to apply for
composition scheme:
deals only in the intra-state supply of goods (or service of only restaurant
sector).
does not supply goods not leviable to tax.
have an annual turnover below Rs. 75 Lakhs (Rs. 50 Lakhs for north-eastern states)
in preceding financial year.
he shall pay tax at normal rates in case he is liable under reverse charge
mechanism.
not supplying through e-commerce operator.
not a manufacturer of � ice cream, pan masala or tobacco (and its substitutes).
Why should you opt for composition scheme under GST?
No requirement to maintain records
Hassle free payments of tax at single rate
Filing monthly returns is a costly and cumbersome process that may just be asking
too much from a small dealer trying to grow a business
-------------------------------------------------------
# Recapitalization
1) Prompt Corrective Action norms/ non PCA ( for credit expansion/ (SBI,PNB like
banks)) based upon RBI guidelines
1. Capital, asset quality and profitability continue to be the key areas for
monitoring in the revised framework.
2. Indicators to be tracked for Capital, asset quality and profitability would
be CRAR/ Common Equity Tier I ratio, Net NPA ratio and Return on Assets
respectively.
3. Leverage would be monitored additionally as part of the PCA framework.
4. Breach of any risk threshold (as detailed under) would result in invocation
of PCA.
2) BAsel III
3) Provisioning
4) capital aquecacy ration
---------------------------------------------------
External Sector
# Balance Of Payments
-> Fll
-> FDI
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
# Exchange Market
-> LERMS ( dual exchange rate partly managed or fixed and partly floating market
based mechanism)
-> NEER
-> REER (competitiveness of economy REER > 1 => competitiveness and high
productivity; else not)
-> EFF (extend fund facility by imf to correct BOP during macroeconomic instablity
or structural reforms which may take time to bear fruit)
stand by arrangement -> short term lending usually 3-4 years
while EFF is 3-4 years (dependent upon quota of member and EFF = 145% of quota
and can be extended upto 435% of quota)
1. When a country faces serious medium-term balance of payments problems
because of structural weaknesses that require time to address, the IMF
can assist with the adjustment process under an Extended Fund Facility (EFF).
2. Compared to assistance provided under the Stand-by Arrangement, assistance
under an extended arrangement features longer program
engagement�to help countries implement medium-term structural reforms�and a longer
repayment period.
-> Depreciation
-> Appreciation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
-> SEZ
-> GAAR
Benefit to Corporates
1. They can borrow at low interest rates from offshore markets. Interests rates in
developed countries are much lower than prevalent in India.
2. Being issuer they are not subjected to FX risks. It will be fully borne by the
investors. Indian corporates have suffered considerable losses earlier on ECB which
are usually USD dominated due to continuous structural downtrend of INR against USD
since last 2-3 decades.
3. They can access wide investor base.
4. It will also help in diversification of portfolio.
Benefit to Investors
Benefit to India
1. This will help in building up foreign investors confidence and knowledge about
about Indian economy.
2. This will contribute to capital account, thus balancing Balance of Payment.
3. Masala bond is a good way to tap foreign capital. India has envisioned few many
ambitious goals like Make in India, developing smart cities, digital India,
boosting infrastructure, climate INDC etc. For this India will require around $400
billion (INR26 lakh crores) in next five years. A big chunk of it will have to be
financed by foreign capital. India has to look for ways to tap foreign sovereign
wealth and attract foreign capital.
4. In India many long term debt stressed projects especially infra and power are
stalled due to capital shortage, long term masala bonds is lucrative for power,
road and infra companies.
5. INR has been falling in a structural downtrend since last few decades against
major hard currencies. Given that FX risk is borne by the creditor, during
repayment of bond coupon and maturity amount, if rupee depreciates, RBI will
realize marginal saving during repayment. INR is overvalued as of Dec'15, and is
expected to fall further.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
e-wallet scheme proposed for exporters whose cash flows have been affected by
delays in refunds on GST paid on domestic inputs has been
deferred till October 1.
The Gross Value Added (GVA) and Gross Domestic Product (GDP) give a picture of
economic activity from producers (supply side) and consumers (demand side)
perspectives respectively. Both GDP and GVA are independent measures. One from
demand side and other from supply side.
GDP or Gross domestic product of a country is the final value of goods and services
for a given period, while gross value added is a metric capturing the value
generated by subtracting the input costs.
GVA or Gross value added is a productivity metric that measures the contribution to
an economy, producer, sector or region. Gross value added provides a dollar value
for the amount of goods and services that have been produced, less the cost of all
inputs and raw materials that are directly attributable to that production.
GVA provides better measure of economic activity. Because GDP can record a sharp
increase just on the account of increased tax collections due to better
compliance/coverage and not necessarily due to increase in output.
GVA is a better reflection of the productivity of the producers as it excludes the
indirect taxes which could distort the production process. However, it can also be
argued that GVA is distorted due to presence of subsidies.
A sector-wise breakdown provided by the GVA measure can better help the
policymakers to decide which sectors need incentives/ stimulus or vice versa.
Both of the measures need not match and there could be a sharp divergence due to
presence of Net Indirect Taxes ( NIT= indirect taxes-subsidies) which are accounted
in GDP calculations (GDP is sum of GVA and NIT).
GDP is more suitable when we went an overview of economy and for comparison
purposes, while GVA is more suitable for fishing sectoral performances
GDP could be increased by inflators pressures while GVA is relatively insulated
from it.
GVA can give insights about the structural bottlenecks of economy.
Thus, both metrics have their own utility and economists need to apply their
judgement in ascertaining suitability on case to case basis.
After the global financial crisis of 2008 countries shifted towards GDP as
indicator and india towards GDP at factor cost. Develop countries calculate GDP at
market price because of lower tax rates. However, india shifted to GDP at market
price or GVA for growth estimation in 2015 as to comply global practices. Since a
decade india's indirect tax collection is growing and subsidies share going down so
to account for this increase to be felt in growth prospects india drifted towards
GVA.
As-> GVA=GDP+tax-subsidy, thus increasing the value of goods and services produced.
(wrong GVA = GDP + Subsidies - tax)
New GDP estimation was made to account for new products to be added like smart
phones etc. and change the base year or constant year to more
The U.S. complaint to the WTO against India�s export promotion schemes is a wake-up
call
India�s export promotion schemes face an uncertain future after the United States
Trade Representative (USTR) decided to challenge their legality in the World Trade
Organisation (WTO). The complaint of the USTR is that India is violating its
commitments under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM
Agreement) using five of the most used export promotion schemes, namely, the
export-oriented units scheme and sector-specific schemes, including electronics
hardware technology parks scheme, merchandise exports from India scheme, export
promotion capital goods scheme, special economic zones and duty-free import
authorisation scheme.
The main argument of the USTR is that India�s five export promotion schemes violate
Articles 3.1(a) and 3.2 of the SCM Agreement, since the two provisions prohibit
granting of export subsidies. Until 2015, India had the flexibility to use export
subsidies as it is among the 20 developing countries included in Annex VII of the
agreement that are allowed to use these subsidies as long as their per capita Gross
National Product (GNP) had not crossed $1,000, at constant 1990 dollars, for three
consecutive years. This provision applicable to the Annex VII countries was an
exception to the special provisions provided to the developing countries (the so-
called �special and differential treatment�) for phasing out export subsidies.
Except Annex VII countries, all other developing countries were allowed a period of
eight years from the entry into force of the WTO Agreement, i.e. 1995, to eliminate
export subsidies.
That India had crossed the $1,000 GNP per capita threshold in 2015 became known
when the WTO Secretariat produced its calculations in 2017. An interpretation
provided in a 2001 report of the Chairman of the Committee on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures, which is also considered as the document providing the
methodology for implementing Annex VII of the agreement, says that countries like
India must eliminate export subsidies immediately upon crossing the above-mentioned
threshold. In the Doha negotiations, India and several other Annex VII countries
sought an amendment of the agreement so as to enable them to get a transition
period.
Extension sought
In a submission made in 2011, India, along with Bolivia, Egypt, Honduras, Nicaragua
and Sri Lanka, argued that the Annex VII countries should be eligible to enjoy the
provisions applicable to the other developing countries, namely, those that had GNP
per capita above the threshold. The latter set of countries was required to phase
out their export subsidies within eight years of joining the WTO. Additionally,
they were allowed to enter into consultations with the Committee on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures, not later than one year before the expiry of the
transition period, to determine if there was a justification for the extension of
this period, after examining all of their relevant economic, financial and
development needs. But this proposal, like all other proposals made as a part of
the Doha Round negotiations, remains unaddressed.
It needs to be pointed out that this is not the first time that the U.S. has put
India�s export promotion schemes under the scanner; although this is the first
instance when its Trade Administration has initiated a WTO dispute involving these
schemes. In 2010, the U.S. had questioned the export incentives provided to the
textiles and clothing sector as a whole, arguing that this sector had a share in
global trade exceeding 3.25% and had therefore become export competitive. The U.S.
pointed out that according to Article 27.5 of the SCM Agreement, any Annex VII
developing country which had reached export competitiveness in one or more products
must gradually phase out export subsidies on such products over a period of eight
years. There was, therefore, considerable pressure on the Department of Commerce to
consider its future strategies regarding export promotion schemes.
It was perhaps the pressure that spoke when the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) of the
National Democratic Alliance government unveiled in 2015 did some serious
introspection about the future of export promotion schemes, the first time that any
government had done so. The policymakers recognised that the extant WTO rules and
those under negotiation were aimed at eventually phasing out export subsidies. The
FTP took this as a pointer to the direction which export promotion efforts in the
country must take in the future: a movement towards more fundamental systemic
measures and away from incentives and subsidies. A similar note was sounded in the
mid-term review of the FTP released in December 2017. This document was significant
also because the Indian government showed its awareness that the country was at the
verge of losing the benefits of being an Annex VII country.
Contrary to the pronouncements made in the FTP, the government has continued to
increase its outlays on export promotion schemes. In 2016-17, the total outlay on
export promotion schemes was Rs. 58,600 crore, an increase of more than 28% in
three years. During this period, the largest export promotion scheme in place
currently, the Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS), was introduced to
promote exports by offsetting the infrastructural inefficiencies faced by exports
of specified goods and to provide a level playing field. The scheme initially
covered 4,914 tariff lines and was subsequently increased to cover 7,914 tariff
lines. In recent months, there has been a two-fold expansion of the scheme: one, to
enhance the MEIS rates of ready-made garments from 2% to 4%; and two, to increase
the MEIS benefits for all labour-intensive and MSME sector products by 2%. These
expansions in the scope of MEIS increased the total outlay on the scheme to nearly
60% over the level in 2016-17.
The utility of export subsidies to promote exports has long been questioned. While
the real impact of these subsidies has never been clearly measured, what has been
quite evident is they have benefited the rent-seekers. There is, therefore, a
strong case for the government to invest in trade-related infrastructure and trade
facilitation measures, which can deliver tangible results on the export front. of
current year to account for inflationary tendencies i.e from 2004-05 to 2011-12
which in whole brought a wave of positivity in market which is required for
igniting investment and growth prospects.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
The eligibility criteria laid down by the Government for grant of Maharatna,
Navratna and Miniratna status to Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs) are
following:
-> The CPSEs fulfilling the following criteria are eligible to be considered for
grant of Maharatna status.
(ii) Listed on Indian stock exchange with minimum prescribed public shareholding
under SEBI regulations.
(iii) Average annual turnover of more than Rs. 25,000 crore, during the last 3
years.
(iv) Average annual net worth of more than Rs. 15,000 crore, during the last 3
years.
(v) Average annual net profit after tax of more than Rs. 5,000 crore, during the
last 3 years.
The CPSEs which have made profits in the last three years continuously
and have positive net worth are eligible to be considered for grant of Miniratna
status.