Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Apollo Tyre Assignment
Apollo Tyre Assignment
Indian tyres market is clearly skewed towards the replacement segment which contributes ~70% of total
revenues. Whereas in volume (tonnage) terms the replacement segment contributes ~60% indicating
realizations in the after-market are clearly higher than OEMs (Original Equipment Manufacturer) market
Truck & Bus (T&B), Passenger Vehicle (PV), 2/3-Wheeler, Off-Highway Tyres
(OHT) & Others
2
T&B tyres in India generates the major revenue i.e. 55% of total revenue whereas globally it’s the PCR
(Passenger Car Radials) contribute the largest portion of the revenue. This is mainly because of very low
penetration of passenger vehicles in India – below 20 per 1,000 people whereas in China the number is 69 per
1,000 people and 786 per 1,000 people in US..
Top 10 companies account for about 80 per cent of the market share. Top three companies -- MRF, Apollo
Tyres and JK Tyres -- have 55 per cent of the market share of the Indian tyre industry and figure among the
top 25 global companies in terms of revenue.
• The industry is a major consumer of the domestic rubber market. Natural rubber constitutes 80 percent
while synthetic rubber constitutes only 20 percent of the material content in Indian tyres. Interestingly,
world-wide, the proportion of natural to synthetic rubber in tyres is 30:70.
• Indian tyre industry is manufacturing all categories of tyres (except some specialized categories like
Snow Tyres for which currently there is no requirement and Aero Tyres). Domestic demand for tyres
to the extent of 98 percent, including demand for tyres for all new vehicles being introduced in the
country, is being met domestically.
• Original Equipment Manufacturers This includes automobile manufacturers like – Hero Honda, Maruti
Suzuki, Ashok Leyland, Tata Motors etc. The demand from the OEM market fluctuates directly in line
with end-use demand for the automobile/construction equipment segment; it is thus prone to a high
degree of cyclicality. The total tyre sales to OEMs are on an average 40-45 percent of the total sales.
3
Porter’s 5 Forces
Analysis Michael Porter’s model identifies the most powerful driving forces within industries and the
interactions between them to determine the competitive position and profit potential. The five driving forces
are:
1. Threat of substitute of products.
2. Bargaining power of suppliers.
3. Bargaining power of buyers.
4. Threat of new entrants.
5. Rivalry among existing competitors.
Company Profile
➢ Strong Brand image: Apollo’s Brand diversity is one of its strengths. The manufacturing units
of the company are in India, Netherlands and South Africa and its sells tires under various brand
names in India, Africa and Europe. The presence of various strong brands in the portfolio gives
the company a credibility which gives the company a competitive advantage.
➢ Strong financial performance: Apollo’s net sales grew at a CAGR of 2% in the last 5 years and
its profit grew at a CAGR of 34% in the same period. Strong financial growth enhances
shareholder’s value and also provides room for further expansion plans and hence market share
also increases.
➢ Market share: As can be seen from the graph, Apollo has a high market share in India. It is the
2nd highest market share holder in LCV’s and the highest market share holder in Medium and
heavy commercial vehicles.
5
WEAKNESS:
➢ Labor unrest effects production: In the recent past, the company has faced various issues of
labor unrest and lockouts in its plants in Durban, Vadodara etc. This affects company’s
production capabilities and hence also affects the financials of the company
➢ Heavy dependence on Indian market: Although the company has expanded globally but the
majority if the company’s revenue depends on in the Indian market (about 65.2% of its
revenues were from India in FY 2015). This makes the company vulnerable to economic and
political changes in India. The company needs to increase its revenues in other market in order
to mitigate the risks of depending heavily on one market.
OPPORTUNITIES:
➢ Growing Four Wheeler Industry in India: Four Wheeler Industry in India is growing
continuously and has shown growth of 4% CAGR from the period of 2015-18. Also, Indian
truck manufacturing has shown a growth of 7% CAGR in the same period. The growth ensures
growing opportunity in the 4-wheeler market as well as the commercial vehicle segment.
➢ Expansion in Two Wheeler segment: Apollo aims to cover 85% market considering its
current product range. With the growth in the 2-wheeler market, Apollo can enhance its
potential in this market.
➢ Global Expansion: From the past 3 years, the company is in an expansion mode with
expansion in countries like Lebanon, Qatar and Jordan. The company should continue the same
and foray into newer markets.
THREAT:
➢ Strong competition: Competition in the tire industry especially in India is very high with competitors
like MRF Tyres, JK Tire and Goodyear is present. Fierce competition can affect sales and the
company’s expansion plans.
➢ Cheaper Tyres in china: Imported Chinese tire products are cheaper and hence presents a stiff
competition in the market. Chines imports can adversely affect Apollo’s profitability.
6
COMPETITOR ANALYSIS
Product
Apollo tyres manufacture tyres, tubes and flaps and are a premier name in the Indian markets and it also
exports to Middle East countries, Europe and Africa. Apollo tyre’s introduced the maiden farm radials
and also India’s first range of high-speed tubeless car tyre’s. The types of tyre’s come according to the
category of the vehicles and major category of Apollo tyre’s products are as follows:
Place
Offering the right product to the right customer is what has been the focus of Apollo tyre’s. Special
efforts are made to understand customer needs. It is perceived as the tyre of the masses and its average
price accompanied by good performance confirms that belief. It is a complete value for money deal due
to high-level technology, which is used in manufacturing of these tyre’s. Radial and tubeless tyre’s are
the main focus now for Apollo tyre’s.
Price
Apollo Tyre’s have been facing good competition from brands like JK tyre, MRF, Bridgestone, CEAT,
Continental and Goodyear. Like if we compare the prices of sedan car tyre’s tube less category Apollo
costs Rs 4300-4500 and JK tyre costs Rs 4000-4200 whereas Bridgestone costs Rs 5800-6000 per tyre.
Truck tyre’s prices if we compare Goodyear is in the range of Rs. 12500-13000 and Apollo HCV tyres
are in range of Rs 17000-17500 approximately and CEAT tyres are in range of Rs 18000-18500. Thus
Apollo tyre’s is clearly using Penetrative pricing to capture the market.
Therefore, there is very stiff competition in terms of price and there are some brands that have prices
close to Apollo so it has to be the quality and service of Apollo, which makes it stand apart from other
brands. Although MRF is the market leader overall, there are certain product segments where Apollo
has an edge over it. However, when compared to its competitors Apollo tyre’s has good business
to business market share, as it has more tie-ups with the automobile companies
8
Promotion:
Apollo tied up with Manchester United Football club for promotions and branding. This has worked really
well for the company and has helped to increase its brand value. The company also engages in strategies like
running tyre loyalty programs, better contact with its customers to encourage them for better driving habits.
The advertisements of its product strikes a chord with its customer as it emphasizes on durability and long life
of product. Apollo Tyres ltd. brand Vredestein social media campaign #RockTheRoad (music video by DJ
Hhardwell) won Global Dolphin Award at Cannes in integrated communication category. Apollo also
promotes Indian tennis players and sponsoring tennis competition which brings brand awareness among
youngsters to the company.
9
SEGMENTATION:
HIGH
WAY
VEHIC INDUSTRI
SEGME
PASSENGER COMMERCIAL LE/ AL/ TWO-
NT
CAR OWNERS VEHICLE OWNERS TRUC HEAVY WHEELER
NAME
KS VEHICLE
OWNE
RS
CONSUTR
BETWEEN CITIES:
UCTION BOTH
MIGHT NEED TO
GEOGR RURA STATES, RUAL AND
URBAN TAVEL THROUGH
APHY L MINE SEMI-
RURAL
EVALUAT URBAN
STRETCHES
ION
LOW
COST,SUPERI
RELIABILITY,DURABI SAFETY,RELIABILITY,DU LONG BETTER OR
BENEFIT LITY,FUEL RABILITY,VALUE FOR LIFE,QU GRIP,LONG GRIP,RELIABI
SOUGHT MILEAGE,PRICE MONEY ALITY, LIFE,QUALITY LITY
PRIMARILY TIME
BASED GURDGE
SERVICING/REPLACEM GURDGE BASED
ENT BASED CHANGE ON PURCHASE:TI
OCCASIO GURDGE BASED OCCASIONALY/GURDG PURCHA REQUIREME ME BASED
N PURCHASE E BASED PURCHASE SE NT SERVICING
HIGH
SELF
INVOLM
ENT,
USUALL
Y HAVE MODERATE
BASIC TO HIGH
KNOWL HIGH- INVOLMENT,
EDGE OF INVOLMENT, MAY NOT
MODERATE SELF THE COST HAVE THE
INVOLMENT, LOYAL REPLACE DECISION,EX KNOWLEDGE
HIGH SELF TOWARD A MENT PERT HOW TO
PERSONA INVOLMENT(DEPTH PARTICULAR BRAND OF RECOMMEN CHOOSE
LITY INFO) OF TYRES TYRES DATION TYRES
STATEMENT:
11
POSITIONING-
HIGH PRICING
MRF
CEAT
TVS
LOW JK APOLLO
PERFORMANCE HIGH
PERFORMANC
FALCON E
LOW PRICING
12
Increasing Competition
• People are no longer buying tyres but leasing them. Hence, the concept of cost per-kilometre. This
was an initiative started by Apollo which still poses a big challenge ahead.
Business Challenges:
• tyres is a difficult product from a brand loyalty perspective. When it comes to commercial vehicles
(trucks, fleet, and light commercial), performance and efficiency play a huge role. For passenger cars,
on the other hand, it is more of brand recall, at least in the Indian market.
• In the last two years, Apollo Tyres has moved towards a very high degree of customer centricity.
The efficiency of supply chain—including manufacturing and distribution—lies in its ability to
influence the customer.
• Also, once the acquisition of Cooper Tyres & Rubber Company fructifies, the US market will bring
its own challenges for the next two to three years with a different set of challenges and solutions.
Conclusion:
• Apollo tyres is the market leader in the LCV&SCV segment followed by MRF, J.K.,
Birls, CEAT
• Apollo tyres is the first tyres company which has launched new scheme to solve the claim
within 2 days.
• Most of the customers are unsatisfied with this scheme. Because dealers do not provide
them this type of facility at their disposal.
Suggestions:
The suggestions from the consumers to the tyres company are following.
• Some consumer is unsatisfied with the price because competitor’s
p r o d u c t price is less than Apollo, so company should pay attention in their mind
on price.
• Company should provide more mileage of tyres because overloading has been
imposed by the government.
• Company should provide credit facility because customer demands this type of facility.
• The problem of Apollo consumers is lack of adequate promotional schemes.
Dealers don't provide adequate information in the support of the Apollo brands. They see
their margin of profit alone.
• Some schemes should be provided by company. It is good technique for
sales promotions.
• Company should give special attention after sales service of their customers.
15
Reference:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/apollo-tyres-ltd/infocompanyhistory/companyid-63.cms
https://www.alphainvesco.com/blog/understanding-the-indian-tyre-industry/
http://www.firstresearch.com/Industry-Research/Tire-Manufacturing.html
https://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/boom-in-automobile-sales-drives-tyre-industry-
s-growth-into-high-speed-lane-118080701499_1.html
https://www.moneycontrol.com/competition/apollotyres/comparison/AT14
https://www.moneycontrol.com/stocks/company_info/print_main.php