Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Advertisement Hide

Log in to check access

Buy article (PDF)

EUR 34.95
Search Home • Log in
• Unlimited access to the
article
• Instant PDF download
Journal of Mountain Science
October 2011, 8:629 | Cite as
Rent this article via

Assessing the economic value of vernacular architecture DeepDyve

of mountain regions using contingent valuation Learn about institutional


subscriptions

Authors Authors and a iliations


Cite article
Stella Giannakopoulou, Dimitris Damigos , Dimitris Kaliampakos

Article
230 6
First Online: 17 September 2011
Downloads Citations

Abstract

Human pressure on mountain resources poses certain threats to their natural and man-made
environment. Although there are many parameters involved, one of the driving forces behind
this situation is the emphasis given so far only to the market value of mountain goods and
services, ignoring the true social and environmental costs of using mountain resources.
Towards this direction, the use of non-market valuation techniques could prove to be
beneficial. Bearing in mind the above remarks, the paper presents an application of the
Contingent Valuation Method, which aims at estimating the monetary value of a mountain
settlement’s vernacular architecture, namely Metsovo. For this purpose, the survey focuses on
Metsovo visitors’ willingness to pay a single annual voluntary contribution to an institution that
would be founded in order to undertake all necessary actions required to preserve the town’s
traditional character. The results are very promising and indicate that vernacular architecture
holds a significant economic value that could justify the implementation of appropriate policies
towards the protection of vernacular settlements in mountain areas.

Keywords
Non-market valuation Vernacular architecture Contingent valuation

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

Apostolakis A, Jaffry S (2005) A Choice Modeling Application for Greek Heritage


Attractions. Journal of Travel Research 43(3): 309–318.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Bateman I, Willis K (1996) Introduction and Overview. In: Bateman IJ, Willis KG (Eds.),
Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation
method in the US, EU and Developing countries, Oxford University Press, New York. pp
1–16.
Google Scholar

Bateman IJ, Carson RT, Day B, Hanemann M, Hanley N, Hett T, Jones-Lee M, Loomes G,
Mourato S, Özdemiroglu E, Pearce DW, Sugden R, Swanson J (2002) Economic valuation
with stated preference techniques: A manual, Department for Transport. UK and Edward
Elgar Publishing.
Google Scholar

Bator FM (1958). The anatomy of market failure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics
72(3): 351–379.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Bedate A, César H, Ángel S (2004) Economic valuation of the cultural heritage:


application to four case studies in Spain. Journal of Cultural Heritage 5(1): 101–111.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Bowitz E, Ibenholt K (2009) Economic impacts of cultural heritage — research and


perspectives. Journal of Cultural Heritage 10(1): 1–8.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Carson R (1997). Contingent valuation: theoretical advances and empirical tests since the
NOAA panel. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79(5): 1501–1507.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Carson R, Groves T (2007) Incentive and informational properties of preference


questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 37(1): 181–210.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Carson R (2004) Contingent valuation — A comprehensive bibliography and history.


Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
Google Scholar

Carson RT, Mitchell RC, Conaway MB, Navrud S (1997) Non-Moroccan Values for
Rehabilitating the FES Medina. Report to the World Bank on the FES Cultural Heritage
Rehabilitation Project.
Google Scholar

Cho SH, Newman D, Bowker J (2005) Measuring rural homeowners’ willingness to pay for
land conservation easements. Forest Policy and Economics 7(5): 757–770.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Coller M, Harrison GH (1995) On the use of the contingent valuation method to estimate
environmental costs. In: Reckers PMJ, (ed.), Advances in accounting, vol. 13. Greenwich.
CT: JAP Press.
Google Scholar

Denniston D (1995) High Priorities: Conserving Mountain Ecosystems and Cultures.


World Watch Paper 123, World Watch Institute, Washington DC.
Google Scholar

Dutta M, Banerjee S, Husain Z (2007) Untapped demand for heritage: A contingent


valuation study of Prinsep Ghat, Calcutta. Tourism Management 28(1): 83–95.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Economics for the Environment Consultancy — EFTEC (1999) The Economic and
Financial Sustainability of the Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu, Final report presented
to the Finnish Forest and Park Service, Economics for the Environment Consultancy,
London.
Google Scholar

Economics for the Environment Consultancy — EFTEC (2005) Valuation of the Historic
Environment. The scope for using results of valuation studies in the appraisal and
assessment of heritage-related projects and programmes, Final Report. Available at:
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/publications/valuation-historic-environment/
(Accessed: March 2010).

Giannakopoulou S, Kaliampakos D (2010) Valuing vernacular architecture: An innovative


tool in sustainable tourism and development in mountain regions. International
Conference on Global Change and the World’s Mountains, 26–30 September, Perth,
Scotland.
Google Scholar

Godde P, Price MF, Zimmermann F (eds.) (2000) Tourism and development in mountain
regions, CAB International, Wallingford.
Google Scholar

Greene WH (2000) Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Google Scholar

Grêt-Regamey A, Kytzia S (2007) Integrating the valuation of ecosystem services into


input output economics of an Alpine region. Ecological Economics 63(4): 786–798.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Groothuis P, Groothuis J, Whitehead J (2008) Green vs. Green: Measuring the


Compensation Required to Site Electrical Generation Windmills in a Viewshed. Energy
Policy 36(4): 1545–1550.
Google Scholar

Hampton MP (2005) Heritage, Local Communities and Economic Development. Annals of


Tourism Research 32(3): 735–759.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Hanemann M (1996) Theory versus data in the contingent valuation debate. In: Bjornstad
DJ and Kahn JR (Eds.), The Contingent Valuation of Environmental Resources:
Methodological Issues and Research Needs, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom.
Google Scholar

Hardin G (1968) The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162:1243–1248.


CrossRef Google Scholar

Harisis V (1995) Metsovo. In: Filippidis D (ed.), Greek vernacular architecture. Thessaly —
Epirus (vol. 6), Melissa, Athens. (In Greek)
Google Scholar

Hellenic Statistical Authority — ELSTAT (2010) Statistical Database. Available at:


www.statistics.gr. (Accessed on March 2010). (In Greek)

ICOMOS (1999) Charter on the Built Vernacular Heritage, Mexico.


Google Scholar

Karanikolas N, Lafazani P, Myridis M, Ramnalis D (2001) The Depopulation of the


Northern Greece Mountainous Settlement: Planning an Observatory for the Residential
Network vitiations of the Balkans. International Congress “Economic, Social,
Environmental and Urban Re-Planning of Degrading or Destroyed European Areas”, 1–5
September, Thessaloniki, Greece. (In Greek)
Google Scholar

Keppa C (2007) The traditional settlements of East Macedonia and Thrace. Texnografima
12/336: 12–13. (In Greek)
Google Scholar

Kim SS, Wong KKF, Cho M (2007). Assessing the economic value of a world heritage site
and willingness-to-pay determinants: A case of Changdeok Palace. Tourism Management
28(1): 317–322.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Koch-Weser MR, Kahlenborn W (2004). Legal, economic and compensation mechanisms


in support of sustainable mountain development. In Price MF, Iatsenia A and Jansky L
(Eds.), Key Issues for the World’s Mountain Regions: 63–85, UNU Press, Tokyo.
Google Scholar

Maddison D, Mourato S (2002). Valuing different road options for Stonehenge. In:
Navrud S and Ready R (eds.), Valuing cultural heritage: applying environmental valuation
techniques to historic buildings, monuments and artefacts: 87–104, Edward Elgar,
Cheltenham, UK.
Google Scholar

Maddala GS (1999). Limited-dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics.


Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Google Scholar

Moran D, Tresidder E, McVittie A (2006). Estimating the recreational value of mountain


biking sites in Scotland using count data models. Tourism Economics 12(1): 123–135.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Mountain Forum (1997). Investing in Mountains: Innovative Mechanisms and Promising


Examples for Financing Conservation and Sustainable Development. E-conference report.
Available at: http://europe.mtnforum.org/rs/econfreports/InvestingInMountains.pdf
(Accessed: March 2010).

Mountain Partnership (2002). Tourism. Fact sheet. Available at:


http://www.mountainpartnership.org/files/pdf/factsheets/tourisme.pdf (Accessed:
March 2010).

Mourato S, Ozdemiroglu E, Hett T, Atkinson G (2004). Pricing cultural heritage: A new


approach to managing ancient resources. World Economics 5(3): 1–19.
Google Scholar

Noonan DS (2003). Contingent valuation and cultural resources: A meta-analytic review


of the literature. Journal of Cultural Economics 27(3–4): 159–176
CrossRef Google Scholar

Poor PJ, Smith JM (2004). Travel Cost Analysis of a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case of
Historic St. Mary’s City of Maryland. Journal of Cultural Economics 28(3): 217–229.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Price MF, Jansky L, Iatsenia AA (2004). Key issues for Mountain Areas. United Nations
University Press, Tokyo.
Google Scholar

Riganti P, Nijkamp P (2004). Valuing Cultural Heritage Benefits to Urban and Regional
Development. 44th European Congress of the European Regional Science Association,
Regions and Fiscal Federalism, August 25–29, University of Porto, Portugal.
Google Scholar

Ruijgrok CME (2006). The three economic values of cultural heritage: a case study in the
Netherlands. Journal of Cultural Heritage 7(3): 206–213.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Salazar S, Marques J (2005). Valuing cultural heritage: The social benefits or restoring
and old Arab tower. Journal of Cultural Heritage 6(1): 69–77.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Scarpa R, Thiene M (2004). Destination Choice Models for Rock Climbing in the
Northeast Alps: A Latent-Class Approach Based on Intensity of Participation. FEEM
Working Paper No. 131.04.
Google Scholar

Tietenberg T (1992). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, 3rd Ed.,


HarperCollins Publishers Inc., New York.
Google Scholar

Tuan TH, Navrud S (2008). Capturing the benefits of preserving cultural heritage. Journal
of Cultural Heritage 9(3): 326–337.
CrossRef Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, CAS and Springer-Verlag
Berlin Heidelberg 2011

About this article

Cite this article as:


Giannakopoulou, S., Damigos, D. & Kaliampakos, D. J. Mt. Sci. (2011) 8: 629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-011-2005-
y

Received Accepted First Online


29 May 2010 14 June 2011 17 September 2011

DOI Publisher Name Print ISSN


https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-011- SP Science Press 1672-6316
2005-y

Online ISSN
1993-0321

About this journal

Reprints and Permissions

Personalised recommendations

1. Vernacular architecture of Iran’s hot regions; elements and strategies for a comfortable living environment
Sahebzadeh, Sadra… Heidari, Ali
Smart and Sustainable Built Environment (2018)

2. Studies on sustainable features of vernacular architecture in different regions across the world: A
comprehensive synthesis and evaluation
Nguyen, Anh Tuan… Tran Le, Anh Dung
Frontiers of Architectural Research (2019)

3. Environmentally responsive design in Eastern Mediterranean. The case of vernacular architecture in the
coastal, lowland and mountainous regions of Cyprus
Philokyprou, Maria… Savvides, Andreas
Building and Environment (2017)

Want recommendations via email? Sign up now Powered by:

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips Academic Edition

Home Impressum Legal information Privacy statement How we use cookies Accessibility Contact us

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.


Not logged in · INASP-Ethiopia (3000256565) - University of Gondar (3000257787) · 213.55.79.193

You might also like