Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research Proposal
Research Proposal
4.0 Timetable
5.0 Reference
THE IMPACT OF REWARDS AND RECOGNITION ON SENIOR
POLICE OFFICERS’ MOTIVATION AND JOB PERFORMANCE:
A CASE OF POLICE TRAINING CENTRE
KUALA LUMPUR
1.0 Introduction
This chapter explains the environment of the Royal Malaysian Police (RMP) and the
importance of reward and recognition on job performance among Senior Police
Officer in Police Training Centre Kuala Lumpur (PULAPOL KL). Following that, this
chapter also explains the problem statements of the study, research questions and
research objectives also the organizations of the chapters.
Background of Study
The Royal Malaysian Police is one of the key pillars in national security to ensure
the Country is safe and secure. Malaysian police are not only work to ensure a
safe and peaceful country, but also to reduce the crime rates in the country
regardless of age, race and religion to improve public safety in Malaysia. As
police personnel, they need motivation to increase inner power and
psychological energy that could affect the fuels behavior.
3
The award ceiling of award service is not more than 8% of the total number of
members in an organization on 31 December of the assessment year.
4
1.2 Research Objectives
The purpose of the study is to investigate the impact of rewards and
recognition on Excellent Service Awards (Anugerah Perkhidmatan Cemerlang) on
motivation and job performance of Senior Police Officers in Police Training
Centre Kuala Lumpur.
ii. How does Excellence Service Award (APC) affect motivation of Senior
Police Officer of PULAPOL KL?
iii. What are the criteria for evaluation for Excellence Service Award (APC) in
the Police force?
iv. Is the Excellence Service Award (APC) effective in the Police force?
5
CHAPTER TWO
Deeprose (1994) argued that the motivation of employees and their productivity can
be enhanced through providing them effective recognition which ultimately results in
improved performance of organizations. The entire success of an organization is
based on how an organization keeps its employees motivated and in what way they
evaluate the performance of employees for job compensation. Managing the
performance of employees forms an integral part of any organizational strategy and
6
how they deal with their human capital (Drucker as cited in Meyer & Kirsten, 2005).
Today where every organization has to meet its obligations; the performance of
employees has a very crucial impact on overall organizational achievement. In a
demotivated environment, low or courage less employees can not practice their
skills, abilities, innovation and full commitment to the extent an organization needs.
Freedman (1978) is of the view that when effective rewards and recognition are
implemented within an organization, favorable working environment is produced
which motivates employees to excel in their performance. Employees take
recognition as their feelings of value and appreciation and as a result it boosts up
morale of employee which ultimately increases productivity of organizations.
Csikszentmihalyi (1990) posits a view that the state of satisfaction and happiness is
achieved by the employees only when they maximally put their abilities in
performing the activities and functions at work. In this way motivated employees are
retained with the organizations thus reducing extra costs of hiring.
Flynn (1998) argued that rewards and recognition programs keep high spirits among
employees, boosts up their morale and create a linkage between performance and
motivation of the employees. The basic purpose of recognition and reward program
is to define a system to pay and communicate it to the employees so that they can
link their reward to their performance which ultimately leads to employee’s job
satisfaction. Where job satisfaction, as defined by Lock (cited in Gruneberg, 1979, p.
3), is a pleasurable positive emotional state as a result of work appraisal from one’s
job experiences. The rewards include the financial rewards, pay and benefits,
promotions and incentives that satisfy employees to some extent but for committed
employees, recognition must be given to keep them motivated, appreciated and
committed.
Baron (1983) argued that when we recognize and acknowledge the employees in
terms of their identification, their working capacity and performance is very high.
Recognition today is highest need according to most of the experts whereas a
reward which includes all the monetary and compensative benefits cannot be the
sole motivator for employees’ motivation program. Employees are motivated fully
when their needs are met. The level of motivation of employees increases when
employees get an unexpected increase in recognition, praise and pay (La Motta,
1995). In today’s dynamic environment the highly motivated employees serve as a
synergy for accomplishment of company’s goals, business plans, high efficiency,
growth and performance. Motivation is also required when the organizational
workforce has not a good relationship pattern. Employees’ relation with employees
and with supervisor is a key ingredient of the inner strength of the organization. The
ability of supervisors to provide strong leadership has an effect on job satisfaction of
employees (Morris, 2004). The study relates how the impact of incentives, rewards
and recognition programs drives employee motivation.
7
2.1 Conceptual framework
The conceptual framework illustrates how the independent variable relates to the
dependent variable. The dependent variable of the study is Job performance while
the independent variable is employee rewards
8
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
9
intends to use structured questionnaire as instrument of primary data collection. The
questionnaire will be structured in the Likert scale of five options ranging from Strongly
Agreed to Strongly Disagreed in order to avoid bias by respondents and to enhance
validity of response.
For this research the ethical issue is not a problem because the research topic is
not sensitive and would not harm the mental or the psychological wellbeing of the
participants. However in this research, subjects were informed of the purpose
and objective of the research so as to make sure that they have no objection in
answering the questions. This will also act as an informed consent, meaning that
they agree with our terms and the researcher is responsible if any complication
happens in the future. In the first place, they were informed that the research is
solely for academic purpose and their words will not be disclosed in the public
sphere or shall remain in the academic paper and not in any other purposes. In
order to get correct answers, questions related to personal identification were
avoided.
3.7 Limitations
The scope of study is being limited to Police Officer working in Police Training
Centre Kuala Lumpur. Therefore, a total of 72 respondents of Senior Police Officer
rank from Inspector to SAC and this study may not represent the whole group of
RMP in Malaysia, and the result cannot be generalized at present.
10
4.0 Timetable and Referencing
11
REFERENCES
Aamir, A., Jehanzeb, K., Rasheed, A., & Malik, O. M. (2012). Compensation methods
and employees' motivation (with reference to employees of National Commercial
Bank Riyadh). International Journal of Human Resource Studies. 2(3), 221-230.
Acar, A. O., & Ende, J. V. D. (2011). Motivation, reward size and contribution in idea
crowd-sourcing. Dime-Druid Academy Winter Conference. JeL_Codes: 031, 032,
030.
Alam, M. D., Saeed, S. A., Sahabuddin, M., & Akter, S. (2013). Relationship between
employee recognition and employee contribution in service industry. International
Journal of Business and Marketing Management. 1(1), 1-8.
Ali, R., & Ahmed, M. S. (2009). The impact of reward and recognition programs on
HPplOyHH’s mVtivatioY aYd satisfaLtioY: aY HVDiriLal study. International Review of
Business Research Papers, 5(4), 270-279.
Arokiasamy, A. R. A., Tata, H. H., & Kanesan, A.G. (2013). The effects of reward system
and motivation on job satisfaction: Evidence from the education industry in
Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal. 24(2), 1597-1604.
Benabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of economic
studies. 70, 489-520.
Cameron, J., Pierce, W. D., Banko, K. M., & Gear, A. (2005). Achievement-Based
reward and intrinsic motivation: A test of cognitive mediators. Journal of
Educational Psychology. 97(4), 641-655.
12
Crank, J. P. (2004). Understanding police culture (2 nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH:
Anderson Publishing.
Danish, R. Q., & Usman, A. (2010). Impact of reward and recognition on job
satisfaction and motivation: An Empirical Study from Pakistan. International Journal
of Business and Management. 5(2), 159-167.
Edrak, B. B., Yin-Fah, B. C., Gharleghi, B., & Seng, T. K. (2013). The effectiveness of
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: A study of Malaysian Amway Company's
Direct Sales Forces. International Journal of Business and Social Science. 4(9), 96-
103.
Gana, A. B., & Bababe, F. B. (2011). The effects of motivation on workers performance (A
case study of Maiduguri Flour Mill Ltd. Borno State, Nigeria). Continental Journal
Social Sciences. 4(2), 8-13.
Hafiza, N. S., Shah, S. S., Jamsheed, H., & Zaman, K. (2011). Relationship between rewards
and employees motivation in the non-profit organizations of Pakistan. Business
Intelligence Journal, 4(2), 327-334.
Hirtz, P. D., Murray, S. L., & Riordan, C. A. (2007). The effects of leadership on quality.
Engineering Management Journal. 2(1), 24-32.
13