With the help of our thorough research and information-
gathering, we have come up with comprehensible facts concerning the eligibility of heinous crime convicts in the GCTA Law.
According to the Republic Act 7659 signed in 1993, heinous
crimes include: Treason, Piracy in general and mutiny on the high seas in Philippine waters, Qualified piracy, Qualified bribery, Parricide, Murder, Infanticide, Kidnapping and serious illegal detention, Robbery with violence against or intimidation of persons, Destructive arson, Rape, and Importation, distribution, manufacturing and possession of illegal drugs. These crimes were considered heinous “for being grievous, odious and hateful offenses and which, by reason of their inherent or manifest wickedness, viciousness, atrocity and perversity are repugnant and outrageous to the common standards and norms of decency and morality in a just, civilized and ordered society.”
Individuals convicted of the above-mentioned crimes were
sentenced to death.
This, however, was eventually reduced to reclusion perpetua
after the abolition of the death penalty in 2006 under then-president Gloria Arroyo through RA 9436. Reclusion perpetua entails imprisonment of at least 20 years and a day up to a maximum of 40 years, after which a prisoner can be eligible for parole – unless otherwise specified.
Nonetheless, Republic Act 10592 (GCTA Law) was signed on
May 29, 2013 by the former President Aquino that can slash by half the sentence of an inmate who demonstrates sustained good behavior.
In the present days, The House of Representatives will pass a bill
amending the law granting good conduct time allowance (GCTA) to convicts. This amendment excludes the heinous crime convicts from getting a welfare from the said law.
However, having the debarment of the convicts will lead to
unethical implementation of the Law of the Philippines. If so, this law will be agreed, and the exclusion of the heinous crime convicts will be validated, don’t you think it’ll be unfair to convicts?