This assessment project evaluates students' literacy skills including letter recognition, sounds, and sight words. Student A struggled with focusing and scored below average, identifying only a few letters. Student B excelled and scored above average in all areas. Both would benefit from a less distracting testing environment. Student A requires interventions to improve letter skills while Student B needs more challenging work to stay engaged. Testing multiple students at once caused distractions. Interventions in a student's native language could help those still learning English.
This assessment project evaluates students' literacy skills including letter recognition, sounds, and sight words. Student A struggled with focusing and scored below average, identifying only a few letters. Student B excelled and scored above average in all areas. Both would benefit from a less distracting testing environment. Student A requires interventions to improve letter skills while Student B needs more challenging work to stay engaged. Testing multiple students at once caused distractions. Interventions in a student's native language could help those still learning English.
This assessment project evaluates students' literacy skills including letter recognition, sounds, and sight words. Student A struggled with focusing and scored below average, identifying only a few letters. Student B excelled and scored above average in all areas. Both would benefit from a less distracting testing environment. Student A requires interventions to improve letter skills while Student B needs more challenging work to stay engaged. Testing multiple students at once caused distractions. Interventions in a student's native language could help those still learning English.
i. The assessment was called CECA LA. It is online, and a progress monitoring assessment. This assessment measures the ability of a child to correctly identify uppercase letters, lowercase letters, lowercase sounds, and National Geographic Sight words. ii. The standards that this assessment addresses: CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RF.K.3.C: Read common, high-frequency words by sight (e.g., the, of, to you, she, my, is, are, do, does). CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RF.K.1.D: Recognize and name all upper- and lowercase letters of the alphabet. iii. The assessments were given in the morning during their morning routine and circle time. This meant that there was talking, and sometimes singing in the background, so the children were sometimes distracted. The children would individually get pulled to complete these assessments. They would sit at the computer, and the teacher would sit to their right. The screen would be pulled up, and the teacher would tell the student to name the letter, name the sound, or read the word. The student would respond, and the teacher would hit the ‘correct’ or ‘incorrect’ button, which would trigger the next test question to appear on screen. At the bottom of the screen is the number of the question they are on out of the total questions, and occasionally the teacher would let the student know if they are halfway. The date theses assessments were given is September 9th, 2018. We iv. were not informed of any accommodations we should make with any of the students we assessed. v. Emma (6 years old) is a student who has difficulty with staying on task and focusing. She has some mild delays that include social and cognitive. She knows a few letters, but will often label incorrectly, or guess instead of saying she does not know the answer. Elizabeth (6 years old) is very focused and motivated. She enjoys learning, and is above her grade levels in reading and math. b. Analysis of assessment results i. Emma scored below average at a 3 out of 26 on uppercase letters, and 4 out of 26 on lowercase letters. ii. Elizabeth scored above average at a 24 out of 24 on her uppercase and lowercase sounds, as well as 24 out of 24 on her lowercase sounds, and 44 out of 44 on her sight words. c. Student Learning i. Emma is able to identify the letter E, and the letter K 100% of the time for uppercase letters. She is very confident, and is easily engaged in large group activities. Emma would benefit from staying in morning circle activities and being tested in an environment that is less distracting. Elizabeth’s strengths are that she is above grade average for both English Language Arts, and Math. She is very motivated and focused. She will need a constant stream of more challenging work to keep her engaged and motivated, as well as extra teacher and family support to continue to challenge herself. ii. The environment in which they do the testing is not ideal. We take them from activities they are really engaged in, and then try to have them focus while the teacher is talking, their friends are talking, and music is playing. It is very distracting and makes taking assessments seem like more of a negative thing, and may cause the students to rush through the test to get back. The testing area is also a row of 5 computers. Several times, two different children would be assessed at the same time. This is also a distraction as they are both naming letters. It has distracted Emma before, and confused her as she started repeating the letters the girl next to her said, instead of reading them off of the screen in front of her. d. Instructional Design i. Emma is delayed enough to warrant one-on-one interventions daily to work on first, uppercase letter recognition. It would be most beneficial if it were in a less distracting environment, and the strategies were hands on, and tailored to her interests. Emma would also benefit from extra attention during circle rotations to ensure she understands the instructions, stays focused, and can easily ask questions and receive quick assistance. Elizabeth will require higher level curriculum. This may include sending home more challenging books, above grade level, so that she can be challenged and continue to learn, rather than getting bored of school. This may also include more challenging homework assignments, such as studying more advanced sight words so that she has something to work towards. This may also include a reading program in which she is placed with a reader that reads at a slightly higher level than herself so she can see a good model of reading, while being challenged. ii. It would be beneficial for the student if they had interventions to catch them up to the level of their English-speaking peers. It would also be most beneficial if the person doing the interventions spoke their language, especially for the children that struggle more with speaking and understanding English. Another strategy is teaching them the letters in their language, and then teaching the English version, and the same for sight words.