Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LGCS 122: Methods in Language Research: Jesse A. Harris:: Spring 2014
LGCS 122: Methods in Language Research: Jesse A. Harris:: Spring 2014
LGCS 122: Methods in Language Research: Jesse A. Harris:: Spring 2014
Overview:
In this course, you will be introduced to the basic components of data collection and analysis relevant to
experimental language research. We want to avoid collecting data without clear hypotheses and predic-
tions, and so we start here, moving on to data collection only after we have worked through the design
stages. This course should be useful to you, so from the onset of this course you should strive to formulate
testable hypotheses that are relevant to any current work and research interests.
The topic this year is on lexical meaning, a key concept in both psychology and linguistics. In particular,
we will be evaluating models of how polysemous words are represented and accessed in the mental lexicon.
For example, school may be refer to a building, an institution, a group of people, and so on. Are all of these
meanings stored in the lexicon? Are all of these meanings activated at once, or are only some? What
determines which words become activated at what point in language processing?
We will survey a variety of experimental designs and data collection procedures. First and foremost, we
will concentrate on developing practical skills that will enable you to conduct your own experimental
research. Currently, the course concentrates on lexical, sentence and discourse level processing, with
discussion of related measures, such as priming effects and questionnaire design. However, additional
topics may be introduced to best fit the needs and interests of the students in the class.
Topics:
• Linguistic and psychological models of the lexicon
• The research process and experimental design
• Basic statistical methods and analyses
• Data collection and analysis
• Presentation of data
• Practice, practice, and more practice!
Communication expectations: I expect that you will check your email every day, and reply to messages
from me as soon as possible.
Class policies:
In-class behavior:
I expect an atmosphere of respect and tolerance, commensurate with the institution that you represent.
Spirited debate is encouraged, but be courteous to your classmates!
Computers and cell phones should be used sparingly and only when absolutely necessary. I reserve the
right to confiscate them, should I find them to be distracting. Checking your email, surfing the web,
etc. during class not only distracts me and limits what you take away from the course, it deprives other
students from your potentially valuable contributions. If you are in doubt, please come talk to me.
Late work:
Most of us are late at some point. I will allow one late homework assignment, no questions asked, exclud-
ing the in-class concept questions and the final project, up to two days after that assignment was originally
due. Unless accompanied by a college sanctioned excuse – e.g., health or family issues, the grade on late
assignments will decrease by one letter grade every day they are late. Cases of true emergencies are of
course exempt.
Academic honesty:
Academic honesty will be taken very seriously in this course. Do not present ideas or work as your own
if it is not; do not present language as your own if is not. You should feel free to consult with me if you
have questions or are unclear about what would constitute a breach of academic honesty, and you should
be familiar with the official academic honesty policy of the college and the consequences with failing to
adhere to it:
http://pomona.catalog.acalog.com/content.php?catoid=3&navoid=80#Academic_Honesty
Other readings:
We will also be reading a number of articles. These readings are posted on the course website along with
the course session that they will be discussed. Please consult the website regularly, as the schedule may
change.
Ferreira, Fernanda & Nicole D. Patson (2007). The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension.
Language and Linguistics Compass, 1, 71–83.
Fishbein, Joel & Jesse A. Harris (submitted with revisions). Making sense of Kafka: Structural biases
induce early sense commitment for metonyms. Submitted to Journal of Memory and Language.
Foraker, Stephani & Gregory L. Murphy (2012) Polysemy in sentence comprehension: Effects of meaning
dominance. Journal of Memory and Language, 76, 407–425.
Frazier, Lyn (1990). Sentence Processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers, chapter 3.
Frazier, Lyn & Keith Rayner (1990). Taking on semantic commitments: Processing multiple meanings vs.
multiple senses. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 181-200.
Frisson, Steven (2009). Semantic Underspecification in Language Processing. Language and Linguistics
Compass, 3, 111–127.
Lupker, Stephen J. (2007). Representation and processing of lexically ambiguous words. In: M. Gareth
Gaskell (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd edition, pp. 159-174.
Mitchell, Don C. (2004). On-line methods in language processing: Introduction and historical review. In:
Carreiras, Manuel, and Charles E. Clifton (Eds.) The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking,
ERP and beyond, pp. 15-32, Psychology Press.
Schütze, Carson T. (2010). Linguistic evidence and grammatical theory. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews:
Cognitive Science, 2, 206-221.