Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MHR405 Chapter 9 Notes
MHR405 Chapter 9 Notes
Define leadership and discuss the role of strategic and formal leadership in organizations.
Explain and critically evaluate the trait theory of leadership.
Compare and contrast the following leadership behaviours and their consequences:
consideration, initiating structure, leader reward, and leader punishment.
Describe and evaluate the situational theories of leadership: contingency theory and path-goal
theory.
Describe and evaluate leader-member-exchange (LMX) theory and transactional and
transformational leadership and their consequences.
Discuss the new and emerging theories of positive leadership including empowering leadership,
ethical leadership, authentic leadership, and servant leadership.
Describe gender differences in leadership and explain why women are underrepresented in
leadership roles in organizations.
Discuss the GLOBE project and explain that culture pays in leadership effectiveness.
Discuss global leadership and describe the characteristics of global leaders.
What Is Leadership?
The influence that particular individuals exert on the goal achievement of others in an
organizational context.
Effective leadership exerts influence in a way that achieves organizational goals by enhancing
the productivity, innovation, satisfaction, and commitment of the workforce.
Leadership is about motivating people and gaining their commitment.
Leadership is about motivating people and gaining their commitment.
Leadership has a strong effect on an organization’s strategy, success, and very survival.
Strategic Leadership
Leadership that involves the ability to anticipate, envision, maintain flexibility, think
strategically, and work with others to initiate changes that will create a viable future for the
organization.
Strategic leaders are open and honest in their interactions with the organization’s stakeholders
and they focus on the future.
Syed Ahad Rizvi Leadership MHR405 Chapter 9
Formal Leadership
Individuals with titles such as manager, executive, supervisor, and department head occupy
formal or assigned leadership roles.
They are expected to influence others and they are given specific authority to direct employees.
Some managers and supervisors fail to exert any influence on others.
Leadership involves going beyond formal role requirements to influence others.
Informal Leadership
It is difficult to determine whether traits make the leader or whether the opportunity for
leadership produces the traits.
Does not tell us what leaders do to influence others successfully.
Syed Ahad Rizvi Leadership MHR405 Chapter 9
It can lead to bias and discrimination when evaluating a leader’s effectiveness and when making
decisions about promoting people to leadership positions.
Leadership Categorization Theory:
o People are more likely to view somebody as a leader and to evaluate them as a more
effective leader when they possess prototypical characteristics of leadership.
It is not a good idea to focus exclusively on traits when making decisions and judgements about
leadership potential and effectiveness.
The most crucial problem is that it does not consider the situation in which leadership occurs.
What are the crucial behaviours leaders engage in, and how do these behaviours influence
employee performance and satisfaction?
Is there a particular leadership style that is more effective than other styles?
The most involved, systematic study of leadership took place at Ohio State University in the
1940s.
Employees described their superiors along a number of behavioural dimensions.
The results revealed two basic kinds of behaviour:
o Consideration
The extent to which a leader is approachable and shows personal concern and
respect for employees.
The considerate leader is seen as friendly and egalitarian, expresses
appreciation and support, and is protective of group welfare.
o Initiating structure
The degree to which a leader concentrates on group goal attainment.
The structuring leader clearly defines and organizes his or her roles and the
roles of followers, stresses standard procedures, schedules the work to be done,
and assigns employees to particular tasks.
The Consequences of Consideration and Structure
o Consideration and initiating structure are not incompatible; a leader could be high, low,
or average on one or both dimensions.
o Consideration and initiating structure both contribute positively to employees’
motivation, job satisfaction, and leader effectiveness.
o Consideration is more strongly related to follower satisfaction, motivation, and leader
effectiveness.
Syed Ahad Rizvi Leadership MHR405 Chapter 9
o Initiating structure is slightly more strongly related to leader job performance and group
performance.
o The relative importance of consideration and initiating structure varies according to the
nature of the leadership situation.
o The Nature of the Situation:
The effects of consideration and initiating structure depend on characteristics of
the task, the employee, and the setting in which work is performed.
Leader reward behaviour provides employees with compliments, tangible benefits, and
deserved special treatment.
When such rewards are made contingent on performance, employees should perform at a high
level and experience job satisfaction.
Leader punishment behaviour involves the use of reprimands or unfavourable task assignments
and the active withholding of raises, promotions, and other rewards.
When punishment is perceived as random and not contingent on employee’s behaviour,
employees react negatively with great dissatisfaction.
Research:
o Contingent leader reward and punishment behaviour is positively related to employees’
perceptions, attitudes, and behaviour.
o Non-contingent punishment behaviour is related to unfavourable outcomes.
o Relationships are much stronger when rewards and punishment are made contingent
on employee behaviour.
o The manner in which leaders administer rewards and punishment is a critical
determinant of their effectiveness.
o Leader reward and punishment behaviours are related to employees’ attitudes and
behaviours because they lead to more positive perceptions of justice and lower role
ambiguity.
Main idea: The association between leadership orientation and group effectiveness is contingent
on (depends on) the extent to which the situation is favourable for exerting influence.
Some situations are more favourable that others, and these situations require different
orientations on the part of the leader.
Leadership orientation is measured by having a leader describe their Least Preferred Co-Worker
(LPC).
o Least Preferred Co-Worker is a current or past co-worker with whom a leader has had a
difficult time accomplishing a task.
The leader who describes the LPC relatively favourably (a high LPC score) is considered to be
relationship oriented.
The leader who describes the LPC unfavourably (a low LPC score) is considered to be task
oriented.
Fiedler has argued that the LPC score reveals a personality trait that reflects the leader’s
motivational structure.
The LPC score is not a measure of consideration or initiating structure which are observed
behaviours.
The LPC score is an attitude of the leader toward work relationships.
The model indicates that a task orientation (low LPC) is most effective when the leadership
situation is very favourable or when it is very unfavourable.
A relationship orientation (high LPC) is most effective in conditions of medium favourability.
Robert House’s theory is concerned with the situations under which various leader behaviours
are most effective.
Path-Goal Theory is concerned with leader behaviours.
Why did House choose the name “path-goal” for his theory?
The most important activities of leaders are those that clarify the paths to various goals of
interest to employees.
The opportunity to achieve such goals should promote job satisfaction, leader acceptance, and
high effort.
The effective leader forms a connection between employee goals and organizational goals.
To achieve job satisfaction and leader acceptance, leader behaviour must be perceived as
immediately satisfying or as leading to future satisfaction.
To promote employee effort, leaders must make rewards dependent on performance and ensure
that employees have a clear picture of how they can achieve these rewards.
Syed Ahad Rizvi Leadership MHR405 Chapter 9
Leader Behaviour
Situational Factors
The effectiveness of each set of behaviours depends on the situation that the leader encounters.
Path-Goal Theory is concerned with two primary classes of situational factors:
o 1. Employee Characteristics
Different types of employees need or prefer different forms of leadership:
High need achievers should work well under achievement-oriented
leadership.
Employees who prefer to be told what to do respond best to directive
leadership.
When employees have low task abilities, they will appreciate directive
leadership.
o 2. Environmental (job) factors
The effectiveness of leadership behaviour depends on the particular work
environment:
When tasks are clear and routine, directive leadership is redundant and
unnecessary and participative leadership is not useful.
When tasks are challenging but ambiguous, directive and participative
leadership is effective.
When a job is frustrating or dissatisfying, supportive leadership is most
effective.
The impact of leader behaviour on employee satisfaction, effort, and acceptance of the leader
depends on the nature of the employees and the work environment.
Leaders might have to tailor their behaviour to the needs, abilities, and personalities of individual
employees.
Effective leaders should take advantage of the motivating and satisfying aspects of jobs while
offsetting or compensating for those job aspects that demotivate or dissatisfy.
Syed Ahad Rizvi Leadership MHR405 Chapter 9
There is substantial evidence that supportive or considerate leader behaviour is most beneficial
in supervising routine, frustrating, or dissatisfying jobs.
There is some evidence that directive or structing leader behaviour is most effective on
ambiguous, less-structured jobs.
The theory works better in predicting employees’ job satisfaction and acceptance of the leader
than in predicting job performance.
There is substantial evidence that employees who have the opportunity to participate in work-
related decisions report more job satisfaction, higher task performance, and organizational
citizenship behaviour toward the organization than those who do not.
These results are partly due to a positive effect on employee empowerment and trust in one’s
supervisor.
Most workers seem to prefer a participative work environment.
However, for participation to be translated into higher productivity, certain facilitating
conditions must exist.
When will participation work best?
A theory of leadership that focuses on the relationship that develops between a leader and an
employee.
It is a social exchange relationship-based approach to leadership.
Effective leadership processes result when leaders and employees develop and maintain high-
quality social exchange relationships.
The variability in the quality of LMX relationships between members of the same workgroup is
called LMX differentiation
o The basis for the effects of LMX on employees is social exchange theory and the norm of
reciprocity.
High LMX involves a high degree of mutual influence and obligation as well as trust, loyalty,
open communication, and respect between a leader and an employee.
In high-quality relationships, employees perform tasks beyond their job descriptions.
Low LMX is characterized by low trust, respect, obligation, and mutual support.
In low-quality relationships, the leader provides less attention and latitude to employees.
Employees do only what their job descriptions and formal role requirements demand of them.
Individuals who are treated favourably by others feel obliged to reciprocate by responding
positively and returning that favourable treatment in some manner.
Employees in a high-quality relationship with their supervisor will reciprocate with extra effort
and higher commitment and performance.
Employees with higher quality LMX have higher self-efficacy, more positive work attitudes, and
higher OCB, job performance, creativity, and career outcomes.
The relationship between LMX and performance and OCB is primarily due to greater levels of
trust.
Higher-quality LMX relationships result in positive outcomes for leaders, employees, work units,
and organization.
Greater LMX differentiation can be detrimental to group harmony and processes which can
harmful to group performance.
Leaders should try to develop fair and high-quality relationships with all of their employees.
Transactional Leadership
Management by Exception
o Leadership that involves the leader taking corrective action on the basis of the result of
leader-follower transactions.
o The leader monitors behaviour, anticipates problems, and takes corrective actions
before the behaviour creates serious problems.
Transformational Leadership
Transformational leadership is leadership that provides followers with a new vision that instills
true commitment.
Transformational leaders change the beliefs and attitudes of followers to correspond with a new
vision and motivates them to achieve performance beyond expectation.
Transformational Leaders
Popular examples of transformational leaders: Herb Kelleher, Michael Eisner, Steven Jobs, Carly
Fiorina, and Coach Boon.
Transformational leaders are usually good at the transactional aspect of clarifying the paths to
goals and rewarding goo performance.
What are the behaviours of transformational leaders who encourage considerable effort and
dedication on the part of followers?
o Charisma
The ability to command strong loyalty and devotion from followers and this
have the potential for strong influence among them.
This is the most important aspect of transformational leadership.
Charisma provides the emotional aspect of transformational leadership.
The emergence of charisma is a complex function of traits, behaviours, and
being in the right place at the right time.
Leadership research has begun to focus on new styles of leadership that emphasize ethical and
morel leader behaviour.
These new forms of leadership represent what has been described as positive leadership.
Positive leadership focuses on leader behaviours and interpersonal dynamics that increase
followers’ confidence and result in positive outcomes and include:
o Empowering leadership (sharing power and participating)
Empowering leadership involves implementing conditions that enable power to
be shared with employees.
Empowering leaders provide participation and autonomy in decision making.
Employees experience a state of psychological empowerment that consists of
feelings of meaning, competence, self-determination, and impact.
Empowering leadership provides employees with a greater feeling of control
over their work and a sense that they can make a difference in their
organization’s effectiveness.
Empowering leadership has been found to be positively related to high self-
efficacy and adaptability, job performance, and creativity relevant behaviours.
Syed Ahad Rizvi Leadership MHR405 Chapter 9
Men leaders engaged in more management by exception and laissez-faire leadership which is a
passive form of leadership that involves avoidance or absence of leadership and is negatively
related to leader effectiveness.
These findings attest to the ability of women to be highly effective leaders.
So, do men and women differ in leadership effectiveness?
A review of 95 studies found that there are some differences in certain situations such as
whether an organization is male or female dominated.
Men are perceived as more effective in organizations that are masculine and male dominated;
women are perceived as more effective in organizations that are feminine and female-
dominated.
When these factors are considered, men and women do not differ in perceived leadership
effectiveness.
Prejudice against female leaders is the result of an incongruity between the perceived
requirements of leadership roles.
Leaders are perceived as similar to men and not very similar to women.
Men are perceived as having agentic traits while women are perceived as having communal
traits.
Agentic and Communal Traits
o Men are perceived as having agentic traits, which convey assertion and control and are
generally associated with effective leadership.
o Women are perceived as having communal traits, which convey a concern for the
compassionate treatment of others.
o Males, but not females, are perceived as having traits that are associated with
leadership.
Syed Ahad Rizvi Leadership MHR405 Chapter 9
Identified nine cultural dimensions that distinguish one society from another.
Based on these cultural dimensions, they identified 10 culture clusters.
o The culture clusters differ with respect to how they score on the nine cultural
dimensions.
Syed Ahad Rizvi Leadership MHR405 Chapter 9
GLOBE wanted to know if the same attributes that lead to successful leadership in once country
lead to success in other countries.
Citizens in each nation have implicit assumptions regarding requisite leadership qualities,
something known as implicit leadership theory.
Implicit Leadership Theory
o A theory that states that individuals hold a set of beliefs about the kinds of attributes,
personality characteristics, skills, and behaviours that contribute to or impede
outstanding leadership.
o Culturally endorsed implicit leadership theory (CLT) refers to belief systems that are
shared among individuals in common cultures.
Global Leadership Dimensions
o Global leadership dimensions that are contributors to or inhibitors of outstanding
leadership:
Charismatic/Value-based, team-oriented, participative, humane-oriented,
autonomous, self-protective.
o Leadership problems for each national culture and clusters of cultures were created
based on scored on the six global leadership dimensions.
o Cultures and clusters differ significantly on all six of the global leadership dimensions.
o Canada and the U.S. score high on the charismatic/value-based, participative, and
human-oriented dimensions, and low on the self-protective dimension, and medium on
the team-oriented and autonomous decisions.
Syed Ahad Rizvi Leadership MHR405 Chapter 9
Leader Attributes
o Many leader attributes such as being honest, decisive, motivational, and dynamic were
found to be universally desirable and believed to facilitate outstanding leadership in all
GLOBE countries.
o Some leader attributes such as being loners, irritable, egocentric, and ruthless are
ineffective in all GLOBE countries.
o Some attributes are culturally contingent – they are effective in some cultures but are
either ineffective or dysfunctional in others.
The results of the GLOBE project show that while there are similarities across cultures in terms
of what are considered to be desirable and undesirable leadership attributes, there are also
important differences.
Managers need to understand the similarities and differences in what makes someone an
effective leader across cultures if they are to be effective global leaders.
Globe Leadership
o Duality
Duality means that global leaders must be able to manage uncertainty and
balance global and local tensions.
o Savvy
Global leaders need to have business and organization savvy.
They need to understand the conditions they face in different countries and be
informed of their organization’s capabilities and international ventures.
Individuals with the potential to become global leaders:
o Have experience working of living in different cultures.
o Speak more than one language.
o Have an aptitude for global business.
Becoming an effective global leader requires extensive training that consists of:
o Travel to foreign countries
o Teamwork with members of diverse backgrounds
o Formal training programs
o Transfer and overseas assignments
Long-term international assignments are considered to be especially effective.
Many organizations do not have enough global leaders now or for the future and they do not
have a system in place for developing them.
Certain countries produce more global leaders than others.
Countries that are considered to be the most global in terms of their involvement in the world
trade and investment such as Canada, tend to produce more global leaders than others given
their size.
They are middle-economy countries that are dependent on foreign trade.
Living in a multicultural environment like Canada is excellent preparation for becoming a global
manager.