Bridge Plan

CHAPTER 6
BRIDGE PLAN
The Project for Study on the Improvement of Existing
E Bridges
Final Report
6. BRIDGE PLAN
6.1 Basic Policy of Bridge Replacement

R Plan
6.1.1 Bridge Planning
The standard design off bridge includes superstructure, substructure, foundation

f and
approach road are determiined based on the bridge inspection data collected through the
survey. The type and dimen
nsion of standard design refer to the drawing colleccted through the
“Strengthening of Construcction Quality Control Project by JICA” (hereinafteer referred to as
the quality control projectt). The standard design would be planned in a way that the
construction technology, an
nd construction material suitable for the capability
y of Cambodian
contractors.
6.1.2 Superstructure
(1) Bridge width
A bridge width with 9 m (traffic lane 7m) includes shoulder. is applied as standard
s bridge
width for the study as shown
n in Figure 6-1.
Number of lane: Two (2)

Width (m) : 1.0+7.0+
+1.0 m
Figure 6-1 Bridge width
(2) Bridge length
Bridge length(Lp) will be determined taken into account a data of the existin
ng bridge in the
bridge inventory, The bridgee length is determined by the existing bridge lengtth and HWL of
the bridge. For instance, if the
t HWL will be 1.0m high above the bridge elev
vation, the new
bridge length will be planneed three times longer than existing bridge length
h. The expected
new bridge length will be determined as follows.
6-1
The Project for Study on the Improvement of Existing Bridges
Final Report
Lp(m)=L*3.0 HWL=GH+1.0m (3 times of the existing bridge length L) (0.75m<HWL 2.0m)

Lp(m)=L*2.0 HWL=GH+0.5m (2 times of the existing bridge length L) (0.25m<HWL 0.75m)
Lp(m)=L*1.5 HWL=GH (1.5 times of the existing bridge length L) (0.0m<HWL 0.25m)
Lp(m)=L HWL< girder under surface (HWL 0.0m)
Where;
L : Length of existing bridge
Lp : Length of replacement bridge
HWL : High water level from the elevation of existing bridge
Figure 6-2 Relationship between existing bridge and replaced bridge
(3) Bridge type and span length
Take into consider the capability of the local contractor, the bridge type conform to the
bridge span are proposed as follows.
RC Flat Slab Bridge : L = 10 m

RCDG Bridge : L = 15 m to 20 m
PC Hollow Slab Bridge : L = 20 m
Note: PC hollow slab bridge will be adopted if the construction site is near Phnom Pen (within
a100km radius of the fabrication site),RCDG: Reinforced Concrete Deck Slab
6-2
Final Report
(4) Bridge accessories
Bridge accessories would be determined based on the drawings collected through the
Quality Control Project.
1) Hand Rail : Reinforced Concrete Handrail

2) Drainage : Pipe drain
3) Expansion : Reinforced by steel at corner of slab
4) Bearing : Elastomeric bearing
5) Wearing Surface : Concrete (Asphalt : in case that the superstructure is PC Hollow
Slab Bridge)
6.1.3 Substructure
The dimension of substructure will be determined based on the bridge inventory data as
follows:
(1) Height of abutment (HA)
HA(m)= Maximum height(5.0m)
(2) Height of Pier (HP)
HP(m) = GL + HWL + AL + GRL + BH

Where;
GL : Maximum clearance of the existing bridge (survey)
HWL : High water level from the elevation of existing bridge (survey)
GDH : Girder height (planning)
AL : Allowable clearance from HWL to bottom of planned bridge (1.0m)
GRL : Distance between surfaces of ground to the top of footing (1.0m)
BH : Thickness of footing (planning)
Hp 8.0m
8.0m<Hp
Figure 6-3 Pier type
6-3
E Bridges
Final Report
6.1.4 Foundation
Bridge foundation type an

nd length of pile would be determined based on the geological
features at the river bed or neear the river.
Table 6-1 Foundation type
River Bed
d condition Foundation Type (Pile length)
1 Fine aggregate(0.35mm or less) RC square pile (L=20m)
2 Coarse aggregate(0.35-2mm) RC square pile (L=15m)
3 Gravel(22-75mm) RC square pile (L=10m)
4 Boulder(75-300mm) Spread foundation
5 Rock(More than
t 300mm) Spread foundation
6.1.5 Approach Road
The length of the approacch road are determined based on the geographicaal feature at the
bridge site and set as followss.
Parabola L(m)
(1) Length of approach road
1) Flat plane 4.0m

LF(m)=(PH-GH)x200/I
I : Slope 4.0%
2) Gentle hill
LG(m)=1/2LF (m)
3) Steep mountain
LS(m)=0.0
Figure 6-4 Approach road
(2) Length of approach slab
LL=4.0m
(3) Width of approach road
Figure 6-5
6 Standard width of approach road
6-4
E Bridges
Final Report
6.1.6 Protective and preventive measures
As a result of site investtigation in February 2012, serious damages or faillures of bridges

b scouring around bridge abutments and piers. They need to
have been found caused by
o recover from the harmful effects caused by the flooding of 2011
undergo proper measures to
and it is necessary to reinfo
orce durability of the slope protection. Gabion matttress is applied
for a score prevention and slope
s protection in this study.
Figure 6-66 Slope protection and scour prevention
6.1.7 Temporary detour duringg the construction of new bridge
Case1: Height of the road

d surface from river bed is less than 5m
Embankment is co
onstructed beside a new bridge as detour
Case2: Height of road su

urface from river bed is larger than 5m
Temporally bridgee is constructed beside a new bridge as a detour.
6-5
E Bridges
Final Report
6.1.8 Standard Drawings
General drawings of each

h type of bridges are shown in the Figure 6-7 to Fig
gure 6-9.
Figgure 6-7 RC Flat Slab Bridge
6-6
E Bridges
Final Report
Figure 6-8 RCDG Bridge
6-7
E Bridges
Final Report
Figure 6-9
6 Pretension Hollow Slab Bridge
6-8
Final Report
6.2 Target Bridges to be Replaced with First Priority

(1) List of Bridges on the Group1 and Group2
The selected 47 bridges are located along NR1 and NR7 are shown in Figure 6-10. An
example of the dimensions and properties of bridges are listed in Table Serial from No.1 to
No.47.
Figure 6-10 Location of the Bridges
6-9
Final Report
Serial No. 1
Road No. 11 Coordinate
Bridge No. 2 North Latitude 11 23' 23.3"
Distance from PP 1) 49.04 km East Longitude 105 19' 58.6"
Replacement Bridge Existing Condition of the Bridge
Superstructure
Bridge Type PC Hollow Bridge Type Steel Truss
Bridge Length 80.0 m Bridge Length 79.9 m
No. of Span 4 Span Length 15.5+48.85+15.55 m
Width 9.90 m Width 6.30 m
Grand Surface 2) 0m Particle Size Fine aggregate
Pier
Pier Type Single Column
Height 18.0 m
Foundation Type Pile (φ500)
Pile Length 20.0 m
Abutment
Abutment Type Inverted-T
Height 5.0 m
Foundation Type Pile (□400*400)
Pile Length 20.0 m
Serial No. 2
Distance from PP 1) 49.39 km East Longitude 105 20' 25.1"
Superstructure
Bridge Type PC Hollow Bridge Type Steel Truss
2)
Grand Surface 0m Particle Size Fine aggregate
Pier
Height 16.0 m
Pile Length 20.0 m
Abutment
Height 5.0 m
Foundation Type Pile (□400*400)
Pile Length 20.0 m
*Notes : 1) Distance from Phnom Penh to the bridge construction site
2) New road surface height from existing road surface
6-10
Final Report
Serial No. 3
Distance from PP 1) 61.85km East Longitude 105 16' 00.7"
Superstructure
Bridge Type PC Hollow Bridge Type Bailey
No. of Span 5 Span Length 4@21.0 m
Grand Surface 2) 0.93 m Particle Size Fine aggregate
Pier
Height 10.0 m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0 m
Foundation Type Pile(□400*400)
Pile Length 20.0 m
Serial No. 4
Superstructure
Bridge Length 75.0m Bridge Length 75.0m
No. of Span 4 Span Length 9.0+5@12.0+6.0 m
2)
Grand Surface 1.53m Particle Size Fine aggregate
Pier
Height 12.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-11
Final Report
Serial No. 5
Superstructure
Bridge Type RCDG Bridge Type Bailey
Bridge Length 150.0m Bridge Length 150.0km
No. of Span 8 Span Length 3@21.0+24.0+3@21.0 m
Width 9.90 m Width 5.36m
Pier
Height 16.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Serial No. 6
Superstructure
No. of Span 2 Span Length 15.0+15.0 m
Width 9.90m Width 5.15m
2)
Pier
Height 16.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-12
Final Report
Serial No. 7
Superstructure
Pier
Height 10.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Serial No. 8
Superstructure
2)
Pier
Height 10.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-13
Final Report
Serial No. 9
Superstructure
No. of Span 6 Span Length 21.0+23.98+30.0+24.0+21.0m
Pier
Height 22.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Serial No. 10
Superstructure
No. of Span 8 Span Length (m) 21.96+24.0+2@30.0+24.0+20.98
2)
Pier
Height 22.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-14
Final Report
Serial No. 11
Superstructure
No. of Span 3 Span Length 27.0m
Grand Surface 2) 2.73m Particle Size Gravel
Pier
Height 10.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Serial No. 12
Superstructure
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Foundation Type None
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
6-15
Final Report
Serial No. 13
Superstructure
Bridge Type PC Hollow Bridge Type Steel Girder
Grand Surface 2) 1.03m Particle Size Fine aggregate
Pier
Height 14.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Serial No. 14
Road No. 314C Coordinate
Superstructure
2)
Pier
Pier Type Multi Column
Height 6.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-16
Final Report
Serial No. 15
Road No. 314D Coordinate
Superstructure
Pier
Height 8.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Serial No. 16
Road No. 316A Coordinate
Superstructure
2)
Pier
Height 6.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-17
Final Report
Serial No. 17
Superstructure
Grand Surface 2) 1.53m Particle Size Coarse aggregate
Pier
Height 8.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
Serial No. 18
Superstructure
2)
Grand Surface 1.03m Particle Size Coarse aggregate
Pier
Height 6.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
6-18
Final Report
Serial No. 19
Superstructure
Pier
Height 6.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
Serial No. 20
Superstructure
2)
Grand Surface 1.83m Particle Size Coarse aggregate
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
6-19
Final Report
Serial No. 21
Superstructure
Pier
Height 6.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
Serial No. 22
Road No. 373B Coordinate
Superstructure
Bridge Type RC Slab Bridge Type Concrete Wood deck
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
6-20
Final Report
Serial No. 23
1)
Distance from PP 152.81km East Longitude 106 15' 38.3"
Superstructure
Bridge Type RCDG Bridge Type None
Bridge Length 30.0m Bridge Length -
No. of Span 2 Span Length (m) -
Width 9.90m Width -
Pier
Height 6.0m
Pile Length 15.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Serial No. 24
Bridge No. 2 North Latitude 11 56 '56.9 "
Superstructure
Bridge Type RCDG Bridge Type Wood
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
6-21
Final Report
Serial No. 25
Superstructure
Bridge Type RC Slab Bridge Type Wood
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Serial No. 26
Superstructure
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
6-22
Final Report
Serial No. 27
Superstructure
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Serial No. 28
Superstructure
Pier
Height 8.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
6-23
Final Report
Serial No. 29
Superstructure
Grand Surface 2) 1.15 Particle Size Gravel
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Serial No. 30
Superstructure
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
6-24
Final Report
Serial No. 31
1)
Superstructure
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Serial No. 32
Superstructure
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
6-25
Final Report
Serial No. 33
1)
Superstructure
Pier
Height 6.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Serial No. 34
Superstructure
2)
Grand Surface 2.83m Particle Size Gravel
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
6-26
Final Report
Serial No. 35
Superstructure
Pier
Height 8.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 10.0m
Serial No. 36
Superstructure
2)
Pier
Height 14.0m
Foundation Type Pile(φ500)
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-27
Final Report
Serial No. 37
Superstructure
Bridge Type RCDG Bridge Type Steel Girder+Bailey+Girder
Pier
Height 14.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Serial No. 38
Superstructure
2)
Pier
Height 14.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-28
Final Report
Serial No. 39
Superstructure
Bridge Type RCDG Bridge Type Wood + Bailey
Pier
Height 14.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Serial No. 40
Superstructure
2)
Pier
Height 14.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-29
Final Report
Serial No. 41
Superstructure
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Serial No. 42
Superstructure
Bridge Type RCDG Bridge Type Steel Girder
2)
Pier
Height 14.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-30
Final Report
Serial No. 43
Superstructure
Pier
Pier Type None
Height -
Pile Length -
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Serial No. 44
Superstructure
No. of Span 2 Span Length 2.9+8.9+10.5+10.5 m
2)
Pier
Height 12.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-31
Final Report
Serial No. 45
Superstructure
Bridge Type RCDG Bridge Type Steel Girder + Bailey
Pier
Height 12.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0ｍ
Serial No. 46
Superstructure
2)
Pier
Height 10.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-32
Final Report
Serial No. 47
Superstructure
Pier
Height 10.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
Abutment
Height 5.0m
Pile Length 20.0m
6-33
E Bridges
Final Report
(2) Dimension of the Target bridges

b
Among 47 bridges, four bridges

b are shown as examples and they are shown
n in Figure 6-11
N on PR277, Bridge No.1 on PR314C, Bridge No.1 on PR373B,
to 6-14 . They are Bridge No.3
and Bridge No.1on PR373D
D respectively.
Figure 6-11 Plan of No3 Bridge on the Route No. 277
6-34
E Bridges
Final Report
Figure 6-12 Plan

P of No1 Bridge on the Route No. 314C
6-35
E Bridges
Final Report
Figure 6-13 Plan

P of No1 Bridge on the Route No. 373B
6-36
E Bridges
Final Report
Figure 6-14 Plan

P of No.1 Bridge on the Route No. 373D
6-37
Final Report
6.3 Construction Plan of the Bridge

6.3.1 Construction Method of the Bridges
Bridges being assumed as new bridge to be replaced in the Study are consisted of
reinforced concrete (RC) bridges with span lengths ranging from 10 to 20 metres and pre-
stressed concrete (PC) bridges. Since these bridges are commonly constructed in Cambodia,
so that ordinary construction methods are assumed. The ordinary construction methods
applied in this study are as follows:
(1) RC bridges
1) Construction on scaffolding (RC Flat Slab Bridge)

2) Girder erection by truck-crane (RCDG Bridge)
(2) PC bridges
1) Girder erection by truck-crane
New bridges are assumed to be constructed at the same location of the existing bridge
when the new road is located on the existing road.
In case that a new bridge is constructed at the same location as an existing one, the
construction sequence is described below.
A detour road will be constructed when the road elevation is less than 5 metres above the
riverbed. A temporary bridge will be constructed when the road elevation is more than 5
metres. No embankment and/or jetty are assumed as the temporary construction road
because most rivers are generally dry during the dry season. When the river flow is affected
by backflow of the Mekong River, a detour road or a temporary bridge will be constructed
on the upstream of the bridge. A schematic construction plan is shown in Figure 6-15.
When the river flow is not affected by backflow of the Mekong River, abovementioned
method may or may not be applied.
Stock yard and casting yard for concrete girders are assumed to be located within the right
of way (ROW) which is 50 metres wide.
100m River or Floodplain 100m
C: Potential Required
Temporary Construction Road

Width (ROW 50m)
Existing Road (Existing Bridge )New Bridge

Approach Approach
Road Road
Temporary Bridge or Embankment
Figure 6-15 Schematic Construction Plan
6-38
Final Report
6.3.2 Construction Schedule of the Bridges
An example of construction schedule is shown in Table 6-2, which assumes an RC bridge

with a bridge length of 30 metres (=2x15 metres), two abutments of pile foundation and one
pier of pile foundation. Estimated construction duration is 15.5 months.
Table 6-2 Example of Construction Schedule

Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Site Office Construction

Preparation (Detouring, Temporary
Bridge, Removal)
Foundation Construction
Substructure Construction
Superstructure Construction
Approach Road Construction
Demobilization
6.4 Cost Estimation of Bridges

6.4.1 Basis of Bridge Cost Estimation
Cost information was collected from the past bridge project which carried out by the
Government and donor countries. As a result of the study, it is fined that each unit costs of
the project were similar and more detailed information of the breakdown of unit cost by the
Government was available. Therefore, cost estimation is carried out based on the cost
information of the bridges which were funded by the Government. These bridges were
constructed by Road Infrastructure Department Bridge Unit (Hereinafter referred to as RID
Bridge Unit) and the HEC. The cost information is obtained from these groups. The
administration and supervising fee are not included in the construction cost.
Cost information for five (5) bridges and one (1) slope protection are as follows:
1) Project Cost Estimated List, Project Work 1 Concrete Bridge Construction NR11 Kampong
Cham Province, PK 127+800 with Length 30.00mx11.00m, Total Estimated Cost
1,512,578,000.00 Riel, Year 2012
2) Project Cost Estimated List, Project of Negotiation Project Works 1 Concrete Bridge
Construction Chrouy Pagoda Bridge Length 90.00mx8.00m Kandal Province, Kaosh Thum
Didtrict, Leuk Daek Village, Total Estimated Cost 4,994,000,000.00 Riel, Year 2011
3) Cost Estimated List, Post of Cost Negotiation, Park of H.E.Sor Keng Bridge Construction
Length 90m, Width 10.5m (5spanx18m), Location: AF Bridge(Stueng Sangke, Battembang
City), Total Cost: 4,560,000,000Riel, March, 2008
4) Cost Estimated List, Post of Cost Negotiation, Wat Kor Bridge Construction Work Length
90mx11m (5spanx18m), Project Location: Stueng Sangke, Battembang District, Battembang
Province, Total Project Cost: 4,889,000,000Riel, June, 2008
5) Cost Estimated List, Post of Negotiation Prek Chlung Bridge Construction Work, Length
137mx10.80m NR7 (PK277+822), Total Cost: 2,865,000,000 Riel, Year 2007
6) NR48 (PK268+830-PK269+290)
6-39
Final Report
6.4.2 Feature of Bridge Construction Funded by the Government of Cambodia
In case of construction is funded by the Government, the cost of construction equipment

owned by RID Bridge Unit and/or the HEC is not included in cost items, but only the lease
price for equipment not owned by the two groups is included as the equipment cost.
Therefore, construction cost consists of the direct cost, which includes those for materials,
fuel and labour, and the indirect costs. The indirect cost is calculated as a certain percentage
of the direct cost.
6.4.3 Calculation of Unit Costs
The five bridges were constructed over five years from 2007 and 2012. Price escalation
for materials, fuel and labour during the five years has been examined based on the cost
information. Table 6-3 shows price fluctuation of cement, sand, aggregates, fuel and labour.
Table 6-3 shows that costs of cement and labour gradually increase year by year, and that
costs of sand, aggregates, rebar and fuel remain almost the same.
Based on abovementioned cost study, price escalation should considered the duration of
the implementation program. The price escalation was estimated by the forecast of GDP
growth rate for short-term plan. The costs will be obtained by multiplying a factor in the unit
costs shown in Table 6-5. The multiplication factor of 1.41 will be used based on analysis on
the forecast of IMF database.
Table 6-3 Comparison of Unit Costs

Prek Chlung Park of H.E. Sor Chrouy Pagoda Road No.11 PK
Project Wat Kor Bridge
Bridge Keng Bridge Bridge 127+800 Bridge
Bridge Length 137mx10.8m 90mx10.5m 90mx11m 90mx8m 30mx11m
Year 2007 2008.3 2008.6 2011 2012
Cement (Riel/t) 354,825 360,000 406,700 430,000 434,600
Sand (Riel/m3) 37,350 48,000 49,800 20,000 20,000
Gravel (Riel/m3) 107,900 52,000 62,250 84,000 84,000
Re-Bar (Riel/t) 2,697,500 4,400,000 5,395,000 3,200,000 3,362,000
Disel (riel/lit) 3,200 4,150 5,700 4,600 5,100
Labor (Riel/day) 8,000 8,000 8,000 10,000 10,000
Construction Cost (Riel/m2) 1,853,204 4,593,968 4,938,384 6,816,932 4,583,570
Round Pile Casing
Note Existing Pier Use
Use for Pier
Constructed by HEC HEC HEC RID Bridge Unit RID Bridge Unit
Source: MPWT
6.4.4 Construction Costs of the Bridges on the Group1 and Group2
Material quantities of a newly constructed bridge will be calculated in accordance with the
standard design. Quantities of concrete and rebar are calculated and listed in the standard
design. These quantities are used for cost estimation of the target bridges.
Items for analyzing the construction costs for new bridges are as follows.
6-40
Final Report
(1) Bridges
1) Concrete
2) Rebar
3) Superstructure miscellaneous, such as bearings,
4) Expansion joints, etc.
5) Substructure miscellaneous, such as earthwork, scaffoldings, false work, signboards,
etc.
(2) Approach road
1) Earthwork
2) Pavement
(3) Revetment and rived bed protection
Revetment and river bed protection are calculated based on the gabion cost per square
metre derived from the cost information.
Results of the analysis on construction costs are shown in Table 6-5.
Table 6-4 shows unit costs. Table 6-6 shows construction costs of the bridges on the
Group1 and 2 estimated by the unit costs. The costs are not include administration and
supervising fee.
Table 6-4 Unit Costs
Bridge
Mater Concrete /m3 Rebar /t Miscellaneous /m2
ial 45Mpa 40Mpa Pile 32Mpa Structure Pile Super Sub
Riel 3,580,829 1,701,602 1,698,088 610,815 11,004,647 10,945,517 196,293 234,463
US$ 868 412 411 148 2,666 2,652 48 57
1US$=4,127.27 Riel
Road
Material Earth /m3 Pavement /m2 Gabion /m2 Temporary
Bridge /m2
Riel 37,554 142,025 337,334 4,748,381
US$ 9 34 82 1,150
1US$=4,127.27 Riel
6-41
Final Report
Table 6-5 Analysis of Construction Cost (USD)

Bridge on Park of H.E.
Chrouy Pagoda Wat Kor Prek Chlung Earth work
Project Name No.11 PK Sorkeng Average
Bridge Bridge Bridge on No.48
127+800 Bridge
Unit
Heavy Heavy Heavy Heavy
RID Bridge RID Bridge
Constructed by Equipment Equipment Equipment Equipment
Unit Unit
Center Center Center Center
1) Bridge
Concrete 45Mpa Riel/m3 - - - - 2,539,595 2,539,595
40Mpa Riel/m3 1,246,146 1,010,107 1,023,431 1,547,557 (850,396) 1,206,810
40Mpa(Pile) Riel/m3 1,245,965 1,010,147 1,023,431 1,537,730 (850,396) 1,204,318
32Mpa Riel/m3 478,656 387,749 - - - 433,202
Reinforce Bar Structure Riel/t 7,581,293 5,957,532 7,799,247 9,880,785 (4,562,664) 7,804,714
Pile Riel/t 7,581,847 5,789,234 7,799,247 9,880,784 (4,562,664) 7,762,778
Superstructure Miscellaneous Riel/m2 100,454 60,927 154,667 154,323 225,704 139,215
Substructure Miscellaneous Riel/m2 124,084 195,358 191,380 154,323 (32,467) 166,286
Pile Miscellaneous Riel/m - 1,179,651 - - - 1,179,651
2) Approch Road
Earth Riel/m3 11,999 26,074 31,273 39,219 24,603 26,634
Pavement Riel/m2 103,136 - 98,317 - - 100,727
3）Gabion
Gabion Riel/m2 293,244 293,244
Pier
Foundation PC Hollow
Note used Round Girder, Existing
and Casing Pier used
Pile.
Source: MPWT
Table 6-6 Construction Costs of the Bridges
Road Bridge Sub Total Road Bridge Cost Sub Total
Cost (USD)
No. No. (USD) No. No. (USD) (USD)
No.2 2,213,281 No.1 223,151
11 4,233,259
No.3 2,019,978 No.2 332,200
No.1 2,074,419 No.3 284,420
70 4,014,307
No.2 1,939,888 No.4 284,980
No.4 3,568,084 No.5 381,320
373D 3,301,477
No.5 1,059,957 No.6 700,781
No.6 1,319,739 No.7 265,982
73 14,441,352
No.7 1,163,920 No.9 270,778
No.8 3,273,284 No.10 280,758
No.16 4,056,368 No.12 277,107
No.3 1,076,648 No.2 824,145
277 1,447,291
No.4 370,643 375 No.3 328,309 1,773,503
279 No.7 3,170,040 3,170,040 No.4 621,049
314C No.1 1,033,501 1,033,501 No.1 1,049,340
314D No.1 508,472 508,472 No.2 1,375,449
316A No.1 591,837 591,837 No.3 1,262,579
No.1 582,900 No.4 2,183,318
No.2 510,055 No.5 1,471,081
372A No.3 517,637 2,452,042 No.6 596,511
377 13,371,630
No.4 324,716 No.7 1,000,005
No.5 516,734 No.8 370,706
373B No.1 316,660 316,660 No.9 838,725
No.10 1,437,826
No.11 893,045
No.12 893,045
Total 50,655,371
Source: Study Team
6-42

Bridge Plan

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Bridge Plan

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CHAPTER 6

6.1 Basic Policy of Bridge Replacement

The standard design off bridge includes superstructure, substructure, foundation

(1) Bridge width

Number of lane: Two (2)

Figure 6-1 Bridge width

(2) Bridge length

Lp(m)=L*3.0 HWL=GH+1.0m (3 times of the existing bridge length L) (0.75m<HWL 2.0m)

Figure 6-2 Relationship between existing bridge and replaced bridge

(3) Bridge type and span length

RC Flat Slab Bridge : L = 10 m

(4) Bridge accessories

1) Hand Rail : Reinforced Concrete Handrail

(1) Height of abutment (HA)

HA(m)= Maximum height(5.0m)

(2) Height of Pier (HP)

HP(m) = GL + HWL + AL + GRL + BH

Figure 6-3 Pier type

Bridge foundation type an

Table 6-1 Foundation type

6.1.5 Approach Road

1) Flat plane 4.0m

Figure 6-4 Approach road

(2) Length of approach slab

(3) Width of approach road

6.1.6 Protective and preventive measures

As a result of site investtigation in February 2012, serious damages or faillures of bridges

Figure 6-66 Slope protection and scour prevention

6.1.7 Temporary detour duringg the construction of new bridge

Case1: Height of the road

Case2: Height of road su

6.1.8 Standard Drawings

General drawings of each

Figgure 6-7 RC Flat Slab Bridge

Figure 6-8 RCDG Bridge

6.2 Target Bridges to be Replaced with First Priority

Figure 6-10 Location of the Bridges

(2) Dimension of the Target bridges

Among 47 bridges, four bridges

Figure 6-11 Plan of No3 Bridge on the Route No. 277

Figure 6-12 Plan

Figure 6-13 Plan

Figure 6-14 Plan

6.3 Construction Plan of the Bridge

1) Construction on scaffolding (RC Flat Slab Bridge)

1) Girder erection by truck-crane

Temporary Construction Road

Existing Road (Existing Bridge )New Bridge

Figure 6-15 Schematic Construction Plan

6.3.2 Construction Schedule of the Bridges

An example of construction schedule is shown in Table 6-2, which assumes an RC bridge

Table 6-2 Example of Construction Schedule

Site Office Construction

6.4 Cost Estimation of Bridges

6.4.2 Feature of Bridge Construction Funded by the Government of Cambodia

In case of construction is funded by the Government, the cost of construction equipment

6.4.3 Calculation of Unit Costs

Table 6-3 Comparison of Unit Costs

6.4.4 Construction Costs of the Bridges on the Group1 and Group2

(2) Approach road

(3) Revetment and rived bed protection

Table 6-5 Analysis of Construction Cost (USD)