Yagi Uda Antenna Design PDF

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Yagi-Uda Antenna Design

Muhammad Luqman Azmer, Abdul Mukhlishiina Lahuddin, Raja Ammar Akif Raja Ismail, Ahmad
Zaim Ali Mokhtar, Muhd Aizat, Muhammad Nawawi Mat Yusof

Abstract-This paper is related with the Yagi-


Uda Antenna (also known as a Yagi) is
another popular type of end-fire antenna
widely used in VHF and UHF bands (30
MHz to 3 GHz). We were given a task to
design an antenna that operate in range of
600-800MHz and it can reach at least 7dB
gain. We chose to design a Yagi-Uda Figure 2
Antenna.
The main feature of this type of antenna is that
I. INTRODUCTION it consists of three different element: the driven
element, reflector and director, as shown in
The Yagi-Uda Antenna (also known as a Yagi) Figure 2. Some people consider the Yagi-Uda
is another popular type of end-fire antenna
antenna an array, since it has more than one
widely used in VHF and UHF bands (30 MHz element. However, it has just one active
to 3 GHz) because of its simplicity, low cost element and feed port; all the other elements
and relatively high gain. The most noticeable (the reflector and director) are parasitic. Thus,
application is for home TV reception and these
some people consider it an elemental antenna
can be found on the rooftop of the house. A array. The main characteristics and design
typical one is shown in Figure 1. recommendations of these element into three
important parts which is the driven element
(feeder), the reflector and the directors.

The driven element (feeder) is the heart of


antenna. It determines the polarization and
central frequency of the antenna. For a dipole,
the recommended length is about 0.50 λ to
ensure good input impedance to a 50 Ω feed
line.

Figure 1 The reflector normally slightly longer than the


driven resonant element to force the radiated
Yagi and Uda were two Japanese professors energy towards the front. It exhibits an
who invented and studied this antenna in the inductive reactance. It has been found that there
1920’s. S. Uda made the first Yagi-Uda antenna is not much improvement by adding more
and published the result in Japanese in 1926 and reflectors to the antenna, thus there is only one
1927, and the designed was further developed reflector. The optimum spacing between the
and published in English by his colleague reflector and the driven element is between 0.15
Professor Yagi a year later. Since then a and 0.25 wavelength. The length of the reflector
significant of mount of work has been done has a large effect on the front to back ratio and
theoretically and experimentally. antenna input impedance.

The directors usually 10 to 20% shorter than the


resonant driven element and appear to direct the
radiation towards the front. They are of
capacitive reactance. The director to director
spacing is typically 0.25 to 0.35 wavelengths,
with larger spacing for longer arrays and
smaller spacing for shorter arrays. The number
of directors determines the maximum
achievable directivity and gain.

The special configuration (long reflector and


short directors) has made the Yagi-Uda
Figure 3
Antenna radiate as an end-fire antenna. The
simplest three element Yagi-Uda antenna (just
one director) already shows an acceptable end
fire antenna pattern. The radiation towards the
back seems to be blocked/reflected by the
longer element, but not just by the reflector; the
reflector and the director produce push and pull
effects on the radiation. Induced current are
generated on the parasitic element and form
traveling wave structure at the desired
frequency. The performance is determined by
the current distribution in each element and the Figure 4
phase velocity of the traveling wave.

Table 1 (in mm)

III. RESULT AND ANALYSIS

Return loss (S11)


Figure 2.1, Reflector, Driven Element and
S11 is a measure of how much power is
Directors repestively.
reflected back at the antenna port due to
II. DESIGN mismatch from the transmission line. When
connected to a network analyzer, S11 measures
The models (refer to Figure 3 and Figure 4) of the amount of energy returning to the analyzer
the Yagi-Uda antenna was designed by using – not what’s delivered to the antenna. The
CST simulation which implemented with the amount of energy that returns to the analyzer is
parameters value as shows in Table 1. All the directly affected by how well the antenna is
parameters have been tweak to get the best matched to the transmission line. A small S11
result. indicates a significant amount of energy has
been delivered to the antenna. S11 values are
measured in dB and are negative. S11 is also
sometimes referred to as return loss, which is
simply S11 but made positive instead (Return
Loss = - S11). So if the antenna Return Loss is
8 dB, S11 is -8 dB. The third and final method
to measure an antenna’s ability to accept power
is VSWR (voltage standing wave ratio).
VSWR evaluates the ratio of the peak
Figure 4
amplitude of the voltage of the wave on the
transmission line versus the minimum Based on S11 graph, the resonance frequency is
amplitude of the voltage of the wave. A VSWR 0.66 GHz as it have the highest gain which is
of 1 is ideal; this indicates that there is no 48dB. The operating bandwidth is between 0.6-
reflected power at the antenna port. When the 0.72 GHz as it have at least 10dB gain.
antenna and transmission line are not perfectly
matched, reflections at the antenna port travel Radiation Pattern
back towards the source and cause a standing
The radiation pattern of an antenna is a plot of
wave to form. The worse the mismatch, the
the far-field radiation properties of an antenna
larger the amplitude of these reflections. Based
as a function of the spatial co-ordinates which
on Figure 5 below, shows the result of the
are specified by the elevation angle (θ) and the
simulation with the applied parameters value.
azimuth angle (φ). More specifically it is a plot
of the power radiated from an antenna per unit
solid angle which is nothing but the radiation
intensity. It can be plotted as a 3D graph or as a
2D polar or Cartesian slice of this 3D graph. It
is an extremely parameter as it shows the
antenna’s directivity as well as gain at various
points in space. It serves as the signature of an
Figure 5 antenna and one look at it is often enough to
realize the antenna that produced it.
Bandwidth (sometimes just referred to as Because this parameter was so important to our
impedance bandwidth) refers to the range of software simulations we needed to understand
frequencies a given Return Loss can be it completely.
maintained. Since Return Loss is a
measurement of how much power the antenna 3-dB Beamwidth
accepts from the transmission line, the
The 3-dB beamwidth (or half-power
impedance of the antenna must match the
beamwidth) of an antenna is typically defined
impedance of the transmission line for
for each of the principal planes. The 3-dB
maximum power transfer. However the
beamwidth in each plane is defined as the angle
impedance of the antenna changes with
between the points in the main lobe that are
frequency, resulting in a limited range that the
down from the maximum gain by 3 dB. This is
antenna can be matched to the transmission
illustrated in Figure above. The 3-dB
line. The Bandwidth is a measure of this range.
beamwidth in the plot in this figure is shown as
Based on the Figure 4, shows the measurement
the angle between the two blue lines in the polar
of the bandwidth range, BW on the return loss
plot. In this example, the 3-dB beamwidth in
curve.
this plane is about 75.6 degrees. Antennas with
wide beamwidth typically have low gain and
antennas with narrow beamwidth tend to have
higher gain. Remember that gain is a measure IV. FUTHER ANALYSIS AND
of how much of the power is radiated in a given DISCUSSION
direction. So an antenna that directs most of its
energy into a narrow beam (at least in one Further Analysis is done for Yagi-Uda antenna
plane) will have a higher gain. to determine the behaviour of the antenna when
certain parameter is being changed.

First parameter being manipulated is the radius


of the element. The radius for our actual
designed antenna is 5mm. But when we change
the radius into 4mm the result is as shown in
Figure 7.

Figure 5, 3D radiation pattern from CST result


which shows a directional pattern.

Antenna plots are the road map for the antenna Figure 7
user. Plots tell you where power is being
radiated or received (since they are reciprocal). Figure 7 shows that the return loss of the
They also tell you how much degradation you antenna is at -40 dB and the resonance
can expect if the antenna is not aimed properly. frequency is at 0.66 GHz with the bandwidth
from 0.6 GHz to 0.72 GHz.
Sometimes it is desirable to communicate with
more than one station. Antenna plots will assist Compare to the actual result the return loss for
in the proper aiming of the antenna for optimum the when uses the 5mm radius is at -48 dB
performance on all the desired signals. The which the different is 8 dB whereas the
narrower the beamwidth, the greater the resonance frequency and the bandwidth remain
difficulty in properly aiming the antenna. the same.
Remember that weather phenomenon such as
wind may also affect antenna performance or Second parameter that has being manipulated is
dictate the type of antenna mounting. the distance between each element. The
parameter is changed into 0.2 time the
wavelength from the actual parameter and the
result is shown in Figure 8.

Figure 6, polar radiation pattern from CST


result. Figure 8

This Figure 2 shows that the return loss of the


antenna is at -24 dB which gives significant loss
in dB compare when changing the radius of the
elements. The resonance frequency and the between 600-800 MHz have been achieved. We
bandwidth still remain the same. have designed a Yagi-Uda antenna that operate
between 600-720 MHz (bandwidth) and have
The third parameter that has being manipulated 48dB gain at its resonance frequency (0.66
is length of driven element and all other GHz). By using CST Studio the parameters
elements. The length is change to 30% smaller have been tweak for antenna to achieve widest
from final design and the result is shown in bandwidth and highest gain. The optimum
Figure 9. radius for all elements is 0.5 mm. The optimum
driven element length is 0.468 x wavelength
(428.58 mm) which is 200.58 mm. The
optimum distance between elements is 0.26 x
wavelength.

VI. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank you everybody whose


involve in this project especially Dr. Mohd
Haizal Jamaluddin for guiding us throughout
this project.
Figure 9
REFERENCES
Figure 9 shows that the change in resonance and
the bandwidth which is 0.93 GHz and 0.85 to 1 Book
GHz respectively whereas the return loss is the 1. "Antenna and Wave Propagation”, U. A.
same as the actual result which is -48 dB. Bakshi, 1st Edition (2011).
2. "Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design”,
In this further analysis, we can conclude that the C. A. Balanis, 3rd Edition (2005).
change in radius has less changed in return loss 3. “Antenna Theory and Design”, W. L.
Stutzman, G. A. Thiele, 3rd Edition (2012).
compare to when changing the space between
the elements. But changing the length of driven
element has no effect to the return loss instead Website
it changes the resonance frequency and the
1. "Yagi-Uda Antenna", http://www.antenna-
bandwidth of the radiation.
theory.com/antennas/travelling/yagi.php
2. "Yagi-Uda antenna." Wikipedia.
V. CONCLUSION Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web.29 May
2015.
From the result, it can be conclude that the task 3. "Antenna (radio)." Wikipedia. Wikimedia
given which is to design an antenna that operate Foundation, n.d. 17 May 2015.

You might also like