Prioritization Sheet
ACTUAL
CRITERIA
1. Nature of the Problem
2. Modification of the
Problem
3. Preventive Potential
4. Salience of the Problem
TOTAL SCORE
2. Readiness for enhanced quality of food intake of Klein Faller
CRITERIA
1. Nature of the Problem
2. Modification of the
Problem
3. Preventive Potential
4. Salience of the Problem
TOTAL SCORE
COMPUTATION JUSTIFICATION
SCORE
(3/3) x 1 1 The problem is a wellness state.
The problem is greatly affected by the primary
caretakers’ knowledge on the right quantity
and quality of complementary foods for C. The
problem is easily modifiable since
(2/2) x 2 2 interventions are feasible in helping the
primary caretakers obtain the necessary
knowledge and skill in providing
complementary food that has the right
quantity and quality.
This is a wellness statement, thus, the family
has a current management regime for this
particular health problem. Interventions are
(3/3) x 1 1 needed to further enhance the caretakers’
ability (in both the knowledge and skill aspect)
to provide adequate nutrition in the form of
appropriate complementary foods.
The family recognizes the problem and is well
aware of the health risk associated (i.e.
inadequate nutrition) if this particular problem
(1/2) x 1 0.5 is not taken care of. However, since the family
is already practicing complementary feeding
with C, they see it as a condition not needing
immediate attention.
4.5
ACTUAL
COMPUTATION JUSTIFICATION
SCORE
(3/3) x 1 1 The problem is a wellness state.
The problem is greatly affected by the primary
caretakers’ knowledge on the appropriate
nutrition a toddler must achieve (specifically
the right quality of food). The problem is easily
(2/2) x 2 2
modifiable since interventions are feasible in
helping the primary caretakers obtain the
necessary knowledge and skill in providing
adequate nutrition to Klein.
This is a wellness statement, thus, the family
has a current management regime for this
particular health problem. Interventions are
(3/3) x 1 1
needed to further enhance the caretakers’
ability (in both the knowledge and skill aspect)
to provide adequate nutrition to K.
The family recognizes the problem and is well
aware of the health risk associated (i.e.
inadequate nutrition) if this particular problem
(1/2) x 1 0.5 is not taken care of. However, since Klein eats
table food together with the family, they see it
as a condition not needing immediate
attention.
4.5
 3. Readiness for enhanced family planning specifically in the use of Implanon
CRITERIA
1. Nature of the Problem
2. Modification of the
Problem
3. Preventive Potential
4. Salience of the Problem
TOTAL SCORE
4. Risk for bottle-feeding related conditions
CRITERIA
1. Nature of the Problem
2. Modification of the
Problem
3. Preventive Potential
4. Salience of the Problem
ACTUAL
COMPUTATION JUSTIFICATION
SCORE
(3/3) x 1 1 The problem is a wellness state.
The problem is greatly affected by the
vulnerable member of the family (K)
knowledge and skill in providing the proper
care/maintenance of a hormonal implant
(Implanon). However, interventions such as
health teachings can provide a solution to this
(2/2) x 2 2
particular problem. Moreover, there are
accessible community resources (Ortoll
Primary Reproductive Health Care Center UP-
PGH, Likhaan Center for Women’s Health,
Kahilum 1 Health Center to name a few)
where the client can avail healthcare services.
With adequate knowledge and skill in
providing the proper care/maintenance of a
(3/3) x 1 1 hormonal implant, the family can avoid having
an unexpected pregnancy, which can be a
possible stress point for the family.
- The family recognizes the problem and is
proactive in seeking health care and
performing interventions that will alleviate the
symptoms.
- Vulnerable member of the family (K)
(2/2) x 1 1
verbalized that whenever she feels hormonal
implant-related symptoms with unusual
severity/intensity/duration, she immediately
goes to the Ortoll Primary Reproductive
Health Care Center at UP-PGH.
5
ACTUAL
COMPUTATION JUSTIFICATION
SCORE
(2/3) x 1 0.66 The problem is a health threat.
The problem is greatly affected by the primary
caretakers’ knowledge on the various health
risks associated with bottle-feeding. Feasible
interventions (such as health teachings) can
(2/2) x 2 2
be done to provide a solution to this problem.
Moreover, interventions that aim to eliminate
and/or prevent these bottle-feeding health
related conditions has little to no cost.
With the newly acquired adequate knowledge
and skills of the primary caretakers, the risk of
bottle-feeding related conditions such as
(3/3) x 1 1
diarrheal diseases, early childhood caries and
even obesity can be eliminated and/or
prevented.
(0/2) x 1 0 The family does not recognize the problem.
 TOTAL SCORE 3.66

5. Risk for recurrent respiratory tract infections

ACTUAL
CRITERIA COMPUTATION JUSTIFICATION
SCORE

1. Nature of the Problem (2/3) x 1 0.66 The problem is a health threat.

2. Modification of the
Problem
3. Preventive Potential
4. Salience of the Problem
The problem is partially modifiable since there
is an inadequacy in family resources both
physically and financially. However, there are
still feasible interventions that can be done
that will provide the primary caretakers with
the adequate knowledge in skills in preventing
(1/2) x 2 1
the recurrence of respiratory tract infections of
K and C. Moreover, accessible community
resources are also available for the family to
avail of; these include health care services
provided by the health centers the family goes
to (Kahilum 1 Health Center) and OPD-PGH.
With the newly acquired adequate knowledge
and skills of the primary caretakers, recurrent
(3/3) x 1 1
respiratory tract infections and its
complications can be prevented.
The family recognizes the problem but does
(1/2) x 1 0.5 not comprehend the magnitude of the
problem.

TOTAL SCORE 3.16