Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Annotated Review
Annotated Review
Then the article goes on to consider different affects disabilities can have on math
achievement. After examining the validity of the effects disability has on math
proficiency, the article features four approaches that improve results: systematic and
explicit instruction, self-instruction, peer tutoring, and visual representations. Systematic
and explicit instruction is a detailed instructional approach in which teachers guide
students through a defined instructional sequence. Self-instruction is the method in which
students learn to manage their own learning with specific prompting or solution-oriented
questions. Peer tutoring is an approach that involves pairing students together to learn or
practice on academic task, while visual representation refers to the use of manipulative,
pictures, number lines, and graphs of functions and relationships to teach mathematical
concepts.
Even though the article goes further in depth to talk about these instructional
approaches and how to apply them in the classroom setting in relation to students with
disabilities in mathematics, I believe that these are approaches that all students can
benefit from, not just those with disabilities. Every student will benefit from these
approaches as a tool to strengthen essential skills needed for proficient mathematics
performance.
However, in doing so, I think the best way to determine how you can best teach
math to your students is from choosing the right kind of instructional intervention that
supports the educational goals of those students based on age, needs, and abilities. Every
classroom and every child in the classroom is unique in its own way—displaying
different kind of needs and preferred methods of learning. Therefore, it is essential to
consider how well-matched any research actually is to your own situation and whether or
not a specific practice will be useful or appropriate for a particular classroom or child.
After determining the appropriate intervention for your class, teachers should implement
differentiation in instruction, keeping in mind the suggested approaches that were proven
to show results.
Work Cited
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final
report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Retrieved March 20, 2008, from the
U.S. Department of Education Web site:
http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf
Steedly, K., Dragoo, K., Arafeh, S., & Luke, S. (2008). Effective mathematics
instruction. 3(1), 1-12. Retrieved from http://nichcy.org/wp-
content/uploads/docs/eemath.pdf