Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 - Plane Elasticity PDF
2 - Plane Elasticity PDF
Main Reference: Theory of Elasticity, by S.P. Timoshenko and J.N. Goodier, McGraw-Hill,
New York. Chapters 2, 3, 4.
σ xx nx + τ xy n y = t x
τ xy nx + σ yy n y = t y
where tx and ty are components of the traction vector prescribed on the edge of the sheet, and nx
and ny are the components of the unit vector normal to the edge of the sheet. The above two
equations provide two conditions for the components of the stress tensor along the edge.
Semi-inverse method. We next go into the interior of the sheet. We already have obtained a full
set of governing equations for linear elasticity problems. No general approach exists to solve
these partial differential equations analytically, although numerical methods are readily available
to solve most elasticity problem. In this introductory course, in order to gain insight into solid
mechanics, we will make reasonable guesses of solutions, and see if they satisfy all the
governing equations. This trial-and-error approach has a name: it is called the semi-inverse
method.
It seems reasonable to guess that the stress field in the sheet only has nonzero components in its
plane: σ xx ,σ yy ,τ xy , and that the components out of plane vanish:
σ zz = τ xz = τ yz = 0 .
Furthermore, we guess that the in-plane stress components may vary with x and y, but are
independent of z. That is, the stress field in the sheet is described by three functions:
Will these guesses satisfy the governing equations of elasticity? Let us go through the equations
one by one.
1. Equilibrium equations. Using the guessed stress field, we reduce the three equilibrium
equations to two equations:
∂σ xx ∂τ xy ∂τ xy ∂σ yy
+ = 0, + =0.
∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y
These two equations by themselves are insufficient to determine the three functions.
2. Stress-strain relations. Given the guessed stress field, the 6 components of the strain field are
σ xx σ σ σ 2(1 + ν )
ε xx = − ν yy , ε yy = yy − ν xx , γ xy = τ xy
E E E E E
ν
ε zz = − (σ xx + σ yy ), γ xz = γ yz = 0 .
E
∂u ∂v ∂u ∂v
ε xx = , ε yy = , γ xy = +
∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x
∂w ∂u ∂w ∂v ∂w
ε zz = , γ xz = + , γ yz = + .
∂z ∂z ∂x ∂z ∂y
It seems reasonable to assume that the in-plane displacements u and v vary only with x and y, but
not with z. From these guesses, together with the conditions that γ xz = γ yz = 0 , we find that
∂w ∂w
= = 0.
∂x ∂y
∂σ xx ∂τ xy ∂τ xy ∂σ yy
+ = 0, + =0
∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y
σ xx σ σ σ 2 (1 + ν )
ε xx = − ν yy , ε yy = yy − ν xx , γ xy = τ xy
E E E E E
∂u ∂v ∂u ∂v
ε xx = , ε yy = , γ xy = + .
∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x
u ( x, y ) , v ( x, y ) , w = 0 .
(
σ zz = ν σ xx + σ yy . )
Furthermore, we have
1− ν2 ⎛ ν ⎞
ε xx =
1
E
(
σ xx − νσ yy − νσ zz = )
E
⎜⎝ σ xx −
1−ν
σ yy ⎟ ,
⎠
1− ν2 ⎛ ν ⎞
ε yy =
1
E
(
σ yy − νσ xx − νσ zz = )
E
⎜⎝ σ yy −
1−ν
σ xx ⎟ ,
⎠
2 (1 + ν )
γ xy = τ xy .
E
These three stress-strain relations look similar to those under the plane-stress conditions,
provided we make the following substitutions:
E ν
E= , ν= .
1−ν 2
1−ν
The quantity E is called the plane strain modulus. Finally, we also have the equilibrium
equations:
∂σ xx ∂τ xy ∂τ xy ∂σ yy
+ = 0, + =0.
∂x ∂y ∂x ∂y
From the forgoing, it is clear that plane stress and plane strain problems are described by the
same equations, as long as one uses the appropriate elastic constants. This also means that the
solution technique for both types of problems is the same. We make use of the following
calculus theorem:
A theorem in calculus. If two functions f ( x, y ) and g ( x, y ) satisfy the following relationship
∂f ∂g
= ,
∂x ∂y
∂A ∂A
f = , g= .
∂y ∂x
The Airy stress function. We now apply the above theorem to the equilibrium equations. From
the equation
∂σ xx ∂τ xy
+ =0,
∂x ∂y
∂A ∂A
σ xx = , τ xy = − .
∂y ∂x
∂τ xy ∂σ yy
+ =0,
∂x ∂y
we further deduce that that there exists a function B(x, y ), such that
∂B ∂B
σ yy = , τ xy = − .
∂x ∂y
Finally, from
∂A ∂B
= ,
∂x ∂y
∂φ ∂φ
A= , B= .
∂y ∂x
The function φ (x, y ) is known as the Airy stress function. The three components of the stress
field can now be represented by the stress function:
∂ 2φ ∂ 2φ ∂ 2φ
σ xx = ;σ yy = ;σ xy = .
∂y 2 ∂x 2 ∂x∂y
Using the stress-strain relations, we can also express the three components of strain field in terms
of the Airy stress function:
1 ⎛ ∂ 2φ ∂ 2φ ⎞ 1 ⎛ ∂ 2φ ∂ 2φ ⎞ 2 (1 + ν ) ∂ 2φ
ε xx = ⎜ 2 − ν 2 ⎟ ε yy = ⎜ 2 − ν 2 ⎟
, , γ = − .
E ⎝ ∂y ∂x ⎠ E ⎝ ∂x ∂y ⎠ ∂x∂y
xy
E
∂u ∂v ∂u ∂v
ε xx = , ε yy = , γ xy = + .
∂x ∂y ∂y ∂x
We derived the compatibility equation by eliminating the two displacements in the three strain
displacement relations to obtain the compatibility equation
∂ 2ε xx ∂ ε yy ∂ γ xy
2 2
+ = .
∂y 2 ∂x 2 ∂x∂y
Biharmonic equation. Inserting the expressions of the strains in terms of φ (x, y ) into the
compatibility equation, we obtain that
∂ 4φ ∂ 4φ ∂ 4φ
+ 2 + =0.
∂x 4 ∂x 2 ∂y 2 ∂y 4
⎛ ∂2 ∂ 2 ⎞ ⎛ ∂ 2φ ∂ 2φ ⎞
⎜⎝ ∂x 2 ∂y 2 ⎟⎠ ⎜⎝ ∂x 2 + ∂y 2 ⎟⎠ = 0 .
+
Because of its obvious similarity to the harmonic equation, it is called the biharmonic equation.
Thus, a procedure to solve a plane stress problem is to solve for φ (x, y ) from the above PDE,
and then calculate stresses and strains. After the strains are obtained, the displacement field can
be obtained by integrating the strain-displacement relations.
Solution: The material clearly deforms under the plane strain conditions. It is reasonable to guess
that the Airy stress function should take the form
φ ( x, y ) = f ( x ) cos ky .
d4 f 2
2 d f
4
− 2 k 2
+ k4 f = 0 .
dx dx
This is a homogenous ODE with constant coefficients. The solution must be of the form
f (x ) = eαx .
(α )
2
2
− k2 = 0.
The algebraic equation has double roots of α = −k , and double roots of α = + k . Consequently,
the general solution is of the form
f (x ) = Ae kx + Be − kx + Cxe kx + Dxe − kx ,
We expect that the stress field vanish as x → +∞ , so that the stress function should be of the
form
f (x ) = Be − kx + Dxe − kx .
We next determine the constants B and D by using the traction boundary conditions. The stress
fields are
∂ 2φ
σ xx =
∂y 2
( )
= − Be − kx + Dxe − kx k 2 cos ky
∂ 2φ ⎛ D ⎞
τ xy = − = ⎜ − Be − kx + e − kx − Dxe − kx ⎟k 2 sin ky
∂x∂y ⎝ k ⎠
∂φ ⎛
2
D ⎞
σ yy = 2 = ⎜ Be − kx − 2 e − kx + Dxe − kx ⎟k 2 cos ky
∂x ⎝ k ⎠
B = −σ 0 / k 2 , D = −σ 0 / k .
σ xx = σ 0 (1 + kx )e − kx cos ky
τ xy = −σ 0 kxe− kx sin ky
σ yy = σ 0 (1 − kx )e − kx cos ky
We have solved the problem where the traction on the boundary of a half space is given by a
simple cosine function. Through application of the superposition principle, which is valid for
linear elastic materials, it is now straightforward to extend this analysis to any periodic traction
distribution. Indeed, a periodic traction distribution can be written as a Fourier series each term
of which is of the form found in the previous problem.
σ xx + σ yy σ xx − σ yy
σ rr = + cos 2θ + τ xy sin 2θ
2 2
σ + σ yy σ xx − σ yy
σ θθ = xx − cos 2θ − τ xy sin 2θ
2 2
σ − σ yy
τ rθ = − xx sin 2θ + τ xy cos 2θ
2
2. Equations in polar coordinates. The Airy stress function is a function of the polar
coordinates, φ (r ,θ ). The stresses are expressed in terms of the Airy stress function:
∂ 2φ 1 ∂φ ∂ 2φ ∂ ⎛ ∂φ ⎞
σ rr = + , σ θθ = , τ rθ = − ⎜ ⎟
r ∂θ
2 2
r ∂r ∂r 2
∂r ⎝ r∂θ ⎠
⎛ ∂2 ∂ ∂ 2 ⎞⎛ ∂ 2φ ∂φ ∂ 2φ ⎞
⎜⎜ 2 + + 2 2 ⎟⎟⎜⎜ 2 + + 2 2 ⎟⎟ = 0 .
⎝ ∂r r∂r r ∂θ ⎠⎝ ∂r r∂r r ∂θ ⎠
The stress-strain relations in polar coordinates are similar to those in the rectangular coordinate
system:
σ rr σ σ σ 2(1 + ν )
ε rr = − ν θθ , ε θθ = θθ − ν rr , γ rθ = τ rθ
E E E E E
∂ur u ∂u ∂u ∂u u
ε rr = , ε θθ = r + θ , γ rθ = r + θ − θ .
∂r r r∂θ r∂θ ∂r r
3. A stress field symmetric about an axis. Let the Airy stress function be φ (r ). The biharmonic
equation becomes
⎛ d 2 1 d ⎞⎛ d 2φ 1 dφ ⎞
⎜⎜ 2 + ⎟⎜ + ⎟=0 .
⎝ dr r dr ⎟⎠⎜⎝ dr 2 r dr ⎟⎠
Each term in this equation has the same dimension in the independent variable r. Such an ODE is
known as an equi-dimensional equation. A solution to an equi-dimensional equation is of the
form
φ = rm .
m 2 (m − 2 ) .
2
The fourth order algebraic equation has a double root of 0 and a double root of 2. Consequently,
the general solution to the ODE is
φ (r ) = A log r + Br 2 log r + Cr 2 + D .
where A, B, C and D are constants of integration. The components of the stress field are
∂ 2φ 1 ∂φ A
σ rr = + = + B(1 + 2 log r )+ 2C ,
r ∂θ
2 2
r ∂r r 2
∂ 2φ A
σ θθ = 2 = − 2 + B(3 + 2 log r )+ 2C ,
∂r r
∂ ⎛ ∂φ ⎞
τ rθ = − ⎜ ⎟=0.
∂r ⎝ r∂θ ⎠
The contributions due to A and C are familiar: they are the same as the cylindrical Lamé
problem. For example, for a hole of radius a in an infinite sheet subject to a remote biaxial stress
S, the stress field in the sheet is
⎡ ⎛ a ⎞2 ⎤ ⎡ ⎛ a ⎞2 ⎤
σ rr = S ⎢1 − ⎜ ⎟ ⎥, σ θθ = S ⎢1 + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ .
⎣⎢ ⎝ r ⎠ ⎦⎥ ⎢⎣ ⎝ r ⎠ ⎦⎥
The stress concentration factor of this hole is 2. We may compare this problem with that of a
spherical cavity in an infinite elastic solid under remote tension:
⎡ ⎛ a ⎞3 ⎤ ⎡ 1 ⎛ a ⎞3 ⎤
σ rr = S ⎢1 − ⎜ ⎟ ⎥, σ θθ = S ⎢1 + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ .
⎢⎣ ⎝ r ⎠ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ 2 ⎝ r ⎠ ⎥⎦
A cut-and-weld operation. How about the contributions due to B? Let us study the stress field
(Timoshenko and Goodier, pp. 77-79)
1
ε rr = (σ rr − νσ θθ ) = B [(1 − 3ν )+ 2(1 − ν )log r ]
E E
1
ε θθ = (σ θθ − νσ rr ) = B [(3 − ν )+ 2(1 − ν )log r ]
E E
γ rθ = 0
∂ur u ∂u ∂u ∂u u
ε rr = , ε θθ = r + θ , γ rθ = r + θ − θ .
∂r r r∂θ r∂θ ∂r r
B
ur = [2(1 − ν )r log r − (1 + ν )r ]+ f (θ ),
E
4 Brθ
uθ = − ∫ f (θ )dθ + g (r ) ,
E
where g (r ) is another function still undetermined. Inserting the two displacements into the
expression
∂u r ∂uθ uθ
γ rθ = + − =0,
r∂θ ∂r r
In the equation, the left side is a function of θ , and the right side is a function of r.
Consequently, the both sides must equal a constant independent of r and θ , namely,
f ' (θ )+ ∫ f (θ )dθ = G
g (r )− rg ' (r ) = G
f (θ ) = H sin θ + K cos θ
g (r ) = Fr + G
B
ur = [2(1 − ν )r log r − (1 + ν )r ]+ H sin θ + K cos θ
E
.
4 Brθ
uθ = + Fr + H cos θ − K sin θ
E
Now we can give an interpretation of B. Imagine a ring, with a wedge of angle α cut off. The
ring with the missing wedge was then welded together. This operation requires that after a
rotation of a circle, the displacement is
uθ (2π ) − uθ (0) = αr
αE
B= .
8π
This cut-and-weld operation clearly introduces a stress field in the ring. The stress field is
axisymmetric, as given above.
4. A circular hole in an infinite sheet under remote shear. Remote from the hole, the sheet is
in a state of pure shear:
τ xy = S , σ xx = σ yy = 0 .
Recall that
∂ 2φ 1 ∂φ ∂ 2φ ∂ ⎛ ∂φ ⎞
σ rr = + , σ θθ = , τ rθ = − ⎜ ⎟.
r ∂θ
2 2
r ∂r ∂r 2
∂r ⎝ r∂θ ⎠
φ (r ,θ ) = f (r )sin 2θ .
⎛ d2 d 4 ⎞⎛ ∂ 2 f ∂f 4f ⎞
⎜⎜ 2 + − 2 ⎟⎟⎜⎜ 2 + − 2 ⎟⎟ = 0 .
⎝ dr rdr r ⎠⎝ ∂r r∂r r ⎠
A solution to this equi-dimensional ODE takes the form f (r ) = r m . Inserting this form into the
ODE, we obtain that
(( m − 2 ) 2
)( )
− 4 m2 − 4 = 0 .
The algebraic equation has four roots: 2, -2, 0, 4. Consequently, the stress function is
⎛ C ⎞
φ (r ,θ ) = ⎜ Ar 2 + Br 4 + 2 + D ⎟ sin 2θ .
⎝ r ⎠
∂ 2φ 1 ∂φ ⎛ 6C 4 D ⎞
σ rr = 2 2 + = −⎜ 2 A + 4 + 2 ⎟ sin 2θ
r ∂θ r ∂r ⎝ r r ⎠
∂ 2φ ⎛ 6C ⎞
σ θθ = = ⎜ 2 A + 12 Br 2 + 4 ⎟ sin 2θ
∂r 2
⎝ r ⎠
∂ ⎛ ∂φ ⎞ ⎛ 6C 2 D ⎞
τ rθ = − ⎜ ⎟ = ⎜ − 2 A − 6 Br + 4 + 2 ⎟ cos 2θ .
2
∂r ⎝ r∂θ ⎠ ⎝ r r ⎠
⎡ ⎛a⎞
4
⎛a⎞ ⎤
2
σ rr = S ⎢1 + 3⎜ ⎟ − 4⎜ ⎟ ⎥ sin 2θ
⎢⎣ ⎝r⎠ ⎝ r ⎠ ⎥⎦
⎡ ⎛a⎞ ⎤
4
σ θθ = − S ⎢1 + 3⎜ ⎟ ⎥ sin 2θ
⎢⎣ ⎝ r ⎠ ⎥⎦
⎡ ⎛a⎞
4
⎛a⎞ ⎤
2
τ rθ = S ⎢1 − 3⎜ ⎟ + 2⎜ ⎟ ⎥ cos 2θ
⎣⎢ ⎝r⎠ ⎝ r ⎠ ⎦⎥
5. A hole in an infinite sheet subject to a remote uniaxial stress. Use this as an example to
illustrate linear superposition. A state of uniaxial stress is a linear superposition of a state of pure
shear and a state of biaxial tension. The latter is the Lame problem. When the sheet is subject to
remote tension of magnitude S, the stress field in the sheet is given by
⎡ ⎛ a ⎞2 ⎤ ⎡ ⎛ a ⎞2 ⎤
σ rr = S ⎢1 − ⎜ ⎟ ⎥, σ θθ = S ⎢1 + ⎜ ⎟ ⎥ .
⎢⎣ ⎝ r ⎠ ⎥⎦ ⎢⎣ ⎝ r ⎠ ⎥⎦
Illustrate the superposition in figures. Show that under uniaxial tensile stress, the stress around
the hole has a concentration factor of 3. Under uniaxial compression, the material may split in
the loading direction.
6. A line force acting on the surface of a half space. A half space of an elastic material is
subject to a line force on its surface. Let P be the force per unit length. The half space lies in
x > 0 , and the force points in the direction of x. This problem has no length scale. Linearity and
dimensional considerations requires that the stress field take the form
P
σ ij (r , θ ) = g ij (θ ),
r
where g ij (θ ) are dimensionless functions of θ . We guess that the stress function takes the form
φ (r ) = rPf (θ ),
where f (θ ) is a dimensionless function of θ . (A homework problem will show that this guess
is not completely correct, but it suffices for the present problem.)
Inserting this form into the biharmonic equation, we obtain an ODE for f (θ ):
d2 f d4 f
f +2 + = 0.
dθ 2 dθ 4
Observe that r sin θ = y and r cos θ = x do not contribute to any stress, so we drop these two
terms. By the symmetry of the problem, we look for stress field symmetric about θ = 0 , so that
we will drop the term θ cos θ . Consequently, the stress function takes the form
φ (r , θ ) = rPCθ sin θ .
2CP cos θ
σ rr = , σ θθ = τ rθ = 0 .
r
2P 2P 2 2P
σ xx = − cos 4 θ , σ yy = − sin θ cos 2 θ , τ xy = − sin θ cos 3 θ
πx πx πx
ur = −
2P
cos θ log r −
(1 − ν )P θ sin θ
πE πE
uθ = −
2νP
sin θ +
2P
sin θ log r −
(1 − ν )P θ cos θ − (1 − ν )P sin θ
πE πE πE πE
7. Separation of variable. One can obtain many solutions by using the procedure of separation
of variable, assuming that
Formulas for stresses and displacements can be found on p. 205, Deformation of Elastic Solids,
by A.K. Mal and S.J. Singh.
A real-life example.
From: S. Ho, C. Hillman, F.F. Lange and Z. Suo, " Surface cracking in layers under biaxial,
residual compressive stress," J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 2353-2359 (1995).
In previous treatment of laminates, we have ignored edge effect. However, we also know that
edges are often the site for failure to initiate. Here is a phenomenon discovered in the lab of Fred
Lange at UCSB. A thin layer of material 1 was sandwiched in two thick blocks of material 2.
Material 1 has a smaller coefficient of thermal expansion than material 2, so that, upon cooling,
material 1 develops a biaxial compression in the plane of the laminate. The two blocks are nearly
stress free. Of course, these statements are only valid at a distance larger than the thickness of the
thin layer. It was observed in experiment that the thin layer cracked, as shown in Fig. 1.
It is clear from Fig. 2 that a tensile stress σ yy can develop near the edge. We would like to know
its magnitude, and how fast it decays as we go into the layer.
We analyze this problem by a linier superposition shown in Fig. 3. Let σ M be the magnitude of
the biaxial stress in the thin layer far from the edge. In Problem A, we apply a compressive
traction of magnitude σ M on the edge of the thin layer, so that the stress field in thin layer in
Problem A is the uniform biaxial stress in the thin layer, with no other stress components. In
problem B, we remover thermal expansion misfit, but applied a tensile traction on the edge of the
thin layer. The original problem is the superposition of Problem A and Problem B. Thus, the
residual stress field σ yy in the original problem is the same as the stress σ yy in Problem B.
With reference to Fig. 4, let us calculate the stress distribution σ yy (x,0 ). Recall that when a half
space is subject to a line force P, the stress is given by
2P 2
σ yy = − sin θ cos 2 θ .
πx
x
dη = dθ ,
cos 2 θ
2σ M ⎛ 1 ⎞
σ yy (x,0 ) = ⎜ β − sin 2 β ⎟ .
π ⎝ 2 ⎠
At the edge of the layer, x / t → 0 and β = π / 2 , so that σ yy (0,0 ) = σ M . Far from the edge,
t / x → 0,
3
σM ⎛ t ⎞
σ yy (x,0) → ⎜ ⎟ .
6π ⎝ x ⎠