entrepreneurs can

significantly
benefit from formal Unexpected
The lack of learning- growth can
business plans to set lead to unexpected
oriented planning and
objectives, generate and outcomes;
control systems Increasingas a major
Critical
Interesting evaluations
features of
that understanding the dynamics
No Topic BM
Authors business for
evaluate communicating
model
Previous changes
Research new cause
Approachesof crisis in SMEs’
tocommercial
Problem business
Bianchi, characterize
The
model eclectic
strategies, ofby the
theory
business;
monitor main of
and generated
growth
Static by
management;
perspective SME's
prevents
11 ESG Bivona induced
causes strategic
oftofailure in small model
and analysis
financial needs
policies to
on
entrepreneurship
Conventional
commit
initiatives their
are BM owner
Though
nascent
support only
strong learn
strategists from
evidence
entrepreneurs and
Bianchi
(2000) business growth sales revenues and
12 BMA
ESG / presented
structures
implementation,
difficult sinceby Verheul
are often
conventional et al. Interconnection
andlacking financial
exists forperformance
experimenting
decision-makers, supporting ofenabling
with and
the
their
Business (2002)
Grosser; Scholars
management
(2002)
of an and
provides
effective practitioners
a profitability,
entrepreneurship, onpicture;
one side,
internal
Dynamic
13 Model communicate
Serious
management games are
tools seen
(e.g., as not
value for
Business
them of
tobigger
game
Models basedand,
evaluate strategic as a
Business Jovy (2016) have
Cosenz; awith criticizedway
comprehensive
communication
different
convenient the adoption
framework
capability
stakeholders.
to and
These
Smallerthe
learning,
result, networking
approaches
(entrepreneurial
firms
research
identifying often the capital
generate
intention),
lack
most
14 Business SWOT tooanalysis, industry initiatives andon alternatives
(2017) of
Simulation in
and
On athe
which static
quality
experience external
other due
the perspective
hand,tomacro-
complex and
(1) a too valuable
and liquidity,
external
managerial
concerning insights
and the
intoother
(institutional)
their financial
impact BMfS,
on
Model Noto
Teplov analysis, portfolio analysis) effective
This
in underutilization
fluent environments may be
15 Business
Model in
Mainthe
level
static
and design
focus of
determinants,
empirical viewpoint
uncertain and
analysis this use
thatline
life-world of
of
formingof for
they small
factors do
resources; business
not
(e.g.
entrepreneurial fully
national
this owner
inhibits
intentions them
(DBM) Abdelkafi; cannot sufficiently capture strategies,
associatedwith especiallya lack in
of
for (2016) conventional
Despite stillthe Business
fact that BMfS where
ABMS there isthe little or no
16 Model
Simulation* Valuable
work
supply
prevents
conducted
the insights
rests
one
entrepreneur on
from into
the
inframing
an conceptualize
wealth
from
has
terms oflevel
using
been
understanding and
formal ofeconomic
neglected;
business control
how Whilst
to
Tauscher
Newbery; and
Model
is a depict the respective
representations.
promising research prior experience.
Sustainabilit (2016) concepts
implications
and
the
by demand
dynamic
other
environment for
scholarsfor individual
complexity
that protects of relationship
Most
growth)
systems.
previous works
sustainability
design remains
real between
that
world
and
conceptualmodels consider the on
17 ESG
y (BMfS) Lean; Moizer dynamic
Cannavacciu methodology
learning
business
(Hutchinson and
entrepreneurship,
sectors in and
the
and design
Ray of Assessing
com-pany,
EL as determined
understudied aits
new and venture's
customers,
by
is not
the student
complexity from key 1986;
risks, entrepreneurial
profitability
uponwhichABMSare
potential for experience
success is
18 ES (2014)
olo, et al entrepreneurship,
alternative
eventually
markets,
Robinson (2) approaches
affect
anda Pearce the
bounded to and the
exceptional
explained natural
bycircumstances
traditional
Shim; such as bankruptcy or1984; based.DesigningABMSinvolv
has beendue
difficult established
to the as one
limited
19 ES (2017) published
entrepreneurship
decision
focus onand
Sexton
emotional applications
process
financial
Van Auken
trauma, of whilst of such
environment.
ashaving
cognitive
factor failure,
analysis.
a opportunity
significant
Bliemel; es identifying essential
field availability of
orinformation
Choi (2017) ABMS
Cosenz education
parameters
1985) has
encouragingin this
individuals. that research
that are
demonstratedarebetter
reflection not recognition
positive causal creation
relationship of
20 BMS concepts
on these (e.g.
firms. agents,
As a result,
(2017) are
able few.
to
sufficient
the deal
perilsthe
through to with
explain
associated the
double-loop how breakthrough
withaa with entrepreneurial innovations.
Only
ongoing recently,
and papersgame objects,
situated subsidizers andand otherintent,
contexts) and
business
structured
learning may
of and become
iterative the
their effect of simulated
applying
nature ofABMS
learning. have begun stakeholders are often the
relationships, and
successful
sophisticated
play. andapproach
the different
to agents’
entrepreneurial
plausible experience
behavioral
to beinpublished reluctant to commit to novel
sources
P&C of value,in(3) a
SMEs. is unknown
rules that are consistent
entrepreneurship . ventures.
shortage of a selective with the literature.
approach to identify the
main variables underlying a
business activity
architecture in action, and
(4) a lack of a systemic
perspective in depicting
both business performance
management and
measurement

ESG Entrepreneurial Serious Games

BMA Business Model Analysis
BMI Business Model Innovation
ENT Entrepreneurship
ESG Entrepreneurial Simulation
Demonstrate how interactive
learning environments (ILEs)
matching system dynamics
The
(SD) aim
withofaccounting
the paper modelsis to Computational modeling
introduce
may support entrepreneurs and
Research computation
Objectives Shows simulation
Contributions
the usefulness of Methodology
modeling
Combining and an
conventional Small, micro
experiments
system dynamics family-
(especially
(SD) System Dynamics;
and
The
Prove other
main small business
objective
usefulness of of
SD thiskey- Moving from a static to a
experimental
Business Model simulation
schemas owned
using
models SD)firms
forfacilitate
supporting Accounting Models
System Dynamics;
actors
study
modelingisintounderstanding
build
into a modelP&Cto dynamic
approach
with System
processes as a SMEs'
Dynamics
originating from paperperspective
estimating
The
entrepreneurial the learning
presents a of Accounting Models
capture
Systems the relationship analysis, the System dynamics (SD)
complementary
modelling
growth strategiesresultsmethod
soaas toto novel
in consequences
perspective
processes in SME of growth
on
between
Investigate the use of a DBM
Provides a new approach methodology
System dynamics (SD)
address
Utilising
strategy dynamic
a complexity
quasi-experimental
design
foster diagnosis and tool that
policymay executing
entrepreneurial
management. strategic learning
entrepreneurship
inner
and logic
interactions ofand
ofpost-test
BMfS strategic may contribute
by design, perspective
initiatives
and offers on
given in
BMfS and
the tight methodology
pre-test
overcome
design. and several limitations Proposing aevidence
dynamic that System dynamics (SD)
external
integrating
initiatives, macro-level
different
businessthe overcoming
combines
models, micro-learning several
many
interdependencies insights
strategies
to explore macro-level
this study
related to assesses The proposed model
method of methodology
System dynamics (SD)
determinants,
perspectives andsystem
and Study
shortages
from forand
the the use
of developed
literature ofmodel
and
impactbusiness
aAnalysing
static
the of
view
possible
the
a model
oflong-term,
serious business
Business between
adopted
can be used
serious
business
entrepreneurship.
games
conventional not
BMin only to a
into Quasi-Experimental
methodology Design
levels
systemic
game while
elements.
on developing
implications of a coherent
elements.
in routine conceptual
business
Model
effects
graphical ofthe
entrepreneurs’
entrepreneurial
representation.
changes
representation in
routine that
build simple
entrepreneurship
representation
model that
transactions
models
doschemas.
uses
with
system
impact
(Pre - Test & Post
Socio-computational - Test)
intent
Suggest of afirst year
bibliometric
entrepreneurship supply-and- Novel
essentialframework
concepts, : but using SimVenture
approach using Agent-Based
Conceptualizing
supports
learning strategies and
thedesigning
design onofagent- education
BMfS. dynamics
the on are explored
notation.
undergraduate
method
demand
debating for
factors.
the students
design of an alsofirms’
Dynamic
to buildperformances
Business
more Model Bibliometric
Model method using
structural
studying
based business
models (ABMs)at a UK
in (survival
Canvas and
(DBMC);
complex models growth)
that as Business Model
Agent-Based Canvas
Model
innovative
properties BM
of framework
entrepreneurial well as on systemic
university.
entrepreneurship Overcoming several (BMC) + System Dynamics
that combines theresearch.
clusters. Business take a large number of
performances related to
shortages
concepts of their
and (SD)
Model the creation and
conventional
interrelations into BM
Canvas (BMC) with System diffusion
structures.
consideration.
Dynamics (SD) modelling. of innovation in firms
networks.
 way the mechanisms by
Use a single case study of an e- which the environmental
commerce
The application of multi- value proposition, value to
startup company and the Interactive
the customer, learning
and captured
Suuport participants in country data, although
Less of design of experimentsit Many
environment for Digital
understanding generalizability
enables of the case
the application
and statistical support; value can reinforce
of the more variables could
The eachStart
A conceptual
Based this specific model
onResults might
article be
to limited;
has various
also countries,
Limitation
shown how the Up growth
other;
ExpansionFuture --> The
ofevaluation
the system
Research
have
problem
learning objective;
framework describing
background, this paper Doesn't Learning
been
is because or
included many from a
of digital
Model explain
specificfocuses how
on to
inactivities in due to the importance ofat
Most
how
has significant
to build
outlined result inevitably
generic
an
results
factors that increased
sharply dynamic
instruments
startup
Further
model,
can't
research for
theoretical-conceptualget
aiming
serious
right
will be
Outline thetoadvantages measure
the
error German learning
rates, of
characterise market
compared result;
management andtopays
a the decision
more makers’
accurate capture
DBMof A
-analysis
SD(a)models
limits growth,
embodying database case studies games using
perspective;
learning from SD methods
feedback;
and
Within of the
disadvantages
this little atten-tion
tailored
complexity model in to current
based
SMEs on one
discourage required
cognition
of overall toin develop
the
national more
economic
(b)
The
the shifting
dynamic
financial the burden,
macro- from multiple industries and Connect computational
interpreted
computational as a global
country’s trends;
time-series applied
development knowledge of BMfS,on the
it can
intervention,
ABMS
and
The
level (c)isescalation
model
model
perspective increasingly
that
of
and to a systematic
market sectors can bedata;
replication of
first behaviour;
modeling
Involving
The
tomanagement
in entrepreneur’s
strategy
modeling tool
with aimed at
SD for Small
Social aspects
sample
approaches suchmight
size as be DBM
be approach
insightful
development to and
study itsthe
of specifically
motivational
regarded
connects as
four
entrepreneurship;
tailor them afactors
to viable
partial
a developed tocommonly
explore accounting
personal topics
attitudes and
or thewill
outlining
business
(personal formal
model
attitudes, employee
also
adopteda reason
in management,
for
bigger confusing
company effectiveness
mental
tailored models
country inofmodels
research
models:
The model
specific methodology
the
SME isfirm,
able the
to in a systematic way the demonstrate
nature of the its potential
decision
conceptual
analysis. certain regarding
aspects supporting
entrepreneurs entrepreneurial
and
The
that topological
perceived
fits the
environment, behavioural
characteristic
theof results
practice
effectiveness ofof
in introducing customer
the
this impact
SD of Future
approach undoubtedly
benefit
Modeling research increase
learning or inthe
should
capture
representations
properties
Analysis
control
features of
and of complex
the the
social -
satisfaction,
entrepreneurship
The
in serious
describing as
game
andwell as
used
improvingin this
making
initiatives
ABMS
managers
precision
therefore
processes.
and
research
ofthat business
in
operate
predictions
explore the inthe
and
decision
non-linear
how maker,
behaviour
an organization and as an
strategy additional
application of
design.
entrepreneurship the strategic
proposed
should
emerging
combination
networks)
entrepreneurshipnetwork
between
exerted are
no investors’
as well
research
start-up as is
BMs.behavior
set in the during
non-significant context theof businesses
enable
impacts better
of athat
rangestrive
understanding
of for
the customer
generated
operates that give
through
and creates the loss-generating planning
approach
Develop
have tool.
to
more
to games
be the analysis
applied
influenced
BMC
research.and
significant SD
To byinvigorate
the
modelling
change on acoefficients
Themanufacturing
proposed period
forbibliometric
cultural achieving
of national
serious amore
positive
specifics,
across impact
when
more
feedback
value. complete
loop. insight - of other
knowledge
approachable types on of
DBMC
by
learning
to
EI;
the enhance strategies
the
application of and regarding
variables;
business. exit strategies,
method does not entirely have on society,
different the
factors
educational economy,
may be of
in BMfS entrepreneurial
and its
novices effectiveness
in the ecosystems,
simulationin
decision
communication
It found
ABMS in making
that serious not been
Another included
limitation, in
which
remove subjectivity from the such and the
different
disciplines natural
importance
and contexts. for
themodel. as start-ups
supporting
methodology,
environment; and networks
entrepreneurial
that the
criteria
gaming firms
effectivenessas
entrepreneurship an use
of when
start-
initial EE prohibited
Limited user us
early steps of ABMS from
interface creating each specific economy
and
futuremakers’
activities
procedure and
researchmaycommunities.
business
add
can a layer
identify
choosing
up business
intervention
research, partners.
thisstrategy
decreased
study more precise tailored models,
is data communication
of
thevalidity checksstrategies,
contingencies to counter
that make
and,
EI. as
proposes a result,
that
certainprovide
subjectivity inchallenges
organizations building for
better
speed up themethod, availability
bibliometric researchers
ABMs.
prepared for anda transition to
acquisition
which can further of be practitioners.
BMfS;
subsidies
utilized toand design other
sources of funding.
ABMs, and analyzes comparison between
essential concepts. successful and less
successful transformations
to BMfS can provide key
insights into potential
contingencies.