Revised Kuppu Ses Scale

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Indian J Pediatr

DOI 10.1007/s12098-016-2223-y

COMMENTARY

Kuppuswamy’s Socio-Economic Status Scale: A Revision


of Occupation and Income Criteria for 2016
Mahesh R. Khairnar 1 & Umesh Wadgave 1 & Pranali V. Shimpi 2

Received: 19 July 2016 / Accepted: 17 August 2016


# Dr. K C Chaudhuri Foundation 2016

Socio-economic status (SES) is one of the most important along with assigned scored for each division have been
determinants of health of an individual and currently, it is presented in Table 2.
widely studied variable in public health and social science Income ranges lose their relevance following inflation
research. SES is an indicator of economic and sociological and resultant depreciation in the value of the rupee [3].
combined total measure of a person’s work experience and The value of the rupee is influenced by monetary infla-
of an individual’s or family’s economic and social position tion which means that the rupee does not retain the
in relation to others, based on income, education, and same value each year in terms of the goods/ services
occupation. that may be purchased with the same amount.
The most widely used scale for urban population is Therefore, it is needed to update the income criteria
Kuppuswamy Socio-economic scale which was given by regularly for socioeconomic classification of study pop-
Kuppuswamy in the year 1976 [1]. The original scale is ulations. The update is linked to the All India Consumer
based upon three components i.e., Occupation of the Price Index (CPI) [4]. Consumer Price Index (CPI) is an
head of the family, Education of the head of the family index of the variation in prices for retail goods and
and Total monthly income of the family from all services that households acquire for the purpose of con-
sources. The scale yields score of 3–29 and classifies sumption [5]. CPI numbers are widely used as a mac-
the study population into high, middle and low SES. roeconomic indicator of inflation. Labour Bureau, Govt.
Education criteria is not changeable; however a revision of India releases three CPI: CPI for Industrial Workers
is proposed in the occupation criteria of this scale as (CPI-IW) base 2001, CPI for Agricultural Labourers
Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (CPI-AL) base 1986–87 and CPI for Rural Labourers
has revised occupation description in 2004 (National (CPI-RL) base 1984–85 [6]. The most commonly used
Classification of Occupations - 2004) [2]. The revised and the most appropriate CPI for revision of socioeco-
occupational divisions along with subdivisions have nomic classifications has been CPI (IW) as it represents
been presented in Table 1 and occupational divisions the expenditure of a normal working class family [7].
The scale has been modified in the previous years by
many authors based on the values of CPI-IW for that
* Mahesh R. Khairnar particular year [8–11].
kmahesh222@gmail.com The authors have attempted to update the income
scale for May 2016 using corresponding CPI-IW.
1
Department of Public Health Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed Kuppuswamy original income groups of family for
University Dental College & Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India 1976 were based on 1960 as 100 (base). The prices
2
Department of Physiology, Lokamanya Tilak Municipal Medical for 2016 have increased manifold compared to 1960
College & Govt. Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India and that increase can be obtained by multiplying
Indian J Pediatr

Table 1 Revised Occupational Divisions along with sub-divisions (Source: National Classification of Occupations - 2004, Ministry of Skill
Development and Entrepreneurship)

Sr. No. Divisions of occupation Sub-divisions

1 Legislators, Senior Officials and Managers •Legislators and Senior Officials


•Corporate Managers
•General Managers
2 Professionals •Physical, Mathematical and Engineering Science Professionals
•Life Science and Health Professionals
•Teaching Professionals
•Other Professionals
3 Technicians and Associate Professionals •Physical and Engineering Science Associate Professionals
•Life Science and Health Associate Professionals
•Teaching Associate Professionals
•Other Associate Professionals
4 Clerks •Office Clerks
•Customer Services Clerks
5 Service Workers and Shop & Market Sales Workers •Personal and Protective Service Workers
•Models, Sales Persons and Demonstrators
6 Skilled Agricultural and Fishery Workers •Market Oriented Skilled Agricultural and Fishery Workers
•Subsistence Agricultural and Fishery Workers
7 Craft and Related Trades Workers •Extraction and Building Trades Workers
•Metal, Machinery and Related Trades Workers
•Precision, Handicraft, Printing and Related Trades Workers
•Other Craft and Related Trades Workers
8 Plant and Machine Operators and Assemblers •Stationary Plant and Related Operators
•Machine Operators and Assemblers
•Drivers and Mobile-Plant Operators
9 Elementary Occupations •Sales and Services Elementary Occupations
•Agricultural, Fishery and Related Labourers
•Labourers in Mining, Construction, Manufacturing and Transport
10 Workers not classified by occupations •New Workers Seeking Employment
•Workers Reporting Occupations Unidentifiable or Inadequately Described
•Workers Not Reporting Any Occupations

original income groups with current CPI prices with a similar income. Also, educational criteria need to be re-
multiplication factor (0.0735). The multiplication factor vised by using suitable survey method. CPI-IW as well as
(0.0735) is needed to convert the value of 1960 base to other CPI (CPI-AL and CPI-RL) do not encompass all the
the current base of 2001. CPI-IW (Base 2001 = 100) segments of the population residing in the country. Hence
shows the current price index as 275 on May 2016 [6]. their use in calculation of income ranges as such does not
reflect the true picture of the price behavior in the country.
Current income groups
To overcome this drawback, Central Statistics Office of
¼ Original family income groups of Kuppuswamy ð1976Þ
 Current consumer price index  0:0735 Ministry of Statistics and Programme started compiling
new series of CPI for the entire urban population, viz.
Hence, the current income groups are obtained as follows: CPI (Urban) base 2010, and CPI for the entire rural popu-
2000 × 275 × 0.0735 = 40,430. (Values rounded off to nearest lation, viz. CPI (Rural) base 2010 and combined CPI for
ten for the lower limits of the respective income groups). the Urban and Rural population having the base 2010,
Updated Kuppuswamy Socio-economic Status scale for which would reflect the changes in the price levels of var-
2016 considering updated occupational divisions and updated ious goods and services consumed by the urban and rural
income scale has been shown in Table 2. population [12]. Using these indices would probably give a
This scale has an inherent limitation that it considers the more accurate picture of socioeconomic status classifica-
total family income, but it does not take into account the tion for the entire urban and rural population and for the
family size. A small family with a particular income will country as a whole. These may be used when appropriate
have higher SES status than a bigger-sized family with linking factors are made available to link them to the
Indian J Pediatr

Table 2 Modified Kuppuswamy


socio-economic status scale, 2016 Sr. No. Education of the Head Score
1 Profession or Honours 7
2 Graduate 6
3 Intermediate or diploma 5
4 High school certificate 4
5 Middle school certificate 3
6 Primary school certificate 2
7 Illiterate 1

Sr. No. Occupation of the Head Score


1 Legislators, Senior Officials & Managers 10
2 Professionals 9
3 Technicians and Associate Professionals 8
4 Clerks 7
5 Skilled Workers and Shop & Market Sales Workers 6
6 Skilled Agricultural & Fishery Workers 5
7 Craft & Related Trade Workers 4
8 Plant & Machine Operators and Assemblers 3
9 Elementary Occupation 2
10 Unemployed 1

Sr. No. Monthly Family Income in Rs. (1976) Updated Monthly Family Score
Income in Rs. (2016)
1 ≥ 2000 ≥ 40,430 12
2 1000–1999 20,210–40,429 10
3 750–999 15,160–20,209 6
4 500–749 10,110–15,159 4
5 300–499 6060–10,109 3
6 101–299 2021–6059 2
7 ≤ 100 ≤ 2020 1

Sr. No. Score Socioeconomic Class


1 26–29 Upper (I)
2 16–25 Upper Middle (II)
3 11–15 Lower Middle (III)
4 5–10 Upper Lower (IV)
5 <5 Lower (V)

previously used series of CPI (IW) for a more accurate References


description of socioeconomic classification based on the
income of the individual study subject or family. 1. Kuppuswamy B. Manual of socioeconomic status (urban). 1st ed.
Delhi: Manasayan; 1981. p. 66–72.
Contributions MRK: Design & concept, definition of intellectual con- 2. National Classification of Occupations 2004, Ministry of Skill
tent, manuscript preparation; UW: Manuscript preparation and editing; Development and Entrepreneurship Available at: http://www.dget.
PVS: Literature search, manuscript editing and review. Dr. Rajesh nic.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/publication/1%20preface.pdf.
Koppikar, Professor & Head, Department of Periodontology, Bharati Accessed on 10 July 2016.
Vidyapeeth Deemed University Dental College & Hospital, Sangli, 3. Mishra D, Singh HP. Kuppuswamy’s socioeconomic status scale - a
Maharahstra, will act as guarantor for the paper. revision. Indian J Pediatr. 2003;70:273–4.
4. Sharma R, Saini NK. A critical appraisal of Kuppuswamy′s socio-
Compliance with Ethical Standards economic status scale in the present scenario. J Family Med Prim
Care. 2014;3:3–4.
Conflict of Interest None. 5. Open Government Data (OGD) Platform India. Consumer Price
Index, Govt. of India. Available at: https://data.gov.
Source of Funding None. in/keywords/consumer-price-index . Accessed on 10 July 2016.
Indian J Pediatr

6. Consumer Price Index Numbers for Industrial Workers - 9. Kumar N, Gupta N, Kishore J. Kuppuswamy′s socioeconomic
CPI(IW). Labour Bureau, Government of India. 2016. scale: updating income ranges for the year 2012. Indian J Public
Available at: http://labourbureau.nic.in/indnum.htm . Health. 2012;56:103–4.
Accessed 10 July 2016. 10. Bairwa M, Rajput M, Sachdeva S. Modified Kuppuswamy’s socio-
7. Patnaik I, Shah A, Veronese G. How to measure inflation in economic scale: social researcher should include updated income
India? New Delhi: National Institute of Public Finance and criteria, 2012. Indian J Community Med. 2013;38:185–6.
P o l i c y. 2 0 11 . Av a i l a b l e a t : h t t p : / / w w w. n i p f p . o r g . 11. Oberoi SS. Updating income ranges for Kuppuswamy’s socio-
in/media/medialibrary/2013/04/wp_2011_83.pdf. Accessed 10 economic status scale for the year 2014. Indian J Public Health.
July 2016. 2015;59:156–7.
8. Kumar N, Shekhar C, Kumar P, Kundu AS. Kuppuswamy′s socio- 12. Central Statistics Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme.
economic status scale- updating for 2007. Indian J Pediatr. 2007;74: Available at: http://mospi.nic.in/Mospi_New/upload/brochure_n_
1131–2. cpi18_feb11.pdf. Accessed on 10 July 2016.

You might also like