Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Beadenkopf 2011
Beadenkopf 2011
Beadenkopf 2011
2 2
Guidelines for Standard Approaches to
Dam Breach Inundation Mapping
Development of Guidelines for Standard Approaches to
Inundation Mapping of Flood Risk Associated with
Dam Incidents and Failures
BACKGROUND
Many states have limited and inconsistent guidelines for developing inundation
maps reflecting dam failure incidents
Dam breach inundation mapping may not contain the information Hazard
Mitigation Planners and Emergency Managers need for other uses of the
inundation mapping
FEMA is a leadership role with the National Dam Safety Program and the
National Dam Safety Review Board recommended that new consistent
guidance is needed to assist State Dam Safety Programs
3 3
Guidelines for Standard Approaches to
Dam Breach Inundation Mapping
To develop a draft FEMA publication
that will provide standardized guidance
for consistent development of
inundation studies, mapping and usage
of maps in hazard mitigation planning,
emergency management planning, and
consequence and loss estimation.
Objectives
Provide standardized modeling and mapping
guidance to support autonomous State Dam
Safety Programs
Support the NDSRB goal of 100% EAP
coverage by 2012
Support FEMA RiskMAP non regulatory
products
4 4
Guidelines for Standard Approaches to
Dam Breach Inundation Mapping
Status
Collection of data from State Dam Safety Programs
Completed Mar 2010
and Federal Agencies
Submission of Data Report with recommendations June 2010
5 5
Guidelines for Standard Approaches to
Dam Breach Inundation Mapping
Phase 1 enhancements
Based on input for States and NDSRB comments
Incorporate H&H modeling database structure and
mapping standards into the guidelines March 2011
Based on early demonstration project map products
developed with the State of Georgia and used in the Dam
Breach Consequences Task Order
Develop a GIS-based dam breach mapping software Dec ember 2011
based on a NWS program
6 6
Simplified Dam Break GIS Toolset
Develop a GIS-based modeling tool based on the widely
accepted NWS program
To model and map dam breach inundation zones
At 1/3 the effort of conventional unsteady HEC-RAS models
Leading to an increase in the number of EAP’s for significant and
high hazard dams
Offer as a PC-based tool and in association with the Dam
Breach Inundation Guidelines currently under development
Encourage State Dam Safety Programs to require Dam Owners to
prepare EAP’s
Incorporate a modeling database and mapping standards
into the Dam Breach Guidelines that result in digital
products useful to RiskMAP
7
Simplified Dam Break GIS Toolset
Step 1 – identify dam and river
User Input
DEM
Lake Polygon
Streamline
Tool Defined:
Lake volume
River stationing
8
Simplified Dam Break GIS Toolset
Step 2 – enter breach information
User Input
Dam type
Breach elevations
Breach width/time
(optional)
Tool Determines:
Breach parameters
9
Simplified Dam Break GIS Toolset
Step 3 –create cross sections
User Input
Cross section
lines
Manning’s
values
Tool
Determines:
Elevation/
Width pairs
Reach
lengths
10
Simplified Dam Break GIS Toolset
Step 4 – select outputs and run SMPDBK
SMPDBK geometry is
auto-generated and
SMPDBK run on the
fly in background
Outputs
automatically created
within GIS
User can import dam
breach inundation
datasets from other
sources
11
Simplified Dam Break GIS Toolset
Outputs – inundation delineation
12
Simplified Dam Break GIS Toolset
Output- standardized EAP map paneling scheme
13
Simplified Dam Break GIS Toolset
Output- standardized EAP maps
14
Relevance to Dam Break Analyses for
Tailings Dams
The Guidance Document will provide a compilation of dam breach
methods and technical resources that can be used to develop dam
breach models
The GIS-based SMDBK program is suited to Tailings Dams where
the breach is a sunny day failure
The simplified GIS breach tool can be a defendable first pass to
evaluate the impacts of multiple breach locations and inundation
zone flow paths
Depending on the consequences of failure a more detailed breach
study may be warranted and limited to select breech locations
Phase 2 tools would allow Owners/Engineers/Emergency
Managers to conduct consequence evaluations
15
QUESTIONS or COMMENTS
16 16