Employers and employees should treat each other with respect and not impair the interests of the public. When interpreting agreements or evidence in labor disputes, doubts should be resolved in favor of the worker based on social justice principles in the Constitution. For termination of an employee or lawyer to be valid, it requires proof of intentional and malicious conduct or just cause if a contract exists.
Employers and employees should treat each other with respect and not impair the interests of the public. When interpreting agreements or evidence in labor disputes, doubts should be resolved in favor of the worker based on social justice principles in the Constitution. For termination of an employee or lawyer to be valid, it requires proof of intentional and malicious conduct or just cause if a contract exists.
Employers and employees should treat each other with respect and not impair the interests of the public. When interpreting agreements or evidence in labor disputes, doubts should be resolved in favor of the worker based on social justice principles in the Constitution. For termination of an employee or lawyer to be valid, it requires proof of intentional and malicious conduct or just cause if a contract exists.
Employers and employees should treat each other with respect and not impair the interests of the public. When interpreting agreements or evidence in labor disputes, doubts should be resolved in favor of the worker based on social justice principles in the Constitution. For termination of an employee or lawyer to be valid, it requires proof of intentional and malicious conduct or just cause if a contract exists.
PT&T v. NLRC Neither capital nor labor should visit acts of oppression against the other, nor impair the interest or convenience of the public.
ART. 1702 CIVIL CODE
Colegio de San Juan de Letran-Calamba v. Villas In controversies between a laborer and his master, doubts reasonably arising from the evidence, or in the interpretation of agreements and writings should be resolved in the former’s favor.
Century Canning Corp. v. Ramil
In case of doubt, cases should be resolved in favor of labor, pursuant to the social justice policy of labor laws and the Constitution.
ART. 19 CIVIL CODE
Mata v. Agravante The common element under Articles 19 and 21 is that the act complained of must be intentional, and attended with malice or bad faith.
Czarina Malvar v. Kraft Foods
Although a client may dismiss her lawyer at any time, the dismissal must be for a justifiable cause if a written contract between the lawyer and the client exists.