Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Performance Measurement & Performance Management
Performance Measurement & Performance Management
Performance management
Saptarshi Saikia
Keywords:
Facilities management, Performance measurement, Performance management
Abstract:
"What you measure is the thing that you get" is a most loved maxim of numerous
an administration essayist. As most rehearsing administrators know, measures
drive the executives conduct, particularly on the off chance that they are
strengthened by remuneration frameworks. In any case, hardly any associations
have comprehended the significance of this association and managed these issues
in an all encompassing manner. It means fabricating new execution the executives
frameworks in parallel with new administration structures and reclassifying
obligation limits. This isn't a simple message for an estimation industry that trusts
it has the total arrangement. The article "The intensity of world-class execution
the executives: use it!" manages the key estimation issues, handles the
association issues worried about adjusting technique and practices, and portrays
the manner in which associations can acquire a world-class execution the board
procedure. The thoughts depicted in the article depend on a benchmark study as
of late performed by the writer at unmistakable, worldwide organizations, and
during ventures he performed, in the region of execution the board, at different
customers.
Introduction:
Conclusion:
The essential capacity of any presentation estimation framework is to
control authoritative tasks. It outfits a language for portraying desires
and execution, along these lines establishing the framework for
exchange on how every individual can add to satisfying the association's
vision. In this way, the exhibition estimation frameworks give a premise
to deciding the fitting endeavors in the general equalization and for
imparting such endeavors through administration control. Along these
lines, the utilization of execution estimation frameworks encourages
learning. The learning procedure places exceptional accentuation on how
various measures are between related. At both individual and
authoritative levels, a superior comprehension of the connection between
what is being done and how well the association succeeds will be
created. Obviously it is pivotal how the exhibition frameworks will
really be utilized. What is required is a suitable motivator structure and
down to earth courses of action for taking care of the data produced, so it
gets appealing and achievable to build up a lot of good practices,
subsequently changing execution estimation to execution the board.
Through a presentation the executives framework a FM association
screens the two its present execution (funds, consumer loyalty and
business procedure results) and its endeavors to improve forms, inspire
and teach workers, and upgrade data framework that is its capacity to
learn and improve.
Executing execution the executives ideas inside FM associations can
have a significant budgetary and authoritative effect on an endeavor. For
a presentation estimation framework to turn into an administration help
it ought to give an organized technique to utilizing execution estimation
data to help set settled upon execution objectives.
References:
Alexander, K. (1994), ``A strategy for facilities management'', Facilities,
Vol. 12 No. 11, pp. 6-10.
Alexander, K. (Ed.) (1996), Facilities Management: Theory and Practice, E
& FN Spon, London.
Amaratunga, D. (2001), ``Theory building in facilities management
performance measurement: application of some core performance
measurement and management principles'', unpublished PhD thesis,
University of Salford.
Amaratunga, D. and Baldry, D. (2000a), ``Assessment of facilities
management performance what next?'', Facilities, Vol. 18 No. 1/2, pp.
66-76.
Amaratunga, D. and Baldry, D. (2000b), Performance Measurement of
Higher Education Facilities: The Balanced Scorecard Approach, RICS
Research Paper series, ISBN/ISSN 0953 3761 17.
Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D. and Sarshar, M. (2000), ``Assessment of
facilities management performance in higher education properties'',
Facilities, Vol. 18 No. 7/8, pp. 293-301.
Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D. and Sarshar, M. (2001), ``Nature of facilities
management performance and its relationships to the core business'',
unpublished paper, The University of Salford.
Belcher, R.G. (1997), ``Corporate objectives, facilities, measurement
and use: a university model'', Proceedings of the RICS Cobra
Conference, Portsmouth.
Bititcti, U.S., Turner, T. and Begemann, C. (2000), ``Dynamics of
performance measurement systems'', International Journal of
Operations and Production Management, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 692-704.
Brignall, S. (1992), Performance Measurement Systems as Change
Agents: a Case for Further Research, Warwick Business School
Research Papers, No. 72, Warwick Business School Research
Bureau, Warwick.
British Institute of Facilities Management (2000), ``Facilities
introduction'', (on-line serial). Available at http://bifm.org.uk
Camarata, J.B. and Camarata, M.R. (2000), ``Towards an integrative
model: performance measurement in not-for-profit organisations'', in
Neely, A. (Ed.), Performance Measurement Past, Present and Future,
Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield School of Management.
Douglas, J. (1994), ``Developments in appraising the total performance of
buildings'', Structural Survey,
Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 10-15.
Featherstone, P. (1999), ``The application of effective facilities
management techniques to best optimis”.