Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Professional Practise
Professional Practise
2009-10
course code: BUSI1360
course title: Professional Practice
course leader: Egle Dagilyte
Contents
This course aims to help you explore the practice of reflection and
maximise your self-potential through contemporary means of
interaction: blog, log and final reflective report. You will be able to
discuss your work and learning with your peers and learn not only from
your own, but also from others’ experience.
The Professional Practice course has been designed to enable to do the following:
Be able to reflect on own personal learning experience and apply this knowledge to
a variety of situations;
Critically review the extent to which local, national and/or international perspectives
of specific areas of practice influence their professional judgement;
Maintain the use of computer moderated communications (CMC) to encourage
further collaboration;
Be able to assimilate material from different contexts and apply to new situations;
Critically evaluate and inter-relate knowledge acquired from a variety of sources;
Be able to draw up a report which provides an objective overview of your learning
experience.
To get the maximum benefit from this course you need to regularly take part in the online
discussions. If you participate, you will be pleasantly surprised at how interesting and
valuable this topic can be to you.
One final note: this course is partly directed, partly self-determined, but the responsibility
lies with you to manage your own learning experience. The more you put into the process
the more you will benefit. I will be here to facilitate your learning and to guide and support
you should you need it.
I hope that you will enjoy this course, and wish you every success as you commence your
managerial career.
Egle Dagilyte
Placement Supervisor
You have an academic supervisor for the duration of your placement, who will review your
contributions to the course and assess your reflective reports. You should raise any administrative
or personal problems you may face with your placement supervisor in the first instance.
Programme Coordinator
The programme coordinator is responsible for the smooth administration of programmes within the
Department. You may contact the programme coordinator if you are have problems with Banner, if
your grades are incorrectly listed, if you have been absent from class through illness or if you have
encountered difficulties making an appointment with your course tutor or course leader.
Your Role
It is your responsibility to undertake all of the work requested of you in this course (i.e. assessment,
reading and Seminar preparation). To do well in courses it is often necessary to make sure you go
beyond the minimum instructions (in reading for example) and that you ask questions or seek
advice if you don’t understand readings, lecturers, Seminar exercises or assessment.
It is also your responsibility to attend regularly or notify the programme coordinator if you are sick.
Please remember that although learning should be intellectually challenging it is important that
classes run smoothly so it is important not to be disruptive (e.g. chatting during classes, leaving
mobile phones on or being persistently late) and not to be impolite to other members of the class.
Finally, remember that your assessments should be your own work unless group work is allowed.
Plagiarism and similar forms of cheating will be punished and it is important not to engage in such
behaviour or to make it easy for other members of your class to cheat.
Please review the regulations governing suspected plagiarism and exam offences:
http://www.gre.ac.uk/students/affairs/rse/regs/documents/plagandeo2005-09-01_003.doc
3.1 Aims
Recent debate on the effectiveness of management education has highlighted the paramount
importance of collective, multidisciplinary, reflective practice to management development and
autonomous integrity. Critical reflection on practice, including different technical, social and
economic influences drawn from a local, national and/or international perspective, is a valuable
resource which can be used to build on professional judgement, professional autonomy and
promote agents of change. Consequently, this course focuses on reflective practice within the
context of the professional role. The use of computer moderated communications (CMC) as a
distance learning medium in the course provides a flexible means to facilitate the individual's
learning experiences, enrich the collaborative nature of practice and broaden the dialogue between
these professionals.
B. Intellectual Skills:
B2. Wisdom
Critically evaluate how the purposes and consequences of own acts (or omissions) can
constrain or promote autonomy;
D. Transferable Skills
Participants will also have access to their placement supervisor and course co-ordinator and will be
encouraged to use examples from practice and independent study of relevant texts to further
enhance this learning process. Individual learner's needs will be negotiated and facilitated through
the learning contract, delivered via e-mail.
The Business School provides a WebCT site for each of its courses. This site provides the basic
information you might need (course outline, electronic submission, communication tools, contact
details etc) and in many cases staff utilise the site more fully.
If you are properly enrolled on a course you should automatically gain access to it and simply need
to log on using your Greenwich username and password in the manner describe below.
If you are having problems accessing Business School sites you are properly enrolled on please
email esupport@gre.ac.uk and explain what the problem is to them.
6. All the courses you have been enrolled on should now be displayed.
Important: Ensure that you click ‘log out’ when you are ready to leave the WebCT
environment.
If you need help using WebCT please contact the e-Support Office by email: esupport@gre.ac.uk
6. Reading
Author Date Title Publisher
th
Handy, C. B. Understanding Organisations (4 ed.) Penguin
1993
Browne, M. N. 2000 Asking the Right Questions: a guide to critical Prentice Hall
th
and S. M. thinking (6 ed.)
Keeley
Boud, D. 1985 Turning experience into learning Kogan Page
Keogh and
Walker (eds.)
Dewey, J 1991 How We Think Prometheus Books
LOG
Students will map steps in their learning, throughout the placement in an online log on WebCT open
only to themselves and the placement tutor. The logs will be assessed by tutors midway and at the
end of the year.
The log should include critical analysis and synthesis of the role and contribution of reflection to:
a) Development of practice:
i. Locally - in the company where you work
ii. Nationally - in the country where you work
iii. Internationally - of your industry worldwide
b) The individual's continuing professional development.
The headlines can be on a variety of aspects of your placement, including but not limited to:
The points to consider for critical analysis of the role may be, including but not limited to:
If you were employed in your organisation full-time, would you be carrying out your
tasks differently; why?
Is there anything that could be improved as regards your position? Why? How?
Is there anything that can be improved in your company to enhance productiveness/
work efficiency/ staff relations/ work ethics etc? Why? How?
Etc
WEEKLY ENTRIES
Please review and edit your log regularly to ensure the critical reflection is preeminent. The entries
could be on one of the topics outlined above or anything else that critically assesses the industry
practice (e.g. retail, hospitality, sales, financial services, marketing etc – depending on the nature of
your placement) and your professional development.
INTERIM ASSESSMENT
Your interim submission will consist of edited highlights of the log half-way of your placement to
maximum word length of 2,000 words.
Do not forget to include word count at the end of your work. Harvard style for citation applies.
Bibliography list is required.
FINAL ASSESSMENT
Your final submission will consist of edited highlights of the log that you have contributed since the
beginning of the programme to a maximum of 2,000 words.
This is similar to interim assessment, but the edited headlines should cover the whole period of your
placement.
Keep in mind the rules of research ethics while writing: you cannot provide the names of your
clients or staff (unless they give their permission in advance).
Do not forget to include word count at the end of your work. Harvard style for citation applies.
Bibliography list is required.
BLOG
Students will reflect on their learning and on the experience of their work placement on a blog on
WebCT open for other students to comment.
Blog is your reflection of personal and professional experiences during the placement. It is a public
personal diary, which can be read and commented by others. It should be engaging for readers. In
other words, try to show how it feels being in your shoes during the placement.
You will have the opportunity to open a blog on WebCT. You will be expected to contribute to your
blog, every week. This will provide an opportunity to both reflect and interact with colleagues.
You can write as much as you feel like: from one sentence to a full story. The most important
task is to give a weekly insight on how you are finding your placement (and working) life. The
headlines can be on a variety of aspects of your placement, including but not limited to:
You can use this list for writing weekly entries, which will be the basis for your interim and final
assessments.
INTERIM ASSESSMENT
You will be expected to contribute to the blog until the end of the course. Contributions will be
assessed by tutors midway.
Your submission should be edited highlights of the blog (approx 2,500 words) half-way of your
placement.
Do not forget to include word count at the end of your work. Bibliography is not required.
FINAL ASSESSMENT
Your final submission will consist of edited highlights of the blog that you have contributed since the
beginning of the programme to a maximum of 2,500 words.
This is similar to interim assessment, but the edited headlines should cover the whole period of your
placement.
Keep in mind the rules of research ethics while writing: you cannot provide the names of your
clients or staff (unless they give their permission in advance).
Do not forget to include word count at the end of your work. Bibliography is not required.
Students will systematically apply theoretical understanding, critical analysis and personal synthesis
to their work placement experience. Maximum words: 5,000.
There are different theoretical models you can employ to reflect on your placement in the Report:
In your Reflective Report you should provide some general information about your placement: the
company profile, your position, responsibilities, staff, etc.
You will not be able to describe everything that happened to you during your placement. It may be a
good idea to choose one or two situations. Explain why you want to describe this particular case
and provide necessary details about it. Tell about the difficulties faced. What caused them? How did
you manage those situations? What was the outcome?
Keep in mind the rules of research ethics while writing: you cannot provide the names of your
clients or staff in the Report (unless they give their permission in advance).
Do not forget to include word count at the end of your work. Harvard style for citation applies.
Bibliography list is required.
If you have been notified that you have to complete coursework resits, check on your course’s
WebCT site where the details of the assessment task, submission dates and methods will be
explained.
8. Electronic Submission
Written coursework will only be accepted as a PDF electronic file submitted through the respective
course WebCT site by the coursework deadline. Submissions that do not meet the following
requirements may not be marked:
1. Submissions can be prepared using any software, such as Word, Excel, Powerpoint, but must
be saved as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file before submission. Software such as
Office 2007, Adobe Acrobat or CutePDF Writer can be used to compile the output of a wide
range of virtually anything that can be printed, including scanned images, preserving the format
you wish. CutePDF writer is freely available from www.cutepdf.com
2. Submissions to courses must include a Header Sheet from the coursework tracking system.
For group work, the ID numbers of all group members must be included on the Header Sheet.
3. Submissions must be in a single file. Multiple files will not be accepted. The last file submitted
will overwrite any earlier uploads.
4. A submitted file must be no larger than 5MB. Large file sizes normally arise because of the
inclusion of images, so review the necessity of these and use black and white and smaller .jpg
images where possible (We print in black and white so colour is unnecessary).
On submission you will be receive an electronic receipt. Please retain a copy of this receipt
as proof of submission of assignments. It is also strongly advisable to keep a copy of all
work submitted in case of any problems with WebCT or printing.
2. Edit/Copy
To submit your
assignment, click on
the submission link.
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 5:
Step 6:
Click on Submit.
Step 8:
If you do not clearly identify and acknowledge the work of other people that you refer to in an
assignment, we view this as misrepresentation; that you are trying to claim credit for work done
by others. This is a serious offence under the University’s regulations.
This most often occurs when students make use of online sources. Many students assemble
information by using copy and paste from websites into a document, then editing this. In using this
method, it is very easy to include direct passages from other people’s work and not properly identify
and acknowledge this.
There are two major views about the cause of the recent surge in oil and food prices. The first is that
this reflects changes in demand and supply conditions. The second is that it results from speculative
investments in commodity markets by pension and hedge funds.
Regulators and other officials have repeatedly said that surges in commodity prices are due
mainly to rising demand and other factors, such as the depreciating dollar, which is used to
price and trade commodities. However, some politicians and market observers believe the
flood of money into the market from big institutions is beginning to distort prices.
… Billionaire investor George Soros said that while rising oil prices are the result of a
number of fundamental changes in the market, investments in the futures market through
index funds are exaggerating price rises and creating a market bubble in oil and other
commodities.
(Chung, 2008, p.1)
On the other hand, demand and supply conditions have changed but perhaps not enough to explain
the rapid rise in prices over the last year.
The in-text citation (Chung, 2008, p.1) is a shorthand pointer to a full reference in the reference list
at the end of the assignment:
Reference List
Chung, J. (2008) Investors’ role in high prices played down. Financial Times, June 4, pp.1-2.
Available from: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0b705d78-31ad-11dd-b77c-0000779fd2ac.html (accessed
30.9.08).
Please note that all coursework submissions will be checked for plagiarism using the 'Turn it
in' software system. This systematically compares the text you submit against text available on the
internet and other student’s submissions at this and other Universities. Any matching passages
between the submission on the left and text already in existence are automatically highlighted:
With section 1.1. of that document, plagiarism is defined as including, but is not limited to:
i) using published work without referencing (the most common);
ii) copying published work but with minor paraphrasing;
iii) copying coursework essays or allowing ones work to be copied;
iv) using work previously submitted for another award;
v) collaborating with any other person when the work is supposed to be individual;
vi) taking another person's computer file/program/designs/drawings;
vii) submitting another person’s work as one’s own;
viii) the use of unacknowledged material published on the web;
ix) purchase of model assignments from whatever source;
x) copying another student’s results.
Penalties for plagiarism vary but may include failure in the piece of work, failure in the course,
failure for the entire year of study, a lower degree classification or exclusion from the University.
To reduce the risk of the inclusion of unidentified or unattributed work you are strongly advised to:
Avoid copying and pasting from online sources; read first and then write from memory or
make handwritten notes as you read.
Make use of 'Document it', a free Microsoft Word plug-in that allows you to record and
manage citations, in accordance with the rules of correct referencing, available from
http://www.documentit.co.uk/download.php or Endnote Web available via the Web of
Knowledge database in the library’s electronic resources listings.
Test your understanding of what is or is not plagiarism with the online Study Skills Course
Progression in Information Skills at the bottom of your ‘my courses’ list on the portal.
From the day of the return date listed for each coursework
assignment in the Summary of Assessment above, you will be
able to view the mark awarded and the tutor’s comments by
clicking on the submission point on the WebCT home page and
then clicking on the Apple icon – a red Apple indicates
feedback is available.
To make a claim, a student needs to complete an extenuating circumstances form (available from
the web address in the section above), attach relevant evidence and submit the form at the earliest
instance that it is clear that the matter will impair their performance. The evidence must (normally)
not just describe the matter but also indicate the level of impact it has had on the student.
The appropriate school committee will then review the claim and evidence and either accept the
claim or reject it and the secretary of the committee will notify the student accordingly.
To protect students’ privacy, the proceedings of this committee are made anonymous by the
committee chair or secretary so that staff taking part in the panel do not know which student is
making the claim. The proceedings of the committee are confidential and only the committee’s
decision will be made public – never the details of the claim.
Regardless of whether a claim is accepted or rejected, the Progression and Award Board will be
advised that a claim was made, in addition, the decision of the extenuating circumstances
committee will be announced so that a student’s performance can be considered in light of the
matters that may have affected them.
In general, students with a reason for missing a deadline where that reason can be described as
unexpected, uncontrollable and where the reason can be suitably evidenced, may apply for
extenuating circumstances and may submit their coursework online up to two weeks after the
deadline.
The decision as to whether the submitted coursework will be marked or not depends upon
the outcome of the Extenuating Circumstances Committee’s deliberations.
To take this option, submit an extenuating circumstances claim form and the late assignment to the
‘Late Submissions’ area of the course WebCT site. This area will be available for the two weeks
following the coursework deadline. You will need to scan the extenuating circumstances claim form
and any supporting evidence to create a PDF file for this submission.
8.5.3 If the WebCT site for your course is not listed under ‘my courses’
If you are unable to submit your coursework because the WebCT for the course is not listed under
‘My Courses’ on the portal, please bring this to the attention of your Personal Tutor at the earliest
opportunity. Your Personal Tutor will then organise the addition of the course to your course
schedule and advise you when you are able to submit.
If you have a coursework due and you cannot gain access to the WebCT site within two weeks
following the due date, you may submit a hardcopy extenuating circumstances claim to the
Business School Office.
9. Course Evaluation
We value student feedback on our courses highly. This provides quality assurance and contributes
to our continuous improvement processes. At the end of the course you will be asked to complete a
course evaluation on the WebCT site.
10. Complaints
If you have a problem about which you wish to complain that relates to this course, please raise it
with the staff member concerned i.e. if you have a problem with something occurring in seminars
talk to your tutor, but if it is a wider problem related to the operation of the course, talk to the course
leader.
If you feel unable to approach the staff member concerned yourself or the problem impacts on a
number of students you can contact your student representative and ask them to pursue the issue
on your behalf.
If, after discussing the matter with the staff member concerned you feel that the problem has not
been resolved you may take the problem to your programme leader.
If this does not resolve the issue, you should follow the complaints procedure outlined in the
Postgraduate Students Handbook.
Marking
Scale Interpretation Criteria
0-100
As below plus:
Able to express an original reasoned argument in a lucid manner by
reviewing and critiquing a wide range of material. Original, critical thinking
Work of exceptional
based on outstanding insight, knowledge and understanding of material.
80+ quality (Excellent
Material contributes to current understanding and is of potentially
work)
publishable quality in terms of presentation and content
Wide reaching research showing breadth and depth of sources.
As below plus:
Contains accurate, relevant material, demonstrates understanding of
complex subject matter and is able to view it in a wider context. Shows
originality and confidence in analysing and criticising assumptions, is aware
Work of exceptional
of the limits of knowledge. Likely to add new insights to the topic and
70-79 quality (Outstanding
approaches the quality of published material.
work)
Evidence of extensive research, uses and presents references effectively
Outstanding quality in terms of organisation, structure, use and flow of
language, grammar, spelling, format, presentation, diagrams, tables etc.
As below plus:
Clear, balanced coherent critical & rigorous analysis of the subject matter.
Work of very good Detailed understanding of knowledge and theory expressed with clarity.
65-69
quality Extensive use of relevant and current literature to view topic in perspective,
analyse context and develop new explanations and theories.
As below plus:
Detailed review and grasp of pertinent issues & a critical contextual overview
Work of good of the literature. Thorough knowledge of theory and methods and uses this
55-65
quality to underpin arguments and conclusions.
Confidence in understanding and using literature.