Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DSA/WDO Based PI Controller Tuning For D-STATCOM For Reactive Power Compensation
DSA/WDO Based PI Controller Tuning For D-STATCOM For Reactive Power Compensation
DSA/WDO Based PI Controller Tuning For D-STATCOM For Reactive Power Compensation
Abstract—Distribution static synchronous compensator (D- compensator called D-STATCOM. Compared to SVC, the
STACOM) has a greater importance in modern distribution level distribution level static synchronous compensator (D-
for reactive power compensation dynamically and power quality STATCOM) has more compact structure, ability to respond
improvement. In this paper an effort has been given to design a quickly to the reactive power demand and more economical
D-STATCOM, an essential shunt Flexible AC Transmission benefits [2, 3]. There are several control schemes have been
Systems (FACTS) device using decoupled current control method developed to compensate the reactive power and power factor
for three phase three wire system to compensate the reactive improvement like control of phase shift [4, 5], decoupled
power. It is difficult as well as time consuming process to get the current control theory (p-q theory) [5, 8], SRF theory [6, 7], ac
proper tuning parameters of PI controller for D-STATCOM
and dc voltage regulation [5] etc.
using conventional methods. An attempt has been made by
implementing two recently developed global optimization In this paper D-STATCOM is designed for reactive power
techniques named Differential Search algorithm (DSA) and Wind compensation using decoupled current control scheme. This
Driven optimization (WDO) for proper tuning of parameters by control scheme needs a number of PI controllers, which are
minimizing the integral square error (ISE) for both outer voltage robust and simple. These PI controllers are used to improve the
controller and inner current controller simultaneously. The PI transient response as well as steady state accuracy. To take the
gain calculated by DSA and WDO shows in terms of reduction of advantage of the PI controllers, it is highly necessary to tune
error, improvement of overshoot in capacitor voltage waveform, the PI parameter properly. By using conventional techniques, it
convergence speed and some other parameters of the circuit.
is very tedious as well as time consuming task to tune the PI
Comparative study of both the methods with trial and error
method reveals that DSA algorithm based PI controller tuning
parameters properly because of nonlinear operation of D-
method gives more optimized results. STATCOM [9, 10].
In order to implement the control policy properly there is a
Keywords— D-STATCOM, Decoupled current control, Reactive requirement of precise mathematical model of the system under
power compensation, Differential search algorithm, Wind driven study. Conventional techniques like Ziegler-Nichols oscillation
optimization. method, pole-zero cancellation method, pole assignment
method, smith predictor etc. requires exact determination of
I. INTRODUCTION
transfer function for tuning of control parameters. So, it is very
In recent days, the major power has been consumed difficult and hard for conventional methods to determine the
through reactive loads like fan, pumps etc. in a distributed transfer function as well as optimize the control parameters of
network. These loads give reactive power burden by drawing D-STATCOM. Using optimization techniques aforesaid
lagging power factor current. The reactive power demand and problem can be solved to a large extent [11, 12, 13, 14]. In the
active power capability are inversely related to each other. If proposed work, two new recently developed optimization
reactive power demand increases, feeder losses also increases algorithms (DSA and WDO) are used to get the optimum value
for which, there is degradation of active power capability as of PI controller parameter for D-STATCOM control system.
well as voltage regulation at the end. To overcome the reactive The control system parameters are evaluated using an offline
power compensation as well as the power quality problems, evolution of fitness function. The new PI gains are calculated
conventional static VAR compensators (SVC) has been by DSA and WDO with minimizing the objective function and
installed [1]. Further, the problem has been overcome to a they are applied in the controller to demonstrate the
greater extent by a newly developed static synchronous improvement in capacitor voltage waveform in terms of
= dt (10)
11
10
Fig. 3: Flow chart of DSA
Parameters Values
Source voltage Vs = 110(Phase Voltage)
Source resistance Rs =0.3Ω
Source inductance Ls =0.0013H
Filter resistance R= 0.03Ω
Filter inductance L= 3mh
DC capacitor C= 2000 F
Initial capacitor voltage C= 400v
Fundamental frequency f = 50 HZ
Sampling frequency fs =10 KHZ
Load P= 2000W, Q= 5000W
Fig. 5: Flow chart of WDO
480 Without compensation
DSA
460 WDO 200
VOLTAGE
TRAIL & ERROR CURRENT
150
440
D C V o lt a g e ( v o lt )
100
420
400 0
380 -50
-100
360
-150
340
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 -200
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
Time (seconds) Time (seconds)
Fig. 6a: DC capacitor voltage responses of D-STATCOM. Fig. 7a: Phase A of Source voltage and current. (R L load)
200
15 VOLTAGE
CURRENT
DSA 150
WDO
10
TRAIL & ERROR 100
0 -50
-100
-5
-150
-200
-10 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
Time (seconds)
-15
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 Fig. 7b: Phase A of Source voltage and current. (RC load)
Time (seconds)
With compensation
Fig. 6b: d-axis current responses in D-STATCOM controller.
200
VOLTAGE
CURRENT
150
100
5
Source Voltage & Current
DSA 50
0 WDO
0
-5 TRAIL & ERROR
-50
-10
-100
Iq C u rre n t
-15
-150
-20
-200
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5
Time (seconds)
-25
The simulation results in Fig. 6a, Fig. 6b & Fig. 6c shows -50
REFERENCES
Active & Reactive Power
0
[1] H. Ebrahimirad, A. Choobdar, G.R. Dehnavi, “A new control approach
for voltage quality improvement in distribution power system by means
-0.5 of an SVC”, 4th IET Conference on Power Electronics, Machines and
Drives, 2008, pp. 583-586.
[2] K. Pillay, Mohamed S.A. Dahidah, N.B Mariun, “On Comparing the
-1
performance of voltage source converters based D-STATCOM for
voltage sag mitigation”, IEEE International Conference on Power and
-1.5 Energy, 2010, pp. 432-437.
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Time (seconds)
[3] C.K. Lee, J.S.K. Leung, S.Y.R. Hui, H.S.H. Chung, “Circuit Level
Fig. 8c: Active and Reactive power supply by D-STATCOM. Comparison of STATCOM technologies”, IEEE Transaction on Power
Electronics, 2003, vol.18, no.4, pp.1084-1092.
Fig. 8b & 8c shows that D-STATCOM is absorbing the [4] A. Banerji, Sujit K. Biswas, Bhim Singh, “DSTATCOM Control
leading reactive power from the system when the load is RL Algorithms: A Review”, International Journal of Power Electronics and
that means it is supplying the lagging reactive power to the Drive System (IJPEDS), 2012, Vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 285-296.
system. [5] D. Masand, S. Jain, G. Agnihotri, “Control Algorithms for Distribution
Static Compensator”, IEEE ISIE, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 1830-1834.
TABLE II. COMPARISON OF PI PRAMETERS [6] P. Kumar, N. Kumar, A.K. Akella, “A simulation based case study for
control of DSTATCOM,” ISA Transactions, 2014, vol. 53, no. 3, pp.
PI Parameters Optimized PI Optimized PI
767–775.
Value by using Parameters Parameters
Trail & Error value by using value by using [7] B. Singh, J. Solanki, “A Comparison of Control Algorithms for
method WDO DSA DSTATCOM”, IEEE Transaction on Industrial Electronics, 2009, vol.
56, no.7.
[8] K. Somsai, T. Kulowrawanichpong, N. Voraphonpiput, “Design of
DC Voltage Decoupling Current Control with Symmetrical Optimum Method for D-
controller 1 30 1.4961 40 1.5 39.9583 STATCOM”, Power and Energy Engineering Conference, 2012, pp. 1-4.
[9] Ben-Sheng Chen, Hsu, Yuan-Yih, “A Minimal Harmonic Controller for
Inner current a STATCOM”,IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2008, vol.
controller 4 45 3 20 3 29.8968 55, no. 2, pp. 655-664.
[10] K. Yang, X. Cheng, Y. Wang, L. Chen, G. Chen, "PCC Voltage
60 Stabilization by D-STATCOM with Direct Grid Voltage Control
58
DSA
WDO
Strategy”, IEEE International Symposium on Industiral Electronics
(ISIE), 2012, pp. 442-446.
56
[11] A.M. Vural, K.C. Bayindir, “Optimization of Parameter set for
54
STATCOM Control System”, Transmission and Distribution
O b je c tiv e fu n c tio n