Research Activity

Components of the Expected Output:
Chapter 1: Project Title and Background of the Problem/Project

Statement of the Problem (not less than 3 statements)
 Determining the dependent variables
 Determining the independent variables
 Identifying the “difference” variables
 Identifying the “relationship” variables
Note: At least two (2) qualitative and two (2) quantitative variables
Sample Questionnaire
Methods and Scope and Delimitation

 Sampling Technique
 Number of Study Participants
 Inclusion Criteria
 Statistical Treatment
Chapter 2: Demographic Profile of the Respondents and Response to Other Questions

 Frequency Distribution
 Data Presentation
 Data Interpretation
 Measures of Central Tendency
 Measures of Variability
Tabulation of Data Gathered from the Respondents
Hypotheses
 Measures of Difference
 Measures of Correlation
Measures of Differences
 Using t-test
 Using One-way ANOVA with post-hoc tests (Scheffe + Tukey HSD)
 Findings (There is… or There is no…)
 Conclusion (Accept or Reject)
 Interpretation
 PASW Printed Output
Measures of Correlations
 Using Pearson
 Using Chi-Square (include the contingency table)
 Findings (There is…. or There is no….)
 Conclusion (Accept or Reject)
Matrix Summary of Conclusions (Measures of Differences)

Matrix Summary of Conclusions (Measures of Correlations)
Chapter 1: Project Title and Background of the Problem/Project
PROJECT TITLE:
A PROFILE ON THE LEVEL OF SELF-ESTEEM AND SATISFACTION OF BS NURSING STUDENTS FROM AND
BETWEEN COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY A AND COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY B*
*(The title must be originally conceptualized and prepared by the bearer of the study to be checked by their instructor)
BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM/PROJECT:
A study was conducted, gathered in equal proportion from the nursing students of two schools – namely
College/University A and College/University B, the first one with an ISO 9001;2008 Quality Management and CHED
Deregulated Status, while the second one bearing the CHED Autonomous Status and the prestigious IQUAME mark.
College/University A, a private Catholic sectarian university whose famous motto “Education with a purpose” has a
very strong humanitarian message, was founded by an American Physicist on the year 1912. Originally a school for liberal
arts, has expanded into a myriad of courses which includes Architecture, Sciences, Business, Law and the latest addition is
healthcare (Nursing, Caregiver). It currently has a student population which is mostly from economic classes B, C and some
from D and E.
On the other hand, the College/University A was founded by a bar topnotcher in 1940. The school laid down its
objectives: (1) to maintain high standard of instruction; (2) to bring within the reach of the masses the blessings of higher
education; and (3) to cooperate with the Philippine government in the implementation of its amelioration programs.
College/University A committed itself to educating and developing men and women who could turn the wheels of progress
and industry. It offers courses such as Engineering, Architecture, Commerce, Liberal Arts, Nursing and is considered to
offer one of the lowest tuition rates among the private universities and colleges in the National Capital Region, which is a
strong reflection of one of its core values. Thus, majority of its student population comes from economic classes C to E.
*Personal experience, readings or general perspective should be included in the background. This may include relevant statistics and
personal reason why the bearers of the study chose their topic of interest
*Include the research locale, the respondents and especially the objectives of the study
*May end the background with the topic by restating it
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
The main purpose of the study is to determine the self-esteem and satisfaction of the students towards their activity in school. In particular,
it seeks to answer the following questions:
1. What is the demographic profile of the students in terms of: (Descriptive Statistics: Frequency and Percentage)
a. Gender
b. Religion
c. Age
d. Educational Attainment
e. Net Monthly Income Range
2. What is the level of self-esteem and satisfaction of the students? (Descriptive Statistics: Mean and Standard Deviation)
3. Is there a significant correlation between work self-esteem and work satisfaction? (Inferential Statistics: Measures of Correlation)
4. Is there a significant difference in the work self-esteem and work satisfaction of the respondents when they are grouped according to their
demographic profile? (Inferential Statistics: Measures of Differences)
5. Is there a significant difference between schools A and B in terms of level of self-esteem and satisfaction? (Inferential Statistics:
Measures of Differences)
In relation to statement of the problem number 3, the following are the dependent and independent variables with their statistical tests to
be used which will be shown in Portfolios 8 and 9:
a. Dependent Variables
a.1. Satisfaction
a.2. Self-Esteem
b. Independent Variables (Demographic Aspects)
b.1. Determining the Differences as shown in Portfolio 8

b.1.1. Comparison on the level of self-esteem based on the following:
b.1.1.1. Gender using t-Test of Independent Samples
b.1.1.2. Religion using t-Test of Independent Samples
b.1.1.3. Age using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Tests
b.1.1.4. Educational Attainment using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or
Tukey Tests
b.1.1.5. Net Monthly Income Range using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or
Tukey Tests
b.1.1.6. Comparison on the level of self esteem between schools A and B using t-Test of Independent Samples
b.1.2. Comparison on the level of satisfaction based on the following:

b.1.2.1. Gender using t-Test of Independent Samples
b.1.2.2. Religion using t-Test of Independent Samples
b.1.2.3. Age using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Tests
b.1.2.4. Educational Attainment using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or
Tukey Tests
b.1.2.5. Net Monthly Income Range using One-way Analysis of Variance with Follow-up Scheffe or
Tukey Tests
b.1.2.6. Comparison on the level of satisfaction between schools A and B using t-Test of Independent Samples
b.2. Determining the Relationship as shown in Portfolio 9
b.2.1. Level of Self – Esteem versus Level of Satisfaction using the Pearson r – Test
b.2.2. Correlation between self-esteem and the demographic profile of the respondents using the eta correlation
b.2.3. Correlation between satisfaction and the demographic profile of the respondents using the eta correlation
* Strictly follow the given format

* The type of statistical tests to be used must be highlighted.
* For follow-up tests, you may use either the Tukey or the Scheffe Test
* If in doubt about the format and discussion, please consult your respective professor.
SCOPE AND DELIMITATION/MANAGEABILITY
The study focused on the level of self-esteem and satisfaction of the students in two different schools. The study is
delimited to the students between two schools with regard to their level of self-esteem and satisfaction towards their
activities.
There were thirty (30) student – respondents involved in the study. Only those who were currently and officially
enrolled in schools A and B participated in the research.
The researchers used the quantitative descriptive method to measure the difference of the students’ level of self-
esteem and satisfaction enrolled in schools A and B. Survey method was used to gather the demographic profile, self-
esteem and satisfaction of the students in two schools.
Non-probability sampling technique was used in selecting the students who served as respondents of the study.
The researchers non-randomly chose the student – respondents from two different schools on the basis of their gender,
religion, age, educational attainment and net monthly income rate.
The researchers adopted the questionnaire formulated by Hipolito, Fulgueras and Arcena (2013) entitled the self-
esteem scale and the satisfaction scale having a reliability of 0.89.
Statistical Treatment of Data
For measures of differences, there will be a separate hypothesis testing (either t – Test of independent samples or
One Way Analysis of Variance) for the entire sample and another for each of the two schools (school A and school B).
For measures of correlation, a hypothesis testing (Pearson r or eta correlation) was conducted for the entire sample
(two schools combined).
On this manner of treatment, twenty-three (23) hypotheses were formulated covering both measures of differences
and correlations.
* Discussion on the inclusion criteria must be included. The criteria for choosing the respondents must be clearly defined.
* The number of respondents, research method, sampling technique and the data gathering technique must be clearly specified.
* The survey instrument must be specified if this is adopted or researcher-made. It is important to take note of the reliability coefficient or the Cronbach Alpha of the research instrument.
Attach the result of the reliability test. The accepted value is at least 0.85.
* The number of research hypotheses should be aligned with the ones stated in portfolio 5 covering both measures of differences and correlation.
FEU ALABANG
Lot 1, Corporate Woods Avenue corner South Corporate Avenue, Woods District, Filinvest City, Alabang, Muntinlupa City
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL PROGRAM
STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY
2nd Semester A.Y. 2018 – 2019
RUBRIC IN RATING THE RATING PORTFOLIO IN STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY
Task Objective: Each student has to identify a research topic related to their chosen academic track. The student should be able to analyze the gathered data related to the topic chosen and appropriate in one’s academic track.
The preparation of the work should satisfy the criteria specified in this scoring rubric.
Levels of Performance
Dimensions/Criteria/Indicators 4 3 2 1 Score/Percentage
Excellent Very Good/Very Good/Satisfactory Poor
Satisfactory
A. Time Management (10%) Submitted one (1) or
Submitted two (2) days Submitted one (1) day Submitted on the date
more days after the
before the date agreed before the agreed date for agreed upon for
agreed upon date for
upon for submission submission submission
submission
B. Completeness of Required Information (30%) Many of the required Some of the required Few of the required
All of the required
Information required in the portfolio based on the specified criteria cited in the guidelines information was indicated information was indicated information was indicated
information were given
(about 75% was indicated) (about 50% was indicated) (about 25% was indicated)
C. Accuracy of Data and Acceptability of Results (45%)
The paper report submitted will gauge its accuracy. Accuracy refers to the correctness of the
information cited in the paper report.
Satisfies the three (3) Satisfies only two (2) of Satisfies only one (1) of Satisfies none of the
1. The researcher/s made use the correct/appropriate statistical test applicable to the
indicators the given indicators the given indicators given indicators
respective research question/data
2. The given findings in the paper report are correct based on the SPSS results.
3. The conclusions in the paper report are strongly based on the findings
D. Mechanics (10%)
1. Work is free from grammatical errors Satisfies the three (3) Satisfies only two (2) of Satisfies only one (1) of Satisfies none of the
2. Work is free from errors in spelling/punctuations indicators the given indicators the given indicators given indicators
3. Work is neat and presentable
E. Packaging/Format (5%)
1. Short bond paper/Book Bound* (*at the end of the semester)
2. Cover page is made up of fluorescent paper
3. The specified format should be reflected on the cover page. Satisfies only five (5) or Satisfies only three (3) or Satisfies only one (1) or
4. Pages are paginated and report is provided with table of contents* Satisfies the seven (7)
six (6) of the given four (4) of the given two (2) of the given
5. Summary is in matrix form as specified in the format indicators
indicators indicators indicators
6. Font is easy to read and size 12, 1 ½ spaced and 1 ½ inches margin in all sides
7. Scoring rubric is attached in the portfolio
`
SAMPLE QUESTIONNAIRE
Respondent Code No. __________
SURVEY
Good day! I would like to get your honest opinion related to your activity which will only take five minutes of your time. Rest
be assured that everything stated here will be treated with utmost confidentiality. These will be used solely as inputs for the
course requirement in statistics.
(Name of the Researcher/s)
PART A. Basic Personal Information
A.1. Name (Optional, print name please)
____________________________________________________________________________
A.2. Gender (please tick one only) ( ) Male ( ) Female
A.3. Religion (please tick one only)
( ) Roman Catholic
( ) Non-Catholic
A.4. Age (please tick one only where your age belongs)
( ) 20 – 30 years old ( ) 51 – 60 years old

( ) 31 – 40 years old ( ) 61 years old and above
( ) 41 – 50 years old
A.5. Educational Attainment
( ) Elementary Graduate ( ) College Degree

( ) High School Graduate ( ) Masters Degree
( ) Vocational Course ( ) Doctorate Degree
A.6. Net Monthly Income Range (take home pay/net profit, less of government taxes)
( ) below Php 10,000.00 ( ) Php 30,001 – Php 40,000

( ) Php 10,001 – Php 20,000 ( ) Php 40,001 – Php 50,000
( ) Php 20,001 – Php 30,000 ( ) Php 50,001 and above
PART B. Self-Esteem Scale. The following are various statements related to your activity in school. Please ENCIRCLE
only one – from 4 (Strongly Agree) to 1 (Strongly Disagree) on each of the statements, which you think are nearest to your
point of view. There are no right nor wrong answers.
Statements Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly

Agree Disagree
B.1. I feel good about my studies. 4 3 2 1
Agree Disagree
B.2. On the whole, I get along well with my other 4 3 2 1
classmates in school.
B.3. I am proud of my ability to cope with difficulties 4 3 2 1
in school.
B.4. When I feel uncomfortable in school, I know 4 3 2 1
how to handle it.
B.5. I can tell that my classmates in school are glad 4 3 2 1
to have me there.
B.6. I know I’ll be able to cope with my studies for 4 3 2 1
as long as I want.
B.7. I am proud of my relationship with my 4 3 2 1
professors in school.
B.8. I am confident that I can handle my studies 4 3 2 1
without constant assistance.
B.9. I feel like I make a useful contribution at 4 3 2 1
school.
B.10. I can tell that my classmates respect me. 4 3 2 1
PART C. Satisfaction Scale. The following are various statements related to your activity in school. Please ENCIRCLE
only one – from 4 (Strongly Agree) to 1 (Strongly Disagree) on each of the statements, which you think are nearest to your
point of view. There are no right nor wrong answers.

Agree Disagree
C.1. What grades I earn in school is enough to 4 3 2 1
pass all of my subjects.
C.2. What grades I earn in school meets my short- 4 3 2 1
term expectations/ goals in life.
C.3. The grades that I have right now reflects my 4 3 2 1
educational experiences.
C.4. I feel secure with the grades that I have 4 3 2 1
earned so far.
C.5. The grades I earn in school is fair enough. 4 3 2 1
C.6. I feel that where I am now has improved 4 3 2 1
compared to the previous year.
C.7. I believe that I gained a wealth of knowledge 4 3 2 1
from my present school, which I could use for my
future plans.
C.8. I feel that the school administration did its part 4 3 2 1
in helping me improve my grades in school.
END OF THE SURVEY… THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRECIOUS TIME.
*strictly follow the given format

*questionnaire can be taken from the internet
*items in the questionnaire should cover the four levels of measurement such as nominal, interval, ratio and interval
*possible problem statements must be culled out and must be statistically analyzed covering the descriptive and inferential statistics
*if in doubt about the questionnaire, please consult your respective professor
TABULATION OF DATA GATHERED FROM THE RESPONDENTS*
Respondent Gender Religion Age EA NMIR SE1 SE2 SE3 SE4 SE5 SE6 SE7 SE8 SE9 SE10 SE_AVE SS1 SS2 SS3 SS4 SS5 SS6 SS7 SS8 SS_AVE
Code No.
1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.00 3 2 2 1 3 2 1 2 2.00
2 2 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 1.40 3 2 2 4 3 2 4 2 2.75
3 1 1 4 2 5 1 2 2 1 3 2 2 4 2 4 2.30 3 2 2 4 3 2 3 2 2.63
4 2 2 3 4 6 2 2 4 2 3 4 3 4 2 2 2.80 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.25
5 2 2 5 4 6 3 2 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 2 3.30 1 3 4 4 2 3 4 3 3.00
6 1 2 2 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3.50 1 2 4 2 1 4 4 3 2.63
7 2 1 3 2 3 3 4 4 4 2 3 3 4 4 4 3.50 2 4 4 2 3 4 4 4 3.38
8 2 2 5 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 1 3.00 2 4 4 2 4 1 2 4 2.88
9 2 2 1 4 5 4 3 4 3 4 3 2 3 3 1 3.00 2 4 1 3 4 2 2 1 2.38
10 1 1 2 1 1 2 4 3 4 4 3 2 3 4 2 3.10 2 2 1 4 4 3 3 3 2.75
11 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 4 1 3 2 1 1 3 1.90 4 2 3 4 2 4 1 3 2.88
12 1 2 5 1 1 3 1 3 4 1 3 4 2 1 4 2.60 4 1 2 4 1 4 1 3 2.50
13 2 1 5 5 2 4 1 3 1 2 4 4 2 4 1 2.60 3 3 2 1 3 4 4 4 3.00
14 2 2 5 5 5 4 2 2 1 4 4 4 3 4 2 3.00 3 4 2 1 3 2 1 1 2.13
15 1 1 3 5 4 4 3 2 2 4 4 4 1 4 2 3.00 4 4 4 2 4 3 1 1 2.88
16 1 2 4 5 3 1 4 2 3 1 1 4 3 1 2 2.20 4 4 1 2 4 4 2 2 2.88
17 1 1 1 2 3 1 4 4 3 1 1 4 3 1 4 2.60 1 1 1 4 4 1 4 4 2.50
18 1 1 2 2 5 1 4 4 4 2 1 1 4 3 4 2.80 1 1 2 4 3 1 4 4 2.50
19 2 2 5 3 6 1 3 1 4 4 1 1 1 2 1 1.90 1 2 3 4 2 2 4 4 2.75
20 2 1 2 4 5 3 1 1 4 4 1 1 2 2 2 2.10 1 3 4 3 1 2 1 2 2.13
21 2 1 2 4 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 1.50 2 3 4 4 1 4 2 2 2.75
22 2 2 3 4 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 2.10 2 3 4 1 3 3 2 4 2.75
23 1 2 3 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 3 1 4 2 2 3.00 2 4 1 2 4 4 2 4 2.88
24 1 1 3 4 5 2 3 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 1 3.10 3 1 1 1 4 2 3 4 2.38
25 1 1 4 5 6 2 1 2 2 4 4 4 1 4 1 2.50 4 1 1 2 4 1 3 2 2.25
26 2 1 5 4 1 4 3 3 3 1 4 2 1 1 4 2.60 `1 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 1.86
27 2 1 5 4 1 2 4 4 4 3 4 3 2 1 1 2.80 1 2 4 2 3 1 4 4 2.63
28 2 1 1 4 2 3 4 1 4 3 1 1 3 1 1 2.20 2 4 4 2 4 1 4 4 3.13
29 1 1 1 2 1 4 1 1 4 4 1 4 3 4 4 3.00 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 1 3.38
30 2 1 2 2 4 1 2 2 2 4 1 1 4 4 1 2.20 2 2 2 4 1 4 1 1 2.13
LEGEND: *All entries must be entered in the Microsoft Excel.
*All averages must be in two decimal places (i.e. SE_AVE and SS_AVE)
EA – Educational Attainment Gender: 1 – Male 2 – Female NMIR: *Do not forget to fill-in all rows and columns. All legends must be placed below the tabulated data
NMIR – Net Monthly Income Range Religion: 1 – Roman Catholic 2 – Non-Catholic 1 – below Php10000 2 – Php10001 to Php 20000 for reference.
SE – Self-Esteem Age: 1 – 20 to 30 2 – 31 to 40 3 – 41 to 50 3 – Php 20001 to Php 30000 4 – Php 30001 to Php 40000 *The sequence of the data to be tabulated in rows and columns should strictly follow the
SE_AVE – Self-Esteem Average 4 – 51 to 60 5 – 61 yrs. and above 5 – Php 40001 to Php 50000 6 – Php 50001 and above arrangement of information found in the questionnaire.
SS – Satisfaction Scale EA: 1 – Elementary 2 – High School 3 – Vocational SE and SS: *There must be at least 30 respondents in the survey to be conducted.
SS_AVE – Satisfaction Average 4 – College 5 – Masters 6 – Doctorate 1 – Strongly Agree 2 – Agree *If in doubt about the tabulated data, please consult your respective professor.
3 – Disagree 4 – Strongly Disagree
DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS AND
RESPONSE TO OTHER QUESTIONS
Table 4.1 Respondents’ Profile Based on Gender
Gender Frequency Percentage

Male 14 46.7
Female 16 53.3
Total 30 100.0
Table 4.1 presents the profile of the respondents based on gender. It is shown that 46.7% or fourteen (14) of the
respondents are males while 53.3% or sixteen (16) of the respondents are females.
Table 4.2 Respondents’ Profile Based on Religion*

Table 4.3 Respondents’ Profile Based on Age*
Table 4.4 Respondents’ Profile Based on Educational Attainment
Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage

Elementary 4 13.3
High School 7 23.3
Vocational 2 6.7
College 11 36.7
Masters 6 20.0
Total 30 100.0
Table 4.4 presents the profile of the respondents based on educational attainment. It is shown that 36.7% or eleven
(11) of the respondents are College graduates while only 6.7% or two (2) of the respondents are graduates of vocational
courses.
Table 4.5 Respondents’ Profile Based on Net Monthly Income Range
Net Monthly Income Range Frequency Percentage

Below Php 10000 6 20.0
Php 10001 to Php 20000 4 13.3
Php 20001 to Php 30000 6 20.0
Php 30001 to Php 40000 4 13.3
Php 40001 to Php 50000 6 20.0
Php 50001 and above 4 13.3
Total 30 100.0
Table 4.5 presents the profile of the respondents based on net monthly income range. It is shown that three (3) of
the net monthly income ranges such as those who are earning below Php 10000, between Php 20001 to Php 30000 and
between Php 40001 to Php 50000 each are 20% or six (6) of the respondents while three (3) of the net monthly income
ranges such as those who are earning between Php 10001 and Php 20000, between Php 30001 and Php 40000 and Php
50001 and above each are 13.3% or four (4) of the respondents.
Table 4.6 Self-Esteem of the Respondents Towards Their Activity in School
Items Mean Standard Interpretation

Deviation
On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates in 2.47 1.167 Low Extent
school.
I am proud of my ability to cope with difficulties in school. 2.43 1.194 Low Extent
When I feel uncomfortable in school, I know how to handle 2.63 1.245 High Extent
it.
I can tell that my classmates in school are glad to have me 2.93 1.230 High Extent
there.
I know I’ll be able to cope with my studies for as long as I 2.77 1.278 High Extent
want.
I am proud of my relationship with my professors in school. 2.50 1.280 Low Extent
I am confident that I can handle my studies without 2.47 1.196 Low Extent
constant assistance.
I feel like I make a useful contribution at school. 2.60 1.163 High Extent
I can tell that my classmates respect me. 2.47 1.196 Low Extent
On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates in 2.27 1.202 Low Extent
school.
Composite Mean 2.55 0.613 High Extent
Legend: 1.00 – 1.50 Very Low Extent; 1.51 to 2.50 Low Extent; 2.51 to 3.50 High Extent; 3.51 to 4.00 Very High Extent
Table 4.6 shows the self-esteem of the respondents towards their activity in school. It is shown that the first
item On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates in school has a mean of 2.47 and a standard deviation which
is interpreted as low extent. The second item I am proud of my ability to cope with difficulties in school has a mean of 2.43
and a standard deviation of 1.194 which is interpreted as low extent. The third item When I feel uncomfortable in school, I
know how to handle it……… Overall, the self-esteem of the respondents has a mean of 2.55 and a standard deviation of
0.613 which is interpreted as high extent.
Table 4.7 Satisfaction of the Respondents Towards Their Activity in School*
*strictly follow the given format especially the tabular presentations

*Tables 4.2 and 4.3 will follow the same format of discussion; for age, the focus of the discussion will be only on the highest and lowest frequencies among the group
*for a four-point scale, use the given ranges in the legend; for a five-point scale, make use of 1.00 – 1.50, 1.51 – 2.50, 2.51 – 3.50, 3.51 – 4.50, 4.51 – 5.00
*Table 4.7 will have the same tabular presentation with Table 4.6 having three columns
*Tables cannot be split into two or more pages. Make sure to construct the table in one page only. Adjust the first column containing the questions if necessary to present the table in just
one page.
*Make sure that the complete Predictive Analysis Software (PASW) results are attached in Portfolio 4
*If in doubt about the format and discussion, please consult your respective professor
PASW RESULTS:
Frequencies
Statistics
Net Monthly
Educational Income
Gender Religion Age Attainment Range
N Valid 30 30 30 30 30
Missing 0 0 0 0 0
Frequency Table
Gender
Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid Male 14 46.7 46.7 46.7
Female 16 53.3 53.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Religion
Cumulative
Valid Roman Catholic 18 60.0 60.0 60.0
Non-Catholic 12 40.0 40.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Age
Cumulative
Valid 20 to 30 yrs. old 6 20.0 20.0 20.0
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 23.3 23.3 43.3
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 20.0 20.0 63.3
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 10.0 10.0 73.3
61 yrs. old and above 8 26.7 26.7 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Educational Attainment
Cumulative
Valid Elementary 4 13.3 13.3 13.3
High School 7 23.3 23.3 36.7
Vocational 2 6.7 6.7 43.3
College 11 36.7 36.7 80.0
Masters 6 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Net Monthly Income Range
Cumulative
Valid below Php 10000 6 20.0 20.0 20.0
Php 10001 to Php 20000 4 13.3 13.3 33.3
Php 20001 to Php 30000 6 20.0 20.0 53.3
Php 30001 to Php 40000 4 13.3 13.3 66.7
Php 40001 to Php 50000 6 20.0 20.0 86.7
Php 50001 and above 4 13.3 13.3 100.0
Total 30 100.0 100.0
Descriptives
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.47 1.167
Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.43 1.194
Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.63 1.245
Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.93 1.230
Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.77 1.278
Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.50 1.280
Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.47 1.196
Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.60 1.163
Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.47 1.196
Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.27 1.202
Ave_Self-Esteem 30 1 4 2.55 .613
Valid N (listwise) 30
Descriptives
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

Satisfaction Scale 29 1 4 2.45 1.121
Ave_Satisfaction Scale 30 2 3 2.66 .391
Valid N (listwise) 29
HYPOTHESES
A. MEASURES OF DIFFERENCES (t – test or One – Way ANOVA)
There is no significant difference on the levels of self-esteem and satisfaction among the respondents when they are grouped
according to their demographic profile.
A.1. There is no significant difference on the level of self-esteem between males and females. (Ho1)
A.2. There is no significant difference on the level of satisfaction between males and females. (Ho2)
A.3. There is no significant difference on the level of self-esteem between Roman Catholic and Non-Catholic. (Ho3)
A.4. There is no significant difference on the level of satisfaction between Roman Catholic and Non-Catholic. (Ho4)
A.5. There is no significant difference on the level of self-esteem among the different age groups. (Ho5)
A.6. There is no significant difference on the level of satisfaction among the different age groups. (Ho6)
A.7. There is no significant difference on the level of self-esteem among the different levels of educational attainment. (Ho7)
A.8. There is no significant difference on the level of satisfaction among the different levels of educational attainment. (Ho8)
A.9. There is no significant difference on the level of self-esteem among the different Net Monthly Income Range groups. (Ho9)
A.10. There is no significant difference on the level of satisfaction among the different Net Monthly Income Range groups. (Ho10)
A.11. There is no significant difference on the level of self-esteem of the students between schools A and B. (Ho11)
A.12. There is no significant difference on the level of satisfaction of the students between schools A and B. (Ho12)
B. MEASURES OF CORRELATION (Pearson r, Chi-Square or Eta Correlation)
B.1. There is no significant relationship between self-esteem and gender of the respondents.(Ho13)
B.2. There is no significant relationship between self-esteem and religion of the respondents. (Ho14)
B.3. There is no significant correlation between self-esteem and age of the respondents. (Ho15)
B.4. There is no significant correlation between self-esteem and educational attainment of the respondents. (Ho16)
B.5. There is no significant correlation between self-esteem and net monthly income range of the respondents. (Ho17)
B.6. There is no significant relationship between satisfaction and gender of the respondents. (Ho18)
B.7. There is no significant relationship between satisfaction and religion of the respondents. (Ho19)
B.8. There is no significant correlation between satisfaction and age of the respondents. (Ho20)
B.9. There is no significant correlation between satisfaction and educational attainment of the respondents. (Ho21)
B.10. There is no significant correlation between satisfaction and net monthly income range of the respondents. (Ho22)
B.11. There is no significant relationship between self-esteem and satisfaction. (Ho23)
*All of the demographic variables (independent variables) i.e. gender, religion, age, educational attainment, net monthly income range are assumed to have no significant relationship
with each of the dependent variables i.e. self-esteem and satisfaction from the two schools combined.
*The list of hypotheses should be parallel to the problem statements presented in Portfolio 5.
* If in doubt about the format and discussion, please consult your respective professor.
MEASURES OF DIFFERENCES
SELF-ESTEEM and SATISFACTION LEVEL between and among the means of the following groups:
A. Using t – Test
A.1. Gender
A.2. Religion
B. Using One-Way ANOVA with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Test

B.1. Age
B.2. Educational Attainment
B.3. Net Monthly Income Range
A.1. There is no significant difference on the level of self-esteem between males and females. (Ho1)*
A.2. There is no significant difference on the level of satisfaction between males and females. (H o2)
PASW RESULTS:
T-Test
Group Statistics
Std. Error
Gender N Mean Std. Deviation Mean
Self-Esteem Male 14 2.21 1.188 .318
Female 16 2.69 1.138 .285
Female 16 2.38 1.088 .272
Female 16 2.63 1.310 .328
Female 16 2.75 1.291 .323
Female 16 2.81 1.167 .292
Female 16 2.56 1.365 .341
Female 16 2.25 1.125 .281
Female 16 2.56 1.153 .288
Female 16 2.44 1.094 .273
Female 16 1.94 1.124 .281
Ave_Self-Esteem Male 14 2.61 .629 .168
Female 16 2.50 .614 .154
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for

Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence Interval
of the Difference
Mean Std. Error
F Sig. t df Sig. (2-tailed) Difference Difference Lower Upper
Self-Esteem Equal variances
assumed .004 .949 -1.113 28 .275 -.473 .425 -1.344 .398
Equal variances
not assumed -1.110 27.110 .277 -.473 .426 -1.348 .402
assumed 2.550 .122 .281 28 .780 .125 .444 -.785 1.035
Equal variances
not assumed .277 25.038 .784 .125 .451 -.803 1.053
assumed .305 .585 .039 28 .970 .018 .464 -.932 .968
Equal variances
not assumed .039 27.887 .969 .018 .461 -.927 .963
assumed .827 .371 .869 28 .392 .393 .452 -.533 1.319
Equal variances
not assumed .875 27.960 .389 .393 .449 -.527 1.312
assumed 3.421 .075 -.206 28 .838 -.098 .476 -1.072 .876
Equal variances
not assumed -.204 25.091 .840 -.098 .482 -1.092 .895
assumed .856 .363 -.281 28 .780 -.134 .476 -1.109 .841
Equal variances
not assumed -.284 27.978 .779 -.134 .472 -1.102 .834
assumed .766 .389 1.063 28 .297 .464 .437 -.430 1.359
Equal variances
not assumed 1.055 26.291 .301 .464 .440 -.440 1.369
assumed .036 .851 .186 28 .854 .080 .433 -.806 .967
Equal variances
not assumed .185 27.013 .855 .080 .434 -.811 .972
assumed 2.484 .126 .140 28 .889 .063 .445 -.849 .974
Equal variances
not assumed .138 25.113 .891 .063 .452 -.867 .992
assumed 1.165 .290 1.651 28 .110 .705 .427 -.170 1.580
Equal variances
not assumed 1.642 26.746 .112 .705 .430 -.176 1.587
Ave_Self-Esteem Equal variances
assumed .175 .679 .503 28 .619 .114 .227 -.351 .580
Equal variances
not assumed .502 27.289 .620 .114 .228 -.353 .581
DATA PRESENTATION:
Differences in the Level of Self-Esteem between Male and Female Respondents*
Level of Self-Esteem Gender Mean Standard t – value Sig Decision on Interpretation

Deviation Ho
I feel good about my studies. Male 2.21 1.188 -1.113 0.275 Accepted Not Significant
Female 2.69 1.138
On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates in school. Male 2.50 1.345 0.281 0.780 Accepted Not Significant
Female 2.38 1.088
I am proud of my ability to cope with difficulties in school. Male 2.64 1.216 0.039 0.970 Accepted Not Significant
Female 2.63 1.310
When I feel uncomfortable in school, I know how to handle it. Male 3.14 1.167 0.869 0.392 Accepted Not Significant
Female 2.75 1.291
I can tell that my classmates in school are glad to have me there. Male 2.71 1.437 -0.206 0.838 Accepted Not Significant
Female 2.81 1.167
I know I’ll be able to cope with my studies for as long as I want. Male 2.43 1.222 -0.281 0.780 Accepted Not Significant
Female 2.56 1.365
I am proud of my relationship with my professors in school. Male 2.71 1.267 1.063 0.297 Accepted Not Significant
Female 2.25 1.125
I am confident that I can handle my studies without constant assistance. Male 2.64 1.216 0.186 0.854 Accepted Not Significant
Female 2.56 1.153
I feel like I make a useful contribution at school. Male 2.50 1.345 0.140 0.889 Accepted Not Significant
Female 2.44 1.094
I can tell that my classmates respect me. Male 2.64 1.216 1.651 0.110 Accepted Not Significant
Female 1.94 1.124
Composite Mean Male 2.61 0.629 0.503 0.619 Accepted Not Significant
Female 2.50 0.614
A.5. There is no significant difference on the level of self-esteem among the different age groups. (Ho5)*
A.6. There is no significant difference on the level of satisfaction among the different age groups. (H o6)
PASW RESULTS:
Oneway
Descriptives
95% Confidence Interval for

Mean
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound Minimum Maximum
Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old 6 2.50 1.378 .563 1.05 3.95 1 4
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 1.86 .900 .340 1.03 2.69 1 3
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 2.83 .983 .401 1.80 3.87 2 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 1.33 .577 .333 -.10 2.77 1 2
61 yrs. old and above 8 3.13 1.126 .398 2.18 4.07 1 4
Total 30 2.47 1.167 .213 2.03 2.90 1 4
Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old 6 2.33 1.506 .615 .75 3.91 1 4
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 2.43 1.512 .571 1.03 3.83 1 4
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 2.67 .816 .333 1.81 3.52 2 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 2.33 1.528 .882 -1.46 6.13 1 4
61 yrs. old and above 8 2.38 1.061 .375 1.49 3.26 1 4
Total 30 2.43 1.194 .218 1.99 2.88 1 4
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 2.29 1.380 .522 1.01 3.56 1 4
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 3.50 .837 .342 2.62 4.38 2 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 2.00 .000 .000 2.00 2.00 2 2
61 yrs. old and above 8 3.00 1.069 .378 2.11 3.89 1 4
Total 30 2.63 1.245 .227 2.17 3.10 1 4
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 2.86 1.464 .553 1.50 4.21 1 4
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 3.00 1.095 .447 1.85 4.15 2 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 2.00 1.000 .577 -.48 4.48 1 3
61 yrs. old and above 8 3.13 1.356 .479 1.99 4.26 1 4
Total 30 2.93 1.230 .225 2.47 3.39 1 4
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 2.86 1.464 .553 1.50 4.21 1 4
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 3.17 .983 .401 2.13 4.20 2 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 2.67 1.528 .882 -1.13 6.46 1 4
61 yrs. old and above 8 2.75 1.282 .453 1.68 3.82 1 4
Total 30 2.77 1.278 .233 2.29 3.24 1 4
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 1.71 1.254 .474 .55 2.87 1 4
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 3.17 .753 .307 2.38 3.96 2 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 2.33 1.528 .882 -1.46 6.13 1 4
61 yrs. old and above 8 3.38 1.061 .375 2.49 4.26 1 4
Total 30 2.50 1.280 .234 2.02 2.98 1 4
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 1.43 .787 .297 .70 2.16 1 3
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 2.67 1.033 .422 1.58 3.75 1 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 3.33 1.155 .667 .46 6.20 2 4
61 yrs. old and above 8 3.00 1.069 .378 2.11 3.89 1 4
Total 30 2.47 1.196 .218 2.02 2.91 1 4
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 2.86 1.069 .404 1.87 3.85 1 4
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 3.00 1.549 .632 1.37 4.63 1 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 2.67 1.528 .882 -1.13 6.46 1 4
61 yrs. old and above 8 2.25 1.035 .366 1.38 3.12 1 4
Total 30 2.60 1.163 .212 2.17 3.03 1 4
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 2.86 .900 .340 2.03 3.69 2 4
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 3.00 1.095 .447 1.85 4.15 2 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 2.33 1.528 .882 -1.46 6.13 1 4
61 yrs. old and above 8 2.25 1.282 .453 1.18 3.32 1 4
Total 30 2.47 1.196 .218 2.02 2.91 1 4
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 2.57 1.134 .429 1.52 3.62 1 4
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 2.17 .983 .401 1.13 3.20 1 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 2.33 1.528 .882 -1.46 6.13 1 4
61 yrs. old and above 8 2.00 1.309 .463 .91 3.09 1 4
Total 30 2.27 1.202 .219 1.82 2.72 1 4
Ave_Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old 6 2.28 .765 .312 1.48 3.09 1 3
31 to 40 yrs. old 7 2.37 .795 .301 1.64 3.11 1 4
41 to 50 yrs. old 6 2.92 .462 .189 2.43 3.40 2 4
51 to 60 yrs. old 3 2.33 .153 .088 1.95 2.71 2 3
61 yrs. old and above 8 2.73 .417 .147 2.38 3.07 2 3
Total 30 2.55 .613 .112 2.32 2.78 1 4
ANOVA
Sum of
Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Self-Esteem Between Groups 10.735 4 2.684 2.335 .083
Within Groups 28.732 25 1.149
Total 39.467 29
Self-Esteem Between Groups .444 4 .111 .068 .991
Total 41.367 29
Total 44.967 29
Self-Esteem Between Groups 3.301 4 .825 .509 .730
Total 43.867 29
Total 47.367 29
Total 47.500 29
Total 41.467 29
Total 39.200 29
Self-Esteem Between Groups 5.610 4 1.402 .978 .437
Total 41.467 29
Total 41.867 29
Ave_Self-Esteem Between Groups 1.842 4 .461 1.272 .307
Within Groups 9.053 25 .362
Total 10.895 29
POST HOC TESTS:
Multiple Comparisons
Tukey HSD
95% Confidence Interval

Mean
Difference
Dependent Variable (I) Age (J) Age (I-J) Std. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old 31 to 40 yrs. old .643 .596 .816 -1.11 2.39
41 to 50 yrs. old -.333 .619 .982 -2.15 1.48
51 to 60 yrs. old 1.167 .758 .548 -1.06 3.39
61 yrs. old and above -.625 .579 .815 -2.33 1.08
31 to 40 yrs. old 20 to 30 yrs. old -.643 .596 .816 -2.39 1.11
41 to 50 yrs. old -.976 .596 .489 -2.73 .78
51 to 60 yrs. old .524 .740 .953 -1.65 2.70
61 yrs. old and above -1.268 .555 .183 -2.90 .36
41 to 50 yrs. old 20 to 30 yrs. old .333 .619 .982 -1.48 2.15
31 to 40 yrs. old .976 .596 .489 -.78 2.73
51 to 60 yrs. old 1.500 .758 .305 -.73 3.73
61 yrs. old and above -.292 .579 .986 -1.99 1.41
51 to 60 yrs. old 20 to 30 yrs. old -1.167 .758 .548 -3.39 1.06
31 to 40 yrs. old -.524 .740 .953 -2.70 1.65
41 to 50 yrs. old -1.500 .758 .305 -3.73 .73
61 yrs. old and above -1.792 .726 .130 -3.92 .34
61 yrs. old and above 20 to 30 yrs. old .625 .579 .815 -1.08 2.33
31 to 40 yrs. old 1.268 .555 .183 -.36 2.90
41 to 50 yrs. old .292 .579 .986 -1.41 1.99
51 to 60 yrs. old 1.792 .726 .130 -.34 3.92
Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old 31 to 40 yrs. old -.095 .712 1.000 -2.19 2.00
41 to 50 yrs. old -.333 .739 .991 -2.50 1.84
51 to 60 yrs. old .000 .905 1.000 -2.66 2.66
61 yrs. old and above -.042 .691 1.000 -2.07 1.99
31 to 40 yrs. old 20 to 30 yrs. old .095 .712 1.000 -2.00 2.19
41 to 50 yrs. old -.238 .712 .997 -2.33 1.85
51 to 60 yrs. old .095 .883 1.000 -2.50 2.69
61 yrs. old and above .054 .662 1.000 -1.89 2.00
31 to 40 yrs. old .238 .712 .997 -1.85 2.33
51 to 60 yrs. old .333 .905 .996 -2.32 2.99
61 yrs. old and above .292 .691 .993 -1.74 2.32
31 to 40 yrs. old -.095 .883 1.000 -2.69 2.50
41 to 50 yrs. old -.333 .905 .996 -2.99 2.32
61 yrs. old and above -.042 .866 1.000 -2.59 2.50
61 yrs. old and above 20 to 30 yrs. old .042 .691 1.000 -1.99 2.07
31 to 40 yrs. old -.054 .662 1.000 -2.00 1.89
41 to 50 yrs. old -.292 .691 .993 -2.32 1.74
51 to 60 yrs. old .042 .866 1.000 -2.50 2.59
Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old 31 to 40 yrs. old -.286 .658 .992 -2.22 1.65
41 to 50 yrs. old -1.500 .682 .213 -3.50 .50
51 to 60 yrs. old .000 .836 1.000 -2.45 2.45
61 yrs. old and above -1.000 .638 .531 -2.87 .87
41 to 50 yrs. old -1.214 .658 .371 -3.15 .72
51 to 60 yrs. old .286 .816 .997 -2.11 2.68
61 yrs. old and above -.714 .612 .769 -2.51 1.08
41 to 50 yrs. old 20 to 30 yrs. old 1.500 .682 .213 -.50 3.50
31 to 40 yrs. old 1.214 .658 .371 -.72 3.15
51 to 60 yrs. old 1.500 .836 .399 -.95 3.95
61 yrs. old and above .500 .638 .933 -1.37 2.37
31 to 40 yrs. old -.286 .816 .997 -2.68 2.11
41 to 50 yrs. old -1.500 .836 .399 -3.95 .95
61 yrs. old and above -1.000 .800 .723 -3.35 1.35
61 yrs. old and above 20 to 30 yrs. old 1.000 .638 .531 -.87 2.87
31 to 40 yrs. old .714 .612 .769 -1.08 2.51
41 to 50 yrs. old -.500 .638 .933 -2.37 1.37
51 to 60 yrs. old 1.000 .800 .723 -1.35 3.35
Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old 31 to 40 yrs. old .310 .709 .992 -1.77 2.39
41 to 50 yrs. old .167 .735 .999 -1.99 2.33
51 to 60 yrs. old 1.167 .901 .696 -1.48 3.81
61 yrs. old and above .042 .688 1.000 -1.98 2.06
41 to 50 yrs. old -.143 .709 1.000 -2.22 1.94
51 to 60 yrs. old .857 .879 .864 -1.72 3.44
61 yrs. old and above -.268 .659 .994 -2.20 1.67
31 to 40 yrs. old .143 .709 1.000 -1.94 2.22
51 to 60 yrs. old 1.000 .901 .800 -1.65 3.65
61 yrs. old and above -.125 .688 1.000 -2.15 1.90
51 to 60 yrs. old 20 to 30 yrs. old -1.167 .901 .696 -3.81 1.48
31 to 40 yrs. old -.857 .879 .864 -3.44 1.72
41 to 50 yrs. old -1.000 .901 .800 -3.65 1.65
61 yrs. old and above -1.125 .862 .691 -3.66 1.41
61 yrs. old and above 20 to 30 yrs. old -.042 .688 1.000 -2.06 1.98
31 to 40 yrs. old .268 .659 .994 -1.67 2.20
41 to 50 yrs. old .125 .688 1.000 -1.90 2.15
51 to 60 yrs. old 1.125 .862 .691 -1.41 3.66
41 to 50 yrs. old -.833 .776 .818 -3.11 1.45
51 to 60 yrs. old -.333 .951 .997 -3.13 2.46
61 yrs. old and above -.417 .726 .978 -2.55 1.72
41 to 50 yrs. old -.310 .748 .993 -2.51 1.89
51 to 60 yrs. old .190 .928 1.000 -2.53 2.92
61 yrs. old and above .107 .696 1.000 -1.94 2.15
31 to 40 yrs. old .310 .748 .993 -1.89 2.51
51 to 60 yrs. old .500 .951 .984 -2.29 3.29
61 yrs. old and above .417 .726 .978 -1.72 2.55
31 to 40 yrs. old -.190 .928 1.000 -2.92 2.53
41 to 50 yrs. old -.500 .951 .984 -3.29 2.29
61 yrs. old and above -.083 .910 1.000 -2.76 2.59
31 to 40 yrs. old -.107 .696 1.000 -2.15 1.94
41 to 50 yrs. old -.417 .726 .978 -2.55 1.72
51 to 60 yrs. old .083 .910 1.000 -2.59 2.76
Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old(*) 31 to 40 yrs. old(*) -.048 .611 1.000 -1.84 1.75
41 to 50 yrs. old -1.500 .634 .158 -3.36 .36
51 to 60 yrs. old -.667 .776 .909 -2.95 1.61
61 yrs. old and above -1.708 .593 .056 -3.45 .03
31 to 40 yrs. old(*) 20 to 30 yrs. old(*) .048 .611 1.000 -1.75 1.84
41 to 50 yrs. old -1.452 .611 .155 -3.25 .34
51 to 60 yrs. old -.619 .758 .923 -2.84 1.61
61 yrs. old and above -1.661 .568 .052 -3.33 .01
31 to 40 yrs. old 1.452 .611 .155 -.34 3.25
51 to 60 yrs. old .833 .776 .818 -1.45 3.11
61 yrs. old and above -.208 .593 .997 -1.95 1.53
31 to 40 yrs. old .619 .758 .923 -1.61 2.84
41 to 50 yrs. old -.833 .776 .818 -3.11 1.45
61 yrs. old and above -1.042 .743 .632 -3.22 1.14
61 yrs. old and above 20 to 30 yrs. old 1.708 .593 .056 -.03 3.45
31 to 40 yrs. old 1.661 .568 .052 -.01 3.33
41 to 50 yrs. old .208 .593 .997 -1.53 1.95
51 to 60 yrs. old 1.042 .743 .632 -1.14 3.22
Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old 31 to 40 yrs. old .905 .600 .567 -.86 2.67
41 to 50 yrs. old -.333 .622 .983 -2.16 1.49
51 to 60 yrs. old -1.000 .762 .686 -3.24 1.24
61 yrs. old and above -.667 .582 .781 -2.38 1.04
31 to 40 yrs. old 20 to 30 yrs. old -.905 .600 .567 -2.67 .86
41 to 50 yrs. old -1.238 .600 .266 -3.00 .52
51 to 60 yrs. old -1.905 .744 .109 -4.09 .28
61 yrs. old and above -1.571 .558 .065 -3.21 .07
31 to 40 yrs. old 1.238 .600 .266 -.52 3.00
51 to 60 yrs. old -.667 .762 .903 -2.91 1.57
61 yrs. old and above -.333 .582 .978 -2.04 1.38
51 to 60 yrs. old 20 to 30 yrs. old 1.000 .762 .686 -1.24 3.24
31 to 40 yrs. old 1.905 .744 .109 -.28 4.09
41 to 50 yrs. old .667 .762 .903 -1.57 2.91
61 yrs. old and above .333 .730 .990 -1.81 2.48
31 to 40 yrs. old 1.571 .558 .065 -.07 3.21
41 to 50 yrs. old .333 .582 .978 -1.38 2.04
51 to 60 yrs. old -.333 .730 .990 -2.48 1.81
41 to 50 yrs. old -.667 .696 .871 -2.71 1.38
51 to 60 yrs. old -.333 .853 .995 -2.84 2.17
61 yrs. old and above .083 .651 1.000 -1.83 2.00
41 to 50 yrs. old -.143 .671 1.000 -2.11 1.83
51 to 60 yrs. old .190 .832 .999 -2.25 2.63
61 yrs. old and above .607 .624 .865 -1.23 2.44
31 to 40 yrs. old .143 .671 1.000 -1.83 2.11
51 to 60 yrs. old .333 .853 .995 -2.17 2.84
61 yrs. old and above .750 .651 .778 -1.16 2.66
31 to 40 yrs. old -.190 .832 .999 -2.63 2.25
41 to 50 yrs. old -.333 .853 .995 -2.84 2.17
61 yrs. old and above .417 .816 .986 -1.98 2.81
61 yrs. old and above 20 to 30 yrs. old -.083 .651 1.000 -2.00 1.83
31 to 40 yrs. old -.607 .624 .865 -2.44 1.23
41 to 50 yrs. old -.750 .651 .778 -2.66 1.16
51 to 60 yrs. old -.417 .816 .986 -2.81 1.98
Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old 31 to 40 yrs. old -1.024 .666 .550 -2.98 .93
41 to 50 yrs. old -1.167 .691 .459 -3.20 .86
51 to 60 yrs. old -.500 .847 .975 -2.99 1.99
61 yrs. old and above -.417 .647 .966 -2.32 1.48
41 to 50 yrs. old -.143 .666 .999 -2.10 1.81
51 to 60 yrs. old .524 .826 .968 -1.90 2.95
61 yrs. old and above .607 .620 .862 -1.21 2.43
31 to 40 yrs. old .143 .666 .999 -1.81 2.10
51 to 60 yrs. old .667 .847 .932 -1.82 3.15
61 yrs. old and above .750 .647 .774 -1.15 2.65
31 to 40 yrs. old -.524 .826 .968 -2.95 1.90
41 to 50 yrs. old -.667 .847 .932 -3.15 1.82
61 yrs. old and above .083 .811 1.000 -2.30 2.46
31 to 40 yrs. old -.607 .620 .862 -2.43 1.21
41 to 50 yrs. old -.750 .647 .774 -2.65 1.15
51 to 60 yrs. old -.083 .811 1.000 -2.46 2.30
41 to 50 yrs. old .167 .735 .999 -1.99 2.33
51 to 60 yrs. old .000 .901 1.000 -2.64 2.64
61 yrs. old and above .333 .688 .988 -1.69 2.35
41 to 50 yrs. old .405 .709 .978 -1.68 2.49
51 to 60 yrs. old .238 .879 .999 -2.34 2.82
61 yrs. old and above .571 .659 .906 -1.36 2.51
31 to 40 yrs. old -.405 .709 .978 -2.49 1.68
51 to 60 yrs. old -.167 .901 1.000 -2.81 2.48
61 yrs. old and above .167 .688 .999 -1.85 2.19
31 to 40 yrs. old -.238 .879 .999 -2.82 2.34
41 to 50 yrs. old .167 .901 1.000 -2.48 2.81
61 yrs. old and above .333 .862 .995 -2.20 2.87
61 yrs. old and above 20 to 30 yrs. old -.333 .688 .988 -2.35 1.69
31 to 40 yrs. old -.571 .659 .906 -2.51 1.36
41 to 50 yrs. old -.167 .688 .999 -2.19 1.85
51 to 60 yrs. old -.333 .862 .995 -2.87 2.20
Ave_Self-Esteem 20 to 30 yrs. old 31 to 40 yrs. old -.088 .335 .999 -1.07 .90
41 to 50 yrs. old -.633 .347 .383 -1.65 .39
51 to 60 yrs. old -.050 .426 1.000 -1.30 1.20
61 yrs. old and above -.442 .325 .658 -1.40 .51
31 to 40 yrs. old 20 to 30 yrs. old .088 .335 .999 -.90 1.07
41 to 50 yrs. old -.545 .335 .494 -1.53 .44
51 to 60 yrs. old .038 .415 1.000 -1.18 1.26
61 yrs. old and above -.354 .311 .787 -1.27 .56
41 to 50 yrs. old 20 to 30 yrs. old .633 .347 .383 -.39 1.65
31 to 40 yrs. old .545 .335 .494 -.44 1.53
51 to 60 yrs. old .583 .426 .651 -.67 1.83
61 yrs. old and above .192 .325 .975 -.76 1.15
31 to 40 yrs. old -.038 .415 1.000 -1.26 1.18
41 to 50 yrs. old -.583 .426 .651 -1.83 .67
61 yrs. old and above -.392 .407 .870 -1.59 .80
61 yrs. old and above 20 to 30 yrs. old .442 .325 .658 -.51 1.40
31 to 40 yrs. old .354 .311 .787 -.56 1.27
41 to 50 yrs. old -.192 .325 .975 -1.15 .76
51 to 60 yrs. old .392 .407 .870 -.80 1.59
Differences in the Level of Self-Esteem Among Different Age Groups*
Self-Esteem Age Mean Standard F – value Sig Decision on Interpretation

Deviation Ho
I feel good about my studies. 20 to 30 yrs. old 2.50 1.378 2.335 0.083 Accepted Not Significant
31 to 40 yrs. old 1.86 0.900
41 to 50 yrs. old 2.83 0.983
51 to 60 yrs. old 1.33 0.577
61 yrs. old and above 3.13 1.126
On the whole, I get along well with my other classmates in 20 to 30 yrs. old 2.33 1.506 0.068 0.991 Accepted Not Significant
school. 31 to 40 yrs. old 2.43 1.512
41 to 50 yrs. old 2.67 0.816
51 to 60 yrs. old 2.33 1.528
I am proud of my ability to cope with difficulties in school. 20 to 30 yrs. old 2.00 1.549 1.796 0.161 Accepted Not Significant
31 to 40 yrs. old 2.29 1.380
41 to 50 yrs. old 3.50 0.837
51 to 60 yrs. old 2.00 0.000
When I feel uncomfortable in school, I know how to handle it. 20 to 30 yrs. old 3.17 1.169 0.509 0.730 Accepted Not Significant
31 to 40 yrs. old 2.86 1.464
41 to 50 yrs. old 3.00 1.095
51 to 60 yrs. old 2.00 1.000
I can tell that my classmates in school are glad to have me 20 to 30 yrs. old 2.33 1.506 0.301 0.875 Accepted Not Significant
there. 31 to 40 yrs. old 2.86 1.464
41 to 50 yrs. old 3.17 0.983
51 to 60 yrs. old 2.67 1.528
I know I’ll be able to cope with my studies for as long as I want. 20 to 30 yrs. old 1.67 1.033 3.601 0.019 Not Significant
31 to 40 yrs. old 1.71 1.254 Accepted
41 to 50 yrs. old 3.17 0.753
51 to 60 yrs. old 2.33 1.528
I am proud of my relationship with my professors in school. 20 to 30 yrs. old 2.33 1.366 2.672 0.055 Accepted Not Significant
31 to 40 yrs. old 1.43 0.787
41 to 50 yrs. old 2.67 1.033
51 to 60 yrs. old 3.33 1.155
I am confident that I can handle my studies without constant 20 to 30 yrs. old 2.33 1.033 0.489 0.744 Accepted Not Significant
assistance. 31 to 40 yrs. old 2.86 1.069
41 to 50 yrs. old 3.00 1.549
51 to 60 yrs. old 2.67 1.528
I feel like I make a useful contribution at school. 20 to 30 yrs. old 1.83 1.329 0.978 0.437 Accepted Not Significant
31 to 40 yrs. old 2.86 0.900
41 to 50 yrs. old 3.00 1.095
51 to 60 yrs. old 2.33 1.528
I can tell that my classmates respect me. 20 to 30 yrs. old 2.33 1.506 0.203 0.934 Accepted Not Significant
31 to 40 yrs. old 2.57 1.134
41 to 50 yrs. old 2.17 0.983
51 to 60 yrs. old 2.33 1.528
Composite Mean 20 to 30 yrs. old 2.28 0.765 1.272 0.307 Accepted Not Significant
31 to 40 yrs. old 2.37 0.795
41 to 50 yrs. old 2.92 0.462
51 to 60 yrs. old 2.33 0.153
Follow-up Tests in the Level of Self-Esteem Among Different Age Groups*
Self – Esteem Age 20 to 30 yrs. old 31 to 40 yrs. old 41 to 50 yrs. old 51 to 60 yrs. old 61 yrs. old and above
I know I’ll be able to 20 to 30 yrs. old *
cope with my studies 31 to 40 yrs. old *
for as long as I want 41 to 50 yrs. old
51 to 60 yrs. old
61 yrs. old and above
FINDINGS:*
 There is no significant difference on the level of self-esteem between males and females.
The PASW generated outputs are t-value at 0.503 and sig – value of 0.619 which is greater than 0.05.
 There is no significant difference on the level of self-esteem among different age groups.
The PASW generated outputs are F-value of 1.272 and sig – value of 0.307.which is greater than 0.05.
CONCLUSION:*
 Accept Ho1 and Ho5.
INTERPRETATION:*
 The male and female groups have similar over-all views on the level of self-esteem.
 All of the five (5) age groups have similar over-all views on the level of self-esteem.
*Only partial tables were presented but in actual portfolio, ALL problem statements pertaining to measures of differences have to be presented in tabular form.
*Every hypothesis should be followed with PASW results, post-hoc test (for One-way ANOVA), tabular presentation, findings, conclusion and interpretation.
* For t-test, assume equality of variances. Only results accompanied with (*) require Post Hoc or Follow-up Test. Follow-up Tests could either be Scheffe or Tukey. Please refer to the table above for the format.
*The same hypothesis must be taken from Portfolio 7.
*If PASW results cannot be possibly presented in portrait orientation, use the landscape but do not change the paper size (letter).
*Strictly follow the format presented. If in doubt, ask your respective professor.
MEASURES OF CORRELATION
In reference to Portfolio 7, the hypotheses on measures of correlation were formulated. In Portfolio 9, the acceptance or
rejection of these hypotheses will be based on the PASW results utilizing the different tests of correlation such as Pearson’s r
(interval/ratio by interval/ratio), Chi-Square (nominal by nominal), Spearman’s rho (ordinal by ordinal) or Eta (nominal by interval)
Correlation.
*
B.1. There is no significant relationship between self-esteem and gender of the respondents. (Ho13)
There is a significant relationship between self-esteem and gender of the respondents. (H113)
PASW RESULTS:
Means
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Ave_Self-Esteem * Gender
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Ave_Self-Esteem * Religion
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Ave_Self-Esteem * Age 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Ave_Self-Esteem * Educational Attainment
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Ave_Self-Esteem * Net Monthly Income Range 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Measures of Association
Eta Eta Squared Eta Eta Squared

Ave_Self-Esteem * Ave_Self-Esteem *
Gender .095 .009 .187 .035
Religion

Ave_Self-Esteem * Age Ave_Self-Esteem *
.411 .169 .377 .142
Educational Attainment
Eta Eta Squared

Ave_Self-Esteem * Net
Monthly Income Range .491 .241
Relationship Between the Respondents’ Self-Esteem and Demographic Profile*
Respondents’ Self-Esteem Eta Eta Squared Decision on Ho Interpretation

in Relation to their:
Gender 0.095 0.009 Rejected Significant
Religion 0.187 0.035 Rejected Significant
Age 0.411 0.169 Accepted Not Significant
Educational Attainment 0.377 0.142 Accepted Not Significant
Net monthly Income Range 0.491 0.241 Accepted Not Significant
At 0.05 Level of Significance
FINDINGS:*
 There is a significant relationship between self-esteem and gender of the respondents.
The PASW generated output is eta squared coefficient of 0.009 which is lower than 0.05.
 There is a significant relationship between self-esteem and religion of the respondents.
 There is no significant relationship between self-esteem and age of the respondents.
The PASW generated output is eta squared coefficient of 0.169 which is greater than 0.05.
 There is no significant relationship between self-esteem and educational attainment of the respondents.
 There is no significant relationship between self-esteem and net monthly income range of the respondents.
CONCLUSION:*
 Accept Ho15, Ho16 and Ho17
 Reject Ho13 and Ho14
INTERPRETATION:*
 The level of self-esteem of the respondents has something to do with their gender and religion.
B.6. There is no significant relationship between satisfaction and gender of the respondents. (Ho18)
There is a significant relationship between satisfaction and gender of the respondents. (H118)
PASW RESULTS:
Means
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Ave_Satisfaction Scale *
Gender 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Religion 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Age 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Educational Attainment 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Net Monthly Income 30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Range
Measures of Association

Ave_Satisfaction Ave_Satisfaction
Scale * Gender .046 .002 Scale * Age .370 .137

Ave_Satisfaction Scale * Ave_Satisfaction
Educational Attainment .234 .055 Scale * Net Monthly .425 .180
Income Range
Eta Eta Squared

Ave_Satisfaction
Scale * Religion .165 .027
Relationship Between the Respondents’ Satisfaction and Demographic Profile*
Respondents’ Satisfaction Eta Eta Squared Decision on Ho Interpretation

in Relation to their:
Gender 0.046 0.002 Rejected Significant
Religion 0.165 0.027 Rejected Significant
Age 0.370 0.137 Accepted Not Significant
Educational Attainment 0.234 0.055 Accepted Not Significant
Net monthly Income Range 0.425 0.180 Accepted Not Significant
At 0.05 Level of Significance
FINDINGS:*
 There is a significant relationship between satisfaction and gender of the respondents.
 There is a significant relationship between satisfaction and religion of the respondents.
 There is no significant relationship between satisfaction and age of the respondents.
 There is no significant relationship between satisfaction and educational attainment of the respondents.
 There is no significant relationship between satisfaction and net monthly income range of the respondents.
CONCLUSION:*
 Accept Ho20, Ho21 and Ho22
 Reject Ho18 and Ho19
INTERPRETATION:*
 The level of satisfaction of the respondents has something to do with their religion only.
B.11. There is no significant relationship between the respondents’ level of self-esteem and satisfaction (Ho23)
There is a significant relationship between the respondents’ level of self-esteem and satisfaction (H123)
PASW RESULTS:
Correlations
Correlations
Ave_Self- Ave_Satisfaction
Esteem Scale
Ave_Self-Esteem Pearson Correlation 1 .276
Sig. (2-tailed) .141
N 30 30
Ave_Satisfaction Scale Pearson Correlation .276 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .141
N 30 30
Relationship Between the Respondents’ Level of Self-Esteem and Level of Satisfaction
Respondents’ Level of Self- Computed r Sig Decision on Ho Interpretation

Esteem in Relation to:
Level of Satisfaction 0.276 0.141 Accepted Not Significant
FINDINGS:*
 There is moderate positive relationship between the respondents’ level of self-esteem and satisfaction but the
relationship is not significant.
The PASW generated output is sig value of 0.141 which is greater than 0.05.
CONCLUSION:*
 Accept Ho23
INTERPRETATION:*
 The level of self-esteem of the respondents does not have something to do with their level of satisfaction.
*Only partial hypotheses were presented but in actual portfolio, ALL hypotheses pertaining to measures of correlation have to be presented in pairs (Ho and H1).
*For eta correlation (nominal by interval/ratio scale), to find the eta squared coefficient, please follow the following procedures:
1. Open the PASW software. Under the Data View, encode the data based on the answers of the respondents to the questionnaire.
2. Under the Variable View, click Analyze, Compare Means then Means.
3. A separate window will appear. Choose the interval variable in the list of variables from the left menu i.e. Ave_Satisfaction Scale, Ave_Self-Esteem and click on the
arrow for it to be included in the Dependent List.
4. In the same window, choose the nominal variable from the left menu i.e. gender, age, religion, educational attainment, net monthly income range and click on the left arrow
for it to be included in the Independent List.
5. Click Options then select Anova table and eta, then click Continue.
6. Click Ok then wait for the results.
*For chi-squared test (nominal by nominal scale), to find the Pearson chi-square coefficient, please follow the following procedures:
1. Open the PASW software. Under the Data View, encode the data based on the answers of the respondents to the questionnaire.
2. Under the Variable View, click Analyze, Descriptive Statistics, Crosstabs.
3. A separate window will appear. Choose the nominal variable in the list of variables from the left menu i.e. Gender, Religion and click on the left arrow for it to be included
in the Row(s).
4. In the same window, choose another nominal variable and click again on the left arrow for it to be included in the Column(s).
5. Click Statistics then select Chi-square.
6. Click Continue then click Ok and wait for the results.
*All hypotheses should be followed with PASW results, tabular presentation using the MTC Research format, findings, conclusion and interpretation.
*If PASW results cannot be possibly presented in portrait orientation, use the landscape but do not change the paper size (letter).
*Strictly follow the format presented. If in doubt, ask your respective professor.
MATRIX SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS
MEASURES OF DIFFERENCES
VARIABLES STATISTICAL TEST USED JUSTIFICATION DECISION ON Ho Interpretation

Self-esteem – Gender t-test of independent samples 2 independent groups Accepted Not Significant
Satisfaction – Gender t-test of independent samples 2 independent groups
Self-esteem – Religion t-test of independent samples 2 independent groups
Satisfaction – Religion t-test of independent samples 2 independent groups
Self-esteem – Age One-way ANOVA 5 independent groups
Satisfaction – Age One-way ANOVA 5 independent groups
Self-esteem – Educational Attainment One-way ANOVA 6 independent groups
Satisfaction – Educational Attainment One-way ANOVA 6 independent groups
Self-esteem – Net Monthly Income One-way ANOVA 6 independent groups
Satisfaction – Net Monthly Income One-way ANOVA 6 independent groups
Self-esteem – School Type (A and B) t-test of independent samples 2 independent groups
Satisfaction – School Type (A and B) t-test of independent samples 2 independent groups
MEASURES OF CORRELATION
VARIABLES STATISTICAL TEST USED JUSTIFICATION DECISION ON Ho Interpretation

Self-esteem – Gender Eta Correlation interval by nominal
Satisfaction – Gender Eta Correlation interval by nominal
Self-esteem – Religion Eta Correlation interval by nominal
Satisfaction – Religion Eta Correlation interval by nominal
Self-esteem – Age Eta Correlation interval by nominal
Satisfaction – Age Eta Correlation interval by nominal
Self-esteem – Educational Attainment Eta Correlation interval by nominal
Satisfaction – Educational Attainment Eta Correlation interval by nominal
Self-esteem – Net Monthly Income Eta Correlation interval by nominal
Satisfaction – Net Monthly Income Eta Correlation interval by nominal
Self-esteem – Satisfaction Pearson’s r Interval by interval
Gender – Religion Chi-square Test of Independence nominal by nominal
Gender – Age Chi-square Test of Independence nominal by nominal
Gender – Educational Attainment Chi-square Test of Independence nominal by nominal
Gender – Net Monthly Income Chi-square Test of Independence nominal by nominal
Religion – Age Chi-square Test of Independence nominal by nominal
Religion – Educational Attainment Chi-square Test of Independence nominal by nominal
Religion – Net Monthly Income Chi-square Test of Independence nominal by nominal
Age – Educational Attainment Chi-square Test of Independence nominal by nominal
Age – Net Monthly Income Chi-square Test of Independence nominal by nominal
Educational Attainment – Net Monthly Income Chi-square Test of Independence nominal by nominal
*All variables being tested must be shown in the matrix.

*For every statistical test used, there must be a corresponding justification.
*Separate tables must be prepared for measures of differences and correlation.
*Portfolio 10 must be presented in portrait orientation, with strict compliance of the format
*If in doubt, ask your respective professor.

Research Activity

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Research Activity

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Components of the Expected Output:

Chapter 1: Project Title and Background of the Problem/Project

Methods and Scope and Delimitation

Chapter 2: Demographic Profile of the Respondents and Response to Other Questions

Matrix Summary of Conclusions (Measures of Differences)

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM/PROJECT:

b. Independent Variables (Demographic Aspects)

b.1. Determining the Differences as shown in Portfolio 8

b.1.2. Comparison on the level of satisfaction based on the following:

b.2. Determining the Relationship as shown in Portfolio 9

* Strictly follow the given format

2nd Semester A.Y. 2018 – 2019

RUBRIC IN RATING THE RATING PORTFOLIO IN STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY

Respondent Code No. __________

PART A. Basic Personal Information

A.1. Name (Optional, print name please)

A.2. Gender (please tick one only) ( ) Male ( ) Female

A.3. Religion (please tick one only)

( ) 20 – 30 years old ( ) 51 – 60 years old

A.5. Educational Attainment

( ) Elementary Graduate ( ) College Degree

( ) below Php 10,000.00 ( ) Php 30,001 – Php 40,000

Statements Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly

Statements Strongly Agree Disagree Strongly

END OF THE SURVEY… THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRECIOUS TIME.

*strictly follow the given format

Table 4.1 Respondents’ Profile Based on Gender

Gender Frequency Percentage

Table 4.2 Respondents’ Profile Based on Religion*

Table 4.4 Respondents’ Profile Based on Educational Attainment

Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage

Table 4.5 Respondents’ Profile Based on Net Monthly Income Range

Net Monthly Income Range Frequency Percentage

Items Mean Standard Interpretation

Table 4.7 Satisfaction of the Respondents Towards Their Activity in School*

*strictly follow the given format especially the tabular presentations

Net Monthly Income Range

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation

A. MEASURES OF DIFFERENCES (t – test or One – Way ANOVA)

B. MEASURES OF CORRELATION (Pearson r, Chi-Square or Eta Correlation)

B.11. There is no significant relationship between self-esteem and satisfaction. (Ho23)

B. Using One-Way ANOVA with Follow-up Scheffe or Tukey Test

Levene's Test for

Differences in the Level of Self-Esteem between Male and Female Respondents*

Level of Self-Esteem Gender Mean Standard t – value Sig Decision on Interpretation

95% Confidence Interval for

POST HOC TESTS:

95% Confidence Interval

Differences in the Level of Self-Esteem Among Different Age Groups*

Self-Esteem Age Mean Standard F – value Sig Decision on Interpretation

Follow-up Tests in the Level of Self-Esteem Among Different Age Groups*

Eta Eta Squared Eta Eta Squared

Eta Eta Squared Eta Eta Squared

Eta Eta Squared

Relationship Between the Respondents’ Self-Esteem and Demographic Profile*

Respondents’ Self-Esteem Eta Eta Squared Decision on Ho Interpretation

Eta Eta Squared Eta Eta Squared

Eta Eta Squared Eta Eta Squared

Eta Eta Squared

Relationship Between the Respondents’ Satisfaction and Demographic Profile*

Respondents’ Satisfaction Eta Eta Squared Decision on Ho Interpretation