Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Potential Risks Assessment of Electronics Unit of Combined Cycle Power Plant by Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Potential Risks Assessment of Electronics Unit of Combined Cycle Power Plant by Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282851202
CITATIONS READS
0 34
5 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Mahdi Jalali on 17 November 2015.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
٧٨
!
(FMEA) #$ % & ' ( %) *+ , -. / ! "
*5
> < *3 44 :; < *3 43 6 7+ 8 421 . *3 41 1
FMEA O! +1 ( !. OC ' 7 : * ; B
94 ! "
٧٩
... S!3 1 M+! ( !. O O!. 2+ ) ;' +C ' 7
Abstract
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a method to systematically identify the failures of systems,
subsystems and their components in the different operational processes. The study aimed to identify the
failures modes and assess their potential effects on other systems, subsystems and other system
components in the electronic unit of combined cycle power plants by FMEA. Based on our design in the
first step, a team of experts was formed to identify the potential failures as well as determining their
Occurrences (O), severities (S), and capabilities of failure detection (Detectability) (D) leading to their
interaction as Risk Priority Number (RPN) in electronics unit. Then, administrative or engineering control
measures or Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) were proposed to diminish the high risk failures to
lower ones. Obtained data were analyzed with Excel software based on related procedures and guidelines
finally. Results showed numbers of potential risks identified in this unit were 37 cases of which 68% were
unacceptable level and 32% of those were at acceptable levels. Among these risks, the highest risk of
electrocution when replacing coal generators and electrocution caused accidentally energized wires went
to an abandoned area of unit with RPN equals to 300. Considering electrocution to the high risk score
units, Engineering and management control measures to reduce the risk of accidents caused by
Electrocution should has been considered in order to achieve optimum results and reducing the risk to
acceptable levels.
Keywords: Risk assessment, Power plant, Failure Mode and Effects Analysis, Safety
94 ! "
٨٠
,
' N ![ K ) ! ! 268 : ' N l K ) ! ! 2 .L (ILO) 3 H!' 7 G ( = '
! 1 6 4 5 K ) 3 3 ' * [ *I " *S![ M! ' .J 7 . 2? !" 3 P m :
3 e ) K ' 4. 1507 1390 . .? + " 7 : ( ' ' .(1) ' n I.
' 3e )7 .o J H 2-!' 2 U( 10 ' C ; 90 = H '. . * 7 I -3
.(2) * 2 f 6 16/8 89 ' C ; >? H . P p 2I I
R' +C * 7L : RI ' ' 3 3 *r 4) 23: ? !( >! 1 '
? H! _ P . ( s 20 P J OC j R H!!51 t ' OC ' 7 .(3) !( ? ' 7 6 2I
H+ OC ' 7 N. ' .(4) . *g 9 ' 7 !. : ? N. 'u !( >! 1 v 01 '
.(3) ( * 4[ 1 M' ? > : V 0 7 1 *! P >3 : RI Q 6 w' 7*
P P ) :! ' x 1 OC ! H!!51 RI g ' 52 I !I
* ( H+ P OC C ; M! 91 N1 ' ;SV .J 7 42 ' 3 2 5 1 ) V : N. I 3
2C( R' x !I 3 * (FMEA) J : K *C+ :L ) M! 91 N1 G H!' 7 .(5)
H .(6) * 2 ( ? 42 s 20 C P ) V P J :L 9 ;. M!C. 2" ' g '
J K H!!51 g ' z n;. P y S1 >2C! 8 ' z 8 3 M! 91 N1 >2C! z G
fP 3 ' P +P i 2C! n;. N 2 H!!51 FMEA Q P .(7) 3 !,!" >2C! '
: RI + P 7 >!P ' H .(8) ' J ! V *! ' ? f * ;. QU)
+C H 2 ' 7 (FMEA) J : K RI :L ) M! 91 N1 G ' 7 ! ,- L " ; '
L ' ` 2 ^ ' ;2. y RI 7 . : V 0 OC ' 7 g ' !. f. + P 7 .(9) . 3 '*
.(10) . 3 42 (FMEA) J : K RI :L ) M! 91 N1 G 7 . +C cV
7 42 d ) ) . . 4 !. ! 1 f;. 3 2CP P ( !. 7 S!3 1 M+! P ( !.
! ' g ' {1 2 5 1 H ' ' .* 2 ( ? 1 *I Q M? ) ' ` . ! 1 * ' P ( !. H
2CP O!. 2+ ^ ' P ) P ( !. ! J V0 2 C? 7 + .(12 ,11) ' 7 !. 2C! H 7
. { p I *! P V ' OC ' 7 ) H ,2 ( ^ ' RI L ' OC ' 1' 3
7 42 ' S!3 1 M+! ( !. O O!. 2+ ) ; ' : RI ' 7 Q P ' d ) 5 R g H '
. ( N. (FMEA) OC ' 7 O! +1
/
. ! ' 7 }" ) . ( N. 92 S!3 1 M+! P ( !. 7 + 5R H
) *3 *SK m e ) ! P r *!5d ) P *! C) ' 1 ' ( !. ( . ( P )
? ' : RI M! 91 N1 ' 7 g ' * C? H 1> H! ' ( !. H O!. 2+
N1 >2C! z G H . 42 (FMEA) J : K *C+ :L ) M! 91 N1 G 7 g H ' .* (
!,!" >2C! ' J K H!!51 g ' z n;. P y S1 >2C! 8 ' z 8 3 M! 91
H!!51 FMEA Q P .(7) 42 6 I o ' 3 7 M! 91 N1 7 M6 ) P *SK ' G H . 3
! V *! ' ? f * ;. QU) fP 3 ' P +P i 2C! n;. N 2
7 M+-2 3 ( O M!+-1 ' ? : RI ~3 ) u ' ' ) .(8) '
94 ! "
٨١
... S!3 1 M+! ( !. O O!. 2+ ) ;' +C ' 7
;, O
51 H 7 .* J2 3 ' 37 ) H ; ' : RI 51 5 R H
. H 1L ' : RI H H!' 7 .(1 M+ ) * ( ? H! " 8 2 \R %32 S? M' ? ![ \R %68
V9 P P >! ? 41 ^' K ,2 (^ ' 1 .` [7 a 51 , P ,2 (^ ' ' OC
.* ( c 51 300 5 RPN ' ' )
C4 1 N >-ƒ ' ` +! : v K C4 1 † 7 ' 2) ' OC * H 2 3 H! _ P
.* ( c 51 36 5 RPN ' C. 1 ,. ! 51 7 C. 1 ` +! a 51 H!)
94 ! "
٨٢
4% ( ; 6 7; , ( E( % CD -2 I
% CD ! Q ;, R RPN E( ' * G H G I 7
F> ' * G
H G I7
RPN
% (
#$ ; 6 '*3 4 ( E(
,.
G" # ( G & O SD V I7
OC
300 6 5 10 ,W + ( ; % X, , %- . * 7
L'
,( %- .
OC Q. & % 7T 8 7 % X! I7
210 6 5 7
L' G R CD 7T % *73
! B Y & 7 % X! I7
OC
200 5 5 8 I R CD 7T Q SE; Z R CD , G R CD
L'
Z
! ( ." & % D [ $! I7
OC # , '*3 , W ." W # ! \7.
192 6 4 8
L' S 7T # ! B ( B (8 W ]
W
# & 7>A "E 7 ! I7
OC
128 4 8 4 - 7 Q SE; "E S ^>A D , % _
8 2
Z ; *
O SO Z & 7 % X! V I7
OC
160 4 4 10 4 * 6 S 7T Q SE; 4 `a 8
L'
; ; b
OC & $# (, ( ' # >S # I7
96 6 4 4
8 2 EO B ( Q SE; X
OC G '7 G ' b7 & SO Z I7
160 4 4 10
L' ; S 7T Q SE; 4
G 7 G - D & SO Z I7
OC
160 4 4 10 -7 8 * 6 ; , ,W %) c \CG
L'
; * 6
94 ! "
٨٣
... S!3 1 M+! ( !. O O!. 2+ ) ;' +C ' 7
G E ( # Y d3 b 7 & SO Z I7
OC
160 4 4 10 [c Q 3 ; b * 6 S 7T 8
L'
e" GW
%- . , % D! 7 % X! I7
OC [c ; * G 7 G % E 6b7 &
72 6 2 6
8 2 7T Q SE; 4 ] # ! '*3 , 73 fW + (
; ; b 4 * 6 S
& 7 % X! SO Z V I7
OC
200 5 4 10 G %- . E 6b7 %- . f ! OI c
L'
%- . S 7T 8
SO Z & 7 % X! V I7
OC %- . G 7 G - b 7 '*3 , E 6
200 5 4 10
L' 7T 8 4# ] T % 7T TO Q . 8
%- . S
, % TCG Y ( D & 7 % X! I7
OC
120 3 5 8 S 7T 8 4 * E / 6 [c Q 3 '*3
8 2
%- .
,D : )# (, ( & ' I7
OC
64 4 4 4 %- . S 7T 8 4 $ g T Q SE; '
H! "
]$ _ " & O SD %- . , % DI 7
73 fW + ( [c %- . # ,
OC
108 3 4 9 I c h3 i ,( ]$ /- I 7 , a;
8 2
SO Z %- . -*O f # ( Z
( E 6
* j 38 O 8 ! & SO Z I7
OC
144 4 4 9 i a ; '7 G b 7
L'
G ;' a E 6b7
." ! & % D SD I7
OC
240 6 4 10 %- . ! ." G ;! jW E , X
L'
( > " ,G <
OC & %- . , % DI 7 O SD I7
216 6 4 9
L' B #! k % U 7D , ,3 ' X
94 ! "
٨٤
; Z % Ic # \CG '*3 , ) B
%- . S 7T 8 4, (,
94 ! "
٨٥
... S!3 1 M+! ( !. O O!. 2+ ) ;' +C ' 7
! E 6R & 7 % X! I7
OC
240 4 6 10 \" E E( : )g T 8 '
L'
E( 7 S 7T 8
% D . d3 t & 7 % X! I7
OC O 6 8 ! R # &
192 4 6 8
L' 8 I ;8 g T EO . 8
8 8 " EO S 7T
8 O R & O d3 t % OI 7
OC
240 4 6 10 7T Q SE; Q!) 'G Q 3 '*3 , " E
L'
" E S
8m % k 3 c & "E 7 ! I7
OC
144 4 6 6 oE # s 8 "E S , #$
L'
; % 7T 8 ;
OC Q SE; SO Z & O d3 t V I7
300 6 5 10
L' B m! g T
4 * ^ # ( & 7 % X! I7
OC Q . '*3 , ) u S 4 ; .!
192 6 8 4
L' g T ' ) ! " 8 ; !
,D :)
' 3 Q 3 & % X! I7
OC
168 6 4 7 ! ' ([ ! ( Q13 E7 *7T
L'
,D : )g T ' ) ! " 8
94 ! "
٨٦
,. h+
O! +1 7 42 ' S!3 1 M+! P ( !. 7 + O!. 2+ ) ; ' +C ' 7 'Q P ' 5R H
M' ? ![ \R +C 7 ٪68 !( ? 7 -. ) H ' 7 M6 ) W 2. .* U" N. FMEA
' ) *!5d 'u . P -. H 3 ' H! " 8 2 \R ٪32 S?
M! 91 N1 ' R 9. ' +C 1 FMEA G 7 42 ' 3 -. 5 R H . '
S? M' ? ![ +C fP 3 * u P +P i ' 1 2 U" N. P ' ' 1 ' . ' S1
8 1 H!;;9 , 8 1 3 * 15 R ' cSR W 2. H .* ' ( S? M' ? \R ' .J .
' RI ! .J G ) VQ P ' + P Bonnabry 8 1 3 ;!;91 7 .* 2 U" N. FMEA G
FMEA G 7 * U" N. !' 1L ' -0' K ' !' ' y ' : V 3 1 !€ 3 K ' ! 7
' y ' s 20 : V FMEA G 7 P 42 3 !( N!2. ( 42 : RI ! .J g '
f t ' ( . 2S? 3 >2C! *! ' ? f t ' . 1 1 !€ 3 : 6 ' !'
H FMEA G 3 n0- ( N. + P !C) 8 1 3 I 5R H! _ P .(16) ( !'
J= ' 1 ! s 20 P7 K ) N M!C. 2" s 20 M 3 3 >P +
.(17) . ) V S? M' ? j R ' S? M' ? ![ j R 7 : RI fP 3 ' u 23: ? 1
K ,2 (^ ' 1 .` [7 a 51 , P ,2 (^ ' ' y ' OC . H 1L ' 3 -. d ) 5 R W 2.
7 ' 2) ' OC * H 2 3 H! _ P . ' ' ) V9 P P >! ' ? 41 u! J
! 51 7 C. 1 ` +! a 51 H!) C4 1 N >-ƒ ' ` +! : v K C4 1 †
' W 2. H . ' ' ) : RI u ' S1 7 -. W 2. H . ' y ' C. 1 ,.
N. c ' L . I 3 e ) ` " 3 5R J . . 0 P + P ; ' 7 5!4 5 R P 2
+ ' . '* RI ! g. 7 s 20 M[ - . 1 FMEA G 7 42 3 ( n0-
94 ! "
٨٧
... S!3 1 M+! ( !. O O!. 2+ ) ;' +C ' 7
G >
3 . ! 3 H! _ P 5R S!3 1 M+! ( !. 3 3 ! 3 7 3 . 7L I ' ; ( C .
. . +-1 ;1 . . . PG 1 ` "H !7
\ E
1. Cheng C-W, Leu S-S, Cheng Y-M, Wu T-C, Lin C-C. Applying data mining techniques to explore
factors contributing to occupational injuries in Taiwan's construction industry. Accident Analysis &
Prevention. 2011;48:214-22.
2. Iranian Legal Medicine Organization. occupational accident. IRAN; [cited 1391]; Available from:
.http://www.lmo.ir./
3. Jahangiri M, parsarad M. Health risk assessment of harmful chemicals: case study in a
petrochemical industry iran occupational risk. 2011;7(4):18-24.(in persian)
4. OS&HD. A Semi-Quantitative Method to Assess Occupational Exposure to Harmful Chemicals.
singapor: ministry of manpower; 2005.
5. Kamalinia M, Amjad sarderodi H, editors. Risk assessment of lathe machines and grindstone in the
manufacturing industrial component Occupational Safety and Health Congress; 2011; Ghazvin-
Iran. (in persian)
6. Wang Y-M, Chin K-S, Poon GKK, Yang J-B. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis
using fuzzy weighted geometric mean. Expert Systems with Applications. 2009;36(2):1195-207.
7. Brauer RL. Safety and health for engineers. 2 ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
8. Pentti H, Atte H. Failure mode and effects analysis of software-based automation systems. STUK-
Y TO-TR-19 0 ,August. 2002;2:1-36.
9. Ebrahimzadeh M, Halvani GH, Mortazavi M, Soltani R. Assessment of potential hazards by Failure
Modes and Effect Analysis (FMEA) method in Shiraz Oil Refinery. Occupational Medicine.
2011;3(2):16-23. (in persian)
10. Jozi S, Jafarzadeh Haghighi Fard N, Afzali Behbahani N. Hazard identification and risk assessment
of high voltage power lines in residential areas using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA).
Iranian Journal of Health and Environment. 2014;7(1): 55-64. (in persian)
94 ! "
٨٨
11. Ameri M, Ahmadi P, Khanmohammadi S. Exergy analysis of a 420 MW combined cycle power
plant. International Journal of Energy Research. 2008;32(2):175-83. (in persian)
12. Cihan A, Hacıhafızoglu O, Kahveci K. Energy-exergy analysis and modernization suggestions for a
combined†cycle power plant. International Journal of Energy Research. 2006;30(2):115-26.
13. The International Marine Contractors Association. Guidance on Failure Modes & Effects Analyses
(FMEAs). USA: IMCA; 2002.
14. Kangavari M, Salimi S, Nourian R, Askarian A. An application of failure mode and effect analysis
(FMEA) to assess risks in petrochemical industry in Iran. Iranian Journal of Health, Safety and
Environment. 2015;2(2):257-63.
15. Van Leeuwen JF, Nauta MJ, De Kaste D, Odekerken-Rombouts Y, Oldenhof MT, Vredenbregt MJ,
et al. Risk analysis by FMEA as an element of analytical validation. Journal of pharmaceutical and
biomedical analysis. 2009;50(5):1085-7.
16. Bonnabry P ,Despont-Gros C, Grauser D, Casez P, Despond M, Pugin D, et al. A risk analysis
method to evaluate the impact of a computerized provider order entry system on patient safety.
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2008;15(4):453-60.
17. Hosseyni Almedvari M, Moghadasi M, Shaffii Zadeh Bafghi M, editors. Risk assessment by
FMEA method and comparison of RPN before and after the corrective actions in the reclamation
directly project Steel Bafgh. occupational safety and health congrees-8th ;2011 ;Ghazvin-Iran. (in
persian)
18. Shaffii Zadeh Bafghi M, Moghadasi M, Hosseyni Almedvari M, editors. Assessment of
Occupational Epidemiology in the steel plant project Bafgh and relationship with Types of jobs.
occupational safety and health congress-8 Th; 2011 ;Ghazvin-Iran. (in persian)
94 ! "