PEER TO PEER EVALUATION PEER TO PEER EVALUATION

NAME: DIZON, RENE NAME: ESPLANA, VIRIEL

NAME OF THE COMPANY: SMILEAT DEPARTMENT: MARKETING NAME OF THE COMPANY: SMILEAT DEPARTMENT: HR

SELLING PERIOD: September 6, 9, 10 TOTAL HOURS: 10 SELLING PERIOD: September 6, 9, 10 TOTAL HOURS: 14

RATING GUIDE: RATING GUIDE:

10 – OUTSTANDING 8 – GOOD 10 – OUTSTANDING 8 – GOOD

9 – VERY GOOD 0-7 – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 – VERY GOOD 0-7 – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

FACTORS RATING FACTORS RATING

A. Quality of work A. Quality of work

7 8
The performance or work done by the The performance or work done by the
student is in accordance with the student is in accordance with the
requirement of the company. requirement of the company.

B. Attitude toward work B. Attitude toward work

8 9
The student shows enthusiasm and The student shows enthusiasm and
interest for the assigned task. interest for the assigned task.

C. Judgement C. Judgement
8 8
The student shows ability to make sound The student shows ability to make sound
decision pertaining to the assigned task. decision pertaining to the assigned task.

D. Cooperation D. Cooperation
8 8
The student shows ability to work and The student shows ability to work and
get along well with his superiors and get along well with his superiors and
peers. peers.

E. Dependability E. Dependability
7 9
The student can be relied upon to The student can be relied upon to
accomplish the assigned task on time. accomplish the assigned task on time.

EVALUATED BY: EVALUATED BY:

SOLIMAN, ANDREI JOHN LLOYD B. SOLIMAN, ANDREI JOHN LLOYD B.

PEER TO PEER EVALUATION PEER TO PEER EVALUATION

NAME: MANGANTI, JOHN CARLO NAME: PINCA, JOANA PAULA

NAME OF THE COMPANY: SMILEAT DEPARTMENT: HR NAME OF THE COMPANY: SMILEAT DEPARTMENT: FINANCE

SELLING PERIOD: September 6, 9, 10 TOTAL HOURS: 10 SELLING PERIOD: September 6, 9, 10 TOTAL HOURS: 14

RATING GUIDE: RATING GUIDE:

10 – OUTSTANDING 8 – GOOD 10 – OUTSTANDING 8 – GOOD

9 – VERY GOOD 0-7 – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 – VERY GOOD 0-7 – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

FACTORS RATING FACTORS RATING

A. Quality of work A. Quality of work

7 9
The performance or work done by the The performance or work done by the
student is in accordance with the student is in accordance with the
requirement of the company. requirement of the company.

B. Attitude toward work B. Attitude toward work

7 8
The student shows enthusiasm and The student shows enthusiasm and
interest for the assigned task. interest for the assigned task.

C. Judgement C. Judgement
7 9
The student shows ability to make sound The student shows ability to make sound
decision pertaining to the assigned task. decision pertaining to the assigned task.

D. Cooperation D. Cooperation
8 8
The student shows ability to work and The student shows ability to work and
get along well with his superiors and get along well with his superiors and
peers. peers.

E. Dependability E. Dependability
9 9
The student can be relied upon to The student can be relied upon to
accomplish the assigned task on time. accomplish the assigned task on time.

EVALUATED BY: EVALUATED BY:

SOLIMAN, ANDREI JOHN LLOYD B. SOLIMAN, ANDREI JOHN LLOYD B.

PEER TO PEER EVALUATION PEER TO PEER EVALUATION

NAME: SANTOS, KRISTEN ATHENE NAME: SEDANZA, MARK JASON

NAME OF THE COMPANY: SMILEAT DEPARTMENT: PRODUCTION NAME OF THE COMPANY: SMILEAT DEPARTMENT: MARKETING

SELLING PERIOD: September 6, 9, 10 TOTAL HOURS: 14 SELLING PERIOD: September 6, 9, 10 TOTAL HOURS: 10

RATING GUIDE: RATING GUIDE:

10 – OUTSTANDING 8 – GOOD 10 – OUTSTANDING 8 – GOOD

9 – VERY GOOD 0-7 – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 – VERY GOOD 0-7 – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

FACTORS RATING FACTORS RATING

A. Quality of work A. Quality of work

9 7
The performance or work done by the The performance or work done by the
student is in accordance with the student is in accordance with the
requirement of the company. requirement of the company.

B. Attitude toward work B. Attitude toward work

9 7
The student shows enthusiasm and The student shows enthusiasm and
interest for the assigned task. interest for the assigned task.

C. Judgement C. Judgement
9 7
The student shows ability to make sound The student shows ability to make sound
decision pertaining to the assigned task. decision pertaining to the assigned task.

D. Cooperation D. Cooperation
8 7
The student shows ability to work and The student shows ability to work and
get along well with his superiors and get along well with his superiors and
peers. peers.

E. Dependability E. Dependability
9 8
The student can be relied upon to The student can be relied upon to
accomplish the assigned task on time. accomplish the assigned task on time.

EVALUATED BY: EVALUATED BY:

SOLIMAN, ANDREI JOHN LLOYD B. SOLIMAN, ANDREI JOHN LLOYD B.

PEER TO PEER EVALUATION PEER TO PEER EVALUATION

NAME: SILAN, JOSE EMMANUEL NAME: TUBOJAN, YUAN

NAME OF THE COMPANY: SMILEAT DEPARTMENT: FINANCE NAME OF THE COMPANY: SMILEAT DEPARTMENT: HR

SELLING PERIOD: September 6, 9, 10 TOTAL HOURS: 14 SELLING PERIOD: September 6, 9, 10 TOTAL HOURS: 8

RATING GUIDE: RATING GUIDE:

10 – OUTSTANDING 8 – GOOD 10 – OUTSTANDING 8 – GOOD

9 – VERY GOOD 0-7 – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 9 – VERY GOOD 0-7 – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

FACTORS RATING FACTORS RATING

A. Quality of work A. Quality of work

8 8
The performance or work done by the The performance or work done by the
student is in accordance with the student is in accordance with the
requirement of the company. requirement of the company.

B. Attitude toward work B. Attitude toward work

7 7
The student shows enthusiasm and The student shows enthusiasm and
interest for the assigned task. interest for the assigned task.

C. Judgement C. Judgement
7 7
The student shows ability to make sound The student shows ability to make sound
decision pertaining to the assigned task. decision pertaining to the assigned task.

D. Cooperation D. Cooperation
9 9
The student shows ability to work and The student shows ability to work and
get along well with his superiors and get along well with his superiors and
peers. peers.

E. Dependability E. Dependability
8 7
The student can be relied upon to The student can be relied upon to
accomplish the assigned task on time. accomplish the assigned task on time.

EVALUATED BY: EVALUATED BY:

SOLIMAN, ANDREI JOHN LLOYD B. SOLIMAN, ANDREI JOHN LLOYD B.

PEER TO PEER EVALUATION

NAME: YABUT, JOSEPH

NAME OF THE COMPANY: SMILEAT DEPARTMENT: MARKETING

SELLING PERIOD: September 6, 9, 10 TOTAL HOURS: 10

RATING GUIDE:

10 – OUTSTANDING 8 – GOOD

9 – VERY GOOD 0-7 – NEEDS IMPROVEMENT

FACTORS RATING

A. Quality of work
8
The performance or work done by the
student is in accordance with the
requirement of the company.

B. Attitude toward work

8
The student shows enthusiasm and
interest for the assigned task.

C. Judgement
7
The student shows ability to make sound
decision pertaining to the assigned task.

D. Cooperation
8
The student shows ability to work and
get along well with his superiors and
peers.

E. Dependability
7
The student can be relied upon to
accomplish the assigned task on time.

EVALUATED BY:

SOLIMAN, ANDREI JOHN LLOYD B.