Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ijsrdv4i30015 PDF
Ijsrdv4i30015 PDF
Ijsrdv4i30015 PDF
III. SIMULATION AND TEST RESULTS Fig. 6: Graphical representation of very inverse
This section explains the detailed simulation results of the characteristics
proposed protection system. The simulated system is shown
in Fig.4. MATLAB/SIMULINK tool is used for simulation
studies. A different condition in both overflux and
overcurrent protection for the entire system is carried out
with the help of various relay characteristics.
Fig. 9: Graphical representation of definite minimum time [11] J. Faiz, S. Lotfi-fard, M.H.J. Bollen, Wavelet-based
characteristics Mann and Morrison algorithm for improvement of
An embedded system is implemented in the three-phase unbalanced voltage dips characterization,
simulation therefore when the IDMT relay operates, the IET Gen. Transm. Distrib. 1 (4) (2007) 640–646.
DMT will not be in operation and vice-versa.
When the V/F exceeds 120% and then the definite
minimum time relay operates due to the change in the
source voltage which is calculated approximately 12920V.
Therefore the tripping time is calculated with the help of the
equation which is mentioned earlier. The graphical
representation of the inverse definite minimum time
characteristics is obtained in Fig.9.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, different time characteristics have been
developed to protection the transformer from the external
faults such as overcurrent and overflux which can lead to
internal one. The Standard Inverse (SI), Very Inverse(VI),
Extreme Inverse(EI) relay characteristics for the overcurrent
protection. Similarly, Inverse Definite Minimum Time
(IDMT) and Definite Minimum Time (DMT) relay
characteristics for the overflux protection is implemented.
REFERENCES
[1] Sandro Gianny, Aquiles Perez, “Modelling Relays for
PowerSystem Protection Studies”, Ph.D. Thesis,
University ofSaskatchewan Electronic Theses and
Dissertations, Canada,April 2006.
[2] Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited, “Handbook of
Switchgears”, McGrawHill Publication, New Delhi,
May 2005.
[3] F. Wang, M.H.J. Bollen, Quantification of transient
current signals in the viewpoint of overcurrent relays,
Proc. Power Eng. Soc. Gen. Meet. 4 (July) (2003)
2122–2127.
[4] F. Wang, M.H.J. Bollen, Classification of component
switching transients in the viewpoint of protection
relays, Elect. Power Syst. Res. 64 (2003) 197–207.
[5] M.A. Rahman, B. Jeyasurya, A state-of-the-art review
of transformer protection algorithms, IEEE Trans.
Power Deliv. 3 (2) (1988) 534–544. 8 S. Lotfifard et al.
/ Electric Power Systems Research 91 (2012) 1–8
[6] T.S. Sidhu, M.S. Sachdev, H.C. Wood, M. Nagpal,
Design, implementation and testing of a micro-
processor-based high-speed relay for detecting
transformer winding faults, IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 7
(1) (1992) 108–117.
[7] P. Liu, O.P. Malik, C. Chen, G.S. Hope, Y. Guo,
Improved operation of differential protection of power
transformers for internal faults, IEEE Trans. Power
Deliv. 7 (4) (1992) 1912–1919.
[8] Weijian Wang. 2002, Principle and Application of
Electric Power Equipment Protection, China
ElectricPower Press.
[9] M.R. Yenchek, J.C. Cawley, A.L. Brautigain, J.S.
Peterson, Distinguishing motor starts from short circuits
through phase-angle measurements, IEEE Trans. Ind.
Appl. 38 (1) (2002) 195–202.
[10] N. Zhang, M. Kezunovic, Transmission line boundary
protection using wavelet transform and neural network,
IEEE Trans. Power. Deliv. 22 (2)(2007) 859–869.