Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 157 (2011) 67–72

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and


Reproductive Biology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ejogrb

Polymorphic variants of folate and choline metabolism genes and the risk
of endometriosis-associated infertility
Malgorzata Szczepańska a, Adrianna Mostowska b, Przemyslaw Wirstlein a,b, Margarita Lianeri b,
Piotr Marianowski b,c, Jana Skrzypczak a, Paweł P. Jagodziński b,*
a
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Division of Reproduction, Poland
b
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 6 Świe˛cickiego St., 60-781 Poznań, Poland
c
I Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T

Article history: Objective: Endometriosis has been considered an epigenetic disease. Single nucleotide polymorphisms
Received 6 December 2010 (SNPs) located in genes encoding enzymes of the folate and choline metabolism may affect DNA
Received in revised form 12 January 2011 methyltransferase activity.
Accepted 23 February 2011
Study design: We studied 16 SNPs in 12 folate and choline metabolism genes, including BHMT
(rs7356530 and rs3733890), BHMT2 (rs625879), CBS (844ins68), CHDH (rs893363 and rs2289205), CHKA
Keywords: (rs7928739), MTHFD1 (rs2236225), MTHFR (rs1801133), MTR (rs1805087), MTRR (rs1801394), PCYT1A
Endometriosis
(rs712012 and rs7639752), PEMT (rs4244593 and rs4646406) and TCN (rs1801198) in one hundred and
DNA methylation
Folate
sixty-three infertile women with minimal endometriosis and one hundred and fifty fertile women.
Choline Results: There were no significant differences between genotype and allele frequencies of these gene
Polymorphism variants in infertile women with endometriosis (n = 163) and controls (n = 150). The lowest, but not
statistically significant, p values of the trend test were observed for the CBS 844ins68 and MTR rs1805087
(ptrend = 0.0527 and ptrend = 0.0771, respectively) polymorphisms. However, the exhaustive multifactor
dimensionality reduction analysis revealed an epistatic interaction between rs1801133 of MTHFR and
rs4244593 of PEMT in endometriosis-associated infertility (p = 0.0240).
Conclusions: Our results showed moderate evidence for the contribution of SNPs located in genes
encoding folate and choline metabolism enzymes to infertility in women with endometriosis.
ß 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction methylation is carried out by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs)


and increased levels of DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B have been
Endometriosis is a complex gynecological condition, diagnosed demonstrated in endometriosis [12]. DNMTs exploit S-adenosyl-
in approximately 10% of reproductive age women, characterized methionine (AdoMet) as the donor of a methyl group for DNA
by the presence and growth of endometrial-like tissue outside the methylation, followed by conversion of AdoMet to S-adenosylho-
uterus [1,2]. Endometriosis results in disability in reproductive age mocysteine (AdoHcy) [13]. DNMT activity can be regulated by the
women, due to dysmenorrhea, pelvic pain, and inflammation, and intracellular AdoMet/AdoHcy ratio, which is strongly related to
accounts for 30–50% of their infertility [2,3]. The risk factors for folate and choline metabolism (Fig. 1) [14]. AdoMet is biosynthe-
endometriosis include aberrations in estrogen production and its sized by methionine adenosyltransferase from methionine [15].
metabolism, immunological abnormalities, exposure to environ- Cellular availability of methionine may be determined by
mental pollution and toxins, and genetic background [4–7]. The homocysteine remethylation by 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homo-
etiopathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis associat- cysteine methyltransferase (MTR) or betaine-homocysteine
ed with below normal fertility are, however, still poorly under- methyltransferase (BHMT) [16,17]. MTR and BHMT use 5-
stood [2]. methyltetrahydrofolate or betaine, a choline oxidization product,
The abnormal methylation of several genes has been associated respectively, as methyl group donor (Fig. 1).
with infertility in women with endometriosis [8–11]. DNA Many polymorphic variants have been found in the genes
encoding enzymes of the folate and choline metabolism, which
may determine the cellular ratio AdoMet/AdoHcy and DNMTs
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +48 61 854 65 13; fax: +48 61 854 65 10. activity (Fig. 1) [18,19]. Most of these investigations involve
E-mail address: pjagodzi@am.poznan.pl (P.P. Jagodziński). polymorphisms of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase

0301-2115/$ – see front matter ß 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.02.003
[()TD$FIG]
68 M. Szczepańska et al. / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 157 (2011) 67–72

Fig. 1. Localization of 16 SNPs in 12 folate and choline metabolism genes. Enzyme names and reference number(s) of studied SNPs are stated in grey boxes. Enzyme
abbreviations: BHMT, betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase; BHMT2, betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase 2; CBS, cystathionine-beta-synthase; CHDH, choline
dehydrogenase; CHKA, choline kinase; DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs), MTHFD1, methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1; MTHFR, 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate
reductase; MTR, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase; MTRR, methionine synthase reductase; PLD, phospholipase D; PCYT1A, choline-phosphate
cytidylyltransferase A; PEMT, phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase; TCN2, transcobalamin II. Substrate abbreviations: AdoHcy, S-adenosylhomocysteine;
AdoMet, S-adenosylmethionine; 5,10-CH2-THF, 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate; 5-CH3-THF, 5 metylotetrahydrofolate; CDP-Cho, CDP-choline; DAG, diacylglycerol; DMG,
dimethylglycine; HCY, homocysteine; SMM, S-methylmethionine; MET, methionine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PtdCho, phosphatidylcholine; PtdEth,
phosphatidylethanolamine; SM, sphingomyelin; THF, tetrahydrofolate.

(MTHFR), MTR, methionine synthase reductase (MTRR) and Poznan University of Medical Sciences and I Clinic of Obstetrics and
methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1 (MTHFD1) (Table 2 Gynecology Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. Chronic pelvic
and Fig. 1) [19]. Our study also included polymorphic variants of pain and suspected pelvic endometriosis were investigated
genes encoding the vitamin B12 transporter transcobalamin II laparoscopically. The patients were divided into two groups:
(TCN2), and cystathionine-beta-synthase (CBS), which consumes one hundred and sixty-three women were included in the infertile
homocysteine and BHMT2 and is an enzyme responsible for with minimal endometriosis group, and one hundred and fifty
homocysteine remethylation with the use of S-methylmethionine. women were used as fertile controls (Table 1). Visualization of
We also assessed polymorphisms of genes encoding enzymes endometriotic lesions and histopathologic criteria were used to
helping to use choline as a methyl donor: choline dehydrogenase diagnose minimal endometriosis in infertile women. The stage of
(CHDH) and BHMT. Our studies also included polymorphic variants endometriosis was assessed according to the revised classification
of genes encoding enzymes of the CDP-choline pathway: choline of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine [20]. Infertile
kinase (CHKA) and choline-phosphate cytidylyltransferase A women with endometriosis exhibited regular menses, no anatom-
(PCYT1A), which is a regulatory enzyme of this pathway. ical changes in the reproductive tract, and a minimum 1 year of
Additionally, we also studied polymorphisms of the gene encoding infertility with a current desire for conception, without contribu-
phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT), involved tion of male factor infertility. Fertile control women were
in biosynthesis of phosphatidylcholine in the liver. individuals that had chronic pelvic pain without any pelvic
abnormalities determined by laparoscopy. Pelvic floor varicose
2. Materials and methods veins were diagnosed in the control women, but with no signs of
past or present inflammation. The control women had at least one
2.1. Patients and controls child born no more than 1 year before laparoscopy, regular menses,
and no anatomical changes in the reproductive tract (Table 1).
Peripheral blood samples from infertile women with endome- Patients and controls were matched by age and were all
triosis and control women were collected from the Gynecologic caucasian of Polish descent (Table 1). Written informed consent
and Obstetrical University Hospital, Division of Reproduction at was obtained from all participating individuals. The procedures of
M. Szczepańska et al. / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 157 (2011) 67–72 69

Table 1 in the coding or putative regulatory regions, and minor allele


Clinical characteristics of infertile women with minimal endometriosis and fertile
frequency (MAF) > 0.1 in the caucasian population. The genotyp-
women.
ing of 14 SNPs was performed by PCR followed by the appropriate
Characteristic Patients Controls restriction enzyme digestion (PCR-RFLP) according to manufac-
Numbers 163 150 turer’s instructions (Fermentas, Vilnius, Lithuania). DNA fragments
Age (years) 31.8 (4.2)a 32.5 (5.9)a were separated in 2% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium
31 (23–40)b 32 (18–40)b bromide staining. The BHMT rs3733890 and MTRR rs1801394
Parity NA 1 (1–3)b
polymorphic variant frequencies were determined by high-
Duration of infertility (years) 3.9 (1.9)a NA
rASRM (stage)c Stage I (n = 80) NA resolution melting curve analysis (HRM) on the LightCycler 480
Stage II (n = 83) system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Detection of the
NA-not applicable. 68-bp insertion in exon 8 of CBS was carried out by PCR followed by
a
Mean (SD). agarose gel electrophoresis. Primer sequences and conditions for
b
Median (range). PCR-RFLP and HRM analyses are presented in Supplementary Table
c
Revised American Society for reproductive medicine classification (rASRM).
2S. Genotyping quality was evaluated by repeated genotyping of
10% randomly selected samples.
the study were approved by the Local Ethical Committee of Poznan
University of Medical Sciences. 2.3. Statistical analysis

2.2. Genotyping The distribution of genotypes in patients and controls was


tested for deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium by Chi-
Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood leucocytes by square analysis. Differences in allele and genotype frequencies
salt extraction. DNA samples were genotyped for 16 single between infertile women with endometriosis and controls were
nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 12 folate and choline evaluated by standard Chi-square and Fisher exact tests. SNPs
metabolism genes: BHMT, BHMT2, CBS, CHDH, CHKA, MTHFD1, were individually tested for association with infertility using
MTHFR, MTR, MTRR, PCYT1A, PEMT and TCN2 (Supplementary Table the Cochran–Armitage trend test. The odds ratio (OR) and
1S). SNPs were selected with the use of the genome browsers of the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were also determined.
International HapMap Consortium (http://www.hapmap.org/ Statistical significance was interpreted as p values < 0.05.
index.html.en), UCSC (http://genome.ucsc.edu) and dbSNP data- The exact positions of SNPs were determined using the UCSC
base (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/). SNPs were genome browser, February 2009 human reference sequence
chosen based on several criteria: functional significance, location (GRCh37).

Table 2
Associations of folate-metabolizing gene SNPs and risk of infertility in women with endometriosis.

Gene rs no. Genotype Cases (frequency) Controls (frequency) Odds Ratio (95% CI) pa ptrendb

CBS 844ins68 WWc 144 (0.88) 122 (0.81) Referent – 0.0527


Wins 19 (0.12) 26 (0.18) 0.619 (0.327–1.173) 0.1389
insins 0 (0.00) 2 (0.01) 0.170 (0.008–3.568) 0.2131d
Wins + insins 19 (0.12) 28 (0.19) 0.575 (0.306–1.080) 0.0828
Minor allele frequency 0.06 0.10 – –

MTHFD1 rs2236225 CC 60 (0.37) 51 (0.35) Referent – 0.6709


CT 75 (0.46) 70 (0.47) 0.911 (0.555–1.495) 0.7114
TT 28 (0.17) 27 (0.18) 0.881 (0.461–1.684) 0.7024
CT + TT 103 (0.63) 97 (0.65) 0.903 (0.567–1.437) 0.6657
Minor allele frequency 0.40 0.42 – –

MTHFR rs1801133 CC 70 (0.43) 77 (0.52) Referent – 0.1101


CT 81 (0.50) 63 (0.43) 1.414 (0.891–2.244) 0.1407
TT 12 (0.07) 8 (0.05) 1.650 (0.637–4.273) 0.2987
CT + TT 93 (0.57) 71 (0.48) 1.441 (0.921–2.254) 0.1091
Minor allele frequency 0.32 0.27 – –

MTR rs1805087 AA 95 (0.59) 101 (0.68) Referent – 0.0771


AG 60 (0.37) 43 (0.29) 1.483 (0.916–2.401) 0.1077
GG 7 (0.04) 4 (0.03) 1.861 (0.528–6.561) 0.3688d
AG + GG 67 (0.41) 47 (0.32) 1.516 (0.950–2.416) 0.0799
Minor allele frequency 0.23 0.17 – –

MTRR rs1801394 AA 52 (0.32) 54 (0.37) Referent – 0.2008


AG 84 (0.51) 77 (0.52) 1.133 (0.694–1.850) 0.6181
GG 27 (0.17) 17 (0.11) 1.649 (0.805–3.377) 0.1693
AG + GG 111 (0.68) 94 (0.63) 1.226 (0.767–1.961) 0.3943
Minor allele frequency 0.42 0.38 – –

TCN2 rs1801198 CC 45 (0.28) 41 (0.28) Referent – 0.7184


CG 85 (0.52) 81 (0.55) 0.956 (0.568–1.610) 0.8660
GG 33 (0.20) 26 (0.17) 1.156 (0.594–2.251) 0.6687
CG + GG 118 (0.72) 107 (0.72) 1.005 (0.611–1.653) 0.9850
Minor allele frequency 0.46 0.45 – –
a
Chi-square analysis.
b
Cochran–Armitage trend test.
c
W, wild allele; ins, allele with insertion.
d
Fisher exact test.
70 M. Szczepańska et al. / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 157 (2011) 67–72

High order gene–gene interactions among all tested polymor- 3. Results


phic loci were studied by the multifactor dimensionality reduction
(MDR) approach (MDR version 2.0 beta 5). A detailed explanation The genotype frequencies of all studied SNPs were consistent
on the MDR method has been described elsewhere. Because with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium among both cases and
missing data are not allowed in MDR, samples with missing controls (p > 0.05), except for the PEMT rs4244593 (p = 0.016) in
genotypes were excluded from the analysis. Based on the obtained infertile women with endometriosis.
testing balanced accuracy and cross-validation consistency values, The MAF for all markers (calculated from the control samples)
the best statistical gene–gene interaction models were established. was above 16%, except for the CBS variant, with MAF equal to 10%
A 1000-fold permutation test was used to assess the statistical (Table 2). Genotype counts, OR, and 95% CI calculations for the 16
significance of MDR models (MDR permutation testing module studied SNPs in 12 genes involved in folate and choline metabolism
0.4.9 alpha). are presented in Tables 2 and 3. There were no significant

Table 3
Associations of choline-metabolizing gene SNPs and risk of infertility in women with endometriosis.

Gene rs no. Genotype Cases Controls Odds Ratio (95% CI) pa pb


(frequency) (frequency)

BHMT rs7356530 AA 60 (0.37) 53 (0.35) Referent – 0.6370


AG 76 (0.47) 71 (0.48) 0.945 (0.579–1.545) 0.8231
GG 25 (0.16) 26 (0.17) 0.849 (0.438–1.646) 0.6285
AG + GG 101 (0.63) 97 (0.65) 0.920 (0.579–1.461) 0.7231
Minor allele frequency 0.39 0.41 – –

BHMT rs3733890 GG 85 (0.52) 71 (0.47) Referent – 0.6573


AG 60 (0.37) 66 (0.44) 0.759 (0.474–1.216) 0.2513
AA 17 (0.11) 13 (0.09) 1.092 (0.497–2.402) 0.8261
AG + AA 77 (0.48) 79 (0.53) 0.814 (0.522–1.270) 0.3647
Minor allele frequency 0.29 0.31 – –

BHMT2 rs625879 GG 60 (0.37) 56 (0.37) Referent – 0.5448


GT 80 (0.49) 66 (0.44) 1.131 (0.694–1.845) 0.6207
TT 22 (0.14) 28 (0.19) 0.733 (0.376–1.429) 0.3611
GT + TT 102 (0.63) 94 (0.63) 1.013 (0.640–1.604) 0.9569
Minor allele frequency 0.38 0.41 – –

CHDH rs893363 TT 71 (0.43) 68 (0.45) Referent – 0.9509


CT 68 (0.42) 58 (0.39) 1.123 (0.693–1.820) 0.6381
CC 24 (0.15) 24 (0.16) 0.958 (0.497–1.846) 0.8974
CT+CC 92 (0.57) 82 (0.55) 1.075 (0.688–1.679) 0.7522
Minor allele frequency 0.36 0.35 – –

CHDH rs2289205 GG 83 (0.51) 86 (0.58) Referent – 0.2586


AG 67 (0.41) 53 (0.35) 1.310 (0.819–2.096) 0.2598
AA 13 (0.08) 10 (0.07) 1.347 (0.560–3.241) 0.5049
AG + AA 80 (0.49) 63 (0.42) 1.316 (0.841–2.058) 0.2287
Minor allele frequency 0.29 0.24 – –

CHKA rs7928739 AA 56 (0.34) 52 (0.35) Referent – 0.7742


AC 77 (0.47) 71 (0.48) 1.007 (0.613–1.655) 0.9779
CC 30 (0.19) 25 (0.17) 1.114 (0.581–2.138) 0.7446
AC + CC 107 (0.66) 96 (0.65) 1.035 (0.648–1.652) 0.8854
Minor allele frequency 0.42 0.41 – –

PCYT1A rs712012 TT 68 (0.42) 63 (0.42) Referent – 0.6208


CT 66 (0.41) 67 (0.45) 0.913 (0.563–1.479) 0.7105
CC 28 (0.17) 20 (0.13) 1.297 (0.665–2.531) 0.4451
CT + CC 94 (0.58) 87 (0.58) 1.001 (0.638–1.570) 0.9965
Minor allele frequency 0.38 0.36 – –

PCYT1A rs7639752 GG 53 (0.32) 40 (0.27) Referent – 0.4775


AG 70 (0.43) 71 (0.48) 0.744 (0.439–1.260) 0.2709
AA 40 (0.25) 37 (0.25) 0.816 (0.445–1.497) 0.5110
AG + AA 110 (0.68) 108 (0.73) 0.769 (0.471–1.254) 0.2911
Minor allele frequency 0.46 0.49 – –

PEMT rs4244593 CC 39 (0.24) 48 (0.32) Referent – 0.4666


AC 99 (0.61) 75 (0.50) 1.625 (0.967–2.728) 0.0656
AA 25 (0.15) 27 (0.18) 1.140 (0.572–2.270) 0.7100
AC + AA 124 (0.76) 102 (0.68) 1.496 (0.910–2.460) 0.1112
Minor allele frequency 0.46 0.43 – –

PEMT rs4646406 TT 43 (0.27) 48 (0.33) Referent – 0.4783


AT 89 (0.55) 73 (0.49) 1.361 (0.813–2.278) 0.2402
AA 29 (0.18) 27 (0.18) 1.199 (0.616–2.335) 0.5934
AT + AA 118 (0.73) 100 (0.67) 1.317 (0.807–2.151) 0.2701
Minor allele frequency 0.46 0.43 – –
a
Chi-square analysis.
b
Cochran–Armitage trend test.
M. Szczepańska et al. / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 157 (2011) 67–72 71

Table 4
Results of gene-gene interactions analyzed by MDR method.

Genes and rs numbers Testing balanced accuracya Cross validation consistencyb p valuec

PEMT_rs4244593 0.4918 6/10 0.9080


MTHFR_rs1801133, PEMT_rs4244593 0.6333 10/10 0.0240
MTHFR_rs1801133, PEMT_rs4244593, PCYT1A_rs712012 0.6095 5/10 0.0680
MTRR_rs1801394, MTHFR_rs1801133, PEMT_rs4244593, PCYT1A_rs712012 0.4892 3/10 0.9200

Significant results are highlighted in bold font.


a
Testing balanced accuracy is the accuracy of classification of cases and controls in the testing dataset calculated as (sensitivity + specificity)/2.
b
Cross validation consistency is the number of times the model was selected as the best model after 10-fold cross-validation runs.
c
Significance of accuracy (empirical p value based on 1000 permutations).

differences between genotype and allele frequencies of any of the To date, a correlation has been found between endometriosis-
investigated gene variants. The lowest, but not statistically associated infertility and genetic variants of ESR1, ESR2, 17b-
significant, p values of the trend test were observed for CBS hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 and luteinizing hormone beta-
844ins68 and MTR rs1805087 (ptrend = 0.0527 and ptrend = 0.0771, subunit gene [32–35]. Moreover, some polymorphisms in folate
respectively). pathway genes have been determined to be the cause of
The results of the exhaustive MDR analysis evaluating two- to unexplained infertility in women [36,37]. We did not, however,
four-loci combinations of all tested SNPs for each comparison are observe a significant association of polymorphic variants of genes
summarized in Table 4. The best combination of possibly encoding folate metabolism enzymes with endometriosis-associ-
interactive polymorphisms was observed for rs1801133 of MTHFR ated infertility, when analyzed separately. These differences
and rs4244593 of PEMT (testing balanced accuracy = 63.33%, cross between our findings in endometriosis-associated infertility and
validation consistency of 10 out of 10, permutation test those of other researchers regarding unexplained infertility can
p = 0.0240). None of these polymorphisms, when considered result from the distinct complex etiology of this disorder,
separately, was significantly associated with endometriosis- differences in the racial structure of the studied populations, or
associated infertility (Tables 2 and 3). The 3- and 4-locus too small population samples. It is also possible that the number of
combinations did not reach statistical significance in predicting selected polymorphisms was insufficient to fully cover the
susceptibility to infertility. investigated genes and some associations may have been missed.
In our study we also did not determine a contribution of
4. Comment separate polymorphic variants of genes encoding choline
metabolism enzymes to endometriosis-associated infertility.
Endometriosis is a complicated disorder resulting from the However, we observed an interaction between the MTHFR
interplay between genetic and environmental factors. Cohort Ala222Val and rs4244593 of PEMT polymorphic variants in
studies and increased rates of endometriosis in relatives of women women with endometriosis-associated infertility. The MTHFR
with this disorder have confirmed the significance of the genetic Ala222Val polymorphism has already been associated with
background in the susceptibility to endometriosis [21–25]. The unexplained infertility in women [36,37]. PEMT is an important
polymorphic variants of genes encoding inflammatory mediators, enzyme in the biosynthesis of endogenous choline and
proteins involved in sex hormone activity, enzymes involved in membrane phospholipids [38]. PEMT expression in humans
glucose homeostasis, and proteins involved in vascular function and mouse hepatocytes is up-regulated by estrogen, and
and tissue remodeling have been considered as risk factors for estrogen production is abnormal in women with endometriosis
endometriosis [26]. [39]. Moreover, the dietary choline requirements in women can
During the various phases of the menstrual cycle, the be modulated by estrogen levels and PEMT genetic variants [40].
expression of hundreds of genes in the endometrium is under We may presume that rs4244593 of PEMT can be in linkage
the control of estrogen and progesterone [27]. The analysis of disequilibrium with an unknown functional PEMT polymor-
the transcriptome profile during the window of implantation in phism, which may modulate the production of choline or
healthy women and women with endometriosis has demon- phospholipids and, together with MTHFR Ala222Val, contribute
strated the defective expression of many genes regulated by to infertility in women with endometriosis.
progesterone [28,29] in the women with endometriosis. The Our study did not show an association of the 16 studied SNPs in
expression of HOXA10, progesterone receptor (PR-B), steroidogenic 12 folate and choline metabolism genes, namely BHMT, BHMT2,
factor-1 (SF-1) and estrogen receptor 2 (ESR2) genes is CBS, CHDH, CHKA, MTHFD1, MTHFR, MTR, MTRR, PCYT1A, PEMT and
changed by their promoter methylation level in the eutopic TCN2, with endometriosis-associated infertility. We observed an
endometrium in women with endometriosis [8–11]. In women interaction, however, between MTHFR Ala222Val and PEMT
with endometriosis, hypermethylation of HOXA10, resulting in rs4244593 polymorphic variants in infertile women with
its reduced expression, is associated with some defects in endometriosis. Our genetic studies were conducted on a limited
uterine receptivity during the midsecretory phase of the number of infertile women with endometriosis and controls,
menstrual cycle [8,30]. The PR-B promoter is also hypermethy- therefore the role of these polymorphisms should be further
lated in women with endometriosis, providing a possible explored in other populations. Moreover, it would also be
explanation for the decreased levels of this receptor’s isoforms, interesting to study the prevalence of these gene variants in a
associated with a loss of progesterone response [9]. By contrast, large number of women with endometriosis and women with
SF-1 and ESR2 promoters exhibited hypomethylation in women infertility, separately.
with endometriosis, which may account for their overexpression
and increased estrogen activity [10,11]. DNA methylation is Acknowledgement
also involved in the regulation of the immune response,
which may also play a role in the immunopathology of Supported by grant no. 502-01-01124182-07474, Poznan
endometriosis [31]. University of Medical Sciences.
72 M. Szczepańska et al. / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 157 (2011) 67–72

Appendix A. Supplementary data [20] Canis M, Donnez JG, Guzick DS, et al. Revised American Society for Reproduc-
tive Medicine classification of endometriosis: 1996. Fertil Steril 1997;67:
817–21.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in [21] Stefansson H, Geirsson RT, Steinthorsdottir V, et al. Genetic factors contribute
to the risk of developing endometriosis. Hum Reprod 2002;17:555–9.
the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.02.003 [22] Zondervan KT, Cardon LR, Kennedy SH. The genetic basis of endometriosis.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2001;13:309–14.
References [23] Treloar S, Hadfield R, Montgomery G, et al. The International Endogene Study:
a collection of families for genetic research in endometriosis. Fertil Steril
[1] Giudice LC, Kao LC, Endometriosis. Lancet 2004;364:1789–99. 2002;78:679–85.
[2] Ulukus M, Cakmak H, Arici A. The role of endometrium in endometriosis. J Soc [24] Viganò P, Infantino M, Lattuada D, et al. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1
Gynecol Investig 2006;13:467–76. (ICAM-1) gene polymorphisms in endometriosis. Mol Hum Reprod 2003;9:
[3] Farquhar CM. Extracts from the ‘clinical evidence’. Endometriosis. BMJ 47–52.
2000;320:1449–52. [25] Kennedy S, Mardon H, Barlow D. Familial endometriosis. J Assist Reprod Genet
[4] Gurates B, Bulun SE, Endometriosis:. the ultimate hormonal disease. Semin 1995;12:32–4.
Reprod Med 2003;21:125–34. [26] Montgomery GW, Nyholt DR, Zhao ZZ, et al. The search for genes contributing
[5] Paul Dmowski W, Braun DP. Immunology of endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin to endometriosis risk. Hum Reprod Update 2008;14:447–57.
Obstet Gynaecol 2004;18:245–63. [27] Kao LC, Tulac S, Lobo S, et al. Global gene profiling in human endometrium
[6] Rier SE. The potential role of exposure to environmental toxicants in the during the window of implantation. Endocrinology 2002;143:2119–38.
pathophysiology of endometriosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002;955:201–12 [dis- [28] Metzger DA, Olive DL, Haney AF. Limited hormonal responsiveness of ectopic
cussion 230–2, 396–406]. endometrium: histologic correlation with intrauterine endometrium. Hum
[7] Barlow DH, Kennedy S, Endometriosis:. new genetic approaches and therapy. Pathol 1988;19:1417–24.
Annu Rev Med 2005;56:345–56. [29] Burney RO, Talbi S, Hamilton AE, et al. Gene expression analysis of endome-
[8] Wu Y, Halverson G, Basir Z, Strawn E, Yan P, Guo SW. Aberrant methylation at trium reveals progesterone resistance and candidate susceptibility genes in
HOXA10 may be responsible for its aberrant expression in the endometrium of women with endometriosis. Endocrinology 2007;148:3814–26.
patients with endometriosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:371–80. [30] Gui Y, Zhang J, Yuan L, Lessey BA. Regulation of HOXA-10 and its expression in
[9] Wu Y, Strawn E, Basir Z, Halverson G, Guo SW. Promoter hypermethylation of normal and abnormal endometrium. Mol Hum Reprod 1999;5:866–73.
progesterone receptor isoform B (PR-B) in endometriosis. Epigenetics [31] Sawalha AH. Epigenetics and T-cell immunity. Autoimmunity 2008;41:
2006;1:106–11. 245–52.
[10] Xue Q, Lin Z, Yin P, et al. Transcriptional activation of steroidogenic factor-1 by [32] Zulli K, Bianco B, Mafra FA, Teles JS, Christofolini DM, Barbosa CP. Polymor-
hypomethylation of the 50 -CpG island in endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol phism of the estrogen receptor b gene is related to infertility and infertility-
Metab 2007;92:3261–7. associated endometriosis. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2010;54:567–71.
[11] Xue Q, Lin Z, Cheng YH, et al. Promoter methylation regulates estrogen [33] Lamp M, Peters M, Reinmaa E, et al. Polymorphisms in ESR1, ESR2 and
receptor 2 in human endometrium and endometriosis. Biol Reprod HSD17B1 genes are associated with fertility status in endometriosis. Gynecol
2007;77:681–7. Endocrinol )2010;(June). doi: 10.3109/09513590.2010.495434.
[12] Wu Y, Strawn E, Basir Z, Halverson G, Guo SW. Aberrant expression of [34] Mafra FA, Bianco B, Christofolini DM, Souza AM, Zulli K, Barbosa CP. Luteiniz-
deoxyribonucleic acid methyltransferases DNMT1 DNMT3A, and DNMT3B ing hormone beta-subunit gene (LHbeta) polymorphism in infertility and
in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 2007;87(2):4–32. endometriosis-associated infertility. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
[13] Turek-Plewa J, Jagodziński PP. The role of mammalian DNA methyltransferases 2010;151:66–9.
in the regulation of gene expression. Cell Mol Biol Lett 2005;10:631–47. [35] Liao WX, Roy AC, Chan C, Arulkumaran S, Ratnam SS. A new molecular variant
[14] James SJ, Melnyk S, Pogribna M, Pogribny IP, Caudill MA. Elevation in S- of luteinizing hormone associated with female infertility. Fertil Steril
adenosylhomocysteine and DNA hypomethylation: potential epigenetic 1998;69:102–6.
mechanism for homocysteine-related pathology. J Nutr 2002;132:2361–6. [36] Altmäe S, Stavreus-Evers A, Ruiz JR, et al. Variations in folate pathway genes
[15] Cantoni GL. S-adenosylmethionine; a new intermediate fordem enzymatically are associated with unexplained female infertility. Fertil Steril 2010;94:130–7.
from L-methionine and adenosinetriphosphate. J Biol Chem 1953;204:403–16. [37] Coulam CB, Jeyendran RS. Thrombophilic gene polymorphisms are risk factors
[16] Li YN, Gulati S, Baker PJ, Brody LC, Banerjee R, Kruger WD. Cloning, mapping for unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 2009;91:1516–7.
and RNA analysis of the human methionine synthase gene. Hum Mol Genet [38] Vance DE, Walkey CJ, Cui Z. Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase
1996;5:851–8. from liver. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997;1348:142–50.
[17] Garrow TA, Purification. kinetic properties, and cDNA cloning of mammalian [39] Resseguie M, Song J, Niculescu MD, da Costa KA, Randall TA, Zeisel SH.
betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase. J Biol Chem 1996;271:22831–8. Phosphatidylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (PEMT) gene expression is
[18] Zeisel SH. Gene response elements genetic polymorphisms and epigenetics induced by estrogen in human and mouse primary hepatocytes. FASEB J
influence the human dietary requirement for choline. IUBMB Life 2007;59: 2007;21:2622–32.
380–7. [40] Fischer LM, da Costa KA, Kwock L, Galanko J, Zeisel SH. Dietary choline
[19] Zeisel SH. Genetic polymorphisms in methyl-group metabolism and epige- requirements of women: effects of estrogen and genetic variation. Am J Clin
netics: lessons from humans and mouse models. Brain Res 2008;1237:5–11. Nutr 2010;92:1113–9.

You might also like