Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heart Failure Novotel BJM
Heart Failure Novotel BJM
of
Acut Heart Failure
Gusti Rifansyah, dr, SpJP, FIHA
1
Overview
Introduction
Epidemiology
Pathophysiology
Clinical Manifestations
Diagnostic Evaluation
Management
4
Classification
Pulmonary
Clinical Classifications
oedema
(Developed by Stevenson & colleagues)
High Output Acutely
Failure Decompensated
Dry and warm Wet and warm
Chronic HF
De (I) Acute(II) on
Novo Chronic
Dry and cold Wet and cold
Cardiogenic
(III) (IV)
Shock Hypertensive
AHF
Right HF
5
Pathophysioogy
6
Causes and Precipitating Factors of
Acut Heart Failure
Ischemic heart disease Circulatory failure
- Acut Coronary Syndromes -Septicaemia
- Mechanical complications of AMI -Thyrotoxicosis
- RV infarction - Anemia
- Shunts
- Tamponade
- Pulmonary embolism
7
SYMPTOMS & SIGNS
8
LABORATORY TEST DIAGNOSTIC TEST
Serum electrolytes:(Na,K)
Chest Radiography
25-30% with Na < 135 mEq/L
3% with K<3,6meq/L,8%>5.5mEq/L ADHERE: >80% congestion
Renal Function : Electrocardiogram
BUN, Creatinin ↑ Biomarkers of EFICA : 13%Normal, 29%ischemic
Myocardial injury changes, 25% AF
Liver Function : Troponin or CK-MB
61% liver disfunction→dose Echocardiogram
adjusments Other : →evaluating the etiology of AHF.
CRP (C-reactive protein) EHFS II: systolic disfunction (66%),
Hematological studies: D-dimers diastolic disfunction (56%), MR
50% anemia (Hb<12g/dl) (43%), TR(30%
ABG (arterial Blood gases
Pulmonary Artery Catheter
Natriuretic Peptides
Provides important &clinically
(BNP, nt-pro-BNP, ANP) relevant hemodynamic data9
Phonocardiography
Implantable hemodynamic
monitors
10
Management
Intermediate
Immediate (in hospital) Long-term &
(ED/ICU/ICCU) Pre-discharge
• Stabilize & optimize
• Improve treatment • Optimize chronic oral
symptoms • Life saving therapy
• Restore pharmacological • Minimize the side
oxigenation therapy effects of treatments
• Device therapy in • Plan follow up
• Improve organ
appropriate patients
perfusion & strategy
• Lab. Monitoring
hemodynamics • Educate & life style
• Diagnostic
• Limit evaluations
adjusment
cardiac/renal • Education about HF • Prevent early
damage • Minimize hospital readmission
• Minimize ICU length of stay • Improve quality of
length of stay life and survival
11
•Advanced
ExacerbatingHF :factors
addressed
• Oral medication regimen
• Atbeleast near
stable foroptimal
24 hours volume
status achieved
HFSA • No intravenous
• Transition from
vasodilators or intravenous
inotropic
guidelines toagent
oral7diuretic completed
to2410hours
for days
Discharge ••Education
Ambulation completed
prior to
• Atdischarge
least neartooptimal
assess
Criteria pharmacological
functional capacity therapy
•achieved
Plans for post-discharge
• Follow-up
management clinic visit
scheduled
12
13
Treatment strategies
Worsening Systolic Blood Pressure
Volume Renal
>100 mm Hg 90-100 mm Hg <90 mm Hg
Overload[*] Function
Yes Yes Vasodilator Vasodilator (cautiously)[§] Inotrope and/or d
Diuretics (consider infusion and/or inotrope Consider norepinephrine or
or combination therapy)[†] Diuretics (consider infusion other vasopressor
Consider ultrafiltration[‡] or combination therapy)[†] Diuretics (consider infusion or
combination therapy)[†]
Yes No Vasodilator Vasodilator (cautiously)[§]
-Recheck volume status
Diuretics and/or inotrope -Inotrope and/or dopamine
Consider ultrafiltration[‡] -Consider norepinephrine or
other vasopressor
-Diuretics (consider continuous
infusion or combination
therapy)
No Yes Vasodilator for hypertensive Vasodilator (cautiously)[‡] -Recheck volume status
HF and/or inotrope -? Volume repletion
-Inotrope and/or dopamine
-Consider norepinephrine or
other vasopressor
No No Vasodilator Consider “normotensive -Recheck volume status
cardiogenic shock” (then -? Volume repletion
treat as if SBP <90 mm Hg) -Inotrope and/or dopamine
-Consider norepinephrine or
other vasopressor 14
Pharmacological
Therapies......
Vasopressin
antagonis
Endothelin antagonis
15
Therapy Indications/ Contraindications/ Adverse effect
Description caution
Vasodilators
Adrenergic
Adrenergic
-Nitrat
Loop diuretic :
agonists -- Pulmonary congestion/oedema
AHF with congestion and -Hypotension, severe
-Hypotension --Hypovolaemia
hypotension,
agonists -Potent - Preload
-Dobutamin
overload
-Hypoperfusion, SBP < 90 mmHg hiponatraemia, - dependent or aortic
acidosis
HR > 100 bpm → headache,
- -Tachycardia
Hyponatremiaabdominal
- PDEIs (Milrinone venodilators→↓pulmonary
-Inotropy, chronotropy
-Positive inotrope & chronotropy stenosisto
& lusitropy unlikely respond
- Renal disfunction→dose - --pain
Hypokalaemia
tachycardia
hypotension (-)
& Enoximone) venous & ventricle
→vasorelaxation
(through infilling
increases pressure,
vascular - NSAID→↓efficacy
smooth cAMP
in intracellular muscle adjustment of diuretic - -Arrhytmia
Hypomagnesemia
- Peripheral
↓oksigen & pulmonary vasodilatation,
& Ca) → demand
improve CO & ↓ afterload - -Hyperuricaemia
? mortality
↓after&preload
-Arterial vasodilators→↓afterload, - Neurohormonal
-Improve renal perfusion
CO↑→useful
--Ca
low dose →for Myocardial
vasodilatation activation
- Ca sensitizer ischemia sensitization of the contractile - hypotension
( Levosimendan) protein→inotropic effect - Ototoxicity
- smooth muscle K-channels opening→
- Nitroprusside -Hipertensive
-precursor toAHF
the(↑afterload),
synthesis of - active myocardial ischemia
-Advanced HF ! - Hypotension, Cyanide
- Dopamin peripheral vasodilatation
moderate to severe
norephinephrin, MR →” side effect (nausea,
- 80 hs half-life agonist of both - high dose→ limb &
- aadrenergic
pro drug →&Nitric oxide + reseptors,
dopaminergic Coronary steal
end phenomenon”
organ ischemia dysphoria),
cyanida
and an inhibitor of NE uptake thiocyanate toxicity,
- induces a balanced reduction
- low dose→improve in flow
renal blood light sensitive
afterload & preload
- intermediate dose→inotropy &
- avasoconstriction
very short half-life→monitor!
-Tapering doses→avoid rebound
hypertension
Vasopressin antagonis -↓PCWP, RA pressure, ↑urine output without change cardiac index /
(Conivaptan, Tolvaptan, hemodynamic
Lixivaptan) -Tolvaptan : ↓ Body weight & improved serum sodium conc.
- ↓ LV filling pressure, ↓afterload, ↑CO
Endotelin Antagonis
- trial was terminated 18
(Tezosentan)
Clinical Outcome & Prognosis
Mortality
Study Patients (n) Rehospitalization Mortality In- Post-Discharge
Hospital
Jong (Ontario; 1994-7) 38,702 N/A N/A 11.6% 30 d
33.1% 1 yr
Lee (Ontario, 1997- 4,031 N/A 8.7% 10.6% 30 d
2001)
31% 1 yr
OPTIME-HF (US) 949 35.2% 60 d[*] 3.0% 9.6% 60 d
IMPACT-HF Registry 567 25.7% 60 d 2.6% 8.5% 60 d
(US)
ADHERE (US) 187,565 N/A 3.8% N/A
OPTIMIZE-HF (US) 41,267 29.5% 60-90 d 3.8% 8.0% 60-90 d
EHFS I (EU) 11,327 24% 12 wk 6.9% 13.5% 12 wk
Rudiger (Zürich- 312 N/A 8% 11% 30 d
Helsinki)
18% 12 wk
29% 1 yr
Tavazzi (Italy) 2,807 38.1% 6 mo 7.3% 12.8% 6 mo
Zannad (France) 581 N/A N/A 27.4% 4 wk[†]
46.5% 1 yr[†]
EHFS II (EU) 3,580 N/A 6.7% N/A 19
20