Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Hamon Ultimate heat sink

cooling tower

Emergency
Cooling
Tower

2
Ultimate heat sink cooling towers: an additional piece of safety within

Application for Emergency Cooling Towers This quantity can be stored within the confines of an
ultimate heat sink cooling tower. In the worst case the
The safe cooling of the nuclear island is a must because
fill up can be handled with trucks.
this is the ultimate heat discharge in the process. In the
case of Fukushima an Emergency Cooling Tower in An ultimate heat sink cooling system consisting mainly
combination with a safe water and energy supply would of cooling tower, pumps, piping and valves can be inte-
have provided the necessary cooling and the required grated in new and in already existing nuclear power plants
water for it. where the risk assessment shows the need for such a
cooling system.
The International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA, espe-
cially requests that the “unavailibility of the heat sink”
due to “external events” needs to be considered in the
design and that the adequate reaction time shall not be Development of state of the art
less then 48 hours. (1)
Ultimate cooling is one of the critical safety systems in
In case of a shut down of the nuclear power plant the a nuclear power plant and its characteristics are defined
nuclear core still requires a permanent cooling capacity considering the environment and the external risks to
of approx. 50 MW. be covered for each specific power plant. Therefore,
international standards or specifications do not thoroughly
This equals a water flow of 2150 m³/h with a cooling describe the cooling towers that are adapted to local
range of 20 K or about 100000 m³ within 48 hours.

If the coolant from the river, lake or sea is blocked due


to an external event (like airplane crash, blocking of water
intake and pumps due to debris, dam brake, water
shortage, or other events), a huge reservoir of coolant
is needed to provide the cooling for the reactor.

An ultimate cooling system which includes a cooling


tower needs only about 3% of this water quantity
(3000 m³) to compensate the evaporation losses.

(1)
 ar. 2.26 and 2.27 of IAEA Safety Standards Series, External Events
p
Excluding Earthquakes in the Design of Nuclear Power Plants, Safety
Guide No. NS-G-1.5, 2003

www.hamon.com
a Nuclear Power Plant

circumstances and design philosophy. Consequently, Concept of Emergency Cooling Towers


in Europe, well known nuclear power plant operators,
For new applications HAMON recommends in general
such as EDF, EnBW, and RWE have developed internal
Emergency Cooling Towers
specifications covering this subject.
 being built of small cellular modules in reinforced
HAMON, as a specialist has been closely involved in the concrete with forced draft fans
development of these specifications. In 1991, after 2 years  with up to 4-fold redundancy
of studies and work, the EDF standard for emergency  with water storage of minimum 2 days
cooling tower was completed and approved by the French  which consider the applicable hazards and are designed
Safety Authorities. It covers the highest safety standards. for extreme climate conditions
 which integrate in the housing the additional equipment
like pumps, piping, valves, electrical, etc.
 almost completely built of non flammable construction
Design Considerations materials

As the ultimate safety equipment these towers should


For existing plants, the technical solution must be
be designed to cover all applicable potential hazards: developed according to the actual needs and situation.
 earthquake
 snow
 storm References
 tornado
 hail and/or icing HAMON has delivered emergency cooling towers for
 aircraft impact new and already existing power plants.
 explosions
The Emergency Cooling Towers of NPP Civaux (EDF,
 fire
France) and GKN II (EnBW, Germany) are in addition to
 missiles
other very good examples of this safety philosophy and
 internal flooding
have determined the state-of-the-Art. Further they are a
 loss of make-up water
demonstration of HAMON’ competence in this field.
 power supply variation (Hz, V) or complete loss
 mechanical failures
References for upgrades of existing plants are:
 C.N. ASCO, Tarragona Spain
The consideration of these hazards in the design leads  C.N. Trillo, Guadalajara, Spain
to several hundred special technical qualifications for  C.N. Vandellos, ANAS, Tarragona, Spain
the construction and equipment. HAMON engineers in
close contact with authorities and owners have worked HAMON Engineers are available to discuss the applica-
out these requirements and the solutions. tion of an Emergency Cooling Tower for your nuclear
power plant.

By integrating an Emergency Cooling Tower into the nuclear cooling circuit the owner
 increases the safety of the plant to ‘State of the Art’ by closing a gap in safety
 increases the likelihood for acceptance by Authorities, Governments and the Public
 saves the creation of an artificial private huge pond with its everlasting maintenance and surveillance
BELGIUM
HAMON THERMAL EUROPE (BE)
Axisparc A
Rue Emile Francqui, 2
1435 Mont-St-Guibert
Tel: +32 10 39 05 00
Fax +32 10 39 05 01
info.hteb@hamon.com

FRANCE
HAMON THERMAL EUROPE (FR)
Perspective Seine
84, rue Charles Michels
Bâtiment C
93284 Saint-Denis
Tel: +33 1 55 87 78 78
Fax: +33 1 55 87 78 79
info.htef@hamon.com

ITALY
HAMON THERMAL EUROPE
Italian Branch
Via G. Durando, 38
20158 Milano
Tel.:+39 02 39325888
Fax: +39 02 39316046
info.htei@hamon.com

GERMANY
HAMON THERMAL GERMANY GmbH
Alte Wittener Strasse 30
44803 BOCHUM
Postfach 1106
44711 Bochum
Tel: +49 234 93550
Fax: +49 234 9355111
info.htg@hamon.com

UNITED KINGDOM
HAMON UK LTD
Units 1 & 2, Ropery Park
Alfred Street
HU3 2DF Hull
Tel: +44 1482.787.767
Fax: +44 1482.706.151
info.huk@hamon.com

1
www.hamon.com

201107

You might also like