Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Studies On Ascorbic Acid. Factors Influencing The Ascorbate-Mediated Inhibition of Catalase"
Studies On Ascorbic Acid. Factors Influencing The Ascorbate-Mediated Inhibition of Catalase"
10, O C L O U L K 1967
ABFTRACT: The inhibition of catalase by ascorbate, hibition studies with ascorbate alone have demon-
and ascorbate plus Cu2+,has been studied. In the pres- strated clearly that ascorbate, by itself, inhibits catalase.
ence of Cu2+,the inhibition is very rapid. It is independ- The inhibition is potentiated by EDTA and by iron,
ent of substrate concentration and pH, but is strongly and a synergistic action has been found when both iron
influenced by temperature. The temperature dependence and EDTA are used with ascorbate. Dimethyl sulfoxide
reflects, a t least in part, the rate of the reaction between reduces the inhibition by ascorbate. I t is concluded
Cu2+ and ascorbate. The inhibition can be prevented that free-radical transients, known to be generated
if solutions of sufficiently high ionic strength are used during the oxidation of ascorbate, are responsible for
( ~ / 2= 0.1), but increases rapidly to a maximum the inhibition of catalase.
when the ionic strength is reduced (x/2 = 0.002). Di- The most likely candidates are .OH and .O?H;
methyl sulfoxide reduces the inhibition by 50%. In- possibly both are involved
STUDIES ON A S C O R B I C ACID. I
BIOCHEMISTRY
Inhibn
Concn ~~
O R R
VOL. 6, NO. 10, OCTOBER 1967
7 100
z
-
0
k
m
- 75
I
2 5
C
w
.-.-c
0
W
a a
55
I-
z
W
-C
0
e
E
W
c L 2
25-
/ r, I I I I I I
I
I I I I I I
10 25 30 4 55 60
10 20 30 40 50 60 Time (min.)
t (min.) FIGURE 3: The inhibition of catalase by ascorbate with
FIGURE 2: The effect of EDTA on the inhibition of Fez+ or Fe3+ in the presence or absence of EDTA.
catalase by ascorbate. (-O-~-O-) Catalase and 2 X (-A-A-A-) Catalase, 2 X M ascorbate, and 2 X
M ascorbate; (-.-e-.-) catalase, 2 X lo-' M 1 0 P Fez+;
~ (-O-@@) catalase, 2 X M ascorbate,
ascorbate, and 2 X M EDTA. and 2 x 10-6 M Fe3+; (-A-A-&-) catalase, 2 X M
ascorbate, 2 X M Fez+, and 2 X M EDTA;
(-o-o-o-) catalase, 2 X M ascorbate, 2 X M
Fe3+, and 2 X M EDTA.
bas run at 37" and aliquots were removed and assayed.
Control tubes without EDTA were run concurrently.
The per cent inhibition was determined by comparison
to catalase alone or to catalase with EDTA (the presence The effect of Fez+ o r Fe3+ a t a concentration of 2
of EDTA did not affect the activity of catalase). The X 10-6 M on the ascorbate-mediated inhibition of
results are shown in Figure 2 . Obviously, EDTA in- catalase was tested by incubating each ion separately
creases the ascorbate-mediated inhibition of catalase. with 2 X M ascorbate and catalase. The reaction
In both cases (Figure 2) the inhibition is linear with was run at 37" and aliquots were removed and assayed
time for 20 rnin and then slowly levels off. The increased with time. The results are shown in Figure 3. It can be
inhibition due to EDTA is approximately 25%. In seen that both ions are equally effective in increasing
considering this result, the possibility that iron was the inhibition of catalase by ascorbate. If the data of
present as a contaminant in the EDTA preparation Figures 2 and 3 are compared, it is apparent that after
could not be ruled out. It is known (Chalk and Smith, 30 min at 37" the presence of 2 X M iron in the
1954) that the Cu2+-EDTA and iron-EDTA chelates reaction mixture has resulted in a twofold increase in
are different. I n the latter case, it has been shown by the degree of inhibition. When EDTA (2 X M) is
Udenfriend et af. (1954) that such a chelate is actike included in the reaction mixture with iron both the
in promoting the hydroxylation of aromatic com- rate and amount of inhibition is dramatically increased
pounds by ascorbate. It seems reasonable to suggest (upper curves, Figure 3); after 10 min catalase is
such a mechanism here. The idea was tested byexam- inhibited by 80% and the reaction is essentially com-
ining the effect of iron on the inhibition of catalase plete. Consequently, the data support the hypothesis
by ascorbate. suggested above, i.e., that the increased inhibition of
The Effect of Fez+ und Fe3+ on the Inhibition of catalase by ascorbate when EDTA is present could
Cutuluse. I n preliminary experiments it was found be due to traces of chelated iron in the reaction mix-
that either Fez+ or Fe3+ (as their respective sulfates) ture.
inhibited catalase strongly (86%) at a concentration The Efect o j Dimethyl Sulfoxide. The results pre-
of 2 X M. However, at 2 X M the inhibition sented in this paper and in a preceding publication
by either ion after incubation at 37" for 10 and 60 (Orr, 1966) strongly suggest that the ascorbate-mediated
rnin was 11 and 18%, respectively. It was felt that the inhibition of catalase is due t o free-radical attack of the
level of inhibition was tolerable in testing the effect protein. If this is true, it should be possible to reduce
of iron or EDTA-chelated iron on the inhibition of the inhibition by the introduction of a free-radical
catalase by ascorbate. sink. Many radical quenchers are known, but a most 2997
appropriate candidate would appear t o be DMSO ascorbate has been postulated by Dwyer (1964) on the
since it has recently been shown by Lohmann et al. basis of the work of Weissburger et a / . (1943) and Weiss-
(1965) that DMSO reduces the inhibition of catalase berger and LuValle (1944). Dwyer (1964) considers
when the combination is exposed to X-ray irradiation. that the perhydroxy radical, . OsH, would be formed
Preliminary experiments demonstrated that DMSO on oxidation of the ascorbate semiquinone. (3) When
(2.8 X M) did not affect catalactic activity. To test C U ~ and+ ascorbate are incubated with aniline, 0-
the effect of DMSO on the inhibition of catalase by aminophenol is formed. This indicates that . O H
ascorbate, incubations were made a t 25" and included or .OsH are formed (C. W. M . Orr, in preparation).
2 X M ascorbate, catalase, and when present, (4) Further evidence for the presence of free radicals
2.8 X lop4 M DMSO. The results are given in Table 11. formed during the interaction of C u 2 + and ascorbate
is suggested from the work of Matsumura and
Pigman (1965) and Barker er ul. (1965) on the degrada-
tion of hyaluronic acid during incubation with Cu2+
and ascorbate. ( 5 ) I t will be shown in a subsequent
TABLE 11: The Effect of DMSO on the Inhibition of
paper (Orr, 1967) that the inhibition is apparently due
Catalase by Ascorbate.
to physical degradation of the catalase molecule result-
ing in a number of lower molecular weight fragments.
% Inhibition I n this report, the interaction between Cu2+, ascor-
Time (min)
of Incubn DMSO + bate, and catalase has been investigated further. It
at 25" DMSO Ascorbate Ascorbate has been shown that the inhibition was independent
of pH and substrate concentration, but that it was
0 0 0 0 weakly temperature dependent between 25 and 37"
10 0 28.5 6.5 and that maximal inhibition occurred at 2 x 10-6 M as-
30 0 66.5 31 .O corbate. The almost complete lack of inhibition at 0"
60 0 79.5 55 has been found to be due to the lack of interaction
between Cu2+and ascorbate.
The inhibition is extremely sensitive to the ionic
strength of the incubation mixture. At high ionic
It is apparent that DMSO protects catalase quite drama- strengths ( ~ / 1 0Tris), no inhibition occurs. Incubation
tically from inhibition by ascorbate. Higher concen- at progressively lower ionic strengths resulted in in-
trations (2.19 X M) of DMSO were tried in a n creased inhibition reaching a maximum at ~ / 5 0 0Tris.
attempt to increase the protective effect. No further Since the rate of ascorbate autoxidation is independent
reduction in inhibition occurred; in fact, at this con- of ionic strength (as determined by the disappearance
centration DMSO by itself is slightly inhibitory to of ODncz,the, , A, for ascorbate), it must be concluded
catalase. that the catalase molecule is altered. Possibly, it be-
DMSO also protects catalase from inhibition by comes unfolded (and presumably, therefore, more
Cu*+ and ascorbate. When catalase was incubated susceptible to free-radical damage) as the ionic strength
with 2 x 10-6 M Cu2+ and 2 x M ascorbate in is lowered. It should be noted that no change in activity
the presence of 2.8 X lop4 DMSO for 30 min at 25", as a function of ionic strength was recorded in control
the inhibition was reduced by 50%. incubations except a t ~ / 1 Tris
0 where a slight reduction
in activity occurs (at ~ / 1 0Tris the activity of catalase
in the presence of Cu2+and ascorbate is actually greater
Discussion
than in their absence).
Foulkes and Lemberg (1948) were the first to demon- Finally, it was demonstrated that the inhibition by
strate the inhibition of catalase by ascorbate and Cu2+, Cuz+ and ascorbate is reduced by 50 in the presence
but no mechanism for the reaction was proposed. The of DMSO. The latter compound is known to be a free-
formation of an enzymatically inactive H@-catalase radical quencher. In this regard, it is pertinent that
complex, known as complex 11, was elegantly demon- Lohmann et a/. (1965) have shown that marked protec-
strated by Chance (1950) when ascorbate was incubated tion of catalase to X-ray irradiation was afforded by
with catalase, and Keilin and Hartree (1951) showed DMSO.
that the same complex occurred if Cu2+ and ascorbate It appears that catalase is not unique in its sensitivity
were incubated with catalase. I t will be shown in the to inhibition by Cu2+ and ascorbate; Levvy and
succeeding paper (Orr, 1967) that complex I1 could not Marsh (1957) have shown that @-glucuronidase is
be demonstrated and in view of that result, and those strongly inhibited by Cu2+ and ascorbate and they
presented in the present report, a second mechanism concluded that the inhibition was due to an alteration
involving free-radical attack of the protein has been in the structure of the protein. Thus, it is possible that
proposed. In support of this contention the following the inhibitory activity of Cu?+ and ascorbate is a
considerations are relevant. (1) The inhibitory species general phenomenon and the simplest interpretation
was a transient product of the CLi2+-catalyzedautoxida- of the effect is to evoke a free-radical mechanism.
tion of ascorbate (Orr, 1966). (2) The production of Under conditions where no Cu2+is added, ascorbate
2998 free radicals in the C u 2 + - c ~ + ~ 7 ~ yautoxidation
zed of inhibits catalase but in a much more limited way.
ORR
VOL. 6, NO. 10, O C I O B E R 1967
Foulkes and Lemberg (1948), on the basis of the rate of autoxidation and consequently, intensity of
pronounced reduction in the ascorbate-mediated radical production. Perhaps the most convincing argu-
inhibition of catalase by DEDTC, felt that ascorbate ment in favor of the radical hypothesis for the ascorbate
alone had n o effect on catalase and that the observed effect stems from the results found when DMSO is
inhibition was solely due t o trace contamination by included with ascorbate and catalase in the incubation
Cuy+. It should be noted, however, that the inhibition mixture. Under these conditions, the inhibition by
was far from being completely reversed; indeed, a ascorbate is severely reduced.
simple calculation from their data (taken after 20-min Although there is substantial inferential evidence
incubation) reveals that 40 of the catalactic activity that the radicals involved in the inhibition of catalase
was still inhibited in the presence of DEDTC. It has are either . O H or .OYHor both, it has not proved
been shown here that DEDTC has no effect on the possible to demonstrate their existence specifically.
inhibition of catalase by ascorbate, thus supporting Attempts to do this using electron spin resonance
the contention that ascorbate alone inhibits catalase. techniques have failed due to the intense noise from the
In a n attempt t o substantiate the results of the long-lived semidehydroascorbate radical.
DEDTC experiment, EDTA was included in the incuba-
tion m:xture with ascorbate and catalase. It was found
References
that EDTA potentiated the ascorbate-mediated inhibi-
tion of catalase. In considering this rather surprising Barker, S. A., Crews, J. T., Marsters, J. B., and Stacey,
result, it was noted that Tanner et nl. (1959) had M. (1965), Nuture207, 1388.
shown that certain chelating agents, among them Chalk, A. J., and Smith, J. F. (1954), Nature 174, 802.
EDTA, enhanced the rate of autoxidation of ascorbate. Chance, B. (1950), Biochem. J . 46, 387.
Since the inhibition is related to the rate of ascorbate Chance, B. (1954), Methods Biochem. Anal. I , 412.
autoxidation, the EDTA result becomes less puzzling. Dwyer, F. P. (1964), in Chelating Agents and Metal
Nonetheless, it is still difficult to understand how Chelates, Dywer, F. P., and Mellor, D. P., Ed., New
EDTA, by itself, could promote the oxidation of as- York, N. Y . ,Academic, p 573.
corbate unless it is postulated that chelated iron is Foulkes, E. C., and Lemberg, R. (1948), .4ustrulian J.
present. If such were the case, the well-known hydroxyl- Exptl. Bid. Med. Sci. 26, 307.
ating system (EDTA, ascorbate, and iron) of Uden- Good, N. R., Winget, G. D., Winter, W., Conolly,
friend et ul. (1954) would be present. This hydroxylat- T. N., Izawa, S., and Singh, R. M. M. (1966), Bio-
ing system is known to act through the production chemistry 5,467.
of .OH and/or .OzH (Norman and Smith, 1964; Keilin, D . , and Hartree, E. F. (1951), Biockem. J . 49,
Staudinger et a/., 1964) and would neatly fall in line 88.
with the free-radical mechanism formulated here. A Kolthoff, I. M., and Medalia, A. I. (1949), J . Am.
study of the inhibitory effect of iron (either Fez+ or Cliem. SOC.71, 3784.
Fe3+) and ascorbate on catalase with and without Lemberg, R., and Foulkes, E. G. (1948), Nuture 161,
EDTA was undertaken. It was shown that iron in- 131.
creases the inhibition of catalase by ascorbate. This Levvy, G . A., and Marsh, C. A, (1957), Nature 180,
result would be anticipated since the HrO? produced 197.
during the autoxidation of ascorbate in the presence Lohmann, W., Moss, A. J., Jr., and Perkins, W. H.
of ferrous iron gives rise t o the well-known Fenton (1965), J . Nucl. Med. 6,519.
reagent (Fez' and H20s) which is known to give rise Matsumura, G., and Pigman, W. (1965), Arch. Biochem.
to .OH and/or .OnH (Kolthoff and Medalia, 1949). Biophys. 110: 526.
When EDTA was present together with iron and as- Norman, R . 0. C., and Smith, J. R. L. (1964), in
corbate the inhibition is extremely rapid; the rate of Oxidases and Related Redox Systems, Vol. 2, King,
inhibition approaches that of Cu2+and ascorbate. T. E., Mason, H. S., and Morrison, M., Ed., New
Ascorbate a t p H 7.0 undergoes autoxidat'on to York, N. Y., Wiley, pp 131-156.
dehydroascorbate with the production of H 2 0 P .It is Orr, C. W. M. (1966), Biochern. Biophys. Res. Commun.
known that H 2 0 2can react with ascorbate to produce 23, 854.
free-radical intermediates. White and Krupka (1965) Orr, C. W. M. (1967), Biochemistry 6, 3000 (this issue;
suggest that this mechanism is responsible for the following paper).
inhibition of fungal ascorbic acid oxidase. Further- Staudinger, H., Kerekjarato, B., Ullrich, V., and
more, support for free-radical transients comes from ex- Zubrzycki, Z . (1964), in Oxidases and Related Redox
periments demonstrating the degradation of hyaluronic Systems, Vol. 2, King, T. E., Mason, H. S., and
acid by ascorbate alone (Matsumura and Pigman, Morrison, M., Ed., New York, N. Y., Wiley, pp
1965) and particularly by ascorbate in the presence 815-837.
of added HyOr (C. W. M. Orr, in preparation). Thus, Tanner, E.: Schuler, W., and Meir, R. (1959), Helc.
the inhibition of catalase by ascorbate alone is con- Chim. Acta 42,445.
sidered to be due t o the production of free radicals Udenfriend, S., Clark, L. T., Axelrod, J., and Brodie,
formed during its autoxidation. The reduction in the B. B. (1954), J . Biol. Chem. 208, 731.
extent and rate of inhibition when compared to ascor- Weissburger, A,, and LuValle, J. E. (1944), J . Am.
bate pliis Cuy+ can be attributed to the much slower Cliem. Soc. 66,700. 2999
Weissburger, A., LuValle, J. E., and Thomas, D. S. White, G. A., and Krupka, R. M. (1965), Arch. Bio-
(1943),J. Am. Chem. Sac. 65,1943. chem. Biophys. 110,448.
ABSTRACT: Incubation of catalase with either ascorbate suggesting that at least some ascorbate must be bound
or ascorbate and Cu2+ results in degradative changes to catalase. After treatment with ascorbate, or ascor-
in the catalase molecule. The effect of ascorbate alone bate and Cu2+, the spectrum of catalase is changed.
appears to be qualitatively distinct from that of ascor- While there is obvious reduction in the Soret band at
bate in the presence of Cu2+.Electrophoretic and chro- 408 mp the shift of this peak to longer wavelengths is
matographic analysis of catalase treated with C U ~ + almost undetectable. It is concluded that very little,
and ascorbate revealed that the molecule is extensively if any, catalase complex I1 is formed under these
degraded with the majority of the resultant fragments conditions. Significant spectral changes occur at shorter
being dialyzable. A similar analysis of the effect of wavelengths. These have been tentatively interpreted
ascorbate alone indicated that the degraded fragments to represent oxidative changes in labile aromatic amino
were substantially larger and that a small fraction of acids. The results strongly support previous data which
aggregated or polymerized material occurred. By using indicated that the inhibition of catalase by ascorbate,
[ 14C]ascorbate, significant nondialyzable radioactivity or ascorbate and Cu2+, was the result of . OH or * OnH
was found associated with the polymerized material attack of the enzyme.
ORR