Dr. Vitthal S.

Bandal
B. E. (Electrical) (Gold Medalist)
M. E. (Electrical) (Power Systems), Ph.D. (IIT Bombay)
PRINCIPAL
Govt. Polytechnic, Karad

Session I-(9/2/2018)
NBA: CO-PO Attainment- A Case Study
 Accreditation Criterion (Tier-II)
Sr. No. Criterion Tier-II
Vision, Mission and Programme Educational Objectives
1 60
(PEO)
2. Program Curriculum and Teaching–Learning Processes 120

3. Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 120

4. Students’ Performance 150
5. Faculty Information and Contributions 200
6. Facilities and Technical Support 80
7. Continuous Improvement 50
8. First Year Academics 50
9. Student Support Systems 50
Governance, Institutional Support and Financial
10 120
Resources
Course Outcomes
 • COURSE OUTCOMES :
C201 : ELECTROMAGNETIC ENGINEERING

Ciii.N Course Outcomes :- At the end of course, Student will able to

C201.1 Compute the spatial variations of physical quantities by using
various coordinate systems
C201.2 Calculate the force and electric field intensity for different
charge distributions
C201.3 Apply the knowledge of electrostatics to design the devices in
solid state electronics, memory devices.
C201.4 Relate the volume charge density and electric flux density in
the bounded area
C201.5 Select the suitable dielectric material for specific application by
the knowledge of its properties
4
 CO-PO MATRIX OF COURSE
CORELATION LEVELS as
1: Slight (low), 2 : Moderate(MEDIUM),
3: Substantial ( HIGH) and for NO CORELATION- “-”
CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10
C 201.1 2 2 3 2 1 2 1 2 2
C 201.2 3 1 1 2 2 3 2 3 3 2
C 201.3 2 2 2 1 2 3 2 2 3
C 201.4 1 3 3 1 3 2 2 1 2
C 201.5 3 1 2 2 2
Total 11 6 7 10 10 10 7 8 8 9
Average 2.2 1.2 1.4 2 2 2 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.8
Eq Av
Attainment 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2

5
SIMILLAR TABLE IS TO BE PREPARED FOR PSOs
 Program Outcomes
• Knowledge and competencies profiles
• Graduate attributes which form the student learning
outcomes:
– Engineering knowledge
– Problem analysis
– Design/development of solutions
– Investigation
– Modern tool usage
– The engineer and society
– Environment and sustainability
– Ethics
– Individual and team work
– Communications
– Project management and finance
– Life-long learning
POs and PSOs

7
 Program Specific Outcomes

Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs):

• Beyond POs
• Specific to the particular program
• 2 to 4 in number
• Must have a process for arriving at them
• Must be realistic
• Program Curriculum and other activities during
the program must help the achievement of PSOs
as with POs!
8
 PSOs - Example
ECE:
1) Specify, design, prototype and test
modern electronic systems that
perform analog and digital signal
processing functions.
2) Architect, partition, and select
appropriate technologies for
implementation of a specified
communication system. 9
 Curriculum
Components
Basic Science & Mathematics
10%
22% 8% Humanities and Social Sciences

4% Core

Elective
56% Breadth

100.00

80.00 71.33 Curriculum Contribution to the POs/PSOs

56.00 54.67
% Contribution

60.00 48.67 50.67

41.33 44.67 43.52
40.00
24.07
15.33 17.33 12.00
20.00 5.33 6.00
0.00
 Academic Process

Course Choice/Allotment
Plan

Academic Calendar
Time Table
Curriculum

Course Details
(CO, CO-PO mapping, Syllabus, Books, Lesson Plan, Question bank, Plan for Test, Gap Analysis
Plan to cover Content Beyond Syllabus, Practical /Tutorial Plan etc.)

Lectures/ Labs with Pedagogical

Co-curricular Activities
learning Methods
Delivery

Delivery for Weak & Bright

Projects
Students

Industry Institute
Add on
Interaction
Courses
Activities
Assessment

Course Outcome, Program Outcomes: Assessment & Evaluation

 Course Outcome Assessment Process &
Tools

Course Test-1 Test-2 MSE Assignments ESE

/Tutorials
Outcomes
CO1 20% 20% 10% 20% 30%
CO2
CO3
CO4
CO5 0% 10% 20% 20% 50%
 Course Outcome Assessment Process & Tools

Course Outcomes

Set Target Level (CO)

Prepare CO-PO and PSO Matrix

Assessment

Direct Assessment (80%) Indirect Assessment (20%)

University Continuous
Internal Tests Course Exit
Examination Assessment
(20%) Survey
(70%) (10%)

60% 85% 96% >50% >60% >70% >70% >80% >90% 1-1.99 2-3.99 4-5

1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3

Attainment Levels
 Course Outcome Assessment

Roll No Q-1 Q2 Q-3

(CO1) (CO2) (CO3)
01 05 07 08
02
..
60
Sum X Y Z
Assessment=X/(60*10)
Attainment= Assessment/Target
 Sample CO Attainment
Course Name: Linear Integrated Circuits Academic Year : 2015-16 Semester: IV
Continuous Indirect CO
Internal Test University Result
Assessment Assessment Attain
(20%) (70%) Direct
Assess Sheet (10%) (IDA) ment Attained
Assess
CO ment (80% Target /Not
ment Course
Tools Avera Attain % Attain % Avg Attain Attain DA attained
(DA) exit
ge ment Result ment Marks ment ment +20%
survey
IDA)
Class
ETC208.1 69.6 2 95.90 2 87.53 2 2.00 4 3 2.20 2.00 Attained
Test,
Universi
ETC208.2 54.9 1 95.90 2 87.53 2 1.80 4 3 2.04 2.00 Attained
ty
Result,
ETC208.3 50.0 1 95.90 2 87.53 2 1.80 3 2 1.84 2.00 Attained
CAS,
ETC208.4 Assignm 66.4 2 95.90 2 87.53 2 2.00 5 3 2.20 2.00 Attained
ents,
ETC208.5 Tutorials 68.3 2 95.90 2 87.53 2 2.00 4 3 2.20 2.00 Attained
,
ETC208.6 Rubrics, 67.3 2 95.90 2 87.53 2 2.00 4 3 2.20 2.00 Attained
Course
ETC208.7 Exit 68.3 2 95.90 2 87.53 2 2.00 3 2 2.00 2.00 Attained
Survey

Attainment Status Justification CO Attainment of all courses

1. Attained Assessment of CO is more than 85% of set attainment level

2. Not Attained Assessment of CO is less than 85% of set attainment level

Note: Depending upon attainment status of the COs, either CO target level or CO assessment level will be
changed for subsequent year ,
 PO/PSO Assessment Process and Tools
• Process • Tools
– Direct Assessment through Courses
• University examination
• Internal examination
POs and PSOs • Tutorials
Attainment • Module tests /class Tests
• Direct Assessment Rubrics
– Continuous Assessment at laboratory
• Indirect Assessment
POs and PSOs – Course exit survey
Assessment – Indirect Assessment through Different Surveys
• Program Exit Survey
• Alumni Survey
• Employer Survey
• External Examiner Feedback
Indirect
• Industrial Visit Evaluation Rubrics
Direct Assessment • In Plant Training Evaluation Rubrics
Assessment (20%) Average • Guest Lecture/Workshop/Expert Lecture resource
through of Assessment person feedback
Courses (80%) of Different • Parent Feedback
Surveys • Guest Lecture/Workshop/Expert Lecture students
feedback
• Co-curricular & Extra Curricular Activities
 PO and PSO Attainment
PO attainment = (PO mapped level/3)* CO attainment
Course Name: Linear Integrated Circuits Academic Year: 2015-2016 Semester: IV

CO
CO PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
Attainment

ETC208.1 2.20 0.73 - - 0.73 - - - 0.00 - - - - 0.73 -

ETC208.2 2.04 1.36 1.36 - 1.36 1.36 - - 1.36 - 1.36 - - 1.36 -

ETC208.3 1.84 0.61 - - - - - - - - - - - 0.61 -

ETC208.4 2.20 0.73 0.73 - - - - - - - - - - 0.73 -

ETC208.5 2.20 1.47 0.73 - - - - - - - - - - 1.47 -

ETC208.6 2.20 1.47 - - - - - - - - - - - 1.47 -

ETC208.7 2.00 1.33 1.33 - 1.33 0.67 - - 0.67 1.33 - - - 1.33 -

Attainment - 1.10 1.04 - 1.14 1.01 - - 1.01 1.33 1.36 - - 1.10 -

 PO and PSO Attainment (Indirect Assessment)
Year of Study: 2015-16
Surveys PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2

Program Exit Survey 2.78 2.66 2.61 2.66 2.64 2.61 2.64 2.73 2.62 2.64 2.63 2.66 2.64 2.66
Alumni Feedback 2 2 - - 3 - 3 3 3 2 3 3 - -
Parent Feedback 2.11 - - - 2.25 2.15 2.15 2.13 - 2.11 - 2.25 - -
Guest Lecture / Expert
Lecture/ workshop 2 - - 2 2 - 1 2 - 1 - 2 - -
Resource person Feedback
Guest Lecture / Expert
Lecture/ Workshop Student 2 - - 3 2 - 3 - - - - 3 - -
Feedback
External Examiner
2 - - 2 - - - 1 - 2 - - - -
Feedback
In-plant training u industry
3 - - - - - - 3 3 1 - 2 - -
person
Industrial Visit by industry
- - - - - - 3 - 3 - 3 - -
person
Employer Feedback 3 2 - - 2 - 3 3 3 3 3 2 - -

Co-curricular activities - - - - 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 - -

Extra-curricular activities - - - - - 2.17 2 2.17 2.2 2 - 2 - -

Recruiters 2 - - - - 2 1 2 1 - 2 - -
Attainment 2.32 2.22 2.61 2.41 2.41 2.39 2.31 2.46 2.80 2.07 2.91 2.45 2.64 2.66
 Formulae for PO& PSO Attainment (2015-2016)
Sample
PO1

• Engineering Knowledge: Apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering

appropriate to Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering.
80% of Direct assessment
Attainment
20%[average(Program Exit Survey, Alumni Survey,
Employer Survey, External Examiner Feedback, In Plant
Training, Guest Lecture/Workshop/Expert Lecture
resource, person feedback, Parent Feedback, Guest
Lecture/Workshop/Expert Lecture student feedback)]

PSO1

• Design Analog, Digital and Embedded Systems using state of the art technology.

80% of Direct assessment

Attainment
20% of Program Exit Survey
 PO/PSO Attainment (2015-2016)
Program
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO1 PO11 PO12 PSO1 PSO2
Outcome
Direct
1.93 1.79 2.34 1.94 1.80 2.38 2.24 1.89 1.92 1.91 2.62 2.01 1.53 1.80
Assessment
Indirect
2.32 2.22 2.61 2.41 2.41 2.39 2.31 2.46 2.80 2.07 2.91 2.45 2.64 2.66
Assessment
Actual
2.01 1.90 2.47 2.05 1.93 2.40 2.26 2.01 2.11 1.95 2.70 2.10 1.82 2.04
Attainment
Rounded to 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2
Target 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2
Attained / Not
Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Attained

PO attainment

2.70
2.47

2.40
2.26

3.00 2015-2016
2.11

2.10
2.05

2.04
2.01

2.01

1.95
1.93
1.90

1.82
2.50 2014-2015
Attainment Level

2.00 2013-2014
1.50 Comparison of
1.00 three Years
0.50
0.00
PO1
PO2
PO3
PO4
PO5
PO6
PO7
PO8
PO9
PO10
PO11
PO12
PSO1
PSO2
Program outcomes
 Action Taken for improvement of POs/PSOs
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Program Attained / Attained / Attained /
Outcome Target Attainment Not Target Attainment Not Target Attainment Not
Attained Attained Attained
Not
PO1 2.00 1.46 2.00 1.78 Attained 2.00 2.01 Attained
Attained

• More practice for solving Numerical for courses.

• Home Assignment for practice.
• Remedial classes
• Inclusion of simulation for more understanding.
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
Program Attained / Attained / Attained /
Outcome Target Attainment Not Target Attainment Not Target Attainment Not
Attained Attained Attained
Not
PO3 2.00 2.00 Attained 2.00 2.80 Attained 3.00 2.47
Attained
 Designing a system becomes complex and critical in some cases.
 Projects developed by the student as mini projects/major projects (final year) are not fully
meeting desired specifications.

Action: Mini projects are introduced in many subjects to enhance design skills.(SE:LIC & TE:AWP)
for academic year 2016-2017
Actions taken for improvement in PO3 attainment

• Hands on Experience

Linear Integrated Circuits-Mini Projects

Antenna Design Electronics System Design

 Action taken to Bridge Curriculum Gap
Short Program Attainment
Course Outcomes
PO1 3
PO4 2 The gap identified for attainment of
PLC & PO5 2 POs a course named “PLC SCADA” has
PO7 2 been started and attainment of
SCADA PO8 2 Program Outcome for the same is
PO10 3 shown for Academic Year: 2015-2016
PO12 2

No. of
Short Course Placement
students

PLC & SCADA 28 57% (16)

The impact of the action taken General Aptitude &
23 48% (11)
has resulted in improvement of Soft Skill
student’s placement for
Academic Year: 2015-2016
 Weak & Bright Students……(cont)
Strategies for Bright students:
Award Policy
Academic Year Prize
Award
2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014 (Rs.)

Academic Deputy 1 1 1 5000/- each

Academic Deputy Jr. 2 2 2 3000/-each

Encourage to assists slow learners.

Motivate to participate in Conferences/Seminars/competitions
20
Participations & Awards

20 15
13
15
8
10
2 2 2 3
5
0
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
(till date)
No. of Participations 8 13 15 20
Award Won 2 2 2 3
 Industry Institute Interaction

Industries visited by the Faculty

Initiatives
• Industrial visits by the 40 33
faculties/Students

No of Industries
30
• Identification & exchange of
resource person 20 12
8 9
• Industrial Training 10
• Campus Recruitment 0
2016-2017 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014
(Till date)

Industrial Training by Students

75*
67
No. of Students

80
60 50 46
*In 40
upcoming
summer 20
Vacation 0
2016-2017 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014
 Industry Institute Interaction

• Industrial Visits 2+1 Planned 3

3
No. of visits
2
2
1
1

0
2016-2017 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014
No. of industrial visits 3 1 2 3

• Industry contribution in Training, Workshop & Expert Talk

8 8
8
7
No of Activities

6
5

0
2016-2017 2015-2016 2014-2015 2013-2014
(till date)
No. of Activities 8 8 5 7
 Industry Collaboration
Year of
Industry Type of Collaboration Activity
Establishment
•Student Training
eInfochips Training and Research
Collaborative Lab 2015-2016 •FDP, Workshops
Academy- e iTRA, Ahamadabad
•Placement
Texas Instruments Industry Supported •*Workshop
2014-2015
(through Edgate Tech. Banglore) Lab • **TI Analog Maker Design Contest
Industry specific Add •Student Training
S.V. Engineering, Pune 2014-2015
on course(PLC-SCADA) •Placement

eiTRA Texas Instruments Activities S. V. Engineering

29 28
30
10 9 25 20 20

No. of Students
Date Participants
20 16
No. of Students

8
*54 15
6 8th-9th participants 10
4 Aug 2014 (Students & 5 1
2 Faculty)
2 1 0
2014- 2015- 2016-
**68 groups 2015 2016 2017 (till
28th Feb 2015
0 participated date)
2014- 2015- 2016- No. of Students undergone
29 28 20
2015 2016 2017 training
No. of Students No. of Students Placed 20 16 1
1 9 2
Placed
 Industry Interaction
Enhancement in Placement

44
45 42 41
40
35
No of Students

35 33
31
28 29
30
25
20
15
10
5
0 2013- 2014- 2015- 2016-
2014 2015 2016 2017
(till date)
No. of Students Placed (As per Success
28 35 31 29
Rate)
OverallPlacement (On Roll) 33 42 41 44
 Add on Courses

Curricular Gap
Relevance to POs Course/ Area Duration
Identified
Necessary for higher
studies and Control System Inclusion in Third
Year Syllabus by
PO12, PO1, PO2 communicated to BOS (Course not in
SUK
(14-10-2014) & curriculum) (wef. 2015-2016)
conducted a course
PO7, PO12, PO1, PO4,
Industry Exposure PLC & SCADA 1 Month
PO5, PO8, PO10
Ethics, Communication, General Aptitude
PO12, PO8, PO9, PO10 3 Months
Individual & Team work & Soft Skill
Hands on for
PO3, PO6, PO11, PO1, Design/Development of
product 2 Days
PO2 solutions
development
 Action Taken for improvement of POs/PSOs
Short Program Assessment
Course Outcomes (Percentage)
PO1 92.14
PO4 80.35 The gap identified for attainment of
PLC & PO5 79.6 POs a course named “PLC SCADA” has
PO7 82.5 been started and attainment of
SCADA PO8 80 Program Outcome for the same is
PO10 100 shown for Academic Year: 2015-2016
PO12 78.9

No. of
Short Course Placement
students

PLC & SCADA 28 57% (16)

The impact of the action taken General Aptitude &
23 48% (11)
has resulted in improvement of Soft Skill
student’s placement for
Academic Year: 2015-2016
 Student Projects
No. of Projects (2015-2016)
Projects Classification
Society
24% Automation
24%
Assessment Process
• Seminar Security
• Poster Presentation 4%
• Project Demo I/II/III Signal
• Project Report Agriculture Processing
20% Industry 8%
Based
Assessment Tools 20%

• Rubrics
• Project Evaluation
• PRC committee
• Project Diary Sponsored Projects 8 8
No. of Sponsored Projects

6
4
4
3

0
2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
No. of Sponsored Projects 3 4 8 8
 Academic Process- Student Projects
Best Projects:(Academic Year-2015-2016)
Project Title Sponsoring Authority
Water ATM Machine using PLC and
SV Engineering Technology, Pune
SCADA
Android Control Pesticide Spraying
Electrodream Tech, Sangli
Robot for Agriculture Application

PLC and SCADA based multilayer car
parking system
Automized rainfall Measurement
System
Blue Tech Electronics and Automation,
Pune
Electrodream Tech, Sangli

Evaluation Criteria

Need Based Project Industry Sponsored Completion of Project

Questions?

33
 Dr. Vitthal Bandal
Email:- vitthalsbandal@gmail.com
Cell No.- 094210 17462