Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview: What Is A Community? A Biological Community
Overview: What Is A Community? A Biological Community
• A biological community
– Is an assemblage of populations of various
species living close enough for potential
interaction
Figure 53.1
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
• Concept 53.1: A community’s interactions
include competition, predation, herbivory,
symbiosis, and disease
• Populations are linked by interspecific
interactions
– That affect the survival and reproduction of
the species engaged in the interaction
Table 53.1
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
Competition
• Interspecific competition
– Occurs when species compete for a
particular resource that is in short supply
Chthamalus
fundamental niche
Balanus
realized niche
Ocean Ocean
Low tide Low tide
A. ricordii
A. insolitus
A. distichus perches
on fence posts and A. alinigar A. christophei
other sunny
surfaces. A. distichus
A. cybotes
A. etheridgei
Figure 53.3
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
Predation
• Predation refers to an interaction
– Where one species, the predator, kills and
eats the other, the prey
Figure 53.5
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
• Aposematic coloration
– Warns predators to stay away from prey
Figure 53.6
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
• In some cases, one prey species
– May gain significant protection by mimicking
the appearance of another
Figure 53.7a, b
(a) Hawkmoth larva
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
• In Müllerian mimicry
– Two or more unpalatable species resemble
each other
Figure 53.8a, b
(b) Yellow jacket
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
Herbivory
• Herbivory, the process in which an herbivore
eats parts of a plant
– Has led to the evolution of plant mechanical
and chemical defenses and consequent
adaptations by herbivores
Figure 53.9
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
Commensalism
• In commensalism
– One species benefits and the other is not
affected
Figure 53.10
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
• Commensal interactions have been difficult to
document in nature
– Because any close association between
species likely affects both species
• Relative abundance
– Is the proportion each species represents of
the total individuals in the community
Community 1
A: 25% B: 25% C: 25% D: 25%
Community 2
Figure 53.11 A: 80% B: 5% C: 5% D: 10%
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
• A community with an even species abundance
– Is more diverse than one in which one or two
species are abundant and the remainder rare
Secondary
consumers
Carnivore Carnivore
Primary
consumers
Herbivore Zooplankton
Primary
producers
Plant Phytoplankton
Figure 53.12 A terrestrial food chain A marine food chain
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
Food Webs
• A food web Humans
– Is a branching
food chain Baleen
whales
Smaller toothed
whales
Sperm
whales
with complex
trophic Crab-eater seals
Leopard
seals
Elephant
seals
interactions
Birds Fishes Squids
Carnivorous
plankton
Euphausids Copepods
(krill)
Phyto-
plankton
Figure 53.13
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
• Food webs can be simplified
– By isolating a portion of a community that
interacts very little with the rest of the
community
Fish larvae
6 6
No. of species
5 5
links 4
4
3 3
2 2
1 1
0 0
High Medium Low
(control)
Productivity
Figure 53.15
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
Species with a Large Impact
• Certain species have an especially large impact
on the structure of entire communities
– Either because they are highly abundant or
because they play a pivotal role in community
dynamics
WithPisaster (control)
20
Number of species
15
present
10 WithoutPisaster (experimental)
0
1963 ´64 ´65 ´66 ´67 ´68 ´69 ´70 ´71 ´72 ´73
(a) The sea starPisaster ochraceous feeds (b) WhenPisaster was removed from an intertidal zone,
preferentially on mussels but will mussels eventually took over the rock face and eliminated
consume other invertebrates. most other invertebrates and algae. In a control area from
Pisaster was not removed, there was little change in
which
Figure 53.16a,b species diversity.
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
• Observation of sea otter populations and their
predation
– Shows the 100
80
(% max. count)
Otter number
effect the 60
40
otters have 20
on ocean
(a) Sea otter abundance
400
communities 300
Grams per
0.25 m2
200
100
0
(b) Sea urchin biomass
10
8
Number per
6
0.25 m2
4
2
0
1972 1985 1989 1993 1997
Year
(c) Total kelp density Food chain after killer
Food chain before
Figure 53.17 killer whale involve- whales started preying
ment in chain on otters
Figure 53.18
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
• Some foundation species act as facilitators
– That have positive effects on the survival and
reproduction of some of the other species in the
community
0
With Without
Juncus Juncus
Salt marsh with Juncus
(foreground) Conditions
Figure 53.19
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
Bottom-Up and Top-Down Controls
• The bottom-up model of community
organization
– Proposes a unidirectional influence from
lower to higher trophic levels
75
herbaceous plant cover
Percentage of
50
25
0
0 100 200 300 400
Figure 53.21a–c (a) Before a controlled burn. (b) During the burn. The detritus (c) After the burn. Approximately one
A prairie that has not burned for serves as fuel for fires. month after the controlled burn,
several years has a high propor- virtually all of the biomass in this
tion of detritus (dead grass). prairie is living.
(a) Soon after fire. As this photo taken soon after the fire shows, the ( b) One year after fire. This photo of the same general area taken the
burn left a patchy landscape. Note the unburned trees in the following year indicates how rapidly the community began to recover.
distance. A variety of herbaceous plants, different from those in the former
forest, cover the ground.
Figure 53.22a, b
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
Human Disturbance
• Humans
– Are the most widespread agents of
disturbance
• Secondary succession
– Begins in an area where soil remains after a
disturbance
Ri
.
g
Gl
Pacific Gl. Alaska 0 5 10
gs
M
de
ui
Gl
Bri
rG
Mc
l.
1940 1912 1948 Miles
Pl
l.
a
1941
tG
1 899
te
a
n
u
me
Gl
1907 1931 1911
se
1879 1948
Ca
1900
1879 1879 1892 1913
1935 1949
1860
Reid Gl.
1879
Johns Hopkins
Gl. Glacier
Bay
1830
1780
1760
Pleasant Is.
60
50
Soil nitrogen (g/m2)
40
30
20
10
0
Pioneer Dryas Alder Spruce
Successional stage
(c) Spruce stage
180
160 200
140
100
120
(log scale)
100
50
80
60
40
20
10
0 1
500 1,000 1,500 2,000
100 300 500 700 900 1,100
Actual evapotranspiration (mm/yr) Potential evapotranspiration (mm/yr)
(a) Trees (b) Vertebrates
Figure 53.25a, b
100
10
1
1 10 100 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 1010
Area (acres)
Figure 53.26
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
Island Equilibrium Model
• Species richness on islands
– Depends on island size, distance from the
mainland, immigration, and extinction
sla t io n
d)
Im
io
Rate of immigration or extinction
(n
an
ct
m
ig
(fa xt inc
)
ea
( la
isl
n
t in
nd
ig
ra
ig
io
ri
la o n
r
t io
ra
Ex
ra
ct
all
sla
E
i
t io
t io
t in
ct
n
Im
ri
m
nd
t in
nd
i sla
m
n
Ex
(s
( la E x
ig
)
(fa
is
nd
ri ra
e
)
sla t io n
rg
nd n t io
I
)
m
c
t in land
(s
)
m
m
Ex
ig
i s
all
ra
r
ea
t io
isl
(n
n
an
d)
Equilibrium number Small island Large island Far island Near island
(a) Immigration and extinction rates. The (b) Effect of island size. Large islands may (c) Effect of distance from mainland.
equilibrium number of species on an ultimately have a larger equilibrium num- Near islands tend to have larger
island represents a balance between the ber of species than small islands because equilibrium numbers of species than
immigration of new species and the immigration rates tend to be higher and far islands because immigration rates
extinction of species already there. extinction rates lower on large islands. to near islands are higher and extinction
rates lower.
Figure 53.27a–c
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Benjamin
Cummings
• Studies of species richness on the Galápagos Islands
– Support the prediction that species richness
increases with island size
FIELD STUDY
Ecologists Robert MacArthur and E. O. Wilson studied the number of
plant species on the Galápagos Islands, which vary greatly in size, in relation to
the area of each island.
RESULTS
400
200
Number of plant species (log scale)
100
50
25
10
0
0.1 1 10 100 1,000
Area of island(mi 2)
(log scale)
CONCLUSION The results of the study showed that plant species richness
Figure 53.28 increased with island size, supporting the species-area theory.
individual
species
Environmental gradient
(such as temperature or moisture)
individual
species
Environmental gradient
(such as temperature or moisture)
600
Number of
per hectare
plants
400
200
0
Wet Moisture gradient Dry
(c) Trees in the Santa Catalina Mountains. The distribution of tree species at one
elevation in the Santa Catalina Mountains of Arizona supports the individualistic
hypothesis. Each tree species has an independent distribution along the gradient,
apparently conforming to its tolerance for moisture, and the species that live together
at any point along the gradient have similar physical requirements. Because the
vegetation changes continuously along the gradient, it is impossible to delimit sharp
Figure 53.29c boundaries for the communities.