Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BUS 801 Answers and Summary
BUS 801 Answers and Summary
MANAGEMENT
Expectancy theory which is a component of process theory of motivation seeks the answers
to the following questions;
– Will increased effort improve performance?
– Will increased performance be rewarded?
– Does the reward have value?
The key to expectancy theory is understanding an individual’s goal and the linkage between
effort and performance, between performance and rewards, and finally, between rewards and
individual goal satisfaction. It emphasizes payoffs, or rewards. As a result, we have to believe
Question (2013/14, No. 4): Reinforcement is anything that causes a given behaviour to
be repeated or inhibited. Discuss
SOLUTION
Reinforcement theory is based on the work of Ivan Pavlov in behavioural conditioning and
the later work B. F. Skinner did on operant conditioning (Bauer et al., 1998).According to
this theory, behaviour is a function of its consequences. Imagine that even though no one
asked you to, you stayed late and drafted a report. When the manager found out, she was
ecstatic and took you out to lunch and thanked you genuinely. The consequences following
your good deed were favourable, and therefore you are more likely to do similar good deeds
Question (2013/14, No. 5): It is interesting to know that Mintzberg classified the modern
manager’s roles into three. What are these roles?
SOLUTION
The term managerial roles refers to specific actions or behaviours expected of and exhibited
by a manager. When describing what managers do from a roles perspective, we’re not
looking at a specific person per se, but at the expectations and responsibilities that are
associated with being the person in that role—the role of a manager.
After following managers around for several weeks, Prof Henry Mintzberg of McGill
University, Canada concluded that, to meet the many demands of performing their functions,
managers assume multiple roles. A role is an organized set of behaviours, and Mintzberg
The direct relationships with people in the interpersonal roles place the manager in a unique
position to get information. Thus, the three informational roles are primarily concerned with
the information aspects of managerial work. In the monitor role, the manager receives and
collects information. In the role of disseminator, the manager transmits special information
into the organization. The top-level manager receives and transmits more information from
people outside the organization than the supervisor. In the role of spokesperson, the manager
disseminates the organization’s information into its environment. Thus, the top-level manager
is seen as an industry expert, while the supervisor is seen as a unit or departmental expert.
The unique access to information places the manager at the centre of organizational decision
making. There are four decisional roles managers play. In the entrepreneur role, the manager
initiates change. In the disturbance handler role, the manager deals with threats to the
organization. In the resource allocator role, the manager chooses where the organization will
expend its efforts. In the negotiator role, the manager negotiates on behalf of the
organization. The top-level manager makes the decisions about the organization as a whole,
while the supervisor makes decisions about his or her particular work unit.
The supervisor performs these managerial roles but with different emphasis than higher
managers. Supervisory management is more focused and short-term in outlook. Thus, the
figurehead role becomes less significant and the disturbance handler and negotiator roles
increase in importance for the supervisor. Since leadership permeates all activities, the leader
role is among the most important of all roles at all levels of management.
A number of follow-up studies have tested the validity of Mintzberg’s role categories and the
evidence generally supports the idea that managers—regardless of the type of organization or
level in the organization—perform similar roles. However, the emphasis that managers give
to the various roles seems to change with organizational level. At higher levels of the
organization, the roles of disseminator, figurehead, negotiator, liaison, and spokesperson are
more important; while the leader role (as Mintzberg defined it) is more important for lower-
level managers than it is for either middle or top level managers.
A leader is someone who can influence others and who has managerial authority. Leadership
is what leaders do. It’s a process of leading a group and influencing that group to achieve its
goals. Leadership is described as the social and informal sources of influence that you use to
inspire action taken by others. It means mobilizing others to want to struggle toward a
common goal.
People have been interested in leadership since they started coming together in groups to
accomplish goals. These early leadership theories focused on the leader (leadership trait
theories) and how the leader interacted with his or her group members (leadership behaviour
theories).
Trait Theories
Most importantly, charismatic leadership and the great man theory (READ ABOUT THEM
YOURSELF), which is among the contemporary approaches to leadership, may be viewed as
an example of a trait approach. Also, the Big man Five Personality Traits (READ ABOUT
THEM YOURSELF).
Stodgil (1948) from his survey concluded that the following traits/qualities are found in
successful leaders:
– Physical traits: height, health, appearance, vigour etc.
– Intelligence and ability traits: This include planning, conceptualisation, comprehension
etc.
– Personality traits: This include self-confidence, aggressiveness, adaptability etc.
– Task related traits: This include initiative, achievement, drive, persistence etc.
– Social traits: This include administrative ability, cooperativeness, interpersonal skill etc.
Kirkpatrick and Locke (1991) identified seven traits for a successful leader;
i. Drive. Leaders exhibit a high effort level. They have a relatively high desire for
achievement, they are ambitious, they have a lot of energy, they are tirelessly persistent in
their activities, and they show initiative.
ii. Desire to lead. Leaders have a strong desire to influence and lead others. They
demonstrate the willingness to take responsibility.
iii. Honesty and integrity. Leaders build trusting relationships with followers by being
truthful or non-deceitful and by showing high consistency between word and deed.
Behavioural Theories:
This is based on the assumption that leadership is a behaviour that can be taught to
individuals. Researchers hoped that the behavioural theories approach would provide more
definitive answers about the nature of leadership than did the trait theories.
Leadership styles
The University of Iowa studies explored three leadership styles to find which was the most
effective.
i. The autocratic style described a leader who dictated work methods, made unilateral
decisions, and limited employee participation.
ii. The democratic style described a leader who involved employees in decision making,
delegated authority, and used feedback as an opportunity for coaching employees.
iii. Finally, the laissez-faire style leader let the group make decisions and complete the
work in whatever way it saw fit.
The researchers’ results seemed to indicate that the democratic style contributed to both good
quantity and quality of work. Had the answer to the question of the most effective leadership
style been found? Unfortunately, it wasn’t that simple. Later studies of the autocratic and
democratic styles showed mixed results. For instance, the democratic style sometimes
produced higher performance levels than the autocratic style, but at other times, it didn’t.
However, more consistent results were found when a measure of employee satisfaction was
used. Group members were more satisfied under a democratic leader than under an autocratic
one.
The impact of individual differences on organisational behaviour is becoming more and more
tremendous. Especially in organisation’s recruitment and selection process, individual
differences are highly concerned by employers. Considering the development of
organisational effectiveness, researchers spent more time on the study of individual
differences to discover how they may affect individual performance so to influence
organisation’s performance. Robbins (2003) states that organisations want to match
individual to specific jobs by taking individual differences into account and organisations
have expanded their interest to the individual-organisation fit recently. How to effectively
manage people within a diverse context is becoming a serious issue for all managers.
According to Mullins (2007), people differ from each other and individual differences are the
basis of diversity within organization. Thus, an effective manager in modern business world
is required to be able to identify individual differences and coordinate individual with
organisation’s requirement. This essay will illustrate a brief study about individual
differences and factors that cause individual differences:
1. Gender
2. Age
3. Personality
4. Ethnicity
5. Religion
6. Educational background
7. Demographic factors,
8. Intelligence
9. Ability
10. Values – Upbringing, Family background.
Furthermore individuals also contrast physical objects to their surroundings and may perceive
something as bigger, smaller, slower, or faster than it really is. In self-perception, we may
commit the self-enhancement or self-effacement bias, depending on our personality. We also
overestimate how much we are like other people. When perceiving others, stereotypes infect
our behaviour. Stereotypes may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Stereotypes are perpetuated
because of our tendency to pay selective attention to aspects of the environment and ignore
information inconsistent with our beliefs. When perceiving others, the attributions we make
will determine how we respond to the situation. Understanding the perception process gives
us clues to understand human behaviour.
Question (2016/17, No. 1): If you fail to plan, you plan to fail. Discuss
The management process involves tasks and goals of planning, organizing, directing,
(coordinating) and controlling. Management is the act of engaging with an organization’s
human talent and its resources to accomplish desired goals and objectives.
Benjamin Franklin was accredited with the statement “If you fail to plan, you are plan to
fail”, this describes the importance and benefits of planning in the managerial process and
function. Organizations that do not take planning critical have tendencies of succeeding in
their organizational goals and objectives. Hence the benefits of planning include
Question (2016/17, No. 4): What is Organizational culture. Explain its components b) what
general and specific types can be used to describe and organizations culture.
SOLUTION
Organizational culture encompasses values and behaviours that "contribute to the unique
social and psychological environment of an organization. According to Needle (2004).
organizational culture represents the collective values, beliefs and principles of organizational
members and is a product of factors such as history, product, market, technology, strategy,
type of employees, management style, and national culture; culture includes the
organization's vision, values, norms, systems, symbols, language, assumptions, environment,
location, beliefs and habits.
The components identified in organizational culture are seen in the levels of organizational
culture which are: Basic Assumptions of the organization, shared values and artefacts.
Routines, Rites and Rituals – Staff meetings, training sessions, performance appraisals,
visits by management or superiors serves the purpose of providing a sense of security,
personal identity, give meaning to the members and also help in better management and
control. For Example, if competent professionals are not staying with the organization for
long time, that implies they are not valued in the organization.
Shared Beliefs and Values - Very essential for the success of the organization. The
unconscious values and beliefs held by the members of the organization are expressed in
certain events repeatedly. For Example, if the organization believes that Customer
Satisfaction is essential for the success, any behaviour that meets the criteria is acceptable
even if it violates the set norms and procedures.
Question (2016/17, No. 5): Explain your understanding of organizational structure. b) What
are the elements of organization structure?
SOLUTION
b) The elements of structure which are also called the building blocks of organization
structure which constitute how organizations conceptualize their structure. According to
Onokala and Banwo (2014), the following elements of organizational structure include: