Professional Documents
Culture Documents
World Health Paper
World Health Paper
World Health Paper
4/10/19
SNT 330 01
I have chosen to analyze Switzerland’s health system, and make comparisons to our own
health system here in the US. Switzerland seems to have most aspects of healthcare figured out
to a decent extent, but I must keep in mind that there healthcare is a complicated topic that must
be approached differently depending on the situation. When comparing Dale ranking between
the US and Switzerland, the US ranks behind Switzerland as Switzerland has a higher disability
adjusted life expectancy. DALE measures the number of years in a person’s life that they spend
unaffected by illness or disability, and it helps to provide a better way of measuring the health of
a population. DALE is more concerned with quality and length of life rather than just the length
of life alone. Switzerland ranks 8th in this category, while the US ranks 24th. To me, this
indicates that US citizens spend more time dealing with illness and disability than Swiss citizens.
This indicates to me that the Swiss population is an overall healthier population, which may be
The US ranks first in terms of responsiveness. In fact, the US is the only country that
ranks ahead of Switzerland in this aspect of healthcare, with Switzerland ranking 2nd.
Responsiveness is a measure of how well a health care system responds to the needs of patients
and how well the system respects their needs and requests. Patient confidentiality and dignity
play a large role in measuring responsiveness. Patients having a choice of their provider is also
important when it comes to having efficient responsiveness. The ability of patients to make
decisions concerning their own health is another important thing to consider when measuring
responsiveness. Health care systems should strive to provide attentive care to patients and make
sure that they have access to social support, as well as making sure that the basic amenities
provided are of sufficient quality. The reason that the US ranks ahead of Switzerland in
responsiveness might be because the US greatly values the rights of the patient and their
preferences, more so than any other nation. The freedom of choice is most prevalent in the
United States. The US also spends the most money on health care, so it would be expected that
the quality of care provided to patients would be the best. Responsiveness strongly correlated
with availability of resources in a country. Many countries do not take full advantage of their
resources.
efficiency of a healthcare system. This measurement is derived from the percentage of household
income that goes toward healthcare. Cost of health insurance, out of pocket payments, and tax
financial contribution. The US ranks at 54-55, while Switzerland comes in at 38-40. This
difference in ranking might be due to the cost of many medical services in the US being very
high in comparison to many other countries. In countries with a well developed health care
systems, a medical scan such as an MRI will cost a mere fraction of the price for an MRI in the
US. Also, fairness in the US may be lower because of the large portion of uninsured individuals
that are forced to pay the full price of medical services out of pocket.
Responsiveness is not the only criteria that the US ranks first in. The US also takes the
number one spot when it comes to expenditure per capita. Expenditure per capita in healthcare is
a ratio of the amount of money spent on healthcare per person in a population. This reflects
overall amount of money that a country spends on health care, so it makes sense that the US
would be ranked number one. Switzerland is ranked 2nd in this criteria. It seems that expenditure
per capita directly correlates with responsiveness in the comparison of these two countries. I
would expect countries to have better health care responsiveness when they spend more on
healthcare. Higher spending usually results in access better technology and resources for
physicians to use when treating patients. Switzerland spends much less than the US, but they also
have a much smaller population, which is most likely why the expenditure per capita ratios for
to provide coverage for its citizens. High levels of uninsured citizens will lead to high levels of
morbidity and mortality that could have been prevented if medical care had been more
accessible. The US is ranked 37th when it comes to overall health system performance, while
Switzerland is ranked 20th. This difference in ranking is largely due to the larger number of
uninsured citizens in the US when compared to Switzerland. Switzerland has a highly developed
health care system while the healthcare system in the US largely divided.
The US uses about 17% of their GDP spending on healthcare, which considerably high,
while Switzerland only spends only around 12% of their GDP on healthcare. (Health System
Tracker, 2018) The infant mortality rate for live births in Switzerland is about 4 deaths per every
1,000 live births, while in the US it is about 5.8 deaths per every 1,000 live births. The higher
infant mortality rate in the US is partially a result of situations where uninsured people have less
access to prenatal care. Health care in the US is divided system that leaves many uninsured. The
mortality rate in Switzerland for children under 5 is the same as their infant mortality rate of
about 4 per every 1,000. In the US, the mortality rate for children under 5 is slightly higher than
the infant mortality rate, this rate is about 7 deaths per every 1,000 children. (CDC, 2017)
Healthcare in Switzerland is funded both publicly and privately. Those who wish to live
in Switzerland must contact a public or private health insurance provider within 3 months of
arriving to the country. The healthcare system in Switzerland is funded isn’t funded by taxes or
employers. Public health insurance providers in switzerland are not allowed to deny any
applicants, regardless if they have a pre existing condition. It is the full responsibility of the
There are many ways that the US could improve its healthcare system based on the
World Health Organization criteria. The US could try to adapt a more unified system of
healthcare so that there are less individuals left uninsured. A large amount of morbidities and
mortalities occur because of uninsured individuals refusing to seek care that they cannot afford.
Paying medical bills without the help of insurance is impossible for many families in the US, so
some will try to put off seeking treatment for as long as they can, and sometimes when they do
finally seek treatment it’s too late. Healthcare could also be improved by increasing the
promotion of public health, which would help citizens shift toward healthier lifestyles. (Cutler,
2015)
References
Infant Mortality | Maternal and Infant Health | Reproductive Health | CDC. (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/infantmortality.htm
How does health spending in the U.S. compare to other countries? (n.d.). Retrieved from
https://www.healthsystemtracker.org/chart-collection/health-spending-u-s-compare-
countries/#item-relative-size-wealth-u-s-spends-disproportionate-amount-health
expats/guide/living-in-switzerland-15504/healthcare-in-switzerland-2
Cutler, D. M. (n.d.). How States Can Improve the Health Care System. Retrieved from
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/healthcare/reports/2010/09/17/8347/how-states-can-
improve-the-health-care-system/