Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Butron V Ydimne-Compromise Final
Butron V Ydimne-Compromise Final
And
WITNESSETH:
Whereas, the PARTIES are plaintiffs and defendants in Civil Case No. 4507
which has been dismissed by virtue of a Compromise Agreement executed by the
PARTIES;
Whereas, part of the Agreement is for the Plaintiffs to pay defendants the amount
of SIX MILLION PESOS (P6,000,000.00) of the remaining area covered by OCT No. P-
21513 and for plaintiffs to pay all expenses relative to the execution of the Deed of
Conveyance such as the payment of the Capital Gains Tax and Documentary Stamp
Tax, Estate Tax, notarial fee and the unpaid real property tax;
Whereas, the Plaintiffs are ready to pay the compromise amount of SIX MILLION
PESOS (P6,000,00.00);
Wherefore, based on the foregoing, the PARTIES hereto agree on the following:
1. That the FIRST PARTY shall pay the amount of THREE MILLION PESOS
(P3,000,000.00) upon the execution of this Agreement;
represented by:
HELEN YDIMNE-EMPANADO
SSS ID No. 09-1635207-5
represented by:
CONCEPTION YDIMNE
Barangay ID No. BL-00967-19
Signed in the presence of:
1. __________________________ 2. ____________________________
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This instrument consists of two (2) pages including this page signed by the
parties and their instrumental witnesses.
COMPROMISE AGREEMENT
The Plaintiffs and the defendants, assisted by their respective counsel, have
agreed to settle this instant civil case under the following terms and conditions:
1. The plaintiffs will pay the defendants the sum of SIX MILLION PESOS
(P6,000,000.00) of the remaining area covered by OCT No. P-21513;
4. That plaintiffs shall shoulder all the expenses relative to the execution of the
Deed of Conveyance such as the payment of the Capital Gains Tax and
Documentary Stamp Tax, Estate Tax, notarial fee and the unpaid real
property tax;
The Parties have signed this Compromise Agreement voluntarily and freely.
ELEONOR EDIMNE
MARLON YDIMNE
COMES NOW, the undersigned counsel, unto this Honorable Court, most
respectfully states:
1. That counsel received a copy of the Order of this Honorable Court dated
November 3, 2016 on November 17, 2016 which Order considered the
defendants to have rested their case for their failure to appear during the said
hearing despite Notice;
2. That counsel most respectfully moves for the reconsideration of the said Order
based on the following grounds:
1. That the CONSTANCIA dated August 18, 2016 setting this case for hearing
on November 3, 2016 was received by the Office of herein counsel only on
October 27, 2016. Copy is hereto attached as Annex “A”;
2. That counsel only learned of the said hearing when she returned for work in
the afternoon of November 4, 2016 since on October 27-29 she attended the
Regional Election of the Board Members in Davao City. The reason why the
said Notice was not reflected in her planner. Copy of her planner for
November 3, 2016 is hereto attached as Annex “B”;
2.1 That on November 2, 2016, though a regular working day but considering
that it was All Souls Day, counsel did not report for work;
2.2 That on November 3, 2016, counsel attended a whole-day committee of
the whole meeting at the Provincial Capitol. Thus, what was reflected in
her planner was only the committee meeting and none for the hearing of
this case;
3. That the counsel is ready to present her last witness whose Judicial Affidavit
was already submitted to this Honorable Court on February 13, 2013.
Other reliefs just and equitable are likewise being prayed for.
LANI M. GABUTERO
Counsel for Defendants
NOTICE
Please submit the foregoing Motion for consideration of this Honorable Court of
November 24, 2016 at 8:30 o’clock in the morning.
LANI M. GABUTERO