Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

World Applied Sciences Journal 17 (11): 1490-1497, 2012

ISSN 1818-4952
© IDOSI Publications, 2012

Evaluation of HEC-RAS Ability in Erosion and Sediment Transport Forecasting


1
Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi and 2Ehsan Zaredehdasht

Department of Water Engineering, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran


1

2
Department of Civil Engineering, Behbahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Behbahan, Iran

Abstract: One of the main objectives of river engineering is river training which is defined as controlling and
predicting river behaviors. It is taking effective measurements to eliminate any associated threats and,
consequently, improving river system. River training is mainly consisted of the control of erosion and
sedimentation in a river. In some rivers, the riverbed continues to erode and degrade; thus never reaching to
balance. Generally, analysis of geometric characteristics of rivers and bed erosion is one of the most
complicated yet key topics in river engineering and sediment hydraulics. The advent of new computer
technologies has enabled engineers to resolve equations of sediment transports and hydraulic issues via
computer simulations and modeling. The selection of proper model and its calibration remained as a difficult,
sensitive task to field engineers. The latest version of HEC-RAS model, called HEC-RAS4, is utilized in this
paper; the obtained results from simulations of river bed, were compared to those model reported in the
literature. This paper primarily focused upon identifying critical erodible points and areas with potential
sediment aggregation along Karun river. The study area was reachable between Mollasani station (upstream)
and Farsiat station (Downstream) with a length of 110 km. This reach includes 113 sections all of which
introduced into the model.

Key words: Erosion Sediment transport One-dimensional model HEC-RAS4 model MIKE 11 model

INTRODUCTION investigation conducted for analysis and prediction of


geometric changes of rivers. such changes became one of
Rivers are affected by natural and human factors; the central complicated discussions in both river
rivers usually undergo severe erosion on bed or banks, engineering and sediment hydraulics. The application of
sedimentation and sectional movements. These factors mathematical models has gained a unique position in
caused dramatic changes to rivers in long run leading to geomorphological studies due to complexities of sediment
what is known as geomorphological changes. One of transport processes and the simultaneous application of
the key topics in river engineering is to investigate flow hydraulic features together with new cross-sections
river morphology that describes the river geometry, and characteristics of bed sediment materials.
bed shape and longitudinal profile, cross-sections and Today, new developments in computer science
changes of river shape [1, 2]. The river morphology is and modeling are capable of solving any complicated
highly dependent upon extensive geomorphologic equations. The need for time consuming, costly physical
knowledge. Until past decades; the connection between models are over. The application of a proper computer
geomorphology and river engineering was unclear and model to any specific region and its calibration is uniquely
imprecise. River engineering may required to use regular important [3].
and prismatic cross sections and geometric sections; a Flow regime is mainly impacted by interactions of
wide range of modifications and stabilization structures diverse hydraulic and hydrodynamic forces. This leads to
along the river and flow control. Numerous studies a dynamic river system and changing cross-sections due
conducted in past showed the significance of morphology to periodic sedimentation and erosion [4].
in the field of river engineering. Delphi et al. [4], Karamour et al. [5] and Rivers [6]
Recently, computer developments in mathematical conducted researches on design of river water quality
modeling encouraged the application of morphology as an monitoring networks, environmental modeling and
academic field in river engineering studies. Generally, the developed water quality management model for karun

Corresponding Author: Amir Hamzeh Haghiabi, Department of Water Engineering, Lorestan University,
Khorramabad, Iran. Tel: +98 9161610580.
1490
World Appl. Sci. J., 17 (11): 1490-1491, 2012

which are used ground bases for this paper. The The hydrodynamic module computes unsteady flows in
followings issues were pursued in the present channels of compound cross sections [10]. In addition,
investigation: the model simulate sediment transport in waterway grid of
NCCHE replacing BEAMS and DWAVNET models. This
Determination of the suitable relation for changes of model includes diffusive wave and dynamic models and
density of suspended sediment materials in Karun resolves completely van-Senant equations.
river;
Simulation of bed changes by application of CCHE2D Model (2002): This model is a two-dimensional
suspended load, bed load and sediment continuity model capable of analyzing sediment hydraulics. The
equations; model can accurately and reliably simulate changes of bed
Simulation of bed changes by a desired model. heights in natural water channels due to sedimentation
and erosion. It also easily simulates changes of river
Description of Existing Models: Numerous cross-section if input data be complete [11].
mathematical models have been presented by many
scholars in the field based on different assumptions Study Area: The great Karun River with a length of 860
and solutions including: km is the longest river in Iran. The river with a basin of
45,221 km2 is situated in southwest of the country. Two
HEC-6: This model was developed by US Corps of main branches of this river include Dez and Karun
Engineers whereby different equations were presented to branches that join at Band-e Ghir in north of Ahwaz
simulate sedimentation and erosion in rivers and forming the Greater Karun [12, 13]. There are three
reservoirs [7]. hydrometric stations including Mollasani, Ahwaz and
Farsiat Stations in the study region. In present research,
Flovial: This model was developed by Chang [8] for flow Mollasani and Farsiat stations were used as upstream and
and sediment routing in rivers downstream boundaries, respectively, (Fig. 1). Karun
River is passing through numerous cities and towns in
BRI-Stars: The two-dimensional model was presented by Khuzestan province with a great number of private and
Albert Molinas to US FHWAS [9]. state-owned industrial activities. There are large residing
populations along this river necessitates the extensive
CCHE1D Model: A one-dimensional flow and sediment study of potential threats arising from sedimentation
transport model developed for channel networks. including formation of sand bars [6].

Fig. 1: General schematic plan of the River

1491
World Appl. Sci. J., 17 (11): 1490-1491, 2012

MATERIALS AND METHODS HEC-RAS4 Beta Model: This model is a hybrid model the
improved HEC-6 and HEC-RAS3.1.3 models developed by
Model Description Hydrologic Engineering Center, US Army Corps of
MIKE11: This software initially developed by Danish Engineers as a one-dimensional system to analyze open
Hydraulic Institute (DHI) is a one-dimensional model used channels [16]. It is of note that part of solving engine of
for natural channels and waterways even drainage HEC-RAS4 Beta is common with that of HEC-6 [16, 17]. In
systems. The capabilities of this model include the this paper, the latest version of this model is used. Among
following items: others capabilities, this model can perform the
calculations of sediment transport, geometrical changes
Hydrodynamic Capabilities: Includes routing of of cross-sections and water quality analysis. The
permanent and temporary flows in open channels and calculations of sediment transport in the model allows the
determines routing of flow and water surface levels user to model dynamic changes in riverbeds and
(profile) for different periods and sections by resolving subsequently, geometrical changes. One has to note that
fully hydrodynamic Saint-venant equations [14]; the latest version of model is a free-of-charge beta version
released by its developers to report any shortcomings by
Material Transport and Diffusion: Includes numerical users and further suggestions by them to improve the
methods to perform calculation related to salinity at quality of the model. For additional information, you may
river estuary, temperature distribution, contamination carry out literature survey and go through developed
transmission and deposition of fine materials in models [10, 18].
reservoirs;
Input to the Model
Water Quality: Performs calculations related to routing General Schematic Plan for the River: Including
water salinity and quality and the balance of dissolved introduction of virtual upstream and downstream points
oxygen, ammonium, nitrates and other materials; along with actual coordinates of theses points. The reach
under study was divided into four sections. The division
Sediment Transport: Used for calculations related to was made based upon Manning roughness coefficient (n)
geomorphologic changes in long run, erosion and obtained from one of the projects carried out by the
sedimentation on river bed, changes of roughness Khuzestan Water and Power Authority (KWPA) (Fig. 1).
factor in floodplain an sediment management; the data
of non-cohesive materials and the type of model in Cross-Sectional Data: The river was divided into 113
this part are selected based upon results of previous sections vertical to the river flow and from left bank to the
studies [15]. right bank. Data of Section 113 are given in Fig. (2).

Fig. 2: Cross-sectional data of the River

1492
World Appl. Sci. J., 17 (11): 1490-1491, 2012

Fig. 3: A view of downstream and upstream boundary conditions by HEC-RAS4 software

Fig. 4: A view of software menu displaying sediment data

Boundary Conditions: Mollasani Station hydrograph Description of Solutions: A number of mathematical


(with recorded daily discharge levels of 5-year) was solutions with different accuracies have been proposed to
introduced as upstream boundary condition while predict sedimentation in rivers. Extensive studies are
discharge-surface levels of Farsiat Station was used as required in order to select the best solution to analyze
the downstream boundary condition into the model. The sediment transport processes and provide sediment
upstream and downstream boundary conditions to the estimations. In most cases, it was noticed that the
model are shown in Fig. (3). differences between calculations and sediment process
determination were significant; even if we assume the
Sediment Data: The data of sediment samples taken from conditions remained the same.
the river reach including grain sizes of river bed and D50 The following summary of information and
at Mollasani and Farsiat Stations were introduced to the terminologies about sediment transport solutions and
model. Fig. (4) shows the window of the model displaying equations are used in HEC-RAS4: Sediment load refers to
sediment data. sediment materials moving in (i.e. jumping, rolling, sliding)

1493
World Appl. Sci. J., 17 (11): 1490-1491, 2012

Fig. 5: Input data range to calculate sediment load in HEC-RAS4

bed layers as salty sands. Suspended load include Lursen Equation is used to predict total sediment
sediments moving above bed layer and their specific load [1]. The equation is mainly used for coarse sediment
weight is carried by water flow and are suspended in grains with 0.011 to 29 mm of diameter.
water for a long time. The suspended load and bed load or 7
bed material discharge and washed-load discharge  ds  6  0  u 
= cm 0.01    − 1  f  * 
together are called total sediment. Total sediment load is D  c   
defined as an aggregate of bed load and suspended load
or as bed material load and alluvial load when river Where Cm is sediment density, ds is average sediment
sediments are low. In less deep rivers, total sediment load particle size, D effective water depth, 0 is shear stress
almost equals to bed load while in deep rivers, bed load is applied to bed, c critical shear stress, U* shear velocity
contributes only 10 to 20% of total sediment. The and is particle fall velocity. The value of f is a function
methods are based upon calculation of total sediment of particle shear velocity to particle fall velocity which is
while Meyer-peter-Muller [19] are based upon bed load. determined by standard tables.
Note that Robbi relation is used in order to calculate
particle fall velocity. Description of Solutions: A number of mathematical
In this paper, those sediment transport and sediment solutions with different accuracies have been proposed to
estimation equations were used to be more consistent predict sedimentation in rivers. Extensive studies are
with the current conditions of Mollasani-Farsiat reached required in order to select the best solution to analyze
[9]. Since other recent sediment transport equations are sediment transport processes and provide sediment
described in literature [20] the following equation is briefly estimates. In most cases, it was noticed that the
described. Input data range to calculate sediment load in differences between calculations and sediment process
HEC-RAS4 shown in Fig. (5). determination were significant; even if it was assumed

1494
World Appl. Sci. J., 17 (11): 1490-1491, 2012

that all conditions were remained the same. The In recent years, it was observed that despite dredging of
sediment transport equations used by HEC-RAS4 critical points sections of the river by using several
and MIKE11 models were based upon calculation dredging machines, due to high volume of aggregated
of total sediment while Meyer-peter and Muller Equations sediments in the river and lack of proper measures in early
based upon bed load. In this paper, attempts were made stages, such sediments have turned into solid bars and
to use an equation to cover both bed and suspended become part of the river section.
loads while considering local conditions of the study Since the solutions of continuity and momentum
region. equations (Sain-venant equations) and sediment transport
equations are not similar in both models. Both models use
Model Calibration: Model reliability depends upon its numerical methods to solve these equations, both are
calibration and verification of results as important steps sensitive to the selection of time periods in simulation
before put the model in use. Literature review showed that process as such that morphological changes of cross-
the correct determination of erosion and sedimentation at sections in Ahwaz reach were analyzed. In this study over
a cross-section of a river depends upon the selection of five years for 1,825 daily discharge were recorded. The
the sediment transport equation and Manning roughness model run time was reduced to 10 minutes to bring the
coefficient. results of models closer together. One of the
It was note that the model calibration to Manning disadvantages of HEC-RAS4 model is the long time it
roughness coefficient was obtained by Dez Ab requires for making simulations of sediment transport. In
Consulting Engineering Company for one of the this work, it took 12 hours to perform simulations due to
related projects owned by KWPA in 2006. Regarding the long time records available (5 years). Also, the results
indicate that the regarding the performance of both
the results obtained, the calibrated Manning roughness
models under similar conditions (Figs. 6 and 8), at most
values for four reaches of the study area from upstream
discharge levels, the depths of sedimentation in HEC-
to downstream were 0.031, 0.04, 0,.05 and 0.026,
RAS4 Model is lower than that of corresponding value in
respectively. During model calibration, the model was
MIKE11 Model from 5 to 9%. Furthermore, at few
run repetitively and by changing Manning roughness
discharge levels, sedimentation results by HEC-RAS4 are
coefficient (n) at intended stations (Mollasani and
higher than (11%) those of MIKE11 model. The
Farsiat stations) and the Manning values were calculated
differences can be related basically to the different
by comparing the predicted water levels with those
solutions of governing equations and removing some
measured at Ahvaz station as selected as the observation
Sain-venant equations terms in HEC-RAS4 [22]. Due to
station. Applying different sediment transport equations,
critical locations of bridges over the river, the models were
it was noticed that Ackers-White and Hunsen equations
comparisons at such location [3, 18]. The results showed
[21] produced better results. In both models, Ackers-
that the most critical region in terms of sedimentation is
White equations was used to allow the comparison of
Ahwaz reach leading to formation of a large bar called
results. Shadi Island as shown in Figs. 6 and 7.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The analysis of the results from running models for


5 years indicated that significant sedimentation in Karun
River within Ahwaz reach that agrees with actual situation
of the river. Formation of large sand bars due to
sedimentation and lack of regular dredging of the river
have caused numerous problems including reduction of
river capacity in passing flood discharge, severe
reduction of Karun water quality and damaging
appearance of the city of Ahwaz. One of the main causes
of the sedimentation phenomenon can be sudden Fig. 6: A comparison of changes in heights of riverbed in
reduction of river longitudinal slope and the increase of Section 47 (Ahwaz Black Bridge) by two models
Manning roughness coefficient to 0.05 in Ahwaz reach. (HEC-RAS4 and MIKE11)

1495
World Appl. Sci. J., 17 (11): 1490-1491, 2012

cross-sectional changes to decide the suitability of such


models in analyzing sediment transport processes
(sedimentation and erosion) in rivers.

REFERENCES

1. Van Rijn, L.C., 1993. Principles of Sediment Transport


in Rivers, Estuaries and Coastal Seas.
2. Graf, W.H., 1984. Hydraulics of sediment transport.
1984: Water Resources Pubns.
3. Jaafarzadeh, E., 1992. Application of computer in river
engineering and sediment transport technologies in
Fig. 7: A comparison of changes in heights of riverbed in channels. Farhang Jame Publications, Iran, pp: 114.
Section 47 (Ahwaz Suspending Bridge) by two 4. Delphi, M., M.M. Shooshtari and H.H. Zadeh, 2010.
models (HEC-RAS4 and MIKE11) Sensitivity Analysis of Sediment Transport in Karun
River. International Journal of Environmental Science
and Development, 1(3): 221-224. ISSN: 2010-0264.
5. Karamouz, M., R. Kerachian, M. Akhbari and
B. Hafez, 2009. Design of river water quality
monitoring networks: a case study. Environmental
Modeling and Assessment, 14(6): 705-714.
6. Afkhami, M., M. Shariat, N. Jafarzadeh, H. Ghadiri
and R. Nabizadeh, 2007. Developing a water quality
management model for Karun and Dez Rivers. Iran. J.
Environ. Health. Sci. Eng., 4(2): 99-106.
7. Tingsanchali, T. and S. Supharatid, 1996.
Experimental investigation and analysis of HEC 6
river morphological model. Hydrological processes,
10(5): 747-761.
Fig. 8: A comparison of changes in heights of riverbed in
8. Chang, H.H., 1985. Water and sediment routing
Section 47 (Ahwaz Fourth Bridge) by two models
through curved channels. Journal of Hydraulic
(HEC-RAS4 and MIKE11)
Engineering, 111(4): 644-658.
9. Molinas, A., 2000. User's Manual for BRI-STARS
Recommendations: Among the advantages of (BRIdge Stream Tube Model for Alluvial River
HEC-RAS4 over MIKE11, its high visual capabilities Simulation).
and complete outputs with detailed tables can be 10. Vieira, D.A. and W. Wu, 2002. CCHE1D Version 3.0 A
mentioned which make this model very popular with Model Capabilities and Applications.
experts of the field. Also, can be downloaded and used 11. Zhang, Y., 2005. CCHE2D-GUI Graphical User
freely by all those interested with any copyright Interface for the CCHE2D Model User Manual
restrictions. It is recommended that the capabilities of this Version 2.2. 2005, NCCHE Technical Report. NCCHE-
model be further explored and report any “bugs” of the TR-2005-03.
model to the developers [16]. For example, one of these 12. Ghadiri, H., 2004. Salinization of Karun River in
bugs is related to the presentation of sediment analysis Iran by Shallow Groundwater and Seawater
based on English system (fps) while the switch to SI mode Encroachment.
is inactive. 13. Sadrolashrafi, S., A. Samadi, M. Rodzi and A. Thamer,
It is recommended that since most of existing models 2008. Flood modeling using WMS Software: A case
including HEC-RAS4 and MIKE11 models are one- study of the Dez River Basin, Iran.
dimensional and are not capable of forecasting cross- 14. Havn, K., M. Madsen, J. Drge and V. Singh, 1995.
sectional changes of rivers, results of the performance of MIKE 11-a generalized river modelling package.
a two or three-dimensional models be compared to those Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology,
by one-dimensional models in terms of longitudinal and pp: 733-782.

1496
World Appl. Sci. J., 17 (11): 1490-1491, 2012

15. Samadi-Boroujeni, H., M. Fathi-Moghaddam, 19. Sheppard, J.R., 1960. Investigation of Meyer-Peter,
M. Shafaie-Bajestan and H.M. Vali-Samani, 2008. Muller bed-load formulas. Sedimentation Section,
Modelling of sedimentation and self-weight Hydrology Branch US Bureau of Reclamation,
consolidation of cohesive sediments. Proceedings in Denver, Colorado.
Marine Science, 9: 165-191. 20. Simons, D.B. and F. Azenturk, 1992. Sediment
16. Brunner, G.W., 1995. HEC-RAS River Analysis transport technology: water and sediment dynamics.
System. Hydraulic Reference Manual. Version 1.0. Water Resources Pubns.
DTIC Document. 21. Van Rijn, L.C., 1984. Sediment transport, part I: bed
17. Kamanbedast, A.A., 2010. Investigation of Sediment load transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering,
Depth-Volume and Seepage (With Using Water 110(10): 1431-1456.
Stops Materials) in Canals of Irrigation Network. 22. Shahrokhnia, M., A. Sepaskhah and M. Javan, 2004.
World Applied Sciences Journal, 11(11): 1353-1360. Estimation of hydraulic parameters for karoon river
18. Brunner, G. and V. Bonner, 1994. HEC River Analysis by cokriging and residual kriging. Iranian Journal of
System (HEC-RAS). DTIC Document. Science and Technology, 28(B1): 153-163.

1497

You might also like