LAPORAN TUGAS 3: WELLBORE PERFORMANCE

Mata Kuliah:
Teknik Produksi (PE3103)

Vini Nandi Rahma (101317059)

TAHUN 2019/2020

FAKULTAS TEKNIK EKSPLORASI DAN PRODUKSI

UNIVERSITAS PERTAMINA
PROGRAM STUDI TEKNIK PERMINYAKAN
Homework’s Details, Number 3:
Exercises (3) A decision has to be made on whether to use 3 in. or 4 in. ID tubing for a well with the
following conditions: Pseudo steady state inflow Initial pressure = 2,500 psi PI = 2.0 STB/psi Bubble
point pressure = 1,200 psi Depth (TVD) = 5,000 ft Required THP = 300 psi GOR = 200 SCF/bbl
Calculate the flow capacity of the well for 4 in. and 3 in.

Data:
PI (stb/psi) 2
Pr (psi) 2500
GOR
(scf/bbl) 300
Pb (psi) 1200

Equations: (excel application + real equations)

VOGEL (Digunakan saat Pwf<Pb)
PI*((PR-PB)+(PB/1.8)*(1-0.2*(PWF/PB)-0.8*((PWF/PB)^2)))

Digunakan saat Pwf>Pb

Q=J*(Pr-Pwf)

Saat dibawah Bubble Point (Equation 1)

Saat diatas Bubble Point (Equation 2)

Equations Implementation:
Casing 3
inch Casing 4 inch
PWF
(psi) Q (stb/d) BHP (psi) BHP (psi)
2500 0
2000 1000 1041 862
1500 2000 1196 960
1000 2970,3704 1322 1033
500 3637,037 1406 1077
0 3933,3333 1440 1094
Curve:
3000

2500

2000
PWF

1500 Pwf vs Q
Casing 3 inch
1000
Casing 4 inch
500

0
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
Q

Kurva diatas merupakan kurva production rate terhadap bottom-pressure. Dimana saat
bottom hole-pressure diatas bubble point menggunakan Equation 2, dan saat bottom hole-
pressure dibawah bubble point menggunakan Equation 1.

Jika dilihat dari figur kurva diatas, dapat ditentukan persamaan garis pada casing 3 inch
yaitu: y = 0,1353x + 914,56 dan pada casing 4 inch yaitu: y = 0,0785x + 792,6. Berdasarkan
persamaan tersebut, nilai Qoptimum pada casing 4 inch lebih besar dibandingkan pada casing
3 inch. Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa penggunakan casing 4 inch akan lebih efektif
digunakann dibandingkan casing 3 inch.
Homework’s Details: Number 4

A well producing from a pay zone between 5000 and 5052 ft is completed with 2⅞-in. tubing hung at
5000 ft. the well has a static BHP of 2000 psi and a PI of 0.3 bbl/(day)(psi) and produces with a GOR
of 300 scf/bbl and a water cut of 10%. At what rate will the well flow with a THP of 100 psi?

Data:
5000
Pay zone ft
5052
ID 2,875 in
tubing 5000 ft
BHP 2000 psi
PI 0,3 bbl/(d.psi)
GOR 300 scf/bbl
water cut 0,1
THP 100 psi

GLR 270 scf/bbl

Qomax 600 stb/d

Equation: (Excel application + Real Equations)

𝑾𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝑪𝒖𝒕 𝒙 𝑸𝒐
𝑸𝒘 =
(𝟏 − 𝑾𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝑪𝒖𝒕)

𝑸𝒍 = 𝑸𝒐 + 𝑸𝒘
𝑮𝑳𝑹 = 𝑮𝑶𝑹 (𝟏 − 𝑾𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝑪𝒖𝒕)

Equations Implementation:
Pwf(Psi) Q(stb/d) Qw (stb/d) Ql (stb/d) BHP
2000 0 0 0
1500 204,0023 22,66691667 226,6692 508
1000 372,0834 41,3426 413,426 555
500 504,0827 56,00918333 560,0918 592
0 600 66,66666667 666,6667 612
Curve:
2500

2000

1500
y = -0.0026x2 - 1.7162x + 1988.8
Pressure (psi)

IPR
TPR
Poly. (IPR)
1000
Poly. (TPR)

500

y = -0.0001x2 + 0.3493x + 440.76

0
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Bottom Hole Pressure were given from Hagedorn and Brown data sheet in excel. The
proporties were inputted to deterime Bottom Hole Pressure at given rate. Hagedornn and
Brown can be used for oil, water and gas fluid type. The equation were to generalized
correlation to handle all lengths of multiphase flow.
This calculation involves THP at various values of q using the value of Pwf from IPR.
After we plot IPR (Pwf vs Q) and plot TPR (BHP vs Q). The BHP was found by
determining the number of Ql by adding Qo and Qg. After we found the Ql, we can put it
inside the data sheet as the properties to calculate the BHP. Finally, after plotting the IPR
and TPR, there will be an intersection between these two function:
1. y = -0,0026x2 - 1,7162x + 1988,8
2. y = -0,0001x2 + 0,3493x + 440,76
From those functions, we can approximate the Qrate when the well flow at 100 psi
based on those black line plotting. Approximately, the number of Qrate from intersection is
480 stb/ day at 475 psi.