The document discusses the concept of welfare economics. It defines welfare economics as evaluating alternative economic situations from the perspective of societal well-being. It aims to show that the current level of welfare could be higher given resources and technology, and to suggest ways to increase welfare. It outlines several criteria for measuring social welfare, including growth in gross national product, Bentham's criterion of utility maximization, Pareto optimality, and the Kaldor-Hicks compensation criterion. The main focus is on efficiency as a prerequisite for maximizing welfare, though efficiency alone is not sufficient and requires ethical standards for comparison.
The document discusses the concept of welfare economics. It defines welfare economics as evaluating alternative economic situations from the perspective of societal well-being. It aims to show that the current level of welfare could be higher given resources and technology, and to suggest ways to increase welfare. It outlines several criteria for measuring social welfare, including growth in gross national product, Bentham's criterion of utility maximization, Pareto optimality, and the Kaldor-Hicks compensation criterion. The main focus is on efficiency as a prerequisite for maximizing welfare, though efficiency alone is not sufficient and requires ethical standards for comparison.
The document discusses the concept of welfare economics. It defines welfare economics as evaluating alternative economic situations from the perspective of societal well-being. It aims to show that the current level of welfare could be higher given resources and technology, and to suggest ways to increase welfare. It outlines several criteria for measuring social welfare, including growth in gross national product, Bentham's criterion of utility maximization, Pareto optimality, and the Kaldor-Hicks compensation criterion. The main focus is on efficiency as a prerequisite for maximizing welfare, though efficiency alone is not sufficient and requires ethical standards for comparison.
The document discusses the concept of welfare economics. It defines welfare economics as evaluating alternative economic situations from the perspective of societal well-being. It aims to show that the current level of welfare could be higher given resources and technology, and to suggest ways to increase welfare. It outlines several criteria for measuring social welfare, including growth in gross national product, Bentham's criterion of utility maximization, Pareto optimality, and the Kaldor-Hicks compensation criterion. The main focus is on efficiency as a prerequisite for maximizing welfare, though efficiency alone is not sufficient and requires ethical standards for comparison.
MR. DIGVIJAY PULKIT GOYAL KATOCH (BBA LLB HONS.) ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The success and final outcome of this assignment required guidance
and assistance from many people and I am extremely fortunate to have got this all along the completion of our assignment work. I express my gratitude to our Vice Chancellor and my subject teacher for giving me this opportunity to do work on this topic and learn so much along the way. Ever encouraging seniors helped me at every step of the research. Furthermore, I would like to acknowledge my and the staff of the Himachal Pradesh National Law University, who gave me the permission to access to all the required equipment in completing this project. This assignment could not have been completed without each one’s help. WELFARE ECONOMICS
A) CRITERIA OF SOCIAL WELFARE
o GROWTH OF GNP AS WELFARE CRITERIA o BENTHAM’S CRITERION o THE PARETO’S OPTIMALITY CRITERION o THE KALDOR-HICKS “COMPENSATION CRITERION” o THE BERGSON CRITERION “SOCIAL WELFARE FUNCTION”
B) MAXIMISATION OF SOCIAL WELFARE
o DERIVATION OF GRAND UTILITY POSSIBILITY FRONTIER o DETERMINATION OF WELFARE MAXIMISING STATE
C) DETERMINATION OF WELFARE MAXIMISING OUTPUT-MIX,
COMMODITY DISTRIBUTION AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION
D) WELFARE MAXIMISATION AND PERFECT COMPETITION
E) CRITIQUE AND EXTENSIONS
o EXTENSION TO MANY FACTORS, PRODUCTS AND CONSUMERS. o CORNER SOLUTIONS o EXISTENCE OF COMMUNITY INDIFFERENCE CURVES o ELASTIC SUPPLY OF FACTORS o JOINT AND INTERMEDIATE PRODUCTS o DECREASING RETURNS TO SCALE o EXTERNALITIES IN PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION o KINKED ISOQUANTS o CONVEX ISOQUANTS o INCREASING RETURNS TO SCALE o INDIVISIBILITIES IN PRODUCTION PROCESSES WELFARE ECONOMICS is concerned with the evaluation of alternative economic situations (states, configurations) from the point of view of society’s Well Being. To illustrate this definition assume that the total welfare in country is W, but given the factor endowments (resources) and the state of technology, suppose that this welfare could be larger, for example W*. The tasks of welfare economics are: (a) To show that in present state W<W*, and (b) To suggest the ways of raising W to W*.
A) CRITERIA OF SOCIAL WELFARE
1) Growth of GNP as A Criterion of Welfare. Adam Smith implicitly accepted the growth of the wealth of society, that is, the growth of the gross national product, as a welfare criterion. He believed that economic growth resulted in the increase of social welfare because growth increased employment and the goods available for the consumption to the community. To Adam Smith, Economic Growth meant increasing W to W*. The growth criterion implies to the acceptance of the status quo of income distribution as ‘ethical’ or ‘just’. Furthermore, growth may lead to a reduction in social welfare, depending on who avails mostly from it. However, the growth criterion highlights the importance of efficiency in social welfare. Given that social welfare depends on the amount of goods and services (as well as on their distribution), efficiency is prerequisite for the maximisation of level of welfare. We note here that economic efficiency can be defined objectively, and the modern welfare economics is mainly concerned with the examination (comparison) of the (Pareto)-efficiency of different economic situations. However, efficiency, although a necessary condition, is not sufficient to guarantee the maximisation of social welfare. Efficiency does not dispose of the need of having an ethical standard of comparing alternative economic states.