Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Salahuddin2017 PDF
Salahuddin2017 PDF
Accepted Article
Article Type : Article
Abstract
Polymethyl methacrylate - zinc oxide (PMMA/ZnO) nanocomposites with different ZnO
morphology and quantities were prepared by in situ curing of MMA/PMMA used in denture
base material in the presence of ZnO nanostructured materials. The composition, structure,
spectra (FT-IR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The effect of ZnO
morphology and contents on the mechanical properties including impact, flexural, and
hardness was studied. The results demonstrated that the mechanical and thermal properties of
denture base materials were improved by incorporation of nano-ZnO into the polymethyl
methacrylate matrix. The impact strength was highly improved upon using ZnO nanotubes.
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not
been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may
lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as
doi: 10.1111/ijac.12802
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Acrylic resins are used in dentistry for different purposes such as removable base
Accepted Article
plates, functional appliances and denture bases, due to its ease of processing, accurate fit,
stability in the oral environment, low cost, nontoxic, odorless, tasteless, nonirritant,
lightweight, color-matching ability, easy for patient to keep clean, high polish attainable, and
easy to repair after fracture.1-3 Due to its superior physical, biological, and esthetic properties,
polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has replaced previous denture materials such as vulcanite,
nitrocellulose, phenol formaldehyde, vinyl plastics, and porcelain. Pure PMMA resin is a
colorless, transparent solid that may be tinted to provide any shade and degree of
4
translucency for proper esthetics for dental applications, individual impression trays and
temporary crowns. However, PMMA possesses insufficient surface hardness and mechanical
strength. A common clinical problem is the fracture of dentures which usually occurs due to
accidents or when the patient applies heavy occlusal forces to dentures. Fracture of dentures
is caused due to fatigue and impact failure and involves expensive repair costs. Removable
prostheses are exposed into two types of stress; intra-orally when the patient applies a high
repeated mastication force that occurs between maxilla and mandible Jaws leading to fatigue
phenomena and extra-orally stress where it is easily broken as a result of dropping. A high
performance of denture based resin requires good impact strength, fracture toughness and
hardness. Adequate hardness of the denture surface possesses good resistance to scratching
in using them. Indeed the growth of some microorganisms such as candida albicans and
bacteria like streptococcus mutans on these appliances has been demonstrated.6 All these
factors increase the need to improve the antimicrobial capability and the strength of denture
base materials.
first approach is to increase the strength of denture base polymer by adding a cross-linking
Accepted Article
agent of poly-functional monomer such as polyethylene glycol dimethacrylate. The second
approach is to devise a reinforcement of denture base polymer with rods or fibers such as
rubber phase, metal oxides, metal wires or metal nets, or clays.4, 7-13 There are many factors
such as; matrix structure, dispersed phase content, shape, size and distribution having a
In recent years, ZnO nanoparticles have attracted increasing attention as one of the
stability. ZnO nanoparticles can potentially apply to catalysts, photocatalyst for degradation
of waste water pollutants, semiconductors, varistors, piezoelectric devices, gas sensors, UV-
shielding materials, field-emission displays, rubber, dental and medical, coatings and
ZnO nanoparticles have been added in various compositions to polymers, to enhance their
nanoparticles (up to 10%) have also been prepared by in situ bulk polymerization in the
compared to simple mixing.26, 27 Hung and Whang 28 have reported on the luminescence of
with a silane coupling agent before the polymerization. Pre et al 29 have prepared transparent
Accepted Article
luminescent nanocomposites powders using solution mixing and solvent casting of ZnO
30
nanoparticles in PMMA. Zhuang et al presented fabrication of the visible light (VL) –
traversing and ultraviolet (UV)-shielding zinc oxide quantum dots (ZnO QDs)-poly (methyl
QDs into a transparent PMMA matrix. The ZnO QDs had been formed by a sol-gel route and
better dispersion and good thermal stability of PMMA/ZnO nanocomposites thin films. Up to
dates no literature exists regarding the ability of ZnO nanoparticles to reinforce denture base
material, though the reports claim that addition ZnO nanoparticles to PMMA has resulted in
In view of the fact that the physical and mechanical properties arise from the
morphology of the material, this work pursues the effect of different ZnO morphology and
content on the mechanical properties of PMMA. The reinforcement of denture base PMMA
with ZnO nanotubes and nanoparticles was studied. First, ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) and
nanotubes (ZnO NTs) were prepared followed, by impregnation of the nanostructured ZnO in
MMA monomer and mixing with PMMA then, cured as recommended by the manufacture.
Furthermore, flexural strength, impact and hardness were measured for the nanocomposites
and compared with pure PMMA. The hypothesis was that ZnO nanostructures increase the
2.1. Materials
Accepted Article
One commercial type of heat-cured acrylic resin PMMA used in dentistry was
selected for this work (super acryl, clear type Spofa Dental, Praha), Zinc nitrate hexahydrate
sodium hydroxide pellets (NaOH, 99% Merck), Ethylene Diamine (EDA C2H8N2; 99%,
Merck), Ethanol ( C2H5OH, 95%, Pio chem) were used without further purification.
2.2. Methods
ZnO NPs were prepared by a precipitation method according to the previous report.33
Briefly, two solutions were prepared as follows: Solution A (0.1 mol Zn(NO3)2.6H2O) was
prepared by dissolving 29.747 g of Zinc nitrate hexahydrate in 200 ml distilled water; and
solution B (0.12 mol Na2CO3) was prepared by dissolving 12.7188 g of sodium carbonate in
240 ml distilled water. After that, the precursor was prepared by adding solution A to solution
B drop wise under vigorous stirring. The white precipitate was collected by filtration and
rinsed with distilled water three times. The solid was then washed with ethanol and dried at
100°C for 6 h. Finally, ZnO NPs were obtained after calcinations of the precursor in air at
350 °C for 2 h.
ZnO NTs were synthesized according to the previous report. 34Firstly, 80 g of NaOH
pellets and 29.748 g of Zn(NO3)2.6H2O were dissolved in deionized water (200 ml) to
solution (Zn2+: OH- =1:20) was mixed with 5 ml of distilled water. After that, 25 ml of pure
Accepted Article
ethanol was added, followed by 5 ml of ethylene diamine. The mixture was then kept in an
ultrasonic water bath for 40 min and subsequently transferred to a Teflon-lined stainless steel
autoclave. The autoclave was kept inside an electric oven set at 180 °C for 2 h and cooled.
The precipitate (ZnO NTs) was separated by centrifugation and washed several times with
deionized water and pure ethanol. The collected product was dried in a vacuum desiccator at
PMMA powder and MMA monomer liquid were mixed as recommended by the
manufacture and left to stand for 10-15 minutes. In this period, the resin changes its
consistency. The dough material was kneaded in clean fingers into a stick roll and forced into
the stone mold ready for each experiment, packed to a slight excess and the flask was closed.
Trial closure of the flask was performed to remove the excess dough, followed by final
closure under pressure. The curing cycle followed the manufacturer's recommendations (75
°C for 1.5 h followed by 100 °C for 1 h). Then they were removed from the water bath and
allowed to cool before deflasking. Deflasking, finishing and polishing of resin samples were
MMA monomer liquid was stirred with different ratios of ZnO nanostructures (0.2
wt%, 0.4 wt%, 0.8 wt% and 1 wt%) then the suspension was mixed with PMMA powder and
(λ =1.5412 Å), 40 Kv, 30 mA in the 2θ range of 10-80° with 2°/min scanning rate. The
crystallite sizes (D) of selected samples were estimated using the Scherer's equation, D=Kλ/
(Bcosθ) where: k = constant (0.89 < k < 1), λ= wavelength of the X-ray, B = FWHM (Full
Shimadzu, from 30 °C to 200°C with a heating rate of 10°C/ min under nitrogen
atmospheres.
a scanning electron microscope SEM-EDS, JSM-6510 LV, JEOL, Japan and a high-
samples for SEM were coated with gold and the samples for TEM analysis were prepared by
dropping dilute suspension of ZnO nanostructures in H2O onto copper meshes. Transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) specimens were cut from nanocomposite block using an ultra-
microtome, power tome XL with a glass knife. The ultra-thin films were cut by moving the
water from where they collected on 200 mesh copper grids and dried at room temperature.
Accepted Article
Flexural testing was carried out on (Instron 5500R) Universal Testing Machine at
room temperature. The test specimens were prepared in the rectangular-shaped specimens (65
x 10 x 2.5 mm), five samples were tested and the average value was taken. The flexural test
performed at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min. The impact strength test was carried out on
(Izod-Impact tester CS-137) test machine at room temperature. The test specimens were
standard notch with 60° angle in the middle of the bar. Five samples were tested and the
average value was taken. Nanoindentation tests were carried out using a Nano Test Vantage
from Micro Materials, Inc., Wrexham, UK. Indentation data were obtained for the samples
using maximum loads of 10 mN. The loading rate was set to 0.1 mN/S. A Berkovich
diamond tip (three-sided pyramidal) diamond indenter was used for all indentations.
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software program SPSS
Version 10 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). The quantitative data were presented as means
and standard deviations. One-way analysis of variance (ANOV) was used to examine
variable effects. The test was considered significant when P˂0.05 and highly significant
when P˂0.001.
Acrylic resin is the most commonly used material for the construction of denture due
to esthetics, ease of manipulation and low cost. However, this material is not ideal because of
have been reinforced by adding materials such as metal oxides, clay minerals and carbon-
Accepted Article
graphite fibers. The size, shape and distribution of these particles in the polymer matrix play
addition, microbial plaque adheres to acrylic resin appliances with a wider adhesion area than
36
to natural teeth and mechanical methods have been shown ineffective in eradicating
nanocomposites have been developed that has self- sterilizing agent by incorporation ZnO
into PMMA.
The XRD patterns of the ZnO NPs, ZnO NTs, pristine PMMA and of the
nanocomposites are shown in Figure 1 (a, b). The X-ray diffraction pattern of ZnO
nanoparticles is shown in Figure 1a. It was observed that all the peaks of ZnO nanoparticles
were indexed as hexagonal wurtzite structure of ZnO (lattice parameter, a=b= 0.3249 nm, c=
0.5206 nm) and the diffraction data are in good agreement with those taken from the Joint
committee of powder diffraction standards (JCPDS) card No. 36-1451). Diffraction peaks
related to impurity are not observed in the XRD pattern, confirming the high purity of the
synthesized product. According to the XRD analysis the average crystalline size of ZnO NPs
was calculated according to Scherer's equation. The highest three peaks were selected for this
calculation and the average diameter was found to be 28.33 nm. Figure 1b. Shows the XRD
pattern of ZnO nanotubes (powders). It is apparent that, the diffraction providing clear
nanocomposites loaded with different contents of ZnO NPs and ZnO NTs, respectively, after
curing. The diffraction pattern of PMMA shows a broad diffraction peak at 2θ= 14°, typical
of an amorphous material, together with two bands of lower intensities centered at 31° and
43°. The XRD patterns of PMMA/ ZnO nanocomposites show the broad, non-crystalline
peak (~14°) of PMMA together with the sharp diffraction peaks of ZnO nanostructures.
These peaks were assigned to be (100), (002) and (101) planes of the crystalline phase of
ZnO in which the intensity increase with increasing ZnO quantity. This confirms that the
ZnO maintained its structure in the composite and that the orientation of the PMMA chains
by TGA and DSC. The TGA curves obtained for the ZnO NPs, ZnO NTs, pristine PMMA,
PMMA/ZnO NPs and PMMA/ZnO NTs nanocomposites are shown in Figure 2 (a, b). The
results reveal that the trend of PMMA/ZnO nanocomposites degradation is similar to pure
PMMA; all nanocomposites degrade in a single step similar to pristine PMMA, suggesting
40
that degradation is due to random chain scission. The thermal stability factors, including
the initial decomposition temperatures where 5% weight loss occurred (TIDT, °C), the
temperatures with 10 wt% weight loss (T10, °C) and the mid-point of the degradation process
at which 50 wt% degradation (T50, °C), could be determined from the TGA thermograms.
in Table 1. In case of PMMA/ZnO NPs all nanocomposites at all composition show higher
Accepted Article
TIDT, T10 and T50 than the pure PMMA resin, which implies an improvement in the thermal
stability. The decomposition temperatures of nanocomposites at 5, 10, and 50 wt% loss were
about~ 12, 14, and 22 °C higher than those of pure PMMA, respectively. On the other hand,
the TGA curves obtained for some PMMA/ZnO NTs composites exhibit initial degradation at
lower temperatures (100-200 °C) than the pristine PMMA resins; these results suggest that
the weight loss is due to the evaporation of absorbed water in the nanocomposites.40
The DSC results of PMMA and the PMMA/ZnO nanocomposites are also shown in
Table 1. The glass transition temperature (Tg) of PMMA (119 °C) is improved up to 126 at
0.4 wt% of ZnO NTs. This small value indicates that there is no interaction between particles
27
Demir et al reported that the glass transition temperature of PMMA/ZnO
nanocomposites measured by DSC is found to be positioned between 102 to 109 °C, very
close to Tg of atactic PMMA (105 °C) at range of loading up to 11% due to absence of any
specific interaction between the particles and the polymer matrix. In another publication
DMA analysis of PMMA/ZnO composites shows that ZnO nanoparticles and nanorods
increase the storage modulus of nanocomposites and shift the Tg towards higher temperature
nanorods.41
Dentures fractures usually result from two types of forces; flexural fatigue and
Accepted Article
impact. When the dentures are dropped the impact causes the fracture. Also repeated flexing
from chowing causes denture fatigue in the mouth. Impact tests measure the energy required
to break the specimen by applying a dynamic load. The flexural strength is a measure of
stiffness and resistance to fracture in which the specimen is under astatic load, which was
considered relevant to the loading characteristics of denture base in a clinical situation. The
hardness measure the resistance to scratching during the cleaning process and polishing.
Zappini G et al.,42 reported that evaluating the strength of acrylic resins depend on impact
strength which not simulate the clinical situation and to predict the clinical function, flexural
strength tests are preferred.35Previous study done by Arnold A M et al., have demonstrated
that ultimate flexural strength of denture base resin indicates the resistance of failure under a
flexural load.43There are several studies showed that addition of metal oxides decreased the
mechanical properties of acrylic denture bases by addition particulate fillers has been studied
by many researches. Zuccari et al.,47 evaluated the effect of Al2O3, MgO and ZrO2 to
reinforce acrylic resins. Asor et al.,35 found that 2% ZrO2 exhibited the greatest improvement
explained that increase in filler fraction is not necessary to increase the strength since high
The mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values for impact strength and
ANOVA results of impact test are presented in Table 2. It was observed that when ZnO
improved impact strength up to 104 % higher than pristine PMMA. This improvement was
Accepted Article
related to the small particle dimension and proper distribution which lead to an increase in
crack length during the process of fracture and increase in energy absorption before
fracture.35 The maximum reinforcement effect was obtained, with the addition of ZnO
nanotubes (Table 2). The higher reinforcement effect in PMMA/ZnO NTs may be attributed
to the high aspect ratio of nanotube (15:1). However, nanoparticles aspect ratio can be
regarded as (1:1). To investigate the reasons for these changes, the fractured surface of each
specimen was characterized by SEM (Figure 3, 4). The fractured surface of PMMA (Figure
3b) is smooth, showing the characteristics of brittle fracture. When ZnO structures (Figure 3a,
4a) are used, the surface was rougher, the roughness increases with increasing the wt% of
ZnO. This was attributed to ZnO nanotubes had unique long tubular structures and the
polymer chains wound around the added nanotubes and formed a three dimensional network
structure without any bonding effect. As a result, the polymer chain could slip along the
nanotube axis under an external force so, bending stress and bending displacement were
improved. However, nanoparticles were just mechanically mixed in the composite and did
not combine with the surrounding polymer chains so, bending strength was improved but
bending displacement was not.49 Incorporation multiwalled carbon nanotubes (2%) into denture
base material showed poor fatigue resistance due to agglomeration and poor interfacial bonding
between multiwalled carbon nanotube and PMMA.50 The impact strength and surface hardness of
zirconia-reinforced high impact resin were not significantly different from that of zirconia –free high
impact resin.51
The mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values for flexural strength
and ANOVA results of Flexural test are presented in Table 3. The results indicate that the
loading (0.2-0.4 wt%) and then decreased with constant addition of ZnO (0.8-1 wt%). This
Accepted Article
decrease of flexural strength may be due to irregular distribution of ZnO into the PMMA
which causes stress concentration due to agglomeration based on TEM observations. The best
flexural strength was reached at 95.780 MPa and 94.196 MPa, for ZnO NPs and ZnO NTs
respectively, which are 14 %, 12 % higher than pristine PMMA, with the optimal content of
0.4-0.8 wt%. Schulze et al 48concluded that an increase in filler fractions creates more defects
It is worth noting that the nanotubes endowed the PMMA with the best reinforcement
effect. When the content of ZnO nanotubes further increased the flexural performance
decreased. This implied that the addition of 0.8 weight% nanotubes provided the
nanocomposites with its maximum flexural performance. Because the ZnO nanotubes possess
the unique pore structures and large specific surface area, the addition of ZnO nanotubes to
the mixture of PMMA and MMA would influence the viscosity of PMMA-MMA dough and
composite.49 Yadav et al 52
have compared the strength of acrylic resin reinforced with
aluminum oxide (5 wt%) and when processed by conventional water bath technique and
microwave energy. The results showed that flexural strength had decreased with addition of
Al2O3. This decrease of flexural strength of modified acrylic resin was explained by the
irregular distribution of Al2O3 filler particles into the acrylic resin which causes stress
concentration due to filler agglomeration. The second reason was due to untreated filler
particles, which decrease the bonding filler particles and the acrylic resin. This suggests that
to get a better bonding between the filler particles and acrylic resin the Al2O3 should be
treated with silane coupling agent. Addition of 2.5 wt% Al2O3 was responsible for a 6.36%
5.82% decrease in flexural strength. This was explained by a decrease in the cross-section of
Accepted Article
the load-bearing polymer matrix; stress concentration because of too many filler particles;
changes in the modulus of elasticity of the resin and mode of crack propagation through the
specimen due to an increased amount of fillers; void formation from entrapped air and
moisture; incomplete wetting of the fillers by the resin; and the fact that the Al2O3 acts as an
interfering factor in the integrity of the polymer matrix. In another publication, the
incorporation of nano-sized TiO2 and SiO2 at concentrations of 0.5% and 1% by weight into
acrylic resin adversely affected the mechanical properties of polymerized material and
flexural strength values decreased with increase in concentration of TiO2. These findings
were attributed to the effect of nano-sized oxides on the internal structure of polymerized
which in turn leads to increase in the level of residual unreacted monomer that acts as
plasticizer.53
indentation load.54 There have been studies which found a correlation between hardness and
wear resistance of artificial denture teeth.55 The effect of ZnO morphology and contents on
nanocomposites have higher hardness values than that of pristine PMMA. This is attributed to
that PMMA unreinforced demonstrated higher hardness than reinforced PMMA due to the
Figure 5a displays TEM micrographs of ZnO NPs. TEM images show that the ZnO
Accepted Article
NPs are spherical shape and the average diameter is 25.4 nm. On the basis of high-resolution
TEM the formation of ZnO NTs was further confirmed (Figure 5b), and the analysis shows
that the mean length and wall thickness of the ZnO NTs were about 2.4 μm and 200 nm,
respectively.
nanocomposites samples were further characterized by TEM. Figures 6 and 7 show the TEM
microscopic observations indicated that the ZnO NPs were well distributed and dispersed in
the PMMA matrix when 0.2 wt% and 0.4 wt% were used, but at high concentration (0.8- 1
wt%) more agglomerations were noted. These results may explain why high content of ZnO
had the lowest value in flexural strength. It is worth mentioning that TEM images clearly
show that ZnO nanoparticles are agglomerated all over the matrix of PMMA at 1 wt%
Limitation
environment by measuring the material fatigue before and after thermocycling in artificial
saliva and evaluate the antimicrobial activity after incorporation ZnO nanoparticles.
4. Conclusion
PMMA nanocomposites reinforced with ZnO nanoparticles and nanotubes were prepared. It
is demonstrated that incorporating ZnO nanotubes can distinctly improve the impact strength
up to 104 % at 0.8 wt% ZnO NTs and flexural strength up to 14 % at 0.4 wt% ZnO
nanoparticles. TEM analysis indicated the absence of particle aggregation at this content. The
decreased in mechanical properties at 0.8- 1 wt% are due to aggregation. The highest impact
that nanocomposites have higher thermal stability and a glass transition temperature than
pristine PMMA.
References
Figure 1: XRD patterns of (a) ZnO NPs, PMMA/ZnO nanocomposites loaded with different
amounts of ZnO NPs (PMMA/ZnO NPs) and (b) ZnO NTs, PMMA/ZnO
nanocomposites loaded with different amounts of ZnO NTs (PMMA/ ZnO NTs).
Figure 5: TEM images of (a) ZnO NPs and (b) ZnO NTs.
Table 1: Thermal stability factors for PMMA/ZnO nanocomposites calculated from TGA and
DSC thermograms.