Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Task 3 - Collaborative Activity 2
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Task 3 - Collaborative Activity 2
Numb
Type of Individua Collaborativ
☐ ☒ er of 6
activity: l e
weeks
Evaluation Intermediat
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
moment: e
Total score of the Environment to submit the activity:
activity: 175 Monitoring and evaluation environment.
Starting date of the
Deadline of the activity: November
activity:
28th, 2019
October 19th, 2019
Competences to develop:
Argumentative, propositional and technological
Topics to develop: Educational leadership and management
Step, phase or stage of the learning strategy to develop
This stage is going to be developed in two task, the first individual and
the second collaborative, in order to
Activities to develop
All the forum participants need to design a development plan for a high
school in which there are 3 different situations to be improved. From
the list, choose one situation to design the corresponding development
plan, according to what Hargreaves and Hopkins proposed.
1. All students discuss in the forum about the topic chosen for the
development plan design.
2. Decide how to develop the plan or how to distribute each plan’s
processes (audit, construction, implementation and evaluation).
Each student should post the ideas directly in the forum, explaining
how the corresponding process will be carried out. Take into
account the roles for the collaborative work.
3. Read all your partners participations in order to give feedback or
help with more ideas.
4. Present the development plan in a word document. This document
must have a cover page, the chosen situation and the development
plan processes explained.
5. The submitter will submit the document into the monitoring and
evaluation environment link for this assignment.
Planning of
activities Group discussion on the forum to design and create the
for the blog or wix web in which site in which the web 2.0
developme proposals are going to be presented.
nt of Revision of posts to improve the written texts.
collaborativ Posting of the link of the online magazine.
e work
Compiler:
Roles to be Puts together the final product and includes the work
performed done only by those who participated on time. Informs
by the the student in charge of alerts about people who did
student in
not participate and will not be included in the final
the
collaborativ product.
e group
Reviser / editor:
Makes sure the written work follows all the criteria
established in the activity guide.
Evaluator:
Evaluates the final document to ensure it follows the
evaluation criteria of the rubric and informs the student
in charge of alerts about any changes that need to be
made before delivering the product.
Submitter:
Student in charge of informing about the dates set for
presenting each task and delivering the final product
according to the course agenda. Also informs other
students that the final product has been sent.
Alerts:
Informs group participants about any news in the work
being done and reports the delivery of the final product
to the course tutor.
Roles and
duties for
the All the roles presented above are in charge of creating,
submission revising, editing, submitting the final group’s product.
of products
by students
All references considered for this activity have to be
References
cited using APA Style
In agreement 029 of December 13th, 2013, article 99,
considers as offenses that infringe upon the academic
order, among others, the following: paragraph e) “To
plagiarize is to present as your own the total sum or
part of the whole of a piece or work, writing, report,
Plagiarism
task, document of invention developed by another
policy
person. It also implies the lack of citation or lack of
references, or including citations where there is no
coincidence between them and the reference” and
paragraph f)”To reproduce, or copy for profit,
educational resources or results of research products,
which have intellectual rights reserved for the
University”.
Evaluation rubric
Activity Individual Collaborati
☐ ☒
type: Activity ve Activity
Evaluation Intermedia
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
moment te
Evaluated Performance levels of the individual activity
Score
items High score Average score Low score
You empower You have
partially the serious
You recognize course elements difficulties to
and empower and issues on recognize and
course elements strategic and empower the
Task 1: and issues on development course
Answers to strategic and planning. elements and 25
the development issues on points
questions planning. strategic and
development
planning.