BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY PABLO BORBON MAIN II ALANGILAN, BATANGAS CITY

RUBRICS FOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ WRITTEN REPORT

CIVIL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT TOPIC : Final Rating :

CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING {Total of (Score x
AY 2019-2020 FIRST SEMESTER Weight)} / 10
Total of (Score x Weight):
CE 401 CE ORIENTATION TITLE: Project Risk Management in Construction Industry
SECTION: CE 2013 GROUP NO. 6
(Write names of members side by side on the space here.) Sum of Scores :
INSTRUCTOR : Engr. MARIO G. BUKAS SANGALANG, JOCEL MADERAZO, DANEL LALONGISIP, KOLEN
RAMOS, FEDIS JOYCE M. VILLANUEVA, AINAH
DATE SUBMITTED : SEPTEMBER 12, 2019
TRAPANE, JOAN ISABELLE RELATIVO, PEARL JEAN

RUBRICS BELOW EXPECTATIONS MEETS EXPECTATIONS EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS SCORE

WEIGHT BE ME EE
No. (in no particular (BE) (ME) (EE) x
(%) SCORE SCORE SCORE
order) Points ≈ 1-2-3 Points ≈ 4-5-6-7 Points ≈ 8-9-10 WEIGHT

1 Submission 5 Late submission On-time submission Early submission

Fails to correctly document any
2 References 10 sources or to utilize appropriate
citation formats.
There are frequent errors in
3 Mechanics 10 sentence structure and grammar,
making the paper confusing.
The report’s objectives are missing
4 Objectives 10 or incomplete, making the paper
vague as to why it was written.
Figures such as graphs, drawings,
pictures, tables, etc. are inaccurate,
5 Figures 10
mislabeled, or no caption at all, or
may be missing..
Content-wise, the details are
wanting making the explanation
inaccurate, incomplete, or
6 Contents 25
confusing. The little information
from the report obtained becomes
misleading.
Most sources are correctly
documented; appropriate citation
formats are generally utilized.
For the most part, sentences are
complete and grammatical. Any
errors are minor.
The report’s objectives are
presented but lack relevance to
current engineering issues.
For the most part, figures such as
graphs, drawings, pictures, etc. are
accurate, creative and well-
captioned based on standards.
Enough detail is presented so that
the content may be assessed well..
With some minor exceptions, the
information (names, facts, events,
statistics, etc.) included in the
report is accurate.
All sources are thoroughly
documented. Appropriate citation
formats are utilized throughout.
Sentences are very well-written
with no redundancy and the text is
free of errors in grammar.
The report’s objectives are clearly
stated and relevant to the current
engineering concerns.
Figures such as graphs, drawings,
pictures, tables, etc. are accurate,
labeled based on standards and
logically supporting the text.
Sufficient detail is presented so
that better judgment is made of the
content. Information (names, facts,
events, statistics, etc.) included in
the report is consistently precise
and correct.
 The report is not organized and
does not employ any or all of the
following features : table of
contents, table of figures,
appropriate introduction, logical
7 Structure 10
progression of ideas, useful and
clear division of sections and sub-
sections, meaningful topic
sentences, and appropriate
concluding section.
Poor computerized encoding
technique makes the document not
Aesthetics / visually appealing. The over-all
8 10
Formatting layout is not consistent. The paper
or manuscript is not formatted well
and lacks a cover page.
Engineering/ There is an overuse of jargon and
9 Technical 5 technical terms without adequate
Terms explanation of their meaning.
The title is out of context with the
10 Title 5 prescribed topic.
The report is organized but
although employing the following
features, at least one of them needs
improvement : table of contents,
table of figures, appropriate
introduction, logical progression of
ideas, useful and clear division of
sections and sub-sections,
meaningful topic sentences, and
appropriate concluding section.
Good computerized encoding style
makes the document easily read,
although the layout could be more
effective and appealing. Formatting
of the paper is consistent and
adequate, with a cover page.
For the most part, terms and jargon
are used correctly with some
attempt to define them.
The title is in harmony with the
prescribed topic.
The report provides effective
organization employing the
following features : table of
contents, table of figures,
appropriate introduction, logical
progression of ideas, useful and
clear division of sections and sub-
sections, meaningful topic
sentences, and appropriate
concluding section.
The document is visually
appealing. Formatting of the paper
(in terms of paging, margin,
spacing, indentation, tabbing, etc.)
is professional and includes a
quality cover page.
Engineering terms and jargon are
used correctly. They are defined
the first time they are used.
The title is appropriate and relevant
with the prescribed topic.

Group No. 6 . Members: Print Name : Signature :

RAMOS, FEDIS JOYCE M.

TRAPANE, JOAN ISABELLE
RELATIVO,
TRAPANE,PEARL JEAN
JOAN ISABELLE
TRAPANE, JOAN ISABELLE
RELATIVO,
RELATIVO,PEARL
PEARLJEAN
JEAN
TRAPANE, JOAN ISABELLE
RELATIVO, PEARL JEAN
MADERAZO, DANEL
TRAPANE, JOAN ISABELLE
RELATIVO, PEARL
VILLANUEVA, JEAN
AINAH
TRAPANE, JOAN ISABELLE
RELATIVO, PEARL
SANGALANG, JEAN
JOCEL
TRAPANE, JOAN ISABELLE
RELATIVO, PEARL
LALONGISIP, JEAN
KOLEN
TRAPANE, JOAN ISABELLE
RELATIVO, PEARL JEAN

BatStateU . CEAFA . CE 401 . CE - 2103 . GROUP NO. 6 . AY 2019-2020 . FIRST SEMESTER . RUBRICS FOR ENGINEERING STUDENTS’ WRITTEN REPORT Page 2 of 2