Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T68 Q1681 EIAReport
T68 Q1681 EIAReport
Kadam
Environmental Consultants
www.kadamenviro.com
E: kadamenviro@kadamenviro.com; T:+912656131000
ACCREDITATION DETAILS
NABET Certificate No. NABET/EIA/1619/RA 0042, Issued on 28032017, Valid up to 26052019.
EIA REPORT FOR EXPANSION OF OPTICAL BRIGHTENER AGENT
RSPL LIMITED, SAGAR (OBA) PLANT IN THE EXISTING MANUFACTURING FACILITY QUALITY CONTROL
RSPL LIMITED
This report is released for the use of the M/s. RSPL Limited, Regulators and relevant stakeholders solely as part of
the subject project’s Environmental Clearance process. Information provided, unless attributed to referenced third
parties, is copyrighted and shall not be used for any other purpose without the written consent of Kadam.
QUALITY CONTROL
Name of EIA report for Expansion of Optical Brightener Agent (OBA) Plant in the Existing Manufacturing Facility at Plot
Publication No. 42 to 59, Sector K, IIDC Growth Center, Sidhguwan Village, Tehsil & District Sagar, Madhya Pradesh.
Project Number 1730542106 Issue No. 1 Revision No. 0 Released May, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 29
1.4 Brief description of the Nature, Size, Location of the Project and its Importance to Country, Region ........ 30
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................................... 40
2.3 Location (maps showing general location, specific location, project boundary & project site layout) ......... 40
2.13 Water Consumption, Wastewater Generation, Treatment & Disposal Facility ...................................... 69
2.15 Solid and Hazardous Waste Identification, Quantification, Storage and Disposal ................................ 91
2.15.2 Quantification, Classification, Collection, Transportation and Disposal of Solid / Hazardous Waste .. 92
3.7.2 Collation of Site Specific Data with Secondary Data of IMD.............................................................. 107
3.8.4 Land use and Land cover Pattern of Study Area .............................................................................. 113
3.13.1 Analysis Method Adopted for Surface and Ground Water ............................................................. 124
3.15.2 Methodology Adopted for Soil Samples Collection and Analysis .................................................... 137
4.4.3 Noise from DG Set, Boiler, Cooling Tower, etc. ................................................................................ 188
4.10.1 Current Scenario of Impact Zone Area and Summarization .......................................................... 208
4.10.3 Mitigation Measures & Social Management Plan (SMP) ................................................................ 209
5.1.1 The Site location has the following advantages ............................................................................... 211
7.2 Risk Assessment (Hazard Identification and Consequence Analysis, ERP / DMP) .................................... 214
10.8.3 Dust, other Chemicals being suspended in the Environment ........................................................ 260
10.8.4 Occupational Hazards Specific Preplacement and Periodic Monitoring ......................................... 260
10.8.5 Plan & Fund Allocation for Occupational Health & Safety ............................................................. 261
10.8.6 Details of Exposure Specific Health Evaluation of the Workers .................................................... 262
10.8.7 Details of Existing Occupational & Safety Chemical Hazards and Control Measures. ..................... 264
11.6.5 Water Sources, Water Consumption and Wastewater Generation ................................................ 271
12.1 Brief Resume and Nature of Consultancy Rendered by Kadam Environmental Consultants ............... 281
LIST OF ANNEXURES
Annexure 1: Environmental Clearance for Existing Plant ...................................................................................... 284
Annexure 4: Toposheet of the project site with Demarcation of Nearest Habitation in 1: 50000 Scale .................. 309
Annexure 6: Agreement Copy with Madhya Pradesh Waste Management Project (Ramky Group) for Hazardous
Waste Dispsoal ................................................................................................................................................... 343
Annexure 7: Gazatte Notofication from MoEF for Recognition of Laboratory under Environmental (Protection) Act,
1986 .................................................................................................................................................................. 357
Annexure 9: Long Term Meteorological Data (1981 – 2010) – IMD Sagar ............................................................ 361
Annexure 10: National Ambient Air Quality Standards from CPCB ........................................................................ 363
Annexure 13: Air Dispersion Modeling Results and Isopleths ............................................................................... 372
Annexure 14: Greenbelt Plan for Existing and Proposed Plant .............................................................................. 384
Annexure 17: Undertacking of Project Proponent on the Ownership of the Report ............................................... 387
Annexure 18: Undertaking by the Consultant – Kadam Environmental Consultants Regarding Compliance of
Prescribed TORs ................................................................................................................................................. 389
Annexure 19: Undertacking for Company has not commenced any Construction Work in Proposed Site ............... 390
Annexure 20: Undertacking for Location of RSPL Site is in Industrial Area ........................................................... 392
Annexure 21: Declaration by Project Proponent Regarding Informations Given in Report are True ....................... 394
Annexure 23: Action Taken Report for Non Complied and Partly Complied Conditions of Existing EC .................... 436
LIST OF TABLES
Table 11: Brief Description of Project ................................................................................................................... 30
Table 216: Details of Water Consumption from Existing and Proposed Unit .......................................................... 71
Table 217: Details of Wastewater Generation from Existing and Proposed Unit .................................................... 71
Table 220: List of ETP Units for 100 KLD Design Capacity .................................................................................... 76
Table 31: Predominant Wind Direction based on Longterm Data ....................................................................... 103
Table 32: Average Meteorological Condition based on Longterm Data ............................................................... 103
Table 34: Site Specific Mean Meteorological Data (Post Monsoon Season) .......................................................... 104
Table 35: Collation of Meteorological data – Post Monsoon Season .................................................................... 107
Table 36: Synopsis of Landuse/Landcover Classification Used for the Project ..................................................... 107
Table 39: Area Statistics for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area .............................................. 116
Table 311: Important Features within the Study Area ........................................................................................ 117
Table 312: Methodology of Analyzing Ambient Air Monitoring Parameters .......................................................... 118
Table 316: Ambient Air Quality Standards in Respect of Noise for Different Areas/Zones .................................... 122
Table 319: Analysis Methods Adopted for Water Samples .................................................................................. 124
Table 324: General Geological Succession and groundwater Yield in the District ................................................. 134
Table 325: Methodology for Soil Sample Collection and Analysis ........................................................................ 137
Table 328: Details of the Water Bodies in the Buffer Zone ................................................................................. 141
Table 331: Floral Species Reported from the Proposed Project Site / Core Zone ................................................. 142
Table 332: Floral Species Reported From the Buffer Zone .................................................................................. 143
Table 336: Avifauna Reported from Core Zone / Project Site .............................................................................. 149
Table 337: Faunal Groups (Mammals and Birds) present in Buffer Zone of Proposed site.................................... 150
Table 339: List of Villages, Population and Households in the Study Area ........................................................... 156
Table 341: Table showing SC/ST population distribution in the study area ......................................................... 159
Table 342: No. of Villages having Educational Facilities in the Study Area........................................................... 159
Table 344: No. of Villages having Health Facilities within the Study Area ............................................................ 161
Table 345: No. of Villages having Drinking Water Facilities within the Study Area ............................................... 161
Table 346: Occupational Pattern within the Study Area ...................................................................................... 163
Table 347: Transportation Facilities within the Study Area ................................................................................. 163
Table 348: No. of Villages having Communication Facilities within the Study Area .............................................. 164
Table 41: Overall Impact Scoring System due to Proposed Project – Consequence Assessment .......................... 167
Table 48: Assumptions for Calculating Emission Estimate for Point Source ......................................................... 182
Table 49: Emission Estimates for Point Source Emissions ................................................................................... 183
Table 410: Summary of Air Dispersion Modeling for Proposed Stacks ................................................................. 185
Table 414: Environmental Impact Scoring for Noise Level .................................................................................. 189
Table 415: Sources of Noise with their Sound Pressure Levels ........................................................................... 191
Table 418: Impact Scoring for Surface Water Quality ......................................................................................... 197
Table 419: Impact Scoring for Solid & Hazardous Waste Management ............................................................... 198
Table 421: Aspect – Impact Identification, Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures ........................................... 202
Table 422: Impact Scoring of Occupational Health, Community Health and Safety ............................................. 206
Table 78: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Aniline ............................................................. 219
Table 79: Toxic Effect Distance due to Release of Aniline ................................................................................... 220
Table 710: Radiation Level and Effect Distance due to Release of Mono Ethanolamine ....................................... 222
Table 711: Distance to Equivalent Toxic Dose due to Release of Mono Ethanolamine ......................................... 222
Table 101: Environmental Management Plan for Air Environment ....................................................................... 247
Table 102: Environment Management Plan for Surface Water ............................................................................ 248
Table 103: Environmental Management Plan for Ground Water .......................................................................... 249
Table 107: Environmental Monitoing Plan for Noise Environment ....................................................................... 250
Table 108: Details of Proposed Greenbelt Plantation around Project Site ............................................................ 253
Table 1010: List of plant species to control Gas, Dust Emission and Noise Levels ............................................... 256
Table 1013: Plan and Fund Allocation for Occupational Health & Safety ............................................................. 261
Table 1014: Details of Occupational and Safety Hazards with Control Measures in Existing Unit.......................... 264
Table 1015: Additional Control Measures for Health & Safety of Workers ........................................................... 264
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 21: General Location of Project Site .......................................................................................................... 41
Figure 25: Layout map of Industrial Area Showing Location of Proposed Unit ....................................................... 45
Figure 28: Assurance Letter form MPAKVN for Water Supply ................................................................................ 69
Figure 29: CGWA Application Receipt for Ground Water Abstraction ..................................................................... 70
Figure 212: Combined Water Balance Diagram – After Proposed Expansion ......................................................... 74
Figure 217: Equipment Layout for Proposed Stripper with Four Effect Evaporator System..................................... 85
Figure 222: Acceptance Letter from Vendors for Purchase Fly Ash ....................................................................... 94
Figure 31: Study Area Map – 10 km from Project Site ........................................................................................ 100
Figure 33: Windrose Diagram for Post Monsoon Season, 20172018 .................................................................. 106
Figure 35: Pie Chart of Area Statistics for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area .......................... 116
Figure 42: Isopleths for Incremental Noise Generated During Daytime ............................................................... 192
Figure 43: Isopleths for Incremental Noise Generated During Nighttime ............................................................. 193
Figure 71: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Aniline due to Catastrophic Rupture at Weather Condition 5.0/D
.......................................................................................................................................................................... 220
Figure 72:Toxic Consequence Contour of Aniline due to 10 mm leak at Weather Condition 2.0/B ....................... 221
Figure 73:Toxic Consequence Contour of Aniline due to 25 mm leak at Weather Condition 5.0/D ....................... 221
Figure 74:Toxic Consequence Contour of Aniline due to Catastrophic Rupture at Weather Condition 5.0/D ......... 221
Figure 75: Late Pool Fire Consequence Contour of Mono Ethanolamine due to 25mm Leak at Weather Condition
5.0/D.................................................................................................................................................................. 223
Figure 76: Toxic Consequence Contour of Mono Ethanolamine due to catastrophic rupture at Weather Condition
3.0/E .................................................................................................................................................................. 223
LIST OF PHOTOGRAPHS
Photographs 21: Site Photographs ....................................................................................................................... 46
Photographs 311: Mining Activities and Agricultural Practices in the Study Area ................................................. 162
Photographs 312: Places of religious importance in the study area ..................................................................... 164
Photographs 41: Photographs Showing Consultation with Local Peoples ............................................................. 209
AN INCIDENT: An incident is emergent situation of any critical deviation in the process control or otherwise that
may lead to a major accident / potential emergency and disaster.
ANEMOMETER: A device used to measure speed of wind or any other moving gas.
ATMOSPHERIC STABILITY: Atmospheric Stability is defined in terms of vertical temperature gradient in the
atmosphere. It is usually described using the system of categories developed by Pasquill. The categories of stability
class are identified by the letter A to F (or sometimes AG)
Neutral stability occurs typically, when there is total cloud cover and is designed by category D (The temperature
gradient = adiabatic lapse rate) Unstable conditions occur when the sun is shining. The unstable conditions are
designated by the letters AC with A is the least stable condition stable conditions occur on clear, calm nights, when
the air near the ground is stratified and free from turbulence and are designated by the letter E &F. Sometimes an
additional category G is used for exceptionally stable conditions. Neutral conditions correspond to a rate of decrease
in temperature with height of about 1°C per meters, vertically. For the dispersion study D & C stability class has
been considered.
BLEVE (BOILING LIQUID EXPANDING VAPOUR CLOUD EXPLOSION): The event may have two folds, one;
flammable liquid under pressure rapidly spread in to the open area in form of vapour cloud, two; if this spreading
vapour cloud gets any source of ignition, then violently explosion took place produce missiles effect with secondary
fires and create heavy damages to the surrounding area. The phenomenon is called as BLEVE.
BUND/DYKE: Raised ground or a wall built around a tank or tank farm, to retain spills and prevent their spread,
thus reducing hazards.
BURNING RATE: The value is the rate (in millimeters per minute) at which the depth of a pool of liquid decreases
as the liquid burns.
CAS (CHEMICAL ABSTRACT SERVICE REGISTRY NUMBER): The unique identification number assigned each
compound/chemicals registered with the Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) is listed to aid in quick identification of
the compound.
DANGEROUS OCCURRENCE: Dangerous Occurrences include bursting of vessel collapse of crane, derrick, hoist,
explosion, fire, leakage, escape of any molten metal / hot liquid, explosion of receiver /container, collapse of
building/ structure, as specified under schedule of Rule 103 of GFR 1995 and provision under section 88A of the
Factories Act 1948, where in a factory any dangerous occurrence as specified occurs weather causing any bodily
injury or disability or not.
DISASTER:A disaster is catastrophic consequence of a major emergency / accident that leads to, not only
extensive damage to life and property but also disrupts all normal human activity for a pretty long time and
requires a major national and international effort for rescue and rehabilitation of those affected.
EMERGENCY: Emergency means a situation leading to a circumstance or set of circumstances in which there is
danger to the life or health of persons or which could result in big fire or explosion or pollution to the work and
outside environment, affecting the workers or neighborhood in a serious manner, demanding immediate action.
FIRE BALL: The burning of a flammable gas cloud, the bulk of which is initially overrich i.e. (UFL). The whole
cloud appears to be on fire as combustion is taking place at eddy boundaries, when air is entrained.
FLASH FIRE: A burning of a flammable vapour cloud at very low flame propagation speed.
FLASH POINT: This is defined as the lowest temperature at which vapours above a combustible substance will
ignite in air when exposed to a flame.
Depending on the test method used, the values given are either Tag closed cup (C. C.) or Cleveland open cup (O,
C.) The values, along with those in 6.2 and 6.5 give an indication of the relative flammability of the chemical. In
general, the open cup value is about 10⁰ to 15⁰F higher than the closed cup value.
CROPPING INTENSITY: Cropping intensity is the number of times a crop is planted per year in a given
agricultural area.
HAZARD: Hazard may be defined as “the potential of an accident.” Hazard exists in man and the system of
materials and machines.
HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS: Any substance or material in a quantity or form which may be harmful to humans,
animals, crops, water systems, or other elements of the environment if accidentally released. Hazardous chemicals
include explosives, gases (compressed, liquefied or dissolved), flammable or combustible liquids, flammable solids
substance, toxic, corrosives, oxidizing substance, poisonous and insecticides substances.
Any Chemical, which satisfies any of the criteria, laid down in Part I of Schedule I and is listed in column 2 of
Part II of the schedule.
Any Chemical listed in Column 2 of Schedule 2.
Any Chemical listed in Column 2 of Schedule 3, as per provisions given below;
Rule 2(e) of MANUFACTURE, STORAGE AND IMPORT OF HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL RULES, 1989.
Rule 2(b) of Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness & Response) Rule, 1996.
IDLH (IMMEDIATELY DANGEROUS TO LIFE AND HEALTH): The level of concentration immediately
dangerous to life or health from which a worker could escape without any impairing symptoms or any irreversible
health effect (NIOSH/OSHA). The concentrations are reported either parts per million (ppm) or milligrams per cubic
meter (mg/m3).
LC50 (LETHAL CONCENTRATION): Lethal Concentration level for air Bourne toxic substance.
LD50 (LETHAL DOSE): The term LD50 signifies that about 50% of the animals given the specified dose by mouth
will die. Thus for a grade 4 chemical (below 50 mg/kg) the toxic dose for 50% of animals weighting 70 kg (150 lb)
is 70 50 = 3, 500 mg=3.5 gr or less than 1 tea spoonful, it might be as little as a few drops. For a Grade 1 chemical
(5 to 15 g/kg) the LD50 would be between a pint and a quart for a 150 lb man.
MAJOR ACCIDENT: Major Accident means an incident involving loss of the life inside or outside the site or ten or
more injuries inside and/or one or more injuries outside or release of toxic chemical or explosion or fire of spillage
of hazardous chemical result in ‘On Site’ or ‘Off Site’ emergencies or damage too equipment leading to stoppage of
process or adverse effects to the environment. (Rule 2(j) of Manufacture, Storage and Import of Hazardous
Chemical Rules, 1989.; Rule 2(f) of Chemical Accidents (Emergency Planning, Preparedness & Response) Rule,
1996).
ODOUR THRESHOLD: The lowest concentration of an air contaminant that can be detected by smell.
OFF-SITE EMERGENCY PLAN: The objective of an Off Site Emergency Plan is to protect the life and property of
the neighborhood areas of the industrial unit. Off Site Emergency Plan shall be prepared by Government Authorities
as per Rule 14 of MSIHC Rules 1989 and follow the instruction under provision of CA (EPPR) Rules 1996.
ON SITE EMERGENCY PLAN: On Site Emergency Plan is to be prepared by occupier of industrial Units as per
Section 41(B)(4) of The Factories Act 1948, Schedule XI under Rule 13 of MSIHC Rules 1989, and Rule 5,7, & 9 of
CA(EPPR) Rules 1996.
OVER PRESSURE: Maximum pressure above atmosphere pressure experienced during the pressure of a blast
wave from an explosion.
PLUME: Hazardous gas / vapour / cloud resulting from a continuous source release.
POOL FIRE: A pool of flammable liquid burning with a stationary diffusion flame
RESPONSE: The efforts to minimize the risks created in an emergency by protecting the people, the environment
and the property, and the efforts to return the scene to normal preemergency conditions. Persons who perform
the various response functions are termed “RESPONDERS”.
RISK: Risk of an accident may be defined as “the chance or probability or likelihood of an accident being caused in
a given manmaterialmachine system.
SPILL: Spill is large liquid releases from a bulk storage tank/process vessel.
SMC (SITE MAIN CONTROLLER): He is overall responsible for directing operations & decides the actions,
consulting with incident controller &seniors, and handle &control the emergency.
SHORT – TERM INHALATION LIMIT (STEL): The parts of vapour (gas) per million parts of contaminated air by
volume at 25 Deg C (77OF) and at one atmosphere of pressure is given. The limits are given in milligrams per cubic
meter for chemical that form a fine mist or dust. The values given are the maximum permissible average exposures
for the time periods specified.
SPECIFIC GRAVITY: The specific Gravity of a chemicals is the ratio of the weight of the solid or liquid to the
weight of an equal volume of water at 4OC (or at some other specified temperature) If the specific gravity is less
than 1.0 (or less than 1.03 in sea water) the chemical will float, if higher it will sink.
TLV (THRESHOLD LIMIT VALUE): TLV refer to airborne concentration of substances. There are three categories
of TLV.
TLV – For gases and vapour is usually expressed in PPM. (Part of the gas/vapour/million parts of air)
TOXIC CLOUD: Air borne mass of gases, vapours, fumes, dust or aerosols of toxic materials.
TOXICITY: The ability of a substance to cause damage to living tissue, impairment of the central nervous system,
serve illness or death when ingested, inhaled or absorbed by the skin.
VAPOUR CLOUD: Air borne dispersing hazardous vapours, which may or may not be visible as a “Cloud”
1 INTRODUCTION
M/s. RSPL Limited intends to expand the optical brightener manufacturing plant from present production of
3000 MT/Year to 8400 MT/Year in the existing manufacturing unit located at Plot No. 42 to 59, Sector K, IIDC
growth center, Village Sidhguwan, District Sagar, Madhya Pradesh.
This report is prepared based on ‘General Structure of EIA’ given in Appendix III and IIIA of EIA Notification, 2006
as amended till date
The manufacture of proposed products at the site location are covered under Project /activity, 5(f)B, namely
“Synthetic Organic Chemicals” (dyes & dyes intermediates; bulk drugs & intermediates excluding drug formulation;
synthetic rubbers; basic organic chemicals; other synthetic organic chemicals and chemical intermediates)”
requiring Environmental Clearance from State Level Environmental Impact Assessment Authorities (SEIAA), Bhopal,
since the project is located in Notified Industrial Area.
RSPL Group is more than 5500 crore diversified conglomerate, which is committed to value for money propositions
& credited with several innovations over last 3 decades. The sagacity to weave its business around consumer needs
has conferred RSPL Group with a distinct value and identity. Efficient capital structure, cutting edge technology,
operational discipline and a widespread distribution network, have together attributed to enhance RSPL Group and
enabled the organization to deliver value to consumers.
Historical Background
Late Dayal Das with his sons Shri Murli Dhar Ji and Shri Bimal Kumar Ji initiated the group as a small family
business. It is said that knowledge and expertise comes from experience. It was their efforts and dedication that
laid the foundation on which the empire of “Ghari” group has been build up within a span of three decades.
RSPL Limited Company does the manufacturing and marketing of detergents, toilet soaps, wind energy and
other FMCG products.
Leayan Global Private Limited This Company is engaged in the manufacturing & marketing of Leather &
Leather Footwear.
Nimmi Build Tech Private Limited (formerly known as Poonam Developers & Infrastructure India Private
Limited) This company is involved in the business of construction and real estate.
Namaste India Foods Private Limited – This is the latest venture of the group into the dairy business. The
Company has set up number of milk collection centers at Shivrajpur, Kanpur for collection of milk from
villagers.
All the Companies are under the supervision and control of the single management thereby making its recognition
as the “GHARI GROUP”.
1.2.3 Turnover
The turnover of the company is Rs. 4584.51 Crore for the year of 20172018.
1.2.4 Export
The product of OBA is used for indigenous consumption in products of Detergent Power and Cake.
1.4 Brief description of the Nature, Size, Location of the Project and its Importance to Country,
Region
Investment
An investment of ~ INR 58.12 crores will be made in this project. This investment will go into the local economy.
Direct Jobs
Around 150 jobs will be directly created by the setting up of the project during its operational lifecycle.
Indirect Jobs
Approx. 100 jobs will be indirectly created for setting up of the project during its construction lifecycle.
The project will add to the local and state tax collection, enlarging the base of the state exchequer. Also State and
National exchequer.
Skills Creation
Local persons will be given to upgrade their skills in chemical manufacturing sector.
Compliance of TOR points is as per the TOR letter issued by SEAC, Bhopal & Standard ToR conditions issued by
MoEF. This compliance includes:
Collection of baseline data with respect to Air, Noise, Water, Land, Biological and SocioEconomic components
for one season.
Identification and assessment of impacts on environment and suggesting mitigation measures.
Preparation of Environment Monitoring, Management and RA/DMP Plan.
The copy of TOR letter issued by SEAC, Bhopal is as per Annexure 3. Pointwise compliance to TOR conditions are
presented in Table 1-2 as mentioned under different sections of the report.
4 Site Details
i General location map of project site is given in
Location of the project site covering village, Taluka/Tehsil, Chapter 2, Figure 2-1, Page No. 41.
District and State, Justification for selecting the site, whether
other sites were considered. Justification for selecting the site is given in
Chapter 5, Section 5.1.1, Page No. 211
ii A toposheet of the study area of radius of 10km and site Toposheet of the study area of radius of 10km and
location on 1:50,000/1:25,000 scale on an A3/A2 sheet. site location on 1:50,000 scale on an A3 sheet is
(including all ecosensitive areas and environmentally sensitive given in Annexure 4.
places)
iii Details for selecting of site is given in Chapter 5,
Details w.r.t. option analysis for selection of site
Section 5.1.1, Page No. 211
iv Google map showing site boundary with Co
Coordinates (latlong) of all four corners of the site. ordinates (latlong) of all four corners of the site is
given in Figure 2-2, Page No. 42
ix Action plan for the green belt development plan in 33 % area Details of existing and proposed greenbelt is given
i.e. land with not less than 1,500 trees per ha. Giving details of in Chapter 10, Section 10.6, Page No. 252
species, width of plantation, planning schedule etc. shall be Greenbelt development plan for existing and
included. The green belt shall be around the project boundary proposed unit is given in Annexure 14, Page No.
and a scheme for greening of the roads used for the project 384
shall also be incorporated.
x Action plan for rainwater harvesting measures at plant site shall Details of rain water harvesting is given in Chapter
be submitted to harvest rainwater from the roof tops and storm 10, Section 10.7, Page No. 257
water drains to recharge the ground water and also to use for
the various activities at the project site to conserve fresh water
and reduce the water requirement from other sources.
xi Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for
Total capital cost and recurring cost/annum for environmental
environmental pollution control measures is given in
pollution control measures shall be included.
Chapter 10, Section 10.10, Page No. 266.
xii Action plan for postproject environmental monitoring shall be Postproject environmental monitoring plan is given
submitted. in Chapter 6, Section 6.3, Page No. 212
xiii Onsite and Offsite Disaster (natural and Manmade) Onsite and offsite disaster management plan is
Preparedness and Emergency Management Plan including Risk given in Chapter 7, Section 7.4, Page No. 225.
Assessment and damage control. Disaster management plan Risk Assessment and damage control is given in
should be linked with District Disaster Management Plan. Chapter 7, Section 7.2 & 7.3, Page No. 214 &
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This chapter provides a condensed description of those aspects of the project likely to cause environmental effects.
Details are described in following sections with regards to type, need, location, size or magnitude of project
operations, technology and other related activities.
The proposed project will manufacture OBAs used for captive consumption in other plants of RSPL for
manufacturing of detergent powder and cake.
Currently OBA is utilized for internal consumption by RSPL’s existing detergents plants to achieve better cost saving
and establish stronger control over final quality of the product.
Due to more requirements of own demand for detergent manufacturing plants of RSPL, it is intended to expand the
capacity of OBA plant.
2.3 Location (maps showing general location, specific location, project boundary & project site
layout)
The project site is located in NE of Sagar town on SH14. Sagar town is located in Sagar district of Madhya Pradesh.
The Project Location is presented in Figure 2-1 which falls in the IIDC Growth Centre, Industrial Estate of
Sidhguwan, District Sagar.
Proposed project is located at Plot No. from 42 to 59, Sector K, IIDC growth center, Village Sidhguwan, District
Sagar, Madhya Pradesh. Specific location of project site along with project boundary on google image is shown in
Figure 2-2. Site location on Toposheet with 10 km of project study area is given in Figure 2-3. Similarly the site
layout map is presented as Figure 2-4.
Layout plan of Sidhguwan industrial area showing site location of existing operational unit of RSPL & Proposed
expansion area is presented in Figure 2-5. Site photographs are presented at Photographs 2-1.
Figure 2-5: Layout map of Industrial Area Showing Location of Proposed Unit
Access Road near the Site Plantation outside the Plant Boundary
Expansion Area
Before plotting of IIDC, the land was used for agricultural activities. Once, it was intimated that the proposed area
will be notified for Industrial use, farmers sold their land to IIDC. The industrial area is in operation since 1990.
By Road
SH – 14 connects Sagar – Damoh, is about 0.35 km towards S direction from main approach to site.
North South Corridor NH26 connects GwaliorSagar Naringhpur stretch, sagar bypass, which is about 2.25 km
towards W direction from site.
NH – 86 connects Sagar –Banda stretch, near Russala village which is about 1.98 km towards W direction from
site.
By Rail
Makronia Railway station, BinaSagar –Katni section which is about 4.9 km towards SW direction from site.
Sagar railway station is about 12.5 km towards SW direction from site.
By Air
Rajabhoj Airport, Bhopal is about 168 km towards W direction from site. Daily multiple flights for Mumbai &
Delhi are available from here.
Jabalpur Airport is around 145 km towards SE direction from the project site.
Dhana (Sagar) Airport is about 15 km away from the project site which is currently not in operational phase for
commercial flights.
Plot area of the project consists of 62,000 sq.m. Site layout map is shown in Figure 2-4. Tentative area breakup is
presented in Table 2-2. Pie chart showing area distribution at site is presented in Figure 2-6 as below:
List of the existing and proposed products along with production capacity is presented inTable 2-3
The estimated cost of the project is ~ INR 58.12 crores. Approximately capital cost on environmental protection
measures will be INR 555 Lacs and recurring cost will be INR 56 Lacs/annum
Months
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Sr. No. Activity
1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to 1 to 16 to
15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31 15 31
days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days days
EC & NOC
1 Approval
2 Tendering Stage
Receipt of Bids /
3 Proposals
Evaluation of
4 Proposals
Finalization of
5 Contractors
Construction
6 Phase
7 Civil Completion
Mechanical
8 Completion
9 CTO Approval
10 Commissioning
Process Description
The raw materials as per material balance are blended in proportions in a Ribbon Blender and then passed through
a Cage Mill for milling. Milling fraction is further sent for Packaging. The process is completely dry and does not
involve any water going in product. Water is utilized in process of preparation of the input materials for mixing
which gets evaporated during drying.
Material Balance
1 Detergent Powder 1
Evaporation
in form of
2 Loss of water 0.0108
Water
Vapour
0.00 0.01 1.00 0.00 0.00
Total
1.0108
Process Description
The raw materials as per material balance are blended in proportions in a Sigma Mixer and then passed through a
Triple Rolling machine for formation of cake. Moisture is maintained for cake formation in the mixer. The Roll cake
is further taken for plodding, cutting and stamping. No Water is discharged in the process. Water is utilized in
process of preparation of the input materials for mixing which gets along with the product and evaporation.
Material Balance
Output/MT of Product
S.
Liquid Air Recovery/ Incinerable Landfillable Remark
No. Product
Effluent Emission Product Waste Waste
Detergent
1 1
cake
Water utilized
Water in
2 0.0390 as moisture in
product
cake formation
0.00 0.039 1.00 0.00 0.00
Total
1.039
Acid Slurry is manufactured by addition of Linear Alkyl Benzene and Sulphuric Acid in a sulphonation mixer through
doser assembly.
Process Description
First of all L.A.B (Linear Alkyl Benzene) and Sulphuric Acid are taken into their respective dozers. From these dozers,
required quantity is transferred into Sulphonator i.e Mixer where mixing of these two items are done for about 4 hours.
Thereafter, required quantity of water is poured into it and mixed materials are taken into a settler where slurry and spent
acid are allowed to settle. Acid slurry being light in weight comes up and spent acid, which is heavy in nature, settles
down. Acid slurry is taken for manufacture of Detergent and Soap.
Spent acid is seperated out and sold to authorised vendor for utilization.
Material Balance
1 Acid Slurry 1
Sold to
2 Spent Acid 0.843 authorized
vendor
0.00 0.00 1.843 0.00 0.00
Total
1.843
Currently LABSA plant is not in working condition and LABSA production is to be discontinued. Instead Acid Slurry is
manufactured and used in plant for own consumption.
Process Description
The hot compressed air is then precooled, using cooling tower water, and chilled to a temperature of 10°C in the
air chiller vessel. The chilled air is then dried in automatic desiccanttype air dryers to a dew point of 70°C.
The dual air dryers are equipped with bubbletight high temperature butterfly control valves. The cooling air blower
supplies cool air to the regenerated (offline) air dryer to reduce the bed temperature to an acceptable level prior to
bringing the regenerated air dryer back online. A regeneration/utility air blower is used to supply cooling air to the
double pipe gas coolers used in the gas plant. The hot air leaving the double pipe coolers is then used to
regenerate the offline air dryer. During the air dryer cooling cycle the regeneration/utility air is vented to the
atmosphere
The sulfur dioxide gas leaving the burner is cooled and delivered to a threestage vanadium oxide catalytic
converter, where the gas is filtered and converted to sulfur trioxide (SO3). The sulfur trioxide gas leaving the
converter is cooled to nearly ambient temperature in an SO3 double pipe cooler and a cascade cooler prior to
entering the inlet mist eliminator which removes traces of sulfuric acid.
Sulfonation System
The sulfonate forms in the unit when an SO3inair mixture is injected into a Falling Film Reactor simultaneously
with the desired organic feed. Cooling jackets in the reactor remove some of the heat of reaction. The system
consists of the film reactor, cyclone separator, cooling system, recycle pump, pipes and fittings etc.
Spent gas is separated from the sulfonic acid recycle stream in the cyclone vessel.
Chemical reaction
Material Balance
1 LABSA 1
0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Total
1.00
Manufacturing Process
Stage -1: Preparation of 4’4, Diamino Stilbene 2’2, Disulphonic Acid Solution
Firstly process water is charged into the MSRL reactor.
DASDA POWDER (4’4, DIAMINO STILBENE 2’2, DISULPHONIC ACID) is added into the reactor under the stirring
condition.
Then 48% of caustic solution is added into the reactor to achieve PH to 7 at room temperature.
After EDTA is charged, 30% HCL solution at 0 Deg Temperature is charged. Cyanuric chloride is to be charged into
the reactor and then stir it for 30 minutes and the slurry further transferred to a 35 KL reactor.
After the process of preparation of cyanuric chloride suspension, the manufacturing process is subdivided into the
stages:
In this stage the reaction has to be start with Dasda solution along with soda ash solution while at this addition 0C
should be maintained. After the addition of that stir it for two hours.
In this stage start with the Aniline oil with the addition of caustic solution on temperature of 5 Deg C to 25 Deg C
and stir the solution for one hour. Then solution reacted mass has been transferred to the 40 KL reactor for third
stage.
After receiving the reacted mass from 35KL reactor, water has been charged to the 40 KL reactor, then charging of
the Monoethanol amine is done, the temperature of the reactor has been increased up to 100 Deg C while
attending the temperature to 100 Deg C, when temperature will reach 85.5 0C the addition of the caustic solution
has been started and complete it till reactor attain 980 oC. Maintain the temperature for two hours.
Then application of cooling agent is done to cool the reactor. During cooling process when temperature of the
reactor became 50 Deg C charging of Vac. Salt in two hours then maintain it for two hours. After that filtration
process has been started with the filter press, and the process of filtration aeration has been done for the next two
hours. The unloading of the wet cake from the reactor is done and then wet cake is transferred into spin flash
dryer.
Stage – 5: Formulation
Charging of the Crude in the Nauta Mixer and after that Vac salt and soda ash is charged into the mixer, close the
manhole of the mixer and start the Nauta mixer stir it for one hour then unload the form material from the mixer
Chemical Reaction
Material Balance
Storage details of raw material and final products is presented in Table 2-11 & Table 2-12
3.4 Sodium Silicate Liquid 1614.9 Non hazardous Storage tanks Normal 2040 2 80 KG 160
3.5 Perfume Liquid 1.45 Fire arboys Normal 2040 25 200 KG 5000
3.6 Perro flight (SOAP STONE) Powder 1795 Non hazardous Bags Normal 2040 5000 50 KG 250000
3.7 Water (Approx) Liquid 96 Non hazardous Water tank Normal 2040 1 60 KL 60
4.6 Aniline Oily Liquid 1120 Non hazardous Storage tank Normal 2040 1 30 KL 30
4.7 Mono Ethanol Amine Liquid 896 Non hazardous Drums normal 2040 250 200 KG 50000
4.8 Soda Ash Powder 980 Non hazardous Bags normal 2040 200 50 KG 100000
4.9 AFILAN UDIOIL Liquid 28 Non hazardous Carboys Normal. 2040 20 100 KG 2000
4.10 EDTA Powder 9.3 Non hazardous Bags Normal. 2040 400 25 KG 1000
4.11 HCl 30% Liquid 466 Corrosive Carboys Normal 2040 50 200 KG 10000
1 Detergent Powder Powder 39600 Non Hazardous Bags Normal 2040 15000 25 KG 375000
2 Detergent Cake Solid 19200 Non Hazardous Cartoon Normal 2040 15000 11 KG 165000
3 Acid Slurry Liquid 27000 Non Hazardous Storage tank Normal 2040 3 32093 KG 96279
4 OBA Powder 3000 Non Hazardous Bags Normal 2040 3500 25 KG 87500
68439 Not Not Yellow Not Not Not
5 AOS Liquid Characteristics ~296 >93.9 100 Stable 1.069
576 available available Amber applicable applicable available
7647
6 Salt NaCl Solid 58.44 800.7 1465 Stable
145
16389 Not Not Not Not Not
7 Dolomite CaCO3·MgCO3 Solid Odorless 184.3 Not available Hazardous White 2.752.9
881 available available applicable applicable established
Optical 7128
8 Liquid >100 196230 Not available
Brightener 645
Water 7732 Not Not Not Not Not Not
9 H2O Liquid Odorless 18.02 0 100 Colorless 1
(Approx.) 185 applicable applicable applicable applicable applicable applicable
15121 White to
10 SLS CH3(CH2)10CH2OOSOONa Solid Mild 288.37 204 Stable
3 Yellowish
1332 Not Non
11 China Clay Solid Not Available 258.2 1760 Not Available Off White 2.2
587 Applicable Flammable
7758 Non
12 S.T.P.P.
294
Na5P3O10 Solid Odorless 367.86 622 Decomposes
Flammable
White
Sodium
Hydroxide 1310
24 NaoH Liquid Odorless 40 318 1390 10 Stable Colorless 2.1
Liquid 732
(48%)
Transportation Details
Sr.
Name Max. Qty.
No. Means of
State Transported Source
Transportation
MT/day
Linear Alkyl Mitsui & co., Ltd, Japan.
1 Liquid Tanker Truck 200
Benzene Nirma/ Gujrat
2 Sulfur Powder Open trucks 50 JAM NAGAR, KOYALIGJ
MITHAPUR/ AHMEDABAD/
3 Soda Ash Powder Truck load 100
INDORE
5 AOS Thick slurry Tanker Truck 50 RSPL Dhar
Krishna minerals rajasthan
6 Salt Powder Truck load 100
/Khanakpur pvt. Ltd.
JABALPUR, MANDLA, SAGAR
7 Dolomite Powder Truck load 100
(M.P)
Khyati Chemicals P. Ltd. /
8 OBA Powder Truck load 20
Gujrat
9 Colour Powder Truck 1 Vidisha kanpur
11 China clay Powder Truck load 100 BHILWARA(RJ)
12 S.T.P.P. Powder. Truck load 100 Bhimandi dipo
13 Sodium silicate Liquid Tanker Truck 20 JABALPUR (M.P)
Khattri aromas / Rudrpur,
14 Perfumes Liquid Truck 1
Haridwar
15 Caustic Lye 48% Liquid Tanker Truck 100 NAGDA /BHOPAL (M.P)
16 DASDA 96% Powder Truck 100 Deepak Nitret Gujrat
(Evonik Industries AG,
Containerised Germany)
17 Cyanuric Chloride Powder 100
cargo
Ahmadabad
18 Aniline Liquid Tanker Truck 20 Rads chemical Mumbai
19 Monoethanol Amine Liquid HDPE drums 10 Amines and plasticizer Mumbai
20 HIS liquid Liquid HDPE carboys 5 Ahmadabad
21 Perro flight Powder Bags 10 Krishna Minerals, Udaipur
22 EDTA Powder Bags in truck 10 Sanchain Kanpur
2.11 Utilities
The power requirement for the proposed facility will be met through Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut
Vitaran Company Ltd. (‘MPPKVVCL’). Total estimated electrical load required for the existing unit is 1305 KVA. After
proposed expansion the required power will be estimated about 2934 KVA.
Total fresh water requirement after the proposed expansion will be about 327 KLD after recycling of treated water.
The required fresh water will be met from Madhya Pradesh Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam (MPAKVN).
During the construction phase around 100 workers will be hired and during operation phase, around 150 people will
be employed.
Internal Roads;
Parking;
Utility area;
Wastewater Treatment Plant (RO & MEE)
Storage area
Production Building and
Green Belt
RSPL will receive water from Madhya Pradesh Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam (MPAKVN) as assured by Govt. of MP.
Permission letter for water supply from MPAKVN is given in Figure 2-8. In absence of water from MPAKVN the
industry will source water from own bore well or nearby other borewells. CGWA application receipt made for
withdrawal of ground water for industrial use is presented in Figure 2-9.
In the proposed manufacturing unit, the water will be mainly used for following areas:
Process
Utilities
Domestic Usage
Washing
Gardening
The total fresh water consumption after the proposed expansion will be estimated about 307 KLD. The breakup of
water consumption and wastewater generation from the existing and proposed unit is described in Table
2-16&Table 2-17and the water balance diagram is given inFigure 2-10 to Figure 2-12.
Table 2-16: Details of Water Consumption from Existing and Proposed Unit
S. No. Area of Consumption Existing, KLD Proposed, KLD Total, KLD
1 Domestic 10 9 19
2 DM Plant 2.5 2.5 5
3 Process 105 149 254
4 Boiler 17.5 48.5 66
5 Softener 0 3 3
6 Cooling Tower 96 164 260
7 Scrubber 6 10 16
8 Other/Floor Washings 1 2 3
9 Gardening 30 22 52
10 Total 268 410 678
11 Recycled water from ETP & MEE 125 226 351
12 Fresh Water Requirement 143 184 327
Table 2-17: Details of Wastewater Generation from Existing and Proposed Unit
Area of Wastewater Treatment and
S. No. Existing, KLD Proposed, KLD Total, KLD
Generation Disposal Facility
1 Domestic 8 8 16
To ETP followed by RO
2 DM Plant 2.5 2.5 5
3 Process 95 171 266 To MEE
4 Boiler 2.5 3.5 6
5 Softener 0 3 3 To ETP followed by RO
6 Cooling Tower 16 30 46
7 Scrubber 4 8 12 To MEE
8 Other/Floor Washings 1 2 3 To ETP followed by RO
278 KLD from
process to MEE,
9 Total 129 228 357 79 KLD to ETP and
then RO
Ro reject to MEE
The effluent generated from the existing plant is segregated at site based on pollution load as below.
High TDS high COD Stream: The high TDS high COD stream coming from the OBA plant and scrubbing
wastewater is directly treated in MEE as the waste water is not amenable to Bio Treatment. Condensate from
the MEE is reused in plant.
Low TDS Low COD Stream: The low TDS low COD streams consists utilities blow downs, wastewater from
washings and domestic sewage is treated in ETP of capacity 40 KLD which will be augmented upto 100 KLD
after proposed expansion and treated water from the ETP is partly used for gardening and surplus will be sent
to recycling RO. There is a zero liquid discharge facility. No wastewater will be disposed outside of plant
premises.
Characteristics of wastewater
Existing ETP is designed for 40 KLD capacity which will be augmented upto 100 KLD capacity after proposed
expansion to treat additional effluent load. The tank sizing details of the effluent treatment plant is presented
inTable 2-20.
Table 2-20: List of ETP Units for 100 KLD Design Capacity
Sr. Equipment Description No. of Dimensions in (m) Volume (m3)
No. Unit
1 Screen Chamber 1 0.77 x 0.5 x 0.8 0.308
2 Oil & Grease tank 1 1.3 x 0.8 x 0.8 0.83
3 Equalization Tank 1 5x5x2 50
4 Flash Mixer 1 1 x 0.8 x 0.8 0.64
5 Flocculation Tank 1 1 x 0.8 x 0.8 0.64
6 Primary Settling Tank 1 2.5 x 2 x 2.2 11
7 Aeration Tank 1 8 x 4.2 x 2.5 84
8 Secondary Settling Tank 1 2.5 x 2 x 2.2 11
9 Chlorine Contact Tank/filter Feed Tank 1 5x1x2 10
10 Pressure sand Filter 1 0.8 m dia with 1.44 m hieght 5 m3/hr
11 Activated Carbon Filter 1 0.8 m dia with 1.44 m hieght 5 m3/hr
12 Treated Water Tank 1 5.2 x 2.5 x 2.3 29.9
13 Sludge Drying Beds 6 1.2 x 2.7 x 2.7 8.75
14 Lime Solution Tank 1 400 litres
15 Polyelectrolyte Tank 1 200 Litres
16 Feric Chloride dosing Tank 1 1000 Litres
Flocculator - 1 No.
Wastewater from Flash mixer overflows to a flocculator for agglomeration of flocs formed. Slow speed paddle type
flocculator mechanism will be provided in this tank for gentle mixing and floc formation. Flocculated effluent will go
to primary settling tank under gravity.
arrangements for inflow and outflow and backwashing of the system. The backwash water of the system shall be
taken to the Equalization tank / Primary Settling Tank for re treatment.
Process block diagram of ETP cum STP is given in Figure 2-13. Block diagram showing streamwise effluent
generation areas upto the treatment facilities is presented in Figure 2-14 and P & ID diagram of ETP cum STP is
given in Figure 2-15.
The evaporator supplied is a hybrid evaporator having the first stage as falling film and rest three stages as forced
circulation.
In a falling film evaporator, the liquid under concentration is fed to the calanderia (heat exchanger) via a specially
designed liquid distributor. This distributor ensures the liquid to pour at the circumference of the tubes and there by
the liquid would subsequently travel on the inner face of the tubes, in its path downwards, forming a thin film of
liquid on the inner face of the tubes.
The heating media, vapor or steam is on the shell side. Vapors being at a higher temperature, heat the down
coming liquid in the tubes. In the process condensation of the vapors take place and the heat liberated is
transferred to the liquid. The pressure / vacuum conditions maintained are such that the condensation temperature
on the shell side is higher than the vaporizing temperature in the tube side.
This ensures that the heating of the liquid is easily achieved for its boiling temperature and the tube side liquid
would boil as it reaches the bottom of the calanderia and the liquid and vapors are transferred to the vapor
separator, where the vapors are separated from the boiling liquid. This vapor is transferred to the shell side of the
next calanderia and acts as the heating media for the next stage. Variation in the vacuum brings about reduction in
the boiling temperatures and hence the vapor from the previous stage is always at a higher temperature.
The first stage is the one in which fresh steam is injected. In the first stage, part of the vapor of the first stage is
recycled using the thermo compressor, back to the shell side of the first stage. This recycle results in energy recycle
and provides for higher water evaporation per unit of steam used.
The rest three stages offered are Forced circulation calanderia or heat exchanger.
In a forced circulation evaporator the liquid is pumped through the tubes at high velocities to ensure that no
precipitation of the salts takes place.
The effluent is introduced in the first stage of the evaporator where partial evaporation takes place and the partially
concentrated liquid is transferred to the second stage where further concentration takes place in the forced
circulation calanderia. The effluent by now has been concentrated to near its solubility limit and hence the third and
fourth stage is designed as forced circulation having Oslo Separator so that as the solubility is exceeded due to
further evaporation, the precipitated salts do not stick to the tube walls. The high velocity of the liquid ensures that
the salt formation and separation take place in the specially designed Oslo vapor separator. The vapor separator
has been specially designed so as to allow the vapor separation in the upper side, and the resulting concentrated
effluent along with the precipitating salts is brought to the lower section, where the salts would settle at the bottom
and the clear supernatant is recycled back to the inlet of the calanderia. The settled salt slurry is pumped to the
centrifuge, where the salts are separated and the mother liquor if recycled back to the inlet of the heat exchanger/
calanderia.
In this manner, the entire liquid is evaporated and the salts from the centrifuge are reused in process.
The condensed steam and vapors from all the stages and from the condenser, where the vapors from the last stage
after preheating the feed are condensed are collected and pumped out from the system. This in absence of
impurities can work as good hot process water and therefore this is planned accordingly for reducing the fresh
water consumption.
After Proposed expansion wastewater quantity will be increased and it will be treated as per existing treatment
scheme. Capacity of existing wastewater treatment plant will be increased to carry proposed effluent load as given
below.
Figure 2-17: Equipment Layout for Proposed Stripper with Four Effect Evaporator System
UF &RO will be proposed for 30 m3/day capacity. Technical specifications of UF &RO system is presented in Table
2-22.
Table 2-22: Technical Specifications of RO System
Sr. No. Description Details
A UF System
1 Feed Flow 2.2 m3/hr
2 Feed TDS 2500
B RO System
1 Feed Flow 2 m3/hr
2 RO Feed Tank 5 m3
3 Feed TDS 2500
4 Feed Pump
Flow Rate 4.0 m3/hr, 35 m Head
Quantity 2 (1 W + 1S)
MOC CI
5 High Pressure Pump
Flow Rate 2.0 m3/hr, 70 m Head
Quantity 2 (1 W + 1S)
MOC SS316
7 RO Membrane Size – LD 4040, Quantity of Element
18, Housing 3 No.
8 Antiscalent Dosing System
Flow Rate 06 LPH
Pressure 4.0 kg/cm2
Tank size 100 Liters, HDPE
9 Chemical Dosing System
Flow Rate 06 LPH
Pressure 4.0 kg/cm2
Tank size 100 Liters, HDPE
10 Micron Cartridge Filter
Flow Rate 4.0 m3/hr
Pore Size 5 Micron
11 pH Correction Dosing Tank 100 Liters, HDPE
12 CIP System 1 No.
Existing Unit
The wastewater generated from the existing unit is segregated at source. The process and scrubbing wastewater is
directly treated in MEE and condensate from the MEE is reused in plant.
Other wastewater like domestic sewage, utilities blow downs and washing effluents are treated in ETP and treated
water from the ETP is used for gardening.
After the proposed expansion the utilities blow downs along with washing and domestic effluent will be treated in
expanded ETP and continued to be used for gardening as per gardening requirements and extra water will be
passed trough UF & RO system. RO Permeate water will be reused in plant and RO reject water will be treated in
MEE along with process wastewater and scrubbing water.
Adequate measures shall be taken to reduce fresh water demand by following measures.
1. Condensate recovery from the boiler which will reduce the overall water demand.
2. Recycling RO will be installed at site which will reduce the fresh water demand
3. Utilisation of treated waste water in gardening reducing fresh water make up.
Due to proposed project various sources of air pollution are identified during construction and operation phase.
Identified air emission sources are as follows:
Construction Phase
During construction phase various activities that are probable sources of air pollution are elaborated as under:
Operation Phase
Point Source
Likely air pollutants from proposed project will be PM, SO2 & NOx from boiler stack and DG Sets. From various
process vents, emissions of PM, HCl and VOC.
Line Source
SPM emissions from movement of vehicles on paved roads & vehicular emissions like SPM, CO & HC’s from exhaust
of the vehicles are envisaged as line source emissions.
Area Source
No area source emissions are envisaged, as the coal storage yard is a covered structure shed.
Others
Fugitive emissions from storage & handling of raw materials and finished product.
Details of gaseous emissions from flue gas stacks & process vents along with attached Air Pollution Control
Equipment are given inTable 2-23 &Table 2-24.
B Proposed Stacks
3 Boiler 5TPH 1 30 3
Mechanical Dust
PM, SOx, NOx Collector and Bag
Filter
4 Boiler (Standby) 5TPH 1 30 3
Mechanical Dust
Boiler (Thermic
5 15 Lacs Kcal 1 30 3 m at top Collector and Bag
Fluid Heater)
Filter
A Existing Unit
1 Spin Flash Dryer1 11 0.3 Bag Filter PM 150 mg/Nm3
OBA Scrubber for Process Reactor,
2 10 0.15 Alkali Scrubber* HCl 20 mg/Nm3
Aniline Day Tank and MEA Day Tank
B Proposed Unit
1 Spin Flash Dryer2 11 0.3 Bag Filter PM 150 mg/Nm3
OBA Scrubber2 for Process Reactor,
2 10 0.15 Alkali Scrubber* HCl 20 mg/Nm3
Aniline Day Tank and MEA Day Tank
* Negligible amount of VOC in the form of Aniline & Mono ethanol amine may be carried away from the OBA
Scrubber which will be <1 ppm. Modelling of these parameters are not considered due to its highly volatile nature.
Layout map for bag filter attached to 5 TPH boiler & Thermic Fluid Heaters are provided in Figure 2-18 & Figure
2-19.
SO2 Scrubber
The packed tower SO2 scrubber system is designed to operate with minimal operator attention as a semi
continuous batch recycle scrubber. The recycle tank is charged with a dilute caustic soda solution which is re
circulated to the top of the absorber tower. The gas contacts the scrubbing solution countercurrently as it passes
upward through the tower to the final stack. The SO2 gas present in the effluent stream is absorbed in the
scrubbing solution and reacts with the caustic soda forming Na2SO3.This liquid is utilized in detergent powder and
cake plant as it contains desired salts.
No coal will be stored in open. Coal storage yard is a covered structure shed.
Details of fugitive emission and control measures to keep work area environment as per the norms of Factory
Rules, is provided in this section.
Coal will be conveyed by trucks covered with HDPE sheets and it will be unloaded and stored in the long
covered shed;
Water sprinkling system in the material storage yard to suppress the dusting due to winds;
Storage of the fly Ash only in the closed silo;
Transportation of the fly ash in the bunker.
All the joints, flanges, pumps, glands, seals, valves will be maintained in good conditions through timely
predictive and preventive maintenance;
Regular workplace monitoring will be carried out;
Boundary wall as wind breaker will be provided to restrict the dispersion of odor/dust from the site;
Phasewise development of green belt will be undertaken in which green belt will be developed along with
construction activity;
All tanks being used for storage of odorous chemicals/ products/ byproducts will be connected to vacuum
system. Manometers will be provided on these tanks. The vacuum will be monitored on daily basis;
Manual Handling of various chemicals will be avoided to the extent possible;
SOP will be established and followed especially for do and don’t during plant operation.
In OBA plant the odour source is mainly from HCL fumes. There is an arrangement of controlling this fumes in the
plant by providing scrubber in reaction. This scrubber ensures that there is no odour problem in plant. Other
chemicals that are used in other reactions have no significant odour nuisance.
There are two solvents used in the proposed project, Aniline and MEA. These two solvents are used as reactant in
the reaction of OBA and hence loss of solvent is minimal upto 0.2 to 0.5%. Even for removing this small quantity
we have made a provision of Stripper Column along with proposed MEE system.
2.15 Solid and Hazardous Waste Identification, Quantification, Storage and Disposal
From the proposed project, it is envisaged that different type of hazardous waste like Used/spent oil, Spent Acid,
Discarded containers/barrels/liners contaminated with hazardous waste, Chemical sludge from waste water
treatment etc. shall be generated.
Other solid waste like paper, plastic, wooden material, scrape, metal waste, glass etc. will be handed over to
authorized vendors.
Based on the Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and Transboundary Movement) Rules, 2016, as amended
till date, categorization, storage and disposal of both process and nonprocess wastes shall be done.
The Solid/Hazardous Waste will be collected and temporarily stored in hazardous waste storage area as per
hazardous waste rules within the plant premises. The details of the solid and hazardous waste generation,
qualification, classification, collection, transportation and disposal facility as per hazardous waste rules 2008 & 2016
& its amendment are mentioned inTable 2-26.
Discarded
Bags/
Sent to Ramky
4 Containers, 33.1 50 MTA 30 MTA 80 MTA All Plant NA
Pithampur
Drums &
Liners
RSPL has taken TSDF membership from Ramky for disposal of hazardous waste. The agreement copy with Ramky,
Madhya Pradesh Waste Management Project is given in Annexure 6.
For spent acid management, Manifest/Invoice copy against sale of spent acid is given Figure 2-21. Acceptance
letter from vendors for purchase of fly ash from RSPL unit is given in Figure 2-22.
Figure 2-22: Acceptance Letter from Vendors for Purchase Fly Ash
All solid and hazardous waste with be handled with proper PPEs ensuring safety of the individuals working with the
solid and hazardous waste handling.
The wastes will be stored in drums and HDPE Bags and further transferred at the Solid cum Hazardous storage
area.
Three months storage with impervious flooring will be provided for hazardous waste storage to avoid leakage
problem.
The Hazardous waste storage area will be provided with base liner of HDPE in order to prevent.
The transport of the hazardous wastes will be in accordance with the provisions of The Hazardous Waste
(Management, Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2016 as amended till date.
Manifest system will be followed in accordance with Form 10 of Hazardous Waste (Management, Handling and
Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2016 as amended till date.
TREM card will be provided to the transport drivers as per Form 11 of Hazardous Waste (Management,
Handling and Trans boundary Movement) Rules, 2016 as amended till date.
PPE’s like hand gloves, organic mask, gum boots/safety shoes, dust mask/ nose mask will be provided to workers
and drivers involved in handling and transportation of hazardous waste.
Bio-medical Wastes
Occupational Health Centre is provided at site for periodic checking of health. Medicines are given on regular basis
for normal health care check ups. No procedural / injectables are been given on site. They are refered for further
investigation and treatment to local ESIS hospital. There is no generation of biomedical wastes from site premises.
Electronic Wastes
Ewaste/ Electronic waste will mainly be generated from the computer lab and administrative buildings. EWaste
comprises of discarded computers, copiers, fax machines, inverters, cell phones, CD’s, LAN Cables, Keyboards,
Mouse, SMPS, Fuses, Data cables, mobile/laptop peripherals like earphones, chargers, circuit boards, printer
cartridges etc.
Ewaste will be handled as per the provisions of the EWastes (Management and Handling) Rules, 2016. The E
wastes are been managed at Corporate level where in an agreement has been made with an authorised recycler for
recycling of Electronic Wastes. The certificate is enclosed in Figure 2-23.
3.1 General
This chapter illustrates the description of the existing environmental status of the study area with reference to the
prominent environmental attributes. The study area covers 10 km radius around the project site. The landuse and
socioeconomic aspects were studied with respect to 10 km radius around the site.
The existing environmental setting is considered to adjudge the baseline conditions which are described with
respect to climate, atmospheric conditions, water quality, soil quality, ecology, socioeconomic profile, landuse and
places of archaeological importance.
The study area is considered to be the area within 10 km radius of the site. Study area map of proposed project on
Googleis shown in Figure 3-1 and sampling location map within the study area is shown in Figure 3-2.
3.3 Period
Baseline monitoring study and surveys of the study area has been carried out in post monsson season from 20th
October 2017 – 20th January 2018
3.4 Component
The baseline environmental data of valued environmental components with respect to air, noise, water, land, flora,
fauna, socioeconomic and soil quality in the study area was collected by conducting primary data collection which
includes sampling/field studies, survey & secondary data collection as mandated by the TOR issued by EAC.
3.5 Methodology
The methodology for conducting the baseline environmental survey obtained from the guidelines given in the EIA
Manual of the MoEF&CC. Baseline information with respect to air, noise, water and soil quality in the study area
was collected by conducting Primary data collection which includes sampling/field studies, Survey & Secondary data
collection.
Field monitoring for meteorological conditions, ambient air quality, water quality, noise quality, Soil quality etc. has
been carried out, which constitutes major portion of the baseline environmental studies. In addition to these
important parameters, certain aspects like land use, socioeconomic studies, Ecological and Biodiversity studies etc.
are covered during the study period. This information is based on secondary information sources and constitutes
remaining part of the baseline environmental studies.
The data has been collected through actual physical surveys and observations, literature surveys, interaction with
locals, government agencies and departments.
All monitoring and analytical work related to Air, Water, noise and soil is done by KEC laboratory which is NABL
accrediated laboratory and recognized under Environmental Protection Act, 1986 by MoEF. Gazatte notification from
MoEF is attached as Annexure 7 and NABL Certificate if given in Annexure 8.
Observatory is on Circuit House since 1811954. Wind instruments is on the roof of the Dy. Commissioner's Office.
A copy of the longterm meteorological data is enclosed as Annexure 9. These tables give useful information
about a region’s weather, since they are collected over a 30year period.
3.6.1 Temperature
The mean daily maximum and minimum temperatures recorded were 41°C (in the month of May) & 11.4°C (in the
month of January) respectively. The highest temperature recorded was 46.4°C on 31st May & 1st June, 1994. The
lowest temperature recorded was 1.1°C on 1st February, 1929.
During the post monsoon season, i.e. for months of October January, mean daily maximum and minimum
temperatures remain between 11.4oC – 32.2oC.
3.6.2 Humidity
Most humid conditions are found in the monsoons, followed by summer, postmonsoons, and winter in that order.
Mornings are more humid than evenings and relative humidity ranges from a high of 61 – 91% in monsoon
mornings to a low of 32 – 43% in winter evenings.
During post monsoon season, relative humidity during morning and evening remains between 51 – 60% and 40 –
45% respectively.
3.6.3 Rainfall
Distribution of rainfall by season is 1,043.3 mm in monsoons (June, July, August, September), 36.3 mm in post
monsoons (October – November), 36.1 mm in winter (December, January, February) and 32.3 mm in summer
(March, April, May). About 90.9 percent of the annual rainfall in the region is received during the monsoon months
i.e. June to September. Number of rainy days are recorded as 54.7. Heaviest rainfall in 24 hours was recorded as
800.3 mm on 22ndJuly, 2006.
The area remains cloudy between June September, which is the active period of the monsoon season. Generally
cloud cover ranges from 4.0 to 6.6 OKTAS during the monsoon season.
In the post monsoon season cloud cover ranges from 1.2 to 2.4 OKTAS range.
3.6.5 Wind
Long term wind direction data is presented in Table 3-1. Overall for the whole year, first predominant wind
directions is from W to E Direction (21.9%), second predominant wind direction is from NE to SW (15.0%) and
third predominant wind direction is from SW to NE Direction (12.3%). Calm condition contributes to 24.1%.
During post monsoon season, first predominant wind direction is from NE to SW (24.8%), second predominant
wind direction is from East to West (10%) and third predominant wind direction is from North to South (6.8%).
Calm condition contributes to 42.3%.
1Indian Meteorological Department (IMD), Long Term Climatological Tables, 1981 – 2010, Sagar District.
Table 3-4: Site Specific Mean Meteorological Data (Post Monsoon Season)
Relative Wind Speed Wind Cloud Rainfall, Mixing
Time Temp °C
Humidity % (m/sec) Direction Cover mm Height, m
0:00 19 57 1.6 NE 0.7 0 147
1:00 18 57 1.4 NE 0.8 0 155
2:00 18 58 1.3 NE 0.8 0 158
3:00 17 58 1.2 NE 0.8 0 160
4:00 17 59 1.2 NE 0.8 0 165
Site specific Meteorological data is compared with IMD’s secondary data as shown in
Based on the above table, it is noted that there is no major difference in site specific & the long term
meteorological data. Minor change is due to following predicted reasons:
The National Remote Sensing Agency (NRSA), Government of India, conducted a land use survey using Remote
Sensing Techniques in the year 198889 at the behest of the Planning Commission for classifying land by visual
interpretation techniques and digital techniques. NRSA’s output resulted in a twolevel system of classification,
comprising seven first level of classification of land use / landcover categories. Some of these categories required
further classification, leading to a second level of classification that resulted in further subcategories.
This system of classification has been the basis for Kadam’s landuse / landcover studies. Whilst these categories are
generally found relevant with respect to describing landuse and landcover classes in the Indian context, sometimes
modifications are required, and made, to include additional subcategories which are more relevant in describing
the landuse and landcover for a particular study. Such subcategories are defined, in any case.
It is defined as an area of human habitation developed due to nonagricultural use and that which has a cover of
buildings, transport, communication utilities in association with water vegetation and vacant lands.
Kadam has chosen to further define this landuse category into additional categories, namely residential/commercial,
agricultural & industrial.
Residential / Commercial
Structures used by humans for living and working, but not including structures used exclusively for manufacturing.
Industrial
Structures used for manufacturing products.
Agricultural Land
It is defined as the land primarily used for farming and for production of food, fibre, and other commercial and
horticultural crops. It includes land under crops (irrigated and unirrigated), fallow land and plantations. These are
further defined.
Crop Land
It includes those lands with standing crop (per se) as on the date of the satellite imagery. The crops may be of
either Kharif (JuneSeptember) or Rabi (October – March) or Kharif Rabi seasons.
Fallow Land
It is described as agricultural land which is taken up for cultivation but is temporarily allowed to rest uncropped for
one or more seasons, but not less than one year. These lands are particularly those which are seen devoid of crops
at the time when the imagery is taken during Rabi and Kharif.
Plantations
Plantations are described as an area under agricultural tree crops (for e.g. mango plantations) planted adopting
certain agricultural management techniques. It includes tea, coffee, rubber, coconut, arecanut, citrus, orchards and
other horticultural nurseries.
Forests
It is an area (within the notified forest boundary) bearing an association predominantly of trees and other
vegetation types capable of producing timber and other forest produce. Forests can be further divided into sub
categories mentioned as follows.
Deciduous Forests
These are described as forests which predominantly comprise of deciduous species and where the trees shed their
leaves once in a year.
Forest Blank
A forest blank is an opening amidst forests without any tree cover. It includes openings of assorted size and shapes
as seen on the imagery.
Forest Plantations
It is described as an area of trees of species of forestry importance and raised on notified forest lands. It includes
eucalyptus, casuarinas, bamboo, etc.
Mangroves
Mangroves are described as a dense, thicker or woody, aquatic vegetation or forest cover occurring in tidal waters
near estuaries and along the confluence of delta in coastal areas. Mangroves include species of the genera
Rhizophora and Aviccunia.
Wastelands
Wastelands are described as degraded lands which can be brought under vegetative cover with reasonable water
and soil management or on account of natural causes. Wastelands can result from internal / imposed constraints
such as by location, environment, chemical and physical prosperities of the soil or financial or management
constraints.
Different types of wastelands include saltaffected lands, waterlogged lands, marshy/swampy lands, mudlands,
gullied / ravenous lands, land with or without scrub, sandy areas and barren rocky / stony waste / sheet rock areas.
Salt-Affected Land
The saltaffected land is generally characterized as the land that has adverse effects on the growth of most plants
due to the action or presence of excess soluble or high exchangeable sodium. Alkaline land has an exchangeable
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS |MAY 2018 109
EIA REPORT FOR EXPANSION OF OPTICAL BRIGHTENER AGENT
RSPL LIMITED, SAGAR (OBA) PLANT IN THE EXISTING MANUFACTURING FACILITY DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
sodium percentage (ESP) of about 15, which is generally considered as the limit between normal and alkali soils.
The predominant salts are carbonates and bicarbonates of sodium. Coastal saline soils may be with or without
ingress or inundation by seawater.
Waterlogged Land
Waterlogged land is that land where the water is at/or near the surface and water stands for most of the year.
Such lands usually occupy topographically lowlying areas. It excludes lakes, ponds and tanks or in the context of
the Wetlands (Conservation and Management Rules, 2010) such areas that could be considered as ‘protected
wetlands’.
Water Bodies
It is an area of impounded water, areal in extent and often with a regulated flow of water. It includes manmade
reservoirs/lakes/tank/canals, besides natural lakes, rivers/streams and creeks.
River / Stream
It is a course of flowing water on the land along definite channels. It includes from a small stream to a big river and
its branches. It may be perennial or nonperennial.
Others
It includes all those landuse and landcover classes which can be treated as miscellaneous because of their nature of
occurrence, physical appearance and other characteristics.
Shifting Cultivation
It is the result of cyclic land use practice of felling of trees and burning of forest areas for growing crops. Such
lands are also known as jhoom lands and cultivation called jhoom cultivation.
Ports/ Harbours
A harbour is a place where ships may shelter from the weather or are stored. Harbors can be manmade or natural.
A manmade harbor will have sea walls or breakwaters and may require dredging. A natural harbor is surrounded
on most sides by land.
A port is a manmade coastal or riverine facility where boats and ships can load and unload. It may consist of
quays, wharfs, jetties, piers and slipways with cranes or ramps. A port may have magazine buildings or warehouses
for storage of goods and a transport system, such as railway, road transport or pipeline transport facilities for
relaying goods inland. In short a port is used mainly for marine trading and a harbour is used as a parking space or
a storage space for ships
Vegetation Cover
It is a land area predominantly covered with vegetation and is not part of Protected / Reserved Forests. This
includes scrub, open and close vegetations.
Scrub
It is described as a vegetative cover having density is less than 10% of the canopy cover. Scrub is area covered by
grasses or herbs and scattered tree or shrubs.
Open Vegetation
This is also categorized based on the vegetation cover having density between 10% to 20% of the canopy cover.
Close Vegetation
This is also categorized based on the vegetation cover having density greater than 20% of the canopy cover.
KADAM ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS |MAY 2018 111
EIA REPORT FOR EXPANSION OF OPTICAL BRIGHTENER AGENT
RSPL LIMITED, SAGAR (OBA) PLANT IN THE EXISTING MANUFACTURING FACILITY DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
The study area covers a distance equal to 10 km from the project site.
The methodology employed for preparation of Land use/ cover map included:
Data Collection
Interpretation of satellite data
Ground truth study
Final Map preparation
Data Collection
Downloading of Google Earth images.
Topographical maps as base map.
Quick reconnaissance survey of the study area to get a feel of the entire ground area which can aid in the
preliminary interpretation of the data.
Ground truth was carried out to check the discrepancy of the interpreted data. The survey consisted of traversing
the study area, crosschecking of identified features with those represented on the map. Field notes were kept in
the form of log sheets that recorded information pertaining to coordinates, photographs and identified land uses.
Additional features identified or remarks made against existing interpretation were also recorded.
The field survey was carried out by Land use land cover expert on 3rd& 4th January, 2018 around radial distance of
10 km from the project site.
GPS readings were taken during the surveys wherever it was felt that additional confirmation in interpretation of
the data and also observations of land features were noted. Additionally, spot checks were also done to confirm the
land use / land cover interpretation even where confidence of interpretation was high. Table 3-7enumerates the
land features and its corresponding GPS readings of all the ground truthing locations selected.
The landuse and landcover of the above mentioned study area comprises of following categories. The features
identified have been presented, considering the discussion provided in Table 3-8.
Residential / Commercial
1. Builtup Land or Habitation
Industrial
2. Agricultural Land Crop Land / Fallow Land
Plantations
Land Without Scrub
Mining
The images classified into the abovementioned classes for different regions of interest are given in Figure 3-4.
Table 3-9: Area Statistics for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area
Level 1 Level 2 Area, Level 2 classes Area, Level 1 classes
S. No.
classification classification Ha. ~km2 ~% Ha. ~km2 ~%
3. Wastelands Mud land Area 21.6 0.22 0.07 2310.8 23.12 7.12
Note: Roads, Railways, Canals are not calculated separately in area statistics.
Figure 3-5: Pie Chart of Area Statistics for Land Use / Land Cover Categories in the Study Area
Details of the important features along with other sensitive ecological locations in the study area are provided
inTable 3-11.
The parameters monitored were PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NOx, HCl & VOC. Other AAQM parameters specified in ToR, were
not analyzed because source of the same is not envisaged due to proposed activities. The detailed monitoring
methodology for ambient air is given inTable 3-12.
Gaseous Flow (Impinger with Sodium Spectro IS: 5182: (Part 6) 2006
NOx 6 µg/m3
Hydroxide (0.1 N) Media) with RDS photometer (RA 2017) Colorimetric
The frequency of monitoring was 24 hrs twice a week at each station spread over the entire season with gaseous
samples being changed six times (at 8hour intervals).
The locations for AAQM were decided based on the prescribed guidelines2. For this study, the purpose is to
ascertain the baseline pollutant concentrations in ambient air. Accordingly, the criterion was selected to ascertain
quality of air at important human settlements (residential areas).
Details of AAQM monitoring locations and justification for selecting these stations are presented inTable 3-13.
Photographs showing monitoring location is given in Photographs 3-3. Figure showing monitoring station
locations is given in Figure 3-2.
2 As per Guidelines for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring by CPCB, MoEF Published as SERIES: NAAQMS/ …/200304, April, 2013
Detailed results of AAQM are given in Annexure 11. Complied average data are represented in Table 3-14.
Observations
The comparison of the results with the value range indicators provided by CPCB (Annexure 10) indicates:
At various locations, average concentration of PM10 was observed to be varying from 63 µg/m3 (at Nayakheda)
to 82 µg/m3(at Sidhguwan);
An average concentration of PM2.5 levels was observed to be in range of 22 to 31 µg/m3 which is well within
NAAQS by CPCB;
The average concentration of SO2 (7.2 – 8.0 µg/m3), NOx (11.2 – 12.8 µg/m3)are within permissible limits as
prescribed by CPCB;
HCl & VOC were found below detectable limit of 1.0µg/m3 at all locations.
Traffic Survey was carried out on SH – 14 in S direction of the proposed site on 7thJanuary, 2018. It is a road
connecting site to Sagar & Jabalpur. Width of this road is 18 feet (~6 meters), which is a 2 Lane (Two Way) Sub
Arterial Road3.
Average peak hourly (i.e. morning 0800 hours to 1200 hours and evening 1600 hours to 2000 hours) traffic on this
route i.e. from Chanatoliya to Sidhguwan and from Sidhguwan to Chanatoliya is 395 and 431 PCU respectively as
tabulated in Chapter4, Table 4-12 &Table 4-13.
Monitoring of noise is done by identifying suitable number of noise quality monitoring locations. Background noise
quality is monitored in dB (A) Leq (d) and dB (A) Leq (n) at the selected locations
3As per The Indian Road Congress Guideline for capacity of roads in urban Area. (IRC:1061990), Table2, Recommended
Design Service Volumes, page – 11.
Suggestions of mitigation measures of Noise/Vibrations and to reduce noise/vibrations of sources exceeding the
allowable limits of SPL.
The standard for monitoring ambient noise level as per CPCB guidelines is as given inTable 3-16.
Table 3-16: Ambient Air Quality Standards in Respect of Noise for Different Areas/Zones
Ambient Air Quality Standards in Area Limits in dB(A) Leq*
Category
Respect of NOISE Code Day Time Night Time
A Industrial 75.0 70.0
The Noise Pollution B Commercial 65.0 55.0
(Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 C Residential 55.0 45.0
D Silence 50.0 45.0
Day Time: 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM; Night Time: 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM
Note: dB(A) Leq*: denotes the time weighted average of the level of sound in decibels on scale A which is relatable to human
hearing.
Locations for noise monitoring were identify by desktop study and fix the location during field survey at 2 km
maximum from the source of noise generation and at sensitive locations ambient noise monitoring i. e. habitation
area.
Noise readings were taken at Eight (8) different locations within the study area as presented inTable 3-17.
Photographs showing monitoring location is given inPhotographs 3-4. Map showing monitoring station locations
is given inFigure 3-2.
Location Distance
Location Date Category Direction Lat./ Long
Code (kms)
Location Distance
Location Date Category Direction Lat./ Long
Code (kms)
78°50'12.88"E
The average noise levels at monitoring stations are presented inTable 3-18.
Observations
Noise level during daytime & nighttime, in Industrial area & Residential area was observed within CPCB standards
i.e. Industrial area (75 dBA (d) & 70 dBA (n)) and residential area (55 dBA (d) & 45 dBA (n)) except in the
Chanatuliya Village because of vehicular movement of nearby highway.
Surface and Ground water samples are collected using manual grab sampling.
The samples were further analysed as per the APHA Standard Methods (23rdEdition, 2017). Analytical methodology
with minimum detection limit of the instruments is presented in Table 3-19.
Minimum Detection
S. No Parameters Methodology
Limit
APHA: 3500AsB (23rdEdition) Silver diethyldithiocarbamate
a Arsenic (as As) 0.01 mg/l
method/APHA: 3114B (23rd Edition) AAS
b Cadmium (as Cd) APHA: 3111B(23rdEdition) AAS 0.003 mg/l
c Chromium (as Cr) APHA: 3500CrB(23rdEdition), colorimetric method 0.02 mg/l
rd
APHA: 3500CuB (23 Edition) Neocuproine method/ APHA:
d Copper (as Cu) 0.03 mg/l
3111 B (23rdEdition) AAS
e Cyanide (as CN) APHA: 4500 CN D & E(23rdEdition) 0.03 mg/l
APHA: 3500FeB (23rdEdition), Phenanthroline method/APHA:
f Iron (as Fe) 0.05 mg/l
3111B(23rdEdition) AAS
g Lead (as Pb) APHA: 3111B(23rdEdition) AAS 0.01 mg/l
rd
IS 3025 (P48): 1994 (RA 2014))/ APHA: 3112B (23 Edition)
h Mercury (as Hg) 0.001 mg/l
Cold vapour AAS method
APHA: 3500MnB (23rdEdition) Persulphate method/ APHA:
i Manganese (as Mn) 0.02 mg/l
3111B(23rdEdition) AAS
j Nickel (as Ni) APHA: 3111B(23rdEdition) AAS 0.02 mg/l
rd
k Zinc (as Zn) APHA: 3111B(23 Edition) AAS 0.03 mg/
rd
l Boron (as B) APHA: 4500 BC (23 Edition), Carmine method 0.05 mg/l
30 Total Coliform APHA: 9221B (23rdEdition), Multiple Tube Fermentation Absent
rd
31 Fecal Coliform APHA: 9221E (23 Edition), Multiple Tube Fermentation Absent
Surface water sampling locations are selected based on review of land use plan, surface drainage pattern/ground
water flow direction & nearby site habitation village /locations in 10 km radius of project.
Surface water samples were collected from four different locations within the study area as shown inTable 3-20,
Figure 3-2 & Photographs 3-5. Analysis results of collected samples are given inTable 3-21.
Table 3-20: Details of Surface Water Sampling Locations
Distance
Date of Latitude Longitude Justification of
Code Location Source (km)/Direction
Sampling (N) (E) Sample collection
from RSPL Site
To check the quality
Bewas River
SW 1 River 7.25/ESE 06.12.17 23°51'57.73" 78°54'58.24" of flowing water in
near Sanoda
Down Stream
Stagnant water body
SW 2 Guda Pond 1.4/SW 06.12.17 23°52'48.31" 78°50'29.34" in the Nearest
Habitation
Stagnant water body
SW 3 Bachlon Dam 7.8/W 06.12.17 23°53'48.31" 78°46'15.69"
in the study area
Stagnant water body
SW 4 Sidhguwan Pond 0.85/SW 07.12.17 23°53'9.71" 78°50'39.27" in the Nearest
Habitation
The quality of Bewas River, Guda pond and Sidhguwan pond is matching with class C as per classification of Inland Surface Water and it can be used for drinking
Source after conventional treatment.
The quality of Bachlon pond is matching with class D as per classification of Inland Surface water. The DO is very less at Bachlon pond and also BOD is slightly high
which may be due to some anthropogenic sources like washing and bathing etc. If there is no alternate source for potable water then it can be used for drinking
purpose with suitable treatment
Ground water samples were collected from Eight (8) different locations within the study area as shown in Table
3-22,Figure 3-2&Photographs 3-6. Analysis results of collected samples are given inTable 3-23.
Table 3-22: Ground Water Sampling Locations
Distance Direction Justification
Sampling Date of
Location Source From site from site
Code Sampling
km
GW 1 At site Borewell 07.12.17 0.00 At site
GW 2 Sidguwan Dugwell 06.12.17 1.10 West
GW 3 Bamhori Dhunder Dugwell 06.12.17 3.12 SE
To check
GW 4 Lithora khurd Dugwell 06.12.17 6.12 SE ground water
GW 5 Baheri Gadgad Dugwell 06.12.17 3.13 SW quality within
the study area
GW6 Bamora Dugwell 06.12.17 4.06 SW
GW 7 Mohli Dugwell 06.12.17 3.26 NW
GW 8 Kerbana Dugwell 06.12.17 2.66 NE
The area is having drainages starting from 1st order till the 4th order in the form of Sonar River. The streams have
stagnant pool of water due to effluent condition and groundwater level higher than the river bed. However the
effluent rate is very low because of the highly weathered basalt. At few places the water flow is through basalt flow
contact.
Deccan traps are the most important formations in the district due to their large aerial extent. The weathered
jointed, fractured and vesicular units of basalts form moderately potential aquifers.
The moderately weathered basalt, below the weathered zone, are tapped as aquifer. Dugwells, with a diameter
ranging from 5 to 7 m, are preferred to bore well for storage and aquifer characteristics.
Geologically, greater part of the district is situated on the rocks of the Vindhyan system and the Deccan Trap
volcanic series, the latter covering about twothirds of the district. The Achaeans are oldest rocks in the district.
Table 3-24: General Geological Succession and groundwater Yield in the District
Geological Era Group/Super Group Rock formation Groundwater Yield
Liter/sec
Recent Alluvial Plain Unconsolidated Up to 30
Pleistocene Older Alluvium Laterite and Bauxite
Cretaceous Deccan Trap Basalt 110
to Bagh & Lameta Bed Sandstone and cherty
Eocene (Intratrappean) Limestone
Paleozoic Gondwana Super Group Boulder beds, Sandstone, Up to 10
to shale, clays, limestone, coal
seams
Cretaceous
Precambrian Vindhyan & Cuddapah Super Sandstone, Shale and 110
Group limestone
Achaean Dharwar Super Group Dharwar Schist, 15
Metamorphosed
conglomerate, Quartzite,
Crystalline limestone
Old metamorphics Basic Intrusives <1
Sauser Group Granite and Gneiss,
Bundelkhand Granite Gneisses &
Granite Schist, Quartzite
Source: Central Groundwater Year Book :199899 & 200304
Geologically, the basement rock is of the Rewa Group, which comprise sandstone and Quartzite belongs to
Vindhyan Super Group, Overlain by younger Volcanics flows Deccan Trap (Basalt). The soil cover is of insitu
material derived from basalt.
3.14.4 Topography
The area is characterized by flat mounds of basalt flows, the height ranging from 5 to 40 m, with very thin cover of
soil, Debris is found in the form of rounded rock pieces and it is the result of spheroidal weathering. The literature
and site conditions reveal that there are number of lava flows and intrusive bodies.
Depressions in valley fill area have deep seated weathering. Because of the deep seated weathering the area is
fertile and used for farming and is now flat. The weathering is observed in open wells to the depth of sometimes
2025 m. Another indirect evidence to weathering is use of quartzite for well masonry, since basalt available in this
area is not suitable for masonry blocks due to close space jointing and weathered infilling.
3.14.5 Drainage
The Sagar district falls in two major river systems Ken and Betwa which falls outside the study area. About 44%
of the district falls in sub basin of the Ganga basin, 53% in Betwa subbasin of Yamuna basin and 3% in Narmada
basin. Bewas, Sonar, Kopra and Bearma are the tributaries of river Ken and Bina, Jamni, Naren and Dhasan are the
tributaries of river Betwa. The drainage of the district is directed towards the north and northeast. The five rivers,
from west to east are the Bina, the Dhasan, the Bewas, the Sonar and the Bamner. They form the main streams,
which are joined by a number of small tributaries, most of which are only wetweather rills coming down the
intervening ridges, and joining the main streams at an acute angle.
The drainage in the Study area has small seasonal streams, expect river Bewas. Drainage map of the study area is
presented in Figure 3-6.
The storm water drainage within the site is collected in a pit and recycled back in plant premises for industrial use
after treatment in ETP.
3.15 Soil
3.15.1 Introduction
The project area falls under Agro climatic zone (NARP)Vindhya Plateau Zone (MP5). The average annual rainfall is
1197.6 mm, mostly through South West monsoon. The major soil types are Deep Black (55.9 %), Shallow soils
(28.2 %) and Medium Black (15.7 %). The main source of irrigation is open wells (47.9 %), followed be reservoirs
(31.28 %) and bore wells (15.2 %), canal (3.4 %).The major crops grown in the area are soybean, black gram,
rice, maize and sorghum in kharif and in winter chick pea, wheat, lentil, pea, and linseed are grown. Main vegetable
crops are potato, onion, tomato, brinjal, okra, cauliflower, chilli and coriander, ashwagandha and safed musli are
prominent medicinal crops. The horticultural crops grown in the region are citrus, papaya, guava, mango and aonla.
The cropping intensity is 137 % of the district.
The locations for soil sample collection were randomly selected at the project site as well as from the surrounding
areas namely Soil1 to Soil08. The soil samples from 015 cm depth were collected by using spade and hoe. The
samples were homogenized and about 1 Kg soil sample was collected in the polyethylene bag. Labelled with sample
ID which includes site numbers and project name. The samples were brought to the laboratory for analysis of
physical (porosity, water holding capacity, permeability and particle size distribution) and chemical properties
(cation exchange, electrical conductivity, sodium adsorption ratio, pH, Ca, Mg, Na, and K).
Soil samples were collected from Eight (8) different locations within the study area as shown in Table 3-26,Figure
3-2&Photographs 3-7. Analysis results of collected samples are given inTable 3-27.
Table 3-26: Soil Sampling Locations
Sampling Distance From site Direction from site
Location Date of Sampling
Code km
S1 At site 07.12.17 0.00 At site
11 Sodium g/kg 0.49 0.68 1.26 0.60 0.49 0.68 1.26 0.60
12 Potassium g/kg 0.09 0.15 0.03 0.19 0.09 0.15 0.03 0.19
The soil samples were collected from the site as well as surrounding areas to know the basic physical and chemical
properties of soils. The porosity ranged from 5062 % and WHC from 62.5078.50 %, while permeability was low to
moderate and varied from 1430.1 mm/hr. The texture of soil was sandy loam to loam, which governs the
permeability of soil and it was the least in a soil having loam texture and maximum under sandy loam soils. The
CEC varied from 23.030.0 meq/100 g soil indicative of loam texture of soil. The EC (0.084 – 0.307 dS/m) and ESP
(<0.010.64) were within prescribed limits of <0.8 dS/m and <15 %, respectively. And pH ranged from 6.74 8.48,
indicative of neutral to slightly alkaline soils. Among basic cations there was predominance of Mg (0.391.89 gm/kg)
followed by Na (0.331.26 gm/kg), Ca (0.100.88 gm/kg) and K (0.050.25 gm/kg).
Overall soil quality results indicate that soils are nonsaline and slightly alkaline. As soils are having sandy loam to
loam texture they are having all desirable properties with regard to soil aeration, soil water retention and
percolation rate of soil.
To inventories floral and faunal components of project area (project site or core zone and 10 km. radius /
buffer zone).
To locate / demarcate and understand ecological setting of the project area in terms of national parks / wildlife
sanctuary / reserve forests / tiger reserve / Ecosensitive Areas / wetlands etc. within 10 km. radius from
project site (if any).
To identify scheduleI, rare, endemic and endangered species within the project study area and prepare
conservation plan for same.
To identify impact zone and evaluate the likely impact of the proposed project on floral and faunal components
of the project study area.
To suggest / prepare action plan to mitigate likely impacts on the biodiversity of the project area through
plantation around project area to reduce / mitigate likely impacts.
3.16.3 Methodology
Detailed methodology for each group of vegetation has been described in Table 3-30.
Birds were noted and identified with the help of binocular and standard field identification guides. Animals were
directly observed from amongst the vegetation, bushes and roadside fields. Other information regarding wild
animals has been collected from the local people. Floral and faunal details along with other agriculture information
have been collected during the field survey.
Sampling Details
The field visit was conducted on 4th January 2018.
5MuellerDombois, D. & H. Ellenberg. 1967. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, London.
545 pp
6Kershaw, K.A. (ed). 1973. Sampling test of Comparison and application of quadrat measures Pp: 2139. In: Quantitative and
Dynamic Plant Ecology. Second edition. William Clowes and Sons Limited, London.
Overall 15 plots for flora were laid / sampled in the project area to enlist floral & faunal elements. Also, many
villagers from six villages were also interviewed.
Flora
Core Zone
The core zone area is occupied with existing industry and green belt and expansion area is occupied with very few
shrubs and herbs. There is no tree species in expansion area at site. Overall 09 species of common flora including
04 shrubs, 04 herbs ans 01 grass were recorded from the core zone.
All species are arranged in alphabetical order. Species names are followed by vernacular names/local names and
families are given inTable 3-31.
Table 3-31: Floral Species Reported from the Proposed Project Site / Core Zone
S.No. Scientific Name Local/Common Name Family
SHRUBS
1 Abutilon indicum Kanghi Malvaceae
2 Calotropis procera Nano Akdo Apocynaceae
3 Carissa spinarum karonda Apocynaceae
4 Zizyphus nummularia Jhahrberi Rhamnaceae
HERBS
5 Echinops echinatus Oontkateli Asteraceae
6 Euphorbia hirta Duddhi Euphorbiaceae
7 Malvestrum coromandelianum Bariar Malvaceae
8 Xanthium strumarium Chota gokhru Solanaceae
7Nayar, M. P. & A. R. K.Sastry (Eds.) (1990). Red data book of Indian plants. Vol. 3. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta
Buffer Zone
Total 228 plant species of flora were reported from the study area. Trees were dominant life form and reported
with maximum 91 species, followed by herbs with 62, shrubs 41 species while climbers with 15 species and 19
species of grasses and bamboos.
All species are arranged in alphabetical order. Species names are followed by vernacular names/local names and
families are given inTable 3-32.
Note 1: F: Frequency, BA: Basal Area, RF: Relative Frequency, RD: Relative Density, RDm: Relative Dominance,
IVI: Important Value Index.
Note 2: Density, Dominance and Frequency are shown where area of quadrant studied, not for the entire study
area.
Table 3-34: Phyto-sociological Study of Shrubs
Density
S. No. Shrub species F(%) RF RD RAB IVI
(t/ha)
1 Abutilon indicum 193.33 86.67 9.77 4.45 7.19 21.42
2 Barleria prionitis 133.33 66.67 8.33 3.22 6.94 18.49
3 Carissa spinarum 173.33 80.00 10.91 4.32 8.08 23.31
4 Cassia obtusifolia 133.33 73.33 10.00 3.32 6.78 20.10
5 lndigofera tinctoria 140.00 60.00 8.18 3.49 8.70 20.37
6 Echinops echinatus 140.00 73.33 10.00 3.49 7.12 20.61
7 Helicteres isora 173.33 66.67 9.09 4.32 9.70 23.11
Density
S. No. Shrub species F(%) RF RD RAB IVI
(t/ha)
8 Holarrhena antidysenterica 126.67 73.33 10.00 3.16 6.44 19.60
9 Lantana sp. 546.67 86.67 11.82 13.62 23.53 48.97
10 Sida acuta 220.00 66.67 9.09 5.48 12.31 26.88
11 Tephrosia purpurea 200.00 73.33 10.00 4.98 10.17 25.16
12 Zyziphus nummalaria 153.33 80.00 10.91 3.82 7.15 21.88
Fauna
Core Zone
Only 2 common species of birds were reported from the project site. While, No direct or indirect evidences of
mammals were reported from the core zone.
Buffer Zone
There is no evidence of presence of tiger, leopard, or other larger animals including specie of conservation
importance were encountered in area under study. It is observed that, biodiversity of the area is facing
considerable anthropogenic pressure especially in the open fringed areas of the forest where very little wildlife was
reported.
A total of 60 species were reported based on field observations and consultation with local people including 8
species of mammals, 47 species of birds and 3 species of lizards and 2 species of amphibians during the site visit. It
is further clarify that No ScheduleI species or endemic species were reported during site visit in buffer zone of 10
Km radius.
While other species mentioned in the list have been referred from working plan of South Sagar, Madhya Pradesh
Forest Division, 2009.
A faunal enlisting of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians with their scientific names, common names and the
schedule (as per Wildlife Protection Act, 1972) to which they belong arranged in alphabetical order and presented
inTable 3-37&Table 3-38.
Table 3-37: Faunal Groups (Mammals and Birds) present in Buffer Zone of Proposed site
S. No. Zoological Name Local/ English Name IWPA-1972 /
IUCN Category
MAMMALS
Antilopinae
1 Boselaphus tragocamelus* Blue bull III, LC
Canidae
2 Canis aureus Jackal II (PartI)
3 Cuon alpines alpinus Indian Wild dog II
4 Vulpes benglensis Indian fox II, LC
Cervidae
5 Axis axis Spotted deer III
6 Cervus unicolor Sambhar III
7 Muntiacus muntijac Indian Barking deer III
CIRCOPHTECIDAE
8 Macaca mulatta* Rhesus macaque II
Colobidae
9 Presbytia entellus* Common Langur II,LC
Erinaceidae
10 Hemiechinus collaris Collared Hedgehog IV
Felidae
11 Felis chaus Common Jungle cat II
Herpestidae
12 Herpestes edwardsi* Common Mongoose II (PartI)
Hyaenidae
13 Hyaena hyaena Striped hyaena III
Hystricidae
14 Hystrix indica Common Indian Porcupine IV,LC
Leporidae
15 Lepus nigricollis* Common Indian hare IV,LC
Muridae
15 Bandicota bengalensis* Indian Mole rat IV,LC
16 Golunda ellioti* The Indian bush rat IV,LC
17 Neosocia bandicota Bandicoot IV,LC
18 Rattus rattus rufescens* Commonhouse rat V, LC
Pteropodidae
19 Cynopterus sphinx Short nosed fruit bat IV
Sciuridae
20 Funambulus pennantii* Common five Striped Squirrel IV,LC
Suidae
21 Sus scrofa Indian wild Boar III, LC
Tupaiidae
22 Suncus murinus Muskshrew IV
BIRDS
Accipitridae
Agriculture Crops
The main agriculture crop in the study area is paddy, maize, jowar and wheat among cereals. Soyabean and Urad
among Pulses, while Rapeseed, Mustard and Ground nut among oil seed. Horticulture crops like Citrus, Papaya and
Guava along with vegetable crops like Potato, Onion, Tomato, Okra, Brinjal, Cauliflower, Chilli and Coriander. The
agriculture crops in study area are mainly categorized as Kharif and Rabi Crops. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is the
main Rabi crop and Soyabean is the main kharif crop within study area.
Medicinal Plants
Among reported floral species some of the plants are used for medicinal purposes includes Aegle marmelos,
Bombax ceiba, Emblica officinalis, Jatropha sp., Ocimum basilicum, Pongamia pinnata, Ricinus communis and
Solanum nigrum etc.
Social Forestry
Social Forestry Division of State Forest Department, Madhya Pradesh carried out plantation along the roadsides,
highways, village land and revenue land. The plant species mostly used in social forestry activities are Tectona
grandis, Emblica offcinalis, Terminalia Arjuna, Aegle marmelos, Butea monospermous, Diospyros melanoxylon,
Terminalia bellirica, Melia azadirchta, Mangifera indica, Albizia procera, Anthocephalus indicus and Cassia fistula etc.
No ScheduleI species were reported from the project study area of 10 km radius. However, some ScheduleI
species exists in the forest areas falling at the distance 1015 km from the project site (Working plan, South Sagar,
MP Forest Division, 2009). Also, none of the reported species can be designated as an endemic species.
Population Distribution
The statistics regarding the human population and the number of households in the study area as given in Table
3-39, indicates that there are 66 habitation/settlements/ villages within the study area of which Sidhguwan,
Nayakhera, Khiria Tajkhan and Kerbana settlements falls within 03 kms within close proximity of the study area.
Almost all the villages are coming under Sagar taluka. This information is gathered from the Census of India, 2011.
Table 3-39: List of Villages, Population and Households in the Study Area
‘ ‘ Indicates the household /population is not clearly mentioned under the name of habitation. It may be included in nearby of
the habitation.
According to the Census of India 2011, the above table shows that the study area consists of 32,921 households
and 1, 53,566 total population. The overall average household size of the study area is around 5 person per
household.
Sex Ratio
The above table depicts that the Sex ratio of the study area is 899 per thousand male. In the villages surrounding
the proposed project site i.e. 03 km aerial distance, it is 906 per thousand male.
Social Characteristics
The district of Sagar lies in the north central region of Madhya Pradesh. It was spelled as Saugor during the British
period. The district has a truly central location in the country. Sagar district is the eight largest district in size in the
State, and the largest in the Sagar revenue division. The district is divided into eleven tahsils, viz, Bina, Khurai,
Malthone Banda, Shahgarh, Rahatgarh, Sagar, Rehli, Garhakota, Deori and Kesli each in the charge of a Tahsildar.
The study area is falling in the Sagar Tehsil & Sagar District.
Vulnerable Groups
The statistics regarding the distribution of SC / ST in the study area are given inTable 3-41.
Table 3-41: Table showing SC/ST population distribution in the study area
2011
Distance % SC % ST
Total Male Female Total Male Female
03 Kms 18.85 52.53 47.47 3.04 53.92 46.08
3 5 Kms 24.35 53.21 46.79 1.69 56.14 43.86
5 7 Kms 32.59 52.90 47.10 3.10 52.94 47.06
7 10 Kms 26.89 53.19 46.81 6.69 53.00 47.00
Total 29.43 52.99 47.01 3.69 53.23 46.77
The SC population in the study area, as per the Primary Census Abstract 2011, is 29.43% and ST population is
3.69% of the total population in study area. The ratio SC male in comparison to female is around 53:47 and ST
Male ratio is also same.
Education Facilities
The statistics regarding to the educational facilities within the study area are given inTable 3-42
Table 3-42: No. of Villages having Educational Facilities in the Study Area
Government Private
Pre- Primary
Pre- Primary
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
Secondary
Primary
Primary
School
School
School
School
School
School
School
School
School
School
Middle
Middle
Senior
Senior
Distance
03 Kms 2 2 1 2 2
35 Kms 13 6 2 2 2 1
57 Kms 18 9 3 5 2
710 Kms 27 12 3 3 4 6 2 2
Total 60 29 6 5 9 14 6 2
According to Primary Census Abstract 2011, the study area has 60 primary schools, 29 Middle Schools, 6 secondary
schools and 5 senior secondary schools operated by Government authority. The study area has also 9 preprimary
schools, 14 primary schools, 6 middle schools and 2 secondary schools which is operated by private company. The
college and adult literacy centre is absent within the aerial distance of 10 kms of the proposed site.
Class Room of Primary School at Lidhora Hat Govt. Middle School Guda Village
Literacy Rate
The statistics regarding the Literacy Rate within the study area is given in Table 3-43.
2011
Distance % Literacy
Total Male Female
03 Kms 67.36 75.02 58.91
35 Kms 71.40 77.98 63.90
57 Kms 73.19 78.73 67.09
710 Kms 66.11 73.84 57.38
Total 71.05 77.33 64.06
The average literacy rate, according to Census 2011, within the study area is 71.05 percent of which male literacy
rate is 77.33 percent and female literacy is 64.06 percent.
There are Anganwadi in each village where nutrition for pregnant and nursing woman and childrens between the
age group of 3 months to 1 year and 6 months to 3 years are provided. The average number of children who go to
the Anganwadi ranges between 1315 numbers where the anganwadi workers teach them PT, poetry and about
cleanliness. There is no furniture or seating place provided for the children. They have to sit down in the open to
sky. Even in the govt. schools the children are sitting on the floor under one roof.
Health Facilities
The statistics regarding to the health facilities within the study area are given in theTable 3-44.
Table 3-44: No. of Villages having Health Facilities within the Study Area
Veterinary Hospital
Community Health
Non-Government
Primary Health
Welfare Centre
Family Welfare
Dispensary
Patient
Centre
Centre
Centre
Centre
Distance
03 Kms 1 1
35 Kms 2 2
57 Kms 1 1 1 1
7 10 Kms 5 2 1 2 3
Total - - 9 - 3 2 - 3 6
‘ ‘ Not Available
According to Primary Census Abstract 2011, there is no Community or Primary Health Centre but 9 primary health
subcentres and 2 Veterinary hospital in the study area. Private Doctors commonly pay visits to villages as and
when required by the people.
Table 3-45: No. of Villages having Drinking Water Facilities within the Study Area
Tap Water-Treated
Tank/Pond/Lake
Uncovered Well
Covered Well
River/Canal
Hand Pump
Tube Wells
Tap Water
Untreated
/Borehole
Others
Spring
Distance
03 Kms √ √ √ √ √ √ × √ √ ×
35 Kms × √ × √ √ √ × √ √ ×
57 Kms √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ×
7 10 Kms √ √ × √ √ √ √ √ √ ×
According to Primary Census Abstract, 2011, it is seen that the untreated tap water, Hand pumpfacilities and tube
well facilities is readily available in the study area. Even several household use the Panchayat tube well water for
domestic use.
Drinking Water Supply by Panchayat Storage Tank Dry Hand Pump at Gudda Village Primary School
Agriculture
The study area is rich for cultivation of Soyabean, Grams and Wheat. However, Masoor, Jowar, Maize, Eggplant,
Toor and Potato are also grown in some parts.
Animal Husbandry
Animal husbandry is the auxiliary occupation for the few households of the study area. They keeps bullock, cows,
buffaloes, goats and sheep.
Mining
Photographs 3-11: Mining Activities and Agricultural Practices in the Study Area
Industries/Factories
The Bina Oman Refinery is the main public sector industry in the region. There are no exportable products unit
available in the region. There is potential for setting up Oil expeller, Spices grinding, bakery products, footwear,
leather bags, plastic products , Bidi mfg., clay bricks mfg. , stone crusher, stone statue & toys, RCC pipes,
detergent soap/ powder, petrochemicals, packing materials Readymade Garment & embroidery, Solvant /oil pant,
leather products & flour mill etc.
Distance Total
Agricultural Household Marginal
Working Cultivators Others
Labour Workers Workers
Population
03 kms 40.51 17.70 29.96 7.66 28.89 15.79
35 kms 38.42 15.16 15.88 10.88 38.38 19.70
57 kms 36.22 10.84 11.51 16.28 47.47 13.90
710 kms 43.83 14.61 24.50 17.58 19.03 24.28
Total 38.47 12.79 16.38 15.39 37.87 17.56
According to the Census Data 2011, there are 12.79 percent cultivators, 16.38 percent agricultural labourers, 15.39
percent household workers and 17.56 percent marginal workers in the study area. The 37.87 percent of the people
fall in other workers category.
Employment Generation
Most of the people within the study area practice agriculture as a source of income. The agriculture is the main
occupation of the people of core zone. The main crops grown in the surrounding villages are wheat, gram, soya
bean etc. As the secondary job many of the youth are engaged in the industries of the industrial area on contract
basis or running the eatery shop at the junction of the village roads.
Infrastructure (Physical)
According to the Social expert field survey it is revealed that the village roads are pucca but not properly
maintained. At few places stagnant water pools are seen around the Harijanbasti. Here the roads are generally
covered by earth rather than bricks. Sanitation is poor and the residents are very careless about keeping the
environment clean and hygiene. Regarding sanitation, the people in the surrounding villages prefer to go for open
defecation to common wasteland or surrounding fields early in the morning to relieve themselves. It was common
to see that the children squatting on roadsides and in lanes, convert the village in one filthy open toilet. Even the
toilets of the government primary schools are in wear and tear condition and not in use since long because of non
supply of water. It can be said that the infrastructure of the villages still requires improvement.
Transportation Facility
03 kms √ √ × √ √
35 kms √ √ √ √ √
57 kms √ √ √ √ √
710 kms √ √ × √ √
The study area is well connected by roads and all the villages have bus services facilities that connect the area to
the nearby bigger villages and towns.
The electricity in study area is being provided by the state electricity board. Although there is no regular supply of
electricity in the rural areas according to villagers.
Means of Communication
The statistics regarding to the means of communication within the study area are given inTable 3-48.
Table 3-48: No. of Villages having Communication Facilities within the Study Area
Internet
Public Call Cafes /
Mobile Private
Post Sub Post Telephone Office Common
Distance Phone Courier
Office Office (landlines) /Mobile Service
Coverage Facility
(PCO) Centre
(CSC)
03 Kms √ × √ √ √ × ×
35 Kms √ √ √ × √ × ×
57 Kms √ × √ √ √ × ×
710 Kms √ × √ √ √ × ×
The internet and private courier facility is absent in the study are according to Primary Census Abstract, 2011. As
per above table it is reflected that Mobile Phone, Post Office and Landline telephone facilities is available in all the
villages of the study area.
Cultural Profile
Lifestyle
Although the people of the study area are poor but having strong social bonding.
Identify project activities that could have positive impact or negative adverse impact on environment of study
area or project affected area;
Predict and assess the environmental impacts of such activities;
Examine each environmental aspectimpact relationship in detail and identify its degree of significance;
Identify possible mitigation measures for these project activities and select the most appropriate mitigation
measure, based on the reduction in significance achieved and practicality in implementation;
In case impact are low or moderate and can be suitably managed by SOP’s / OCP’s, to minimize / control the
consequences, no specific management plans are prescribed;
If consequences are high / indicating Moderate, Major (or higher) impacts, then implementation of mitigation
measures requires specific management plan. These are prescribed
Key Definitions
Environmental Aspects
These are elements of an organization’s activities or products or services that can interact with the environment.
Environmental aspects could include activities that occur during normal, abnormal and emergency operations.
Environmental aspects selected for further study should be large enough for meaningful examination and small
enough to be easily understood.
Environmental Impacts
Environmental impacts are defined as any change to the environment, whether adverse or beneficial, wholly or
partially resulting from an organization’s environmental aspects.
Environmental Indices
The environment includes surroundings in which an organization operates such as air, water, land, natural
resources, flora, fauna, humans and their interrelation.
The environmental indices (or parts of the receiving environment on which impacts are being assessed) include:
Land use/land cover, air quality, noise quality, surface water environment, ground water environment, soil, ecology
and bio diversity, socio economics, occupational health, community health and safety
After the identification of impacting activities, impacts require to be assessed based on subjective / objective criteria
to assess the impacting activities. This is done in the following steps.
Identification of Impacts
1. Listing of environmental aspects (i.e. activities or parts thereof that can cause environmental impacts)
2. Identifying applicable components of the environment on which the environmental aspects can cause an
environmental impact
3. Making notes of the reason / possible interrelationships that lead to environmental impact creation
4. Listing the environmental components likely to receive impacts, along with the key impacting activities on each
component.
A component wise approach to environmental risk assessment and mitigation is now applied. For each
environmental component this is carried through a series of steps as follows.
Step 1: Review and Assessment of the Specific Aspects Generating Environmental Risk
Several scientific techniques and methodologies are also used to predict impacts on the environment. Mathematical
models are useful tools (where applicable) to quantitatively describe the cause and effect relationships between
sources of pollution and different components of environment. In cases where it is not possible to identify and
validate a model for a particular situation, predictions have been arrived based on logical reasoning / consultation /
extrapolation or overlay methods. In any case, for each component of the environment, the methods used to arrive
at the likely impacts require to be described.
Step 2: Quantifying the Environmental Risk, Identifying Aspects Causing Unacceptable Levels of Risk
and Prioritizing Aspects Requiring Mitigation Measures
Once a general understanding of the impacts has been studied and understood, efforts are made to compare
different impacts so as to prioritize mitigation measures, focusing on those impacting activities (i.e. aspects) that
require urgent mitigation. For ease of comparison across different activities, a summary environmental risk score is
calculated. Two key elements are taken into consideration based on standard environmental risk assessment
methodologies:
Severity / consequence: The resultant effect of an activity and its interaction with the physical, biological
and/or socioeconomic environments
Probability: The likelihood that an impact may occur due to the project activity/aspect
A combination of severity / consequence with probability gives a reasonable measure of environmental risk, which
aids in decision making. It must always be kept in mind that any scoring methodology howsoever welldefined is
subjective and different persons can arrive at different impact risk scores based on their understanding / opinion.
Therefore end results should be evaluated against past experience, professional judgment as well as project and
activity specific conditions to ensure adequacy and equity. Kadam has made an effort to ensure that the scoring
does not change significantly assuming that different evaluators are equally well informed on the project as well as
knowledgeable on the concerned issues. The steps in identifying environmental risk is as follows.
The consequences on various environmental receptors have been ranked into 5 levels ranging from insignificant to
catastrophic consequence and are given inTable 4-5.
Table 4-1: Overall Impact Scoring System due to Proposed Project – Consequence Assessment
Environmental Severity (Impact and Score8)
S
Component Insignificant Moderate Major Catastrophic
No. Minor (+/-) 2 points
Impacted (+/-) 1 point (+/-) 3 points (+/-) 4 points (+) 5 points
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7
Unacceptable environmental
Moderate environmental Significant environmental
Minor environmental impact* impact*** leading to
impact* leading to visual impact** leading to
1 Air Quality Temporary nuisance* with no lasting detrimental possibility of chronic / acute
impacts, at significant exceedance of limits specified
effects health issues, injuries or
nuisance levels in EP Rules
fatalities
Background Noise Levels, with respect to Applicable Limit9 as per The Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000, as Measured at
Boundary of Relevant Noise Generating Unit
<10% or more Between <10 to <5% Between <5% or the limit Upto 5% above the limit >5% above the limit
Incremental Noise Levels, as Predicted at Boundary of Relevant Noise Generating Unit
2 Ambient Noise
1 dB(A) or less 1 dB(A) – 2 dB(A) 2 dB(A) – 3 dB(A) 3 dB(A) – 4 dB(A) 4 dB(A) or more
Incremental Noise Levels, as Predicted at Boundary of Nearest Human Settlement / Sensitive Receptor from Boundary of Relevant Noise
Generating Unit
0.5 dB(A) or less 0.5 dB(A) – 1 dB(A) 1 dB(A) – 1.5 dB(A) 1.5 dB(A) – 2 dB(A) 2 dB(A) or more
Water Consumption (KLD)
< 50 51 – 100 101 – 250 250 – 500 501 and above
Water Consumption, Duration
3.1 Surface Water < 1 year 1 – 3 years 3 – 5 years 5 – 10 years 10 years or more
Wastewater Discharge Quality
Other discharge, outside
Discharge to an authorized, Other discharge within limits
No wastewater generation Zero Discharge10 limits specified by the EP
functional CETP specified by the EP Rules
Rules
Location of Drawl, as per CGWA / CGWB Regulations
3.2 Ground Water Safe Semicritical Critical Overexploited Notified
Water Drawl (KLD)
8In case none of the impacts are applicable, then Not Applicable (NA) is written in the appropriate cell.
10 Meaning that any wastewater generated is recycled and any nonrecycled water is disposed without discharge, through an appropriate means such as thermal destruction.
Duration
Very short term Short term Long term
Medium term (>3 5 years) Very long term (>10 years)
(upto 1 year) (>1 3 years) (> 510 years)
Land Use /
Landcover Extent (Area affected)
(Average Score Medium Range Long Range
4.2 to be taken Very Limited (Within core Limited Extensive
zone) >1 – 3.0 km around core (>3 – 7 km around core (>7.0 km around core zone)
based on (<1 km around core zone)
zone) zone)
Duration, Extent
and Intensity) Effect on land use/cover classes
Nonagricultural land, Land
Agricultural land, Open and
without scrub, Industrial area Scrub land Water body Forest Area
Close Vegetation
with scrub land
4.3 Solid Hazardous Type
11Source: Ministry of Housing Spatial Planning and the Environment, Netherlands; Soil Remediation Circular 2009, Annex A.
Site specific loss (removal) of Site specific loss (removal) of Site specific loss (removal) Site specific impact on Impact on threatened
common floral species (but some saplings of trees. of some common well threatened species but species listed in as a
not any tree or trees). Minor temporary impacts on grown tree / trees species. impacted species is widely endemic / ScheduleI as per
Vegetation composition does ecosystem functioning or Site specific loss of nesting / distributed outside the project IWPA 1972, BSI, Red Data
not form a habitat character habitat ecology of common / breeding habitat of common site. Short term impacts may Book, ZSI, BSI or literature
for any species of generalist species. / generalist species of flora lead to loss of abundance or published by any State
conservation significance. fauna but will not result in extent, but unlikely to cause Govt. Institute, University
Minor short term / long term
permanent loss of habitat. local population extinction. and Collage etc.
No short term or long term impacts on surrounding /
impacts are likely to immediate / adjacent habitats Short term or long term Site specific habitat loss of Loss of habitat of above
Ecology and fauna listed in IUCN, WCMC, said florafauna.
adversely affect the and are resilient to changes in impacts are likely to
5.1 Biodiversity: Birdlife International, or any
surrounding habitat / habitat structure or condition. adversely affect the Impact on genetic diversity
Terrestrial other international literature
ecosystem. Impact on surrounding agro surrounding habitat Impact on NP /PF /WLS
character/ habitat ecology/ secondary information. /ESZ /IBA / tiger reserve /
Site specific disturbance to ecosystem / agriculture when
common / generalist faunal environmental data / functioning of ecosystem. Impacts on habitats / elephant corridor / corridor.
species (e.g. movement parameters are within Impact on surrounding ecosystems of international Impact on ecosystem like
pattern, displacement etc.). permissible limits. agroecosystem / importance. river, forest, wetland (e.g.
No negative impacts on agriculture when physical RAMSAR site etc.) etc.
surrounding ecosystem parameters with marginal
functioning or habitat increase but can be
ecology. mitigated.
Damage to an extensive
Significant localized impacts
Minor impact on aquatic portion of aquatic
but without long term Significant widespread impact
Ecology and Occasional short term impact ecosystem, including flora, ecosystem resulting in
impact on aquatic on protected wildlife or
5.2 Biodiversity: and / or disruption to aquatic fauna and habitat. No severe impacts on aquatic
ecosystem and/or short aquatic ecosystem of
Aquatic flora and fauna significant impact on water population and habitats and
term impacts on water moderate duration
resources. or long term impact on
resources.
water resources.
Consequence Distance
Minor injury or health effects Major injury of health
Slight injury or health effects Affecting work performance, effects (including
permanent disability) Single fatality or permanent
(including first aid case and e.g. restriction to activities, or Multiple FatalitiesFrom an
Affecting work performance total disability from an
7.1 Risk to People medical treatment case). Not need to take a time off work to accident of occupational
in the longer term. e.g. accident or occupational
affecting work performance recover. Limited, reversible illness
prolonged absence from illness
or causing disability health effects e.g. skin
irritation, food poisoning work. Irreversible health
damage without loss of life,
After identifying the consequence severity as shown in Table 41, the probability of occurrence also needs to be
estimated to arrive at a complete picture of environmental impact risk. Table 4-2 pprovides probability / likelihood
ratings on a scale of 15. These ratings are used for estimating the likelihood of each occurrence.
The level of environmental impact risk is calculated by multiplying the consequence score and the probability of
occurrence together. Thus,
Table 43below assigns significance criteria, based on the scale of 125, used for prioritizing mitigation measures
for reducing the environmental impact risks and thereafter, formulating and implementing Environmental
Management Plans (EMPs). Mitigation measures require being formulated and implemented for all extreme, high
and moderate severe activities.
Environmental risks are now clubbed into five levels from extreme severe to negligible activities.
Extreme risk activities are unacceptable and therefore need to be either stopped or modified such that they are
brought to a lower level of environmental risk.
High and moderate risk activities, although acceptable, require being evaluated and mitigated in a manner that
their consequences / probabilities are lowered, with more focus on high risk activities visàvis moderate risk
activities.
Low risk activities do not require further mitigation unless escalation of risk is possible.
As discussed earlier, environmental impacts have been identified based on an assessment of environmental aspects
associated with the project. The symbol ‘●’ indicates a negative impact and ‘o’ indicates a beneficial (positive)
impact. Identified environmental impacts have been listed inTable 4-5.
The project activities will require acquiring of land for which land acquisition will be carried out directly with the
government since the entire area is government owned, based on agreed terms and conditions.
This will lead to change in landuse from scrub land to industrial (nonagricultural).
Excavation and paving of site to allow for the impact loads due to construction activities will lead to minor impacts
on land use.
During operational phase, soil property may get affected due to clearing of undergrowth for movement of trucks.
During the operation, domestic waste and sewage from labor camps may also cause land contamination.
The following mitigation measures are suggested to manage the anticipated environmental impacts:
Necessary efforts will be made during selection of site to minimize disruption of current land use to the extent
possible;
On completion of works (in phases), all temporary structures, surplus materials and wastes will be completely
removed below the surface;
Existing roads will be used wherever possible for movement of personnel as well as materials and machineries;
all transportation of hazardous materials will be done as per applicable laws and using drivers qualified to
transfer such materials safely and with suitable permits and training including spill control training.
Optimization of land requirement through proper site lay out design will be a basic criteria at the design phase;
Considering the above mitigation measures, the impact scores on land environment are likely to be as mentioned in
Table 4-6.
Table 4-6: Impact Scoring-Land Use
Impact Scoring
Impacting
Code Consequence, Probability, P Remarks
Activity Final Score C x P
C
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
Minor Impact
Preparation of
1 1 3 3 The change in land use/cover is from
Site
scrub land to the industrial use
Minor Impact
2 Excavation Work 1 2 2 generate debris and if not properly
managed could change the topography
of the site
Dismantling of
structures of the Negligible impact
3 1 1 1
project Change in Landuse
components
For the purpose of impact predictions on air environment, emission sources can be classified into point and area
sources. Whilst no area sources have been identified as part of the project, point sources have been identified and
these include stacks attached to various units.
Potential impacts on Air Environment / Nearby Ambient Air Quality are tabulated inTable 4-7.
N / AN / E
Impact Scoring
Significance
S Final Operation Controls / EMP
Project Activity Identified Aspect Legal Severity, Probability, /
No. Score, Mitigation Measures Required
S P Consequence
SxP
1 Pre-construction phase
Site
Barricading will be done wherever
1.1 cleaning/Preparation of Generation of dust N No 1 4 4 Low No
required.
Site
2 Construction Phase
Dust generation due to
Barricading will be done wherever
paving of site, Movement
2.1 Excavation work N No 1 5 5 Low required. Water sprinkling is No
of JCBs, other machinery,
carried out as and when required.
workers / labors etc
Barricading will be done wherever
2.2 Filling of foundation Dust generation N No 1 4 4 Low No
required.
Building of structures
Barricading will be done wherever
2.3 including temporary Dust generation N No 1 4 4 Low No
required.
structures
Vehicle movement due
PUC Certified vehicles will be used.
to transportation of
2.4 Dust generation N No 2 4 8 Moderate Traffic management will be No
construction materials
ensured.
and equipment
Heavy fabrication work
VOC’s emission due to Proper PPE will be provided to
2.5 including metal cutting N No 1 4 4 Low No
painting; workers.
(Gas cutting, welding)
Particulate emission due
to machinery and
Laying of underground
instrument operation, Properly certified, tested and
2.6 & above ground N No 1 4 4 Low No
Fumes and gases near calibrated equipment will be used.
pipeline
the work area due to
welding activities
VOC’s emission due to Properly certified, tested and
2.7 Coating, Painting N No 1 4 4 Low No
painting calibrated equipment will be used.
Final cleaning of site, Barricading will be done wherever
2.8 Dust generation N No 1 4 4 Low No
temporary structures required.
N / AN / E
Impact Scoring
Significance
S Final Operation Controls / EMP
Project Activity Identified Aspect Legal Severity, Probability, /
No. Score, Mitigation Measures Required
S P Consequence
SxP
Process Emissions of PM
Commissioning of AN No 3 2 6 Low SOP's, OCP, OEP will be made and No
& HCl
equipments like, followed. APC will be provided.
2.9 Flue gas Emissions of PM,
reactors, storage tanks, Firefighting and emergency
DG Set, boiler, etc. NOx, CO, unburnt fuel, AN No 3 2 6 Low response team will be at place. No
etc.
3 Operational & Maintenance Phase
PUC Certified vehicles will be used.
Transportation of Raw SPM Generation and
3.1 N No 3 5 15 High Traffic management will be Yes
material, Fuel, etc. Emission of HC & CO.
ensured.
Proper housekeeping will be
ensured. Regular work place
Handling & Storage of
3.2 Fugitive emissions of VOC N No 4 4 16 High monitoring will be done. Leakages Yes
Raw material, fuel, etc.
will be immediately attended. OCP
will be followed.
Bag Filter will be attached to Spin
Product Manufacturing Process Emissions of PM Flash Dryer and Alkali Scrubber
3.3 N Yes NR NR NR Significant Yes
& Operation of reactors & HCl will be attached to day tanks of
Aniline & MEA.
Suppression of air
3.7 Greenbelt development N No NR NR NR Positive No
pollutants
Mechanical Dust Collector and Bag
Operation of Boiler, Flue gas Emissions of PM,
Filter will be provided to control
3.9 Thermic Fluid Heater & NOx, CO, unburnt fuel, N Yes NR NR NR Significant Yes
PM. Adequate Stack height will be
DG Sets etc.
provided for proper dispersion.
As per the discussions with RSPL officials, following relevant data were collected to calculate emission rates of
relevant pollutants from point source due to proposed activities during operation phase:
Quantity of fuel;
Fuel analysis;
Stack details: Internal diameter at top, height*, exit gas velocity, temperature.
* Stack Height is calculated based on the sulphur content in coal, considering worst case, i.e. when all APCM fails.
Details of proposed stacks & APCM are given in Chapter 2, Table 2-23 &Table 2-24. Sulphur and Ash content in
HSD & Coal is tabulated in Table 4-8.
Table 4-8: Assumptions for Calculating Emission Estimate for Point Source
Sulphur Ash
S.
Fuel Type Content, Content, Source
No.
% %
1 HSD 0.25 0.01 Secondary Source: Bharat Petroleum
2 Coal 0.75 10.05 Proximate analysis as provided in Error! Reference source not found..
Emissions rates from proposed point sources (flue gas stacks & process stacks) are shown inTable 4-9.
From the proposed project, no area source emissions are envisaged, as the coal storage yard will be covered with
shed. Hence, modelling for the same is not carried out.
Emissions due to movement of additional 5 trucks on 6 meter width road (SH14) is envisaged. But, since these
road is a “pakka” road, dispersion modelling is not carried out.
* Not considered for dispersion modeling, as it will operate during emergency conditions as stand by.
Dispersion Modelling
Emissions from all the proposed stacks were analyzed for their impacts on the GLC for various distances using the
dispersion modelling guidelines of AERMOD, developed by the AERMIC (American Meteorological Society (AMS)/United
States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), as directed by CPCB.
About AERMOD
AMS/EPA Regulatory Model (AERMOD) is a steadystate plume model. It is designed to apply to source releases and
meteorological conditions that can be assumed to be steady over individual modelling periods (typically one hour or
less). AERMOD has been designed to handle the computation of pollutant impacts in both flat and complex terrain
within the same modelling framework.
The American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model Improvement Committee
(AERMIC) was formed to introduce stateoftheart modelling concepts into the EPA's air quality models. Through
AERMIC, a modelling system, AERMOD, was introduced that incorporated air dispersion based on planetary boundary
layer turbulence structure and scaling concepts, including treatment of both surface and elevated sources, and both
simple and complex terrain.
AERMET is an input data processor that is one of the regulatory components of the AERMOD modelling system. It
incorporates air dispersion based on planetary boundary layer turbulence structure and scaling concepts. Data flow in
AERMOD modelling system is shown in Figure 4-1.
Meteorological Parameters
The hourly meteorological data considered were wind speed, wind direction, ambient atmospheric temperature, cloud
cover, humidity & rainfall.
Other Assumptions
The dispersion modeling assumptions considered are as follows:
Results
Air dispersion modelling results with predicted GLC (Isopleths) from proposed activity of all parameters are provided in
Annexure 13. Maximum 24 hourly average GLC’s for PM10, SO2& NOx and hourly average GLC’s for HCl are tabulated
in Table 4-10.
The worst combined environmental situation is predicted as the sum of average baseline monitored value of a
parameter and the incremental GLC at the monitoring location. Incremental GLC’s due to the proposed activities /
emissions as tabulated in Table 4-11.
Conclusion
Comparing the incremental ground level concentrations of pollutants with the CPCB limits and allowable limits as per
factories act, it can be concluded that proposed activities are not expected to cause any effect on vegetation and
human settlements in the vicinity of the project site.
APC like Bag Filters, Scrubbers will be provided along with adequate heights;
Effective water spraying will be done on the access roads to control reentrained dust during dry season (if
required);
Proper operating procedures will be followed during startup and shutdown;
Proper PPE like dust masks will be provided to workers and its use ensured;
Regular Work place monitoring will be done.
During operation phase, vehicular emissions due to transportation of raw materials, finished goods and local travel of
employees are envisaged. Approximately additional 5 trucks per day shall be using the state highway connecting Site
with Sagar & Jabalpur, SH14 (Chanatoliya to Sidhguwan Road).
Average peak hourly traffic on this route is 395 and 431 PCU respectively;
From the proposed project, additional 2 PCU’s per hour will be added on SH14;
Thus, the maximum PCU on the road will be 397 (Chanatoliya to Sidhguwan) & 433 (Sidhguwan to Chanatoliya).
As per IRC, carrying capacity of this approach road is 1,200 PCU;
Thus, the road is capable of carrying the excess traffic from the proposed project. Summary of traffic survey (peak
hourly) are given in Table 4-12 & Table 4-13. Detailed Traffic Survey sheets are given in Annexure 12.
Mitigation measures
The trucks transporting raw materials and finished goods will be covered.
It will be assured that vehicles are PUC certified.
Adequate measures will be taken to avoid spillage or leak of raw material and drivers will be instructed to
control leakages and collection of spilled material.
Ensuring the availability of valid Pollution under Control Certificates (PUCC) for all vehicles used on site.
Traffic management plan shall be made and implemented
The proposed project related activities will lead to emission of noise that may have minor impact on the
surrounding communities in terms of minor increase in noise levels. The potential impacts on noise level may arise
out of the following:
During construction phase, operation of earth movers like crane, dumper, roller, bulldozers etc. will be used. The
machinery will be used during daytime and will emit noise within permissible limits. Thus, there will not be any
adverse impact on nearby habitation due to proposed activity.
Vehicle movement for transportation of materials and work force to the site will cause minor noise emission as the
frequency of vehicular movement is few times in a week.
Noise generated from DG Set, Boiler, Cooling tower, etc. will have a permanent effect to the workers working in the
nearby vicinity, if they will work for more hours in a day.
Impact Scoring
S Identified Significance/ Operation Controls/Mitigation EMP
Project Activity N/AN/E Legal Final
No. Aspect Consequence Probability Consequence Measures required
Score
C P
C×P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14
1 Pre-Construction Phase
Impact Scoring
S Identified Significance/ Operation Controls/Mitigation EMP
Project Activity N/AN/E Legal Final
No. Aspect Consequence Probability Consequence Measures required
Score
C P
C×P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C8 C9 C10 C11 C12 C13 C14
Project activities to be undertaken
Noise Moderately
3.2 Product Manufacturing N No 2 5 10 during regular working hours, No
Generation Severe
Erection of temporary barriers
Noise modeling study was done using the Software tool called “Sound Plan” which predicts the Noise Map
generated due to the sources present at the project site, and predicts the Noise Levels at various receiver points
due to the sources present at the project site.
To analyze the Noise Map of the project site, first, the geometrically coordinated Google Earth images of the Project
site were imported into the software. Various Sources of noise were added with their approximate Sound Pressure
Levels, and the “Receiver points” were added at various locations where Noise Monitoring was conducted.
“SoundPlan” generates the Noise Map with colored pattern isoplates, which indicate whether or not the SPL in that
particular region is above the limits mentioned by CPCB or not. If the Limit for Sound Pressure Level indicated by
CPCB for that particular area is 75 dB during the day, and if the predicted SPL is below that, the Noise Map will
show diffrent colour for that area. But if the SPL is above the “user set” allowable limit, the same will be shown in
different colour depending upon the Difference between then Predicted SPL and the Allowable SPL, and the
“Conflict” in SPL is mentioned in the table if any conflict is predicted.
The sources considered at the project site for the analysis with their approximate Sound Pressure Levels are
considered slightly on the higher side for more critical analysis. The sources of noise considered are asTable 4-15
Using above consideration the isopleths generated during daytime and nighttime are as given in Figure
4-2&Figure 4-3.
Observations
The sound pressure levels were predicted at different sources as mentioned above. The observations are:
The project site is located in a designated industrial area, where the CPCB limits defined for Noise Levels are 75 dB during the day and 70 dB during the night.
However, sound pressure levels are considered on higher side for more critical analysis.
Since the sources of noise are present within the project site, and the boundary wall of the project site being present, increase beyond 75 dB at the site was not
observed.
From Figure 4-2andFigure 4-3, it can be observed at project site, noise is predicted in the range of 44dB (A) 64 dB (A) which is within the permissible limit
for industrial area.
The incremental increase of noise level by 0.8 dB (A) is observed in the Chanatuliya is observed due to the vehicular traffic nearby.
The predicted noise levels along with the incremental increase in Noise levels are given in Table 4-16.
1 Nr. Main Gate Industrial 75.0 70.0 58.4 55.2 58.8 55.5 0.4 0.3
2 Nr. Boiler & Coal Storage Area Industrial 75.0 70.0 63.5 56.9 63.7 57.5 0.2 0.6
3 Nr. Boiler House No. 2 Industrial 75.0 70.0 63.2 56.9 63.4 57.7 0.2 0.8
4 Nr. Gate No. 2 Industrial 75.0 70.0 54.6 52.7 55.7 53.3 1.1 0.6
5 Chanatuliya Residential 55.0 45.0 57.6 51.9 58.4 52.1 0.8 0.2
6 Nr GLC Stack area Industrial 75.0 70.0 51.2 46.6 51.5 46.9 0.3 0.3
7 Kerwana Village Residential 55.0 45.0 50.6 45.6 50.7 45.9 0.1 0.3
8 Sidguwan Village Residential 55.0 45.0 55.6 44.2 55.7 44.2 0.1 0.0
Conclusion
From above, during the day time and night time only 0 to 0.8 dB increase are noticed in the Industrial area and
Residential area, which is negligible considering that the minimum increase noticeable by a human ear is 0.5 dB.
Mitigation Measures
Although there was no increase beyond the allowable limit predicted at any of the noise monitoring locations
outside the project site, the noise environment also includes the people who are working within the project site,
and who may face permanent hearing damage in case they face the Noise Dosage beyond the allowable level of
Noise. Therefore, it is important to implement the following mitigation in order to avoid any permanent hearing
damage to the people working inside the project site.
Impact Identification
RSPL will utilize 327 KLD water sourced from own borewell & from MPAKVN. While meeting the demand, study of
existing data and field data is studied besides the rules/orders issued by government authorities.
As per CGWA Guidelines Sagar district falls under Semi Critical Zone, so it is mandatory to recharge at least
50% of total quantity of groundwater withdrawal and a necessary approval from CGWA required for
groundwater abstraction if any.
Our site visit around the project and interaction with local people at village Kerbana on 4thJanuary, 2018
reveled that water levels are falling, at an average rate of 6 m/annum, due to depletion of groundwater. Earlier
Tubewells having depth of 100120 m are going defunct and hence trend is to go deeper upto 200m.The
discharge measured at various places ranges around 3 to 6 lps. Situation is heading towards Criticality
The study carried out by G S Thakur and T Thomas ,from the department of applied Geology Sagar, is
Published in JOURNAL GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA Vol.77, April 2011, pp.303308. The study reveals that
water level is falling in Sagar Block.
Mitigation Measures
Rain water harvesting will be carried out to recharge ground water and improve the ground water condition.
Based on the above discussion, the post mitigation impact score is presented inTable 4-17.
Final
Code Impacting Activity Probability, Remarks
Consequence, C Score
P
CxP
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
1 Construction Phase
LowImpact
Runoff generated from plant during
1.1 Excavation work 2 2 4
monsoon will be used for
rainwater recharging
Minor risk
Laying of underground Care will be taken during laying of
1.2 2 1 2
& aboveground pipeline pipeline to avoid ground water
contamination.
Commissioning of
equipments like, Low impact. Waste generated during
1.3 Compressors , storage 2 2 4 commissioning activities will be stored
tanks, DG Set, boiler, properly to avoid leakage
etc.
2 Operation Phase
Modearte Impact.
Minimum water will be used from
2.1 Product Manufacturing 2 4 8 borewell and rain water harvesting will
be carried out to recharge ground water
and to improve ground water condition.
High Risk (However, Sagar district is
categorized as SemiCritical area by
CGWA)
2.2 Usage of Water 3 4 12 Minimum water will be used from
borewell and rain water harvesting will
be carried out to recharge ground water
and to improve ground water condition.
Minor Impact
Storage and handling of Proper storage area will be proposed
2.3 2 1 2
Hazardous waste with impervious flooring to avoid
leakage of any waste.
Minor Impact
Spillage of diesel, oil, It is assumed that storage is having
2.4 2 1 2
lubes, etc. impervious foundation base and guard
around the structure to restrict flow
Impact identification
The main raw water source for the proposed project will be met from borewell as well as from MPAKVN. Total
water requirement will be 327 KLD after recycling of treated water. Due to huge quanity of water
consumption,natural resources will be depleted.
The plant will provide Zero Liquid Discharge facility by providing recycling RO & MEE. So no wastewater will be
discharged outside the project premises. Hence surface water quality will not get polluted due to proposed project
activities.
Mitigation Measures
To reduce the fresh water demand and conserve the natural resource, proper mitigation measures will be proposed
by RSPL.
Recycling RO will be installed after ETP and treated water will be reused in plant.
Condensate recovery from boiler which will reduce the overall fresh water demand.
Rain water harvesting will be carried out to recharge borewell and improve the ground water level.
Separate drainage will be provided for wastewater and storm water to avoid runoff contamination during rainy
season.
All chemical and fuel storage and handling areas will be provided with proper bunds to avoid runoff
contamination.
Impact Scoring
Code Impacting Activity Consequence, Final Score Basis of scoring
C Probability, P CxP
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
Moderate impact, to reduce the
fresh water demand, proper
mitigation measures will be
proposed at site. To reduce
overall water demand, recycling
2.3 Usage of Water 3 5 15 RO will be proposed at site.
Rain water harvesting will be
carried out to recharge borewell
and to improve ground water
level.
Low impact. Adequate storage
facility will be given to store
untreated effluent generation
due to abnormal operation if
Operation of ETP, RO & any.
2.4 2 3 6
MEE
Hazardous waste like ETP
sludge and MEE salts will be
disposed at approved TSDF
facility.
Low impact. Proper storage
area will be proposed with
impervious flooring to avoid
Storage and handling of
2.5 3 2 6 leakage of waste. Bunding will
Solid &Hazardous waste
be provided to avoid runoff
contamination due to any
leakage of waste.
Low impact. Proper collection
Spillage of diesel, oil, system will be in place to collect
2.6 2 2 4
lubes, etc. the leakage Oils and it will be
disposed as per SPCB norms.
Moderate impact as wastewater
will be treated in proposed ETP,
Operation of Boiler, RO and MEE and treated water
2.7 2 5 10
Cooling Tower will be completely reused in
plant premises which will reduce
the overall fresh water demand.
Low impact as proper storage
area will be provided to avoid
Storage, handling & leakage and spillage
2.8 transportation of final 2 2 4 problem.Care will be taken
Chemicals & Products duringtransportation of raw
materials and final product to
avoid any spillages.
Table 4-19: Impact Scoring for Solid & Hazardous Waste Management
Impact Scoring
S. No. Impacting Activity Remarks
Consequence, C Probability, P Final Score, C x P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
1 Construction Phase
Impact Scoring
S. No. Impacting Activity Remarks
Consequence, C Probability, P Final Score, C x P
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
Minor Impact as
Heavy fabrication temporary activity and
work including metal waste like scrap
1.1 1 2 2 generated will be sold to
cutting (Gas cutting,
welding) recyclers.
Proper storage area with impervious flooring will be provided for storage of hazardous waste. Bunds will be
proposed to control overflow of any spillage/leakage which can contaminate the runn off water and
surroundings.
All solid and hazardous waste with be handled with proper PPEs ensuring safety of the individuals working with
the solid and hazardous waste handling.
The wastes will be stored in drums and HDPE bags and further transferred at the Solid cum Hazardous storage
area.
Adequate storage area will be proposed to store hazardous waste considering rainy season as during monsoon
waste cannot be dumped.
All solid and hazardous waste will be disposed as per the conditions /rules given by the SPCB.
1 Pre-Construction Phase
Moderate impact on loss of
1.1 Site cleaning/Preparation of Site 3 3 9 soil due to erosion as soils
are hilly
2 Construction /Establishment Phase
Low impact. Top soil will be
used for filling of law lying
areas at site and
2.1 Excavation work 2 2 4
surroundings. Also top soil
will use for greenbelt
development.
Vehicle movement due to
Minor impact as temporary
2.2 transportation of construction 2 1 2
activity
materials and equipment
During excavation there may increase in soil erosion, level the soil by cutting & filling.
Spillage of construction materials may be taken care of to avoid soil contamination and deterioration on soil
quality as cement is highly alkaline
Spillage of oil, diesel etc. take care to avoid soil contamination.
If soil becomes saline/alkaline due to fall of construction materials, use of ETP waste water/municipal solid
waste etc.; use gypsum, organic manures and provide drainage for removal of excess salt.
As discussed earlier, environmental aspects and impacts have been identified based on an assessment of
environmental aspects associated with the project. Potential impacts on Ecology and Biodiversity are given inTable
4-21.
Impacts on the flora, fauna and habitats have assessed in the following table on the basis of multiplication of
consequence and probability scorings. Two major activities found to be impacting to the ecological components.
Final scores are obtained for impacting activities and they are tabulated below. Looking towards the likely impacts
mitigation measures as mentioned in below table will be implemented. Details regarding plantation scheme and
plant species have been described in the EMP section.
Table 4-21: Aspect – Impact Identification, Impact Scoring and Mitigation Measures
Likely Impact Scoring
Impacts on Impact Consequence -
S. Project Aspect Significance / Mitigation EMP
Ecology and Probability Description Legal Final
No. Description Severity, Probability, Consequence Measures Required
Biodiversity / Justification Score,
S P
(EB) SxP
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C9 C10 C11
1. Pre- Construction Phase
Site possesses common
Site specific floral species; clearing of Operation subject
loss of common same will not result in loss to periodic
floral diversity of flora in true sense. This monitoring /
will be site specific impact. surveillance.
Faunal species reported However,
from site are common / greenbelt /
Site specific generalist species which plantation will be
Site
loss of uses wide variety of developed in
1.1 cleaning/Preparation No 2 3 6 Less severe No
associated habitats of the local project site and in
of Site
faunal diversity environment so there is no periphery of the
threat of loss of faunal project boundary,
diversity. which will
Project site forms common improve floral
Site specific and faunal
habitat structure which is
loss of habitat / diversity of the
very common component
habitat project area.
of the buffer zone
diversity
habitats.
2. Construction /Establishment Phase
Operation subject
Handling & Storage of Impact on surrounding
Contamination to periodic
3.1 Raw material, fuel, vegetation and associated No 3 5 15 Very severe Yes
of nearby area monitoring /
etc. biodiversity.
surveillance.
Operation subject
to management
by operational
controls. Emission
levels of all
pollutants will be
Impact on surrounding kept within
Deposition of
3.3 Use of DG sets vegetation and associated No 3 4 12 Moderately severe permissible levels Yes
PM, SO2
biodiversity. through various
engineering
control measures.
However, green
belt development
with suitable
species will help
Operation subject
Storage, handling & Impact on surrounding
Contamination to periodic
3.4 transportation of final vegetation and associated No 3 5 15 Very severe Yes
of nearby area monitoring /
products biodiversity.
surveillance.
This includes,
Hazards Identification,
Selection of Potential Loss Scenarios,
Simulation of release source model, and
Plotting of contour maps
A detailed risk assessment and consequence analysis study is presented in chapter 7 i.e. Additional Studies of EIA
report.
On the basis of that study MLCs (as shown in Table 74) have been selected and studied. On the basis of the
outcomes of the study a detailed impact scoring was under taken and presented in Table 4-22, including the
following general safety measures and mitigation measures.
Table 4-22: Impact Scoring of Occupational Health, Community Health and Safety
Impact Scoring Safety Measures/
Code Impacting Activity Basis of Scoring
C P C×P Mitigation Measures
Leak C = 2 as flash
point is low and P Level indicator, earthing,
1 Aniline Catastrophic 2 2 4 = 2 as sufficient flame arrestor & visual
Rupture safety measures observation
provided
Leak C = 5 as highly
Level indicator, earthing,
Mono Ethanol toxic and P = 2 as
2 Catastrophic 5 2 10 flame arrestor & visual
Amine sufficient safety
Rupture observation
measures provided
Considering the various chemicals handled and stored at site; following safety measures will be provided at the site.
Requisite personnel protective equipment shall be provided. Instruction/Notice to wear the same will be
displayed. Further, it will be insisted to use the same while at work.
Provision of safety shower with eye washer.
MSDS of all hazardous chemicals will be available at office and with responsible persons.
Antidotes for all chemicals being used as per MSDS will be available at the site.
Regular training programme for safety awareness.
Provisions of First Aid Box and trained person in first aid.
Prohibition on eating, drinking or smoking at workarea.
Any leakage/spillage of liquid chemical shall be immediately attended.
Work area will be monitored to maintain work environment free from any dust/chemicalsfumes/vapours and to
keep well within below permissible limit.
Provision of adequate Fire Extinguishers at site and training will be imparted to the workers also.
Maintaining the FireProtection System adequately.
Availability of Self Breathing Apparatus at site.
Provisions of immediate accident/incident reporting and investigation.
Instructions on Emergency/Disaster will be displayed.
Safety Posters and slogans will be exhibited at conspicuous places.
Arrangement of Periodical Training to workers and supervisors.
Positive impact due to creation of temporary jobs and increase in indirect income. Likely impact score is presented
in Table 4-23.
Impact Scoring
Code Impacting Activity Final Score, Remarks
Consequence, C Probability, P
CxP
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6
Beneficial Impact
2.7 Final cleaning of site 1 2 2
Temporary job creation
3 Operational Phase
(Acyivity has Minor Benefits)
Transportation of Raw Employment generation will
3.1 1 4 4
Materials and Products be accompanied by minor
effect on existing roads.
(Acyivity has Minor Benefits)
Employment generation will
3.2 Product Manufacturing 1 4 4 be accompanied by minor
effect on existing socio
economic condition.
After on site field survey of the study area it was revealed that the proposed area for expansion of the M/s RSPL
Limited is located on Sidguan and Kerbana village limit boundary of Sagar district (MP) which falls in purview of
Madhya Pradesh Notified Industrial Area. The majority population of the core zone area are SC, ST and OBCs. The
village roads are pucca but not properly maintained. At few places stagnant water pools are seen around the
Harijanbasti. Here the roads are generally covered by earth rather than bricks. Sanitation is poor and the residents
are very careless about keeping the environment clean and hygiene. Regarding sanitation, the people in the
surrounding villages prefer to go for open defecation to common wasteland or surrounding fields early in the
morning to relieve themselves. It was common to see that the children squatting on roadsides and in lanes, convert
the village in one filthy open toilet. Even the toilets of the government primary schools are in wear and tear
condition and not in use since long because of nonsupply of water.
The agriculture is the main occupation of the people of core zone. The main crops grown in the surrounding villages
are wheat, gram, soya bean etc. They sell kharif and rabi crops to the Sagar local market. As the secondary job
many of the youth are engaged in the industries of the industrial area on contract basis or running the eatery shop
at the junction of the village roads. Animal husbandry is the other occupation for the few households of the study
area. They keeps bullock, cows, buffaloes, goats and sheep.
There is ample supply of water in the study area. Hand pump is also readily available for the villages. Even several
household use the panchyat tube well water for domestic use. Infrastructure of the villages still requires
improvement.
There are Anganwadi in each village where nutrition for bracing and lactating mothers and children between the
ages of 3 months to 1 year and 6 months to 3 years are provided. The average number of children who go to the
Anganwadi ranges between 1315 numbers where the anganwadi workers teach them PT, poetry and about
cleanliness. There is no furniture or seating place provided for the children. They have to sit down in the open hot
sun. Even in the govt. schools the children are sitting on the floor under one roof.
In few villages there is no active PHC or dispensary. There is no maternity centre in the village. The two Balmiki
traditional dais help during the child birth. Through the interaction with the villagers it revealed that the infant
mortality is high in the area.
Although the people of the study area are poor but social bonding is strong. There is no archeological sites in the
proximity of the core zone except Shiv Shakti Dham Temple which is religious place for Hindus.
During the public consultation carried out w.e.f 18/12/2017 to 23/12/2017 it is found that the local communities of
Nayakhera, Sidguwan, Guda, Kerbana, Mohlli were having complain that the youth for employment are hired from
outside state and local people are not given priority. The villagers apprecieated that earlier their crops were spoiled
due to effluent and gas discharged coming from existing RSPL site but now it is under control as they have
constructed ETP in their premises. Now there is air pollution due to mining activities being carried out in the
jurisdiction of Guda Village panchayat. During the primary social survey it is seen that the schools were not having
better infrastructure facilities as well as at few places iinternal village road were under wear and tear condition. At
few places the construction activities were in process under Pradhan Mantri Gramin Sadak Pariyojana. The
Sarpanch of Sidguwan Mr. Dasarath Aheerwal put the suggestion that RSPL company should increase the size of
Panchayat Overhead Water Tank under Company CSR Scheme becasuse all th migratory labour of RSPL are
residing in the village have put extra burden on the available drinking water facilities meant for the existing
population.
The project proponent should assist in bringing out the permanent solution for the regular supply of drinking water
in village or schools, either by increasing the capacity of Panchayat Overhead Storage Tank or supplying drinking
water through tanker at regular interval and improvement in the education of the children. For the upcoming of the
RSPL project the project proponent has to build better rapport at the community level through community
development programme. To mitigate the existing adverse impact on the socioeconomic environment the project
proponent will adopt the following given measures to get local people confidence so as to avoid any misconceptions
and conflicts.
Meeting will be arranged at regular interval with the community of the core zone by the project proponent to
avoid any conflict.
Project proponent to organize environmental awareness programme for improving the quality of life in the
surrounding areas.
Social Welfare Activities/Community Development programme will be conducted under CSR Scheme in co
ordination with the local administration, Village Panchayat, Block Development Office etc.
Proper land and crops compensation if applicable, will be given by the project proponent to avoid any conflict in
future.
The locally available workforce will be given priority in employment for the skilled and unskilled work in the
company.
To strengthen the socioeconomic conditions of the people of the surrounding areas the project proponent will
perform its roles & responsibilities towards the communities at regular interval. It is the commitment of the project
proponent that it will carry out different social activities under CSR Scheme in the fields of health, education,
infrastructure, skill enhancement or development program in the full block. According to “The Companies Act
2013”, the project proponent will invest at least 2% of their net profit for the cause of social development of the
area. The undermentioned activities will conducted at regular interval by the project proponent as a mitigation
measures for the adverse impact.
The project proponent will initiate to improve the sanitation, education and health quality of people under
company’s CSR Scheme.
Health Clinic, Immunizations and Free Eye Checkup camps will be organized twice a year for the surrounding
villages.
Drinking water facilities will be provided in the nearby villages.
The toilet facilities will be upgraded in all the schools of the core zone area.
School uniform will be provided for the BPL students studying in the nearby schools.
Sports competition will be organized in a year at the school level for all the institution coming under the study
area.
For the women empowerment in the surrounding areas, the cloth stitching, weaving, beauty parlor classes will
be organized at regular interval.
Awareness programs to the local people will be given at regular interval regarding potential risks and hazards
arising out of project activities.
Job oriented skill development courses will be organized through ITIs/Vocational Training institute like
electrician, motor winding, automobiles repair, driving, tailoring, welding and fabrication related other jobs.
The technology used in the existing OBA plant is tried, tested and successful. The same technology is proposed to
be used in the proposed unit.
6.1 Introduction
The regular monitoring of environmental parameters is of immense importance to assess the status of environment
during project operations. With the knowledge of baseline conditions, the monitoring programme will serve as an
indicator for any deterioration in environmental conditions due to operation of the project. This shall enable taking
up timely suitable mitigation steps. Monitoring is as important as that of control of pollution since the efficiency of
control measures can only be determined by monitoring.
The following EHS regulatory requirements are applicable to the activities being planned, and the checklist given in
Table 6-2 may be taken into consideration prior to actual commencement of operations. This checklist requires to
be reviewed at quarterly intervals
8 PROJECT BENEFITS
Environmental cost benefit analysis has not been recommended at the scoping stage, and has therefore not been
carried out.
Preliminary EMP is required to be in place prior to commencement of even preconstruction phase at the proposed
site to implement mitigation measures, as the adverse impact would start immediately upon commencement of
project activities. With the progress of construction activities, the EMP would also be revised in accordance with the
requirement of additional impact mitigation measures.
Before the plant startup, the EMP for operation phase will be prepared incorporating various environmental
management aspects and requirements relevant to the plant operating processes and its impact on the
environment. This EMP would also be revised in accordance with the requirement of additional impact mitigation
measures due to change in site conditions, natural calamities, unforeseen eventuality, etc.
The proposed EMP for construction and operation phase is described in the subsequent section.
Details of expected impact from various activities, and its management plan are given inTable 10-2.
Objective To reduce soil and land contamination due to hazardous waste storage and disposal
Concern Pollution to soil, land, groundwater and surface water
Benefit of EMP Surrounding environment will not be impacted by the proposed activity
Impacting Mitigation Measures Implementation and Management
Remarks
Activities and Rationale Location Timing Responsibility Monitoring Records
contamination in case of
any leakage of waste.
PPE’s shall be mandatory
wile handling the
hazardous waste during
loading & unloading of
wastes.
Benefit of EMP Noise environment of the area will not be impacted by the proposed activity
Implementation and Management
Impacting Mitigation Reporting
Data Measurement Emergency Procurement Remark
Activity Measures Frequency Location Schedule/
Analysis Methodology Procedure Schedule
Responsibility
C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C6 C7 C8 C11 C12
Vehicles trips
Vehicular
during daytime
movement for Vehicle Route for safe During
only fixing At material
transportation of movement Manual Daily Security officer exit will be in construction and
route by gate
materials and records place. operation phase
avoiding
equipment
populated area
Acoustic
Once during
Startup activities enclosures will Ear plugs/Ear
week (Hourly Regular
like operation of be used. Ear Plant in charge & muffs to be
reading for Maintenance During operation
equipment for all plugs and Ear Noise Levels SLM Inside plants Third worn by
24 hours at of equipment phase
the proposed muffs will be Party/Contractor workers at all
each to be done.
plants provided to times.
location)
workers
SOP’s will be
followed. Proper
Operation of Once during
Acoustic Periodic personal
other utilities like week (Hourly
enclosures will Plant in charge & Maintenance protective
Cooling Tower, reading for During operation
be provided. Noise Levels SLM All plants Third of all equipment to
Pumps, Blowers 24 hours at phase
Ear plugs and Party/Contractor equipment will be worn by
etc. & Equipment each
Ear muffs will be scheduled workers at all
maintenance location)
be provided to times.
workers
Green Belt design and development has been attributed a great importance and became an essential element of
planning policy. The main objective of the green belt is to provide a buffer / barrier between the sources of
pollution and the surrounding areas. The green belt helps to capture the fugitive emissions and attenuate the noise
apart from improving the aesthetics quality of the region. Greenbelt will be developed by using appropriate plant
species as suggested by CPCB guidelines to mitigate air pollution and to improve biodiversity status of the study
area.
Though the concentration of HF, HCl, NOx, SO2 and PM is found within permissible limits, dispersion modeling
shows that these gases have likely impact on ecology / ecosystem at NorthEast & South East directions.
Facts considered during selection of plant species for greenbelt development are:
Green belt will be developed in periphery of project location and in various ecosystems falling in the identified
impact zone. Plantation will be carried out as per CPCB guidelines (CPCB 2000)12
Likely impacts due to PM and other gaseous can be reduced by growing multi layers of vegetation cover around the
project boundary. So plantation will be carried out in the three layers by using combination of different plant
species. Total greenbelt area of 13,068 m2 (21 % of total plot area) i.e. 1.48 Ha, has been allotted for greenbelt
development within project boundary. Also around 4569 m2 (7.37 % of total plot area) i.e. 0.46 Ha, has been
developed for greenbelt development outside the plant boundary.
Considering 1500 trees per Ha, project area will have a total plantation of approximate 2910 trees shall be planted.
Existing greenbelt is already present within project site and approximately plantation of 789 trees is already planted
at site and around periphery. Remaining plantation of 2121 tree species will be carried out at site and surroundings.
Plant species suggested for Greenbelt and Landscaping at site are tabulated inTable 10-8.
All species are arranged in alphabetical order. Location of species in different layers followed by species names,
vernacular names/local names, height, type and sapling required is given in Table 10-8.
12
CPCB 2000. Guidelines for developing green belts, Programme Objective Series PROBES/75/19992000nCentral Pollution
Control Board, New Delhi, pp. 195.
Dust Controller (CPCB 2007)15, Environmental Adaptation (DR Drought resistance, SR Salinity resistance, FR Fire Resistance,
T Tolerant to Air Pollution).
Approximate plantation of 550 trees, shrubs and herbs at site has already been carried out. A details of existing
plantation at site is given in Table 10-9. Greenbelt plan for existing and proposed unit is given in
13
Saxena, V.S. 1991. Afforestation as a tool for environmental improvement. In: Executive development program on greening the
townships. Vaniki Prashikshan Sansthan, Jaipur. Pp 1344
14
Greenbelts for Pollution Control: Concepts, Design, Applications. 2000. Abbasi, S.A. and F.I. Khan. Discovery Publishing House,
New Delhi.
15
Phytoremediation of particulate matter from ambient environment through dust capturing plant species. Published 2007 by
Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment & Forests, Govt. of India in Delhi.
Sr. No. Name of Plant Inside the Plant Outside the Plant
12 Ashok 20 0
13 Aunkreshiya 5 5
14 Kuresiya 10 10
15 Maltaform 10 0
16 Salmaari 10 0
17 Kadam 5 0
18 Lemon 6 0
19 Khinne 2 0
20 Dudhi 2 2
21 Luhagal 2 1
22 Gudhal 25 0
23 MadhuKamani 10 0
24 Kachnar 40 15
25 Jamun 20 20
26 Chipu 13 0
27 Aanwala 6 0
28 Neem 20 20
29 Sweet Neem 5 0
30 Orange 10 0
31 Papeeta 10 0
32 Kathal 5 0
33 Champa 5 1
34 Sodar Morpanti 10 0
35 Seetafal 5 0
36 Kaner 10 0
37 Mahuaa 2 0
38 Bel 2 5
39 Bans 5 5
40 Banana 2 2
41 Kalpvrakchha 1 1
42 Beri 1 1
43 Peepal 5 5
44 Kanjee 5 10
45 Bargad 1 2
46 Chhewla 1 2
47 Ukeliptus 0 2
48 Tilipuaar 5 10
49 Kanak Champa 0 2
50 Supadhi 6 4
51 Vilayati imlee 0 5
Total 473 316
In addition to developing green belt, greenbelt need to be developed in the various areas i.e. agriculture hedges
and villages of identified impact zone. Plantation scheme with detail budget allocation for five years is represented
in Table 10-11.
Table 10-10: List of plant species to control Gas, Dust Emission and Noise Levels
Ecological
S. No Scientific Name Common Name Locations
performance
Greenbelt around the project site will be developed within five years simultaneously plantation in green belt,
agriculture areas and village areas will be carried out and continued up to five years. Detailed budget breakup is
given inTable 10-11.
plant)
Plantation Technique
Since the project area fall under semiarid condition and having poor soil quality, plantation of tree species
required approx. 1m3 pit for soil enrichment
Pit should be filled with imported soil with 3:1:1 the ratio of sand, silt and form yard manure
Procure well grown saplings of recommended species from the nearby Forest Department nursery
Make 1m diameter ring bund around the planted saplings for water retention
Watering of sapling is species specific, therefore watering need to be done once in 2 or 3 days for a period of
two years
Soil wok and weeding need to be done once in a two months
Monitoring Protocol
The plantations need to be managed by regular watering, soil enrichment work, applying manure, weeding and
provide proper protection.
Replacement of sapling (replanting) required whenever mortality occurs in the plantation during the growth
stage.
Plantation requires after care for a period of minimum five years till the saplings attain matured tree stage.
Any damage to the developed greenbelt due to any natural or cattle activity should be redeveloped and
maintained by the agency.
Project site encompasses common species of plants so clearing of these species will not have significant impact on
the floral diversity and associated faunal diversity at ecosystem level. Moreover, floral and faunal species reported
during this survey are common and generally found in many habitats in the project study area. So, it can be stated
that the proposed project and associated activities are unlikely to influence any floral and faunal components
significantly provided that the suggestions / recommendations in this report are implemented. Strict
implementations of EMP / mitigation measures are required to ensure that the biodiversity of the study area should
not impacted negatively.
Rainwater harvesting is a mechanism involved in collecting, storing and using rainwater which is most essential.
All the rain water from the terraces will be brought at ground level through vertical downtake pipes and
through surfaces and it will be collected in infiltration well
Rainwater harvesting scheme will design and provide a suitable stilt chamber to remove the pollutants such as
sand, leaves, weeds, etc. before the storm water is collect in infiltration Well.
All premonsoon and post monsoon steps will be taken to minimize the pollution of the collected storm water
There are various advantages of Rain Water recharging from which some of those are listed below:
Based on the long term IMD Data for Sagar District, calculations are done accordingly and shown in Table 10-12.
The total rain water harvested from the project area from the runoff generated inside the project premises is
46,600.07 m3/year.
As Rainwater availability calculations shows, maximum rainwater available for harvesting annually is 46,600.07 m3
By considering factor of average rainwater available per day, rainwater storage tank of volume 1000 m3 is
proposed.
These tank can be created below parking area, green belt and gardens, roads etc. and conveyed stored water
through filters before recharging through recahrge wells. Stored water can directly be used for domestic and
horticulture to reduce ground water abstraction.
10.7.2 Inferences
The RWH system design is based upon the criteria recommended by Central Ground Water Board.
Total area in the premises accounts for 50,500 m2. The land use type includes roof top area, paved area and
green belt / open area.
As this area falls under semicritical zone, hence as per CGWA guideline M/s RSPL have to recharge 50% of
yearly ground water usage.
As per Rain water harvesting calculation rainwater available for recharging groundwater is 46,600.07 m3/year.
Six recharge well with trench as RWH structure will be installed within the premises of the Unit. The RWH
structure has also been provided with the desiltation chamber.The tentative design of the RWH structure for
both is shown in Figure 10-1.
The diameter of bore and recharge well has been designed as 154 mm and 100 mm respectively.
A lid of iron mesh will be provided as a cover on RWH structure.
10.8.1 Noise
Noise will be regularly monitored plant boundary for checking compliance against environmental noise parameters
as per CPCB norms. It will also be monitored near noise generating equipment to ensure that all noise generating
equipment do not emit noise in excess of the statutory norms.
All workmen will be provided with required set of PPEs like ear plug, ear muff etc. where noise levels in excess of
80 db (A) are regularly generated.
Preventive maintenance of noise generating equipment shall be regularly carried out to ensure that noise levels are
minimized to the extent possible. To the extent feasible, equipment will be purchased considering noise generation
as one of the parameters.
10.8.2 Heat
The project does not envisage conditions that could lead to excess heating. Consequently, special requirements for
protection against heat stress are not anticipated. However, the following shall be carried out:
Drinking water availability shall be ensured at several locations within the plant to ensure workers have easy access
to the same.
In case of occasional handling of heated equipment or materials, suitable PPEs such as heat resistant gloves will be
used.
The possibility of suspended particles going into the body of the workmen, either in the form of inhalation,
ingestion or through skin absorption are least and negligible as because the entire operation at the plant will be
performed under closed loop condition, right from charging till discharging, hence it’s a rare possibility that the
workmen will come in direct contact with raw material or final goods.
At the same time the level of SPM and RPM will definitely be of least and nominal value. But even though the same
will be under closed monitoring and periodical surveillance as per EIA norms and applicable legislations and any
minor deviation from the same will be dealt immediately and will be corrected.
Further to this all of the workmen will be provided with complete set of appropriate PPEs, like nose musk / nose
respirator, gloves, helmet, protective uniform and clothing, eye protections etc.
As per policy and norms all of the workmen are put to medical examination and testing periodically and at set
interval and based on the medical report actions are taken, if at all anything is necessary and required. Even based
on the medical examination report/feedback, workmen are counseled and put in different area /job rotation kind of
activities. Following are the periodic testes conducted by RSPL.
Physical examination
Vision
Color vision
Audiometry
Chest Xray
ECG
Pulmonary function test
CBC
ESR
Blood Sugar
Creatinine
Uric acid
Blood urea nitrogen
SGOT, SGPT, Serum bilirubin
Serum cholesterol
Urine routine microscopic
TSH
10.8.5 Plan & Fund Allocation for Occupational Health & Safety
For all workers and for all employees in OBA plant RSPL are very much serious and cautious about their health and
safety because of gravity of the work.
For health and safety of the all plant workers, visitors; RSPL have planned to spend in following categories.
Table 10-13: Plan and Fund Allocation for Occupational Health & Safety
S.No. Category Quantity/Frequency Budget
Personal Protective Equipments
Chemical Suits, Safety Shoes, Chemical
1 respirators, Chemical gloves, Chemical goggles, 100 set 5 Lakh
Helmets, Mask, Safety Belt.etc
Plant safety Equipments
Chemical shower, Eye Washers, MSDS, First aid
boxes arrangements, RO water arrangement, SBA
2 set, Chemical spillage kit, Self breathing As per standard 5 Lakh
apparatus, Hydrometer, Temperature meter,
Luminous level,
Occupational Health Center development
Qualified doctor with medical attendant with all
01 Qualified doctor with
equipments i.e. stature, artificial respirators set,
3 medical attendant & 04 set 7 Lakh
PFT arrangement, BP, Pulse, blood sugar
equipments
measurement
Work zone monitoring
Quarterly work zone monitoring for PEL, LEL
4 analysis, Noise level, Humidity, LUX level, 02 times in a year 0.5 Lakh
temperature, dust level, air quality etc.
Process Plant safety
Process plant safety valves, Safety switches,
5 safety provisions testing, 01 times 0.5 Lakh
Fitness testing of plant operation equipments.
Pressure Vessel
Pressure vessels, tools & tackles testing of plant
6 Twice in a year 1 Lakh
miscellaneous equipments.
Health and fitness testing of all Workers
7 Health checkup and Fitness testing of all workers. Twice in a year 1 Lakh
Emergency Preparedness arrangements
Emergency controller team, Emergency walkway,
Emergency telephone, fire fighting arrangements,
As per On Site Emergency
First aid arrangements, Emergency lightings, 5 Lakh
8 Plan
Emergency control center, Assembly points, fire
fighting suits ,stature etc.
RSPL are very caring about health and disease of our workers. Company will develop a well equipped occupational
Health center within our plant and processing Health Checkup of our plant workers twice in a year in following
formats.
10.8.7 Details of Existing Occupational & Safety Chemical Hazards and Control Measures.
Details of existing occupational & safety hazards along with control measures is given in Table 10-14.
Table 10-14: Details of Occupational and Safety Hazards with Control Measures in Existing Unit
S. No. Chemical Name State Plant exposure Level status
1 Linear Alkyl Benzene Liquid Under permissible exposure level
2 Sulfur Powder Under permissible exposure level
3 Soda Ash Powder Under permissible exposure level
4 LABSA Liquid Under permissible exposure level
5 AOS Thick slurry Under permissible exposure level
6 Salt Powder Under permissible exposure level
7 Dolomite Powder Under permissible exposure level
8 OBA Powder Under permissible exposure level
9 Colour Powder Under permissible exposure level
10 Acosol liquid Under permissible exposure level
11 China clay Powder Under permissible exposure level
12 S.T.P.P. Powder. Under permissible exposure level
13 Sodium silicate Liquid Under permissible exposure level
14 Perfumes Liquid Under permissible exposure level
15 Caustic Lye 48% Liquid Under permissible exposure level
16 DASDA 96% Powder Under permissible exposure level
17 Cyanuric Chloride Powder Under permissible exposure level
18 Aniline Liquid Under permissible exposure level
19 Monoethanol Amine Liquid Under permissible exposure level
20 HIS liquid Liquid Under permissible exposure level
21 Perro flight Powder Under permissible exposure level
22 EDTA Powder Under permissible exposure level
For additional preparation RSPL will provide following equipments/control measures for more caution and safety of
plant workers.
Table 10-15: Additional Control Measures for Health & Safety of Workers
S. Area/Plant Description
No.
1 SFD Plant, Boiler, Thermic Fluid Heater Bag Filters
2 Reaction vessels Chemical Scrubber
3 Process & Flue Gas Stacks Proper Stack heights
4 Plant Operation/Manufacturing units Additional and related PPEs like, Appropriate Masks,
Chemical suits, Respirators, Chemical Showers, Chemical
boots, gloves etc for workers.
Previous years RSPL have completed medical examination of all workers and health conditions of all workers was
found satisfactory.
The total number of employees and workers involved in OBA plant is 120, out of which 65 workers directly handle
the chemical. We have conducted health check up of all the 65 workers and all are were found medically fit for
work. The health checkup details of few workers are given in Annexure 25.
The project proponent has earmarked nearly INR 1.45 Crores as Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC) in the break
up for the next 5 years for the development of the villages in the surrounding areas of the project site.
The project proponent shall expence ~ 2.5 % of the total project cost is on ESC as given in below table.
The activities has been identified under the following heads and budget has been allocated for the five years.
As per the result of social survey, utmost care will be taken for the overall development of the study area. The
above budget breakup is the tentative plan for investment which may vary from time to time depending upon the
priority of the CSR activity.The monitoring and evaluation of CSR activities shall be conducted by a reputed
institution/organization every year.
Total 56 555
The total estimated cost of project is INR 58.12 Crores. Approximate capital cost on environmental issue will be
INR 555 Lacs and recurring cost INR 56 Lacs/Annum.
The Plant Manager will be responsible for environmental issues at plant. The responsibilities of the various
members of the environment management cell are given inTable 10-18.
Overall responsibility for environmental management and decision making for all environmental
2. Works Manager
issues
3. Plant Manager Overall incharge of operation of environmental management facilities of respective sections.
Secondary responsibility for environmental management and decision making for all
4. Engineering Manager
environmental issues
The hierarchical system or administrative order of the company to deal with the environmental issues and for
ensuring compliances with the EC conditions is shown in Figure 10-3.
Historical Background
Late Dayal Das with his sons Shri Murli Dhar Ji and Shri Bimal Kumar ji initiated the group as a small family
business. It is said that knowledge and expertise comes from experience. It was their efforts and dedication that
laid the foundation on which the empire of “Ghari” group has been build up within a span of three decades.
RSPL Limited Company does the manufacturing and marketing of detergents, toilet soaps, wind energy and
other FMCG products.
Leayan Global Private Limited This Company is engaged in the manufacturing & marketing of Leather &
Leather Footwear.
Nimmi Build Tech Private Limited (formerly known as Poonam Developers & Infrastructure India Private
Limited) This company is involved in the business of construction and real estate.
Namaste India Foods Private Limited – This is the latest venture of the group into the dairy business. The
Company has set up number of milk collection centers at Shivrajpur, Kanpur for collection of milk from
villagers.
All the Companies are under the supervision and control of the single management thereby making its recognition
as the “GHARI GROUP”.
The proposed project is an expansion project. M/s. RSPL Limited intends to expand the optical brightener
manufacturing plant from present production of 3000 MT/Year to 8400 MT/Year in the existing manufacturing unit
located at Plot No. 42 to 59, Sector K, IIDC growth center, Village Sidhguwan, District Sagar, Madhya Pradesh.
Details of products along with production capacities are given in below table.
Quantity in MTPA
Sr.
Name of Product Proposed
No. Existing Total
Expansion
1 Detergent cake 19200 0 19200
2 Detergent powder 39600 0 39600
The proposed expansion project falls under Schedule 5 (f) namely “Synthetic Organic Chemical” requiring
Environmental Clearance from SEIAA, Bhopal as the project site is located within Notified Industrial Area. So it is
considered as B category project.
The project brings the following benefits to the Country and the Region that are both needed and beneficial to the
Country and the Region:
Direct employment for upto 150 persons and additional indirect employment to traders, vendors and other
suppliers of services and products
Taxes, revenues and royalties to the local administration, state and central governments
The total estimated cost of project is INR 58.12 Crores. Approximate capital cost on environmental issue will be
INR 555 Lacs and recurring cost INR 56 Lacs/Annum.
Total plot area for the project is 62,000 m2including proposed expansion area which is 18,000 m2. The total
greenbelt area will be 13,061m2 and road & open area will be about 21,696 m2.
The power requirement for the proposed facility will be met through Madhya Pradesh Paschim Kshetra Vidyut
Vitaran Company Ltd. (‘MPPKVVCL’). Total estimated electrical load required for the existing unit is 1305 KVA. After
proposed expansion the required power will be estimated about 2200 HP i.e. 2934 KW.
During the construction phase around 100 workers will be hired and during operation phase around 150 people will
be employed.
Sorce of water
The required fresh water will be met from own bore well and from Madhya Pradesh Audyogik Kendra Vikas Nigam
(MPAKVN).
Water Consumption
Existing fresh water demand is 143 KLD and proposed water demand will be 184 KLD including industrial and
domestic. So total fresh water requirement after the proposed expansion will be about 327 KLD after recycling of
treated water from RO & MEE. Total recycled water quantity will be 351 KLD.
Recycling RO will be installed in proposed expansion unit which will reduce the overall water demand and reduce
the total load on MEE.
Existing wastewater generation is 129 KLD (121 KLD Industrial + 8 KLD Domestic). Proposed wastewater
generation will be 228 KLD (220 KLD Industrial + 8 KLD Domestic). So after proposed expansion total wastewater
generation will be 357 KLD (341 KLD Industrial + 16 KLD Domestic).
Wastewater will be segregated at source based on pollution load and treated in ETP, RO & MEE. High COD stream
generated from process i.e. 278 KLD including scrubbing wastewater will be directly sent to MEE while low COD
streams generated from utilities, domestic and washing activities will be treated in ETP. The treated water from
from the ETP will be reused in gardening as per requirements and surplus will be sent to RO.
RO permeate will be reused in plant and RO reject water will be sent to MEE for further treatment. The condensate
from the MEE will also reuse in plant premises.
There is a zero liquid discharge facility. No wastewater will be disposed outside of plant premises.
The sludge generated from the ETP and MEE salts will be disposed at Madhya Pradesh Waste Management Project
(Ramky), TSDF facility for further treatment.
1. Existing ETP will be augmented from 40 KLD to 100 KLD. The proposed expansion of ETP will be designed
maintaining the existing flow scheme of treatment system.
2. Recycling UF and RO System will be installed of 30 KLD capacity for recycling and reuse the ETP outlet.
3. MEE System will be installed of 300 KLD capacity for OBA effluent. Total MEE capacity after proposed
expansion will be 410 KLD.
Point source emission from flue gas stacks are PM, SO2 and NOx and from process vents are PM, HCl, Aniline &
Ethanol Amine. APCM like adequate stack height, dust collector and bag filters will be provided for flue gas stacks.
For process stacks alkali scrubber and bag filters will be proposed.
Line source emissions (CO, HC & PM) is anticipated from vehicular movement at the project site.
Fugitive emissions from storage & handling of various hazardous chemicals used as either raw material or finished
product.
Hazardous waste like ETP Sludge, Spent acid, Used Oil and discarded Containers will be generated from the plant
operations which will be disposed in nearby landfill facility. The unit has membership of M/s. Madhya Pradesh
Waste Managemnt Project (Ramky), Pithampur for disposal of Hazardous Waste. Recyclable waste will be handed
over to authorized recyclers.
Baseline monitoring study and surveys of the study area has been carried out in post monsson season from 20th
October 2017 – 20th January 2018.
The study area is considered to be the area within 10 km radius from the project site.
Landuse within 10 km radius of the study area has been determined with the help of satellite imagery. The major
portion of the land in the study area is covered by Agriculture Land i.e. ~ 69% with another ~ 18 % of land
covered with vegetation. ~ 3 % of the land comes under the category of builtup land / habitation. ~ 7 % land
covered by wastelands, ~ 1% land covered by water Bodies, ~ 2 % land is forest area.
11.7.4 Climatology
The climatological data presented on the basis of information collected by the meteorological station set up at the
project site for a period of three months.
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring was conducted at Eight (8) locations within the study area in post monsoon season
2018. The frequency of monitoring was 24 hrs twice a week at each station spread over the entire season with
gaseous samples being changed six times (at 8hour intervals).
A comparison of results obtained during monitoring with the range indicators provided by CPCB indicates the
followings.
The comparison of the results wih the value range indicators provided by CPCB indicates:
At various locations, average concentration of PM10 was observed to be varying from 63 µg/m3 (at Nayakheda)
to 82 µg/m3(at Sidhguwan);
An average concentration of PM2.5 levels was observed to be in range of 22 to 31 µg/m3 which is well within
NAAQS by CPCB;
The average concentration of SO2 (7.2 – 8.0 µg/m3), NOx (11.2 – 12.8 µg/m3)are within permissible limits as
prescribed by CPCB;
HCl & VOC were found below detectable limit of 1.0 µg/m3 at all locations.
Traffic Survey was carried out on SH – 14 in S direction of the proposed site on 7thJanuary, 2018. It is a road
connecting site to Sagar & Jabalpur. Width of this road is 18 feet (~6 meters), which is a 2 Lane (Two Way) Sub
Arterial Road16.
Average peak hourly (i.e. morning 0800 hours to 1200 hours and evening 1600 hours to 2000 hours) traffic on this
route i.e. from Chanatoliya to Sidhguwan and from Sidhguwan to Chanatoliya is 395 and 431 PCU respectively
11.7.7 Noise
Noise readings were taken at Eight (8) different locations within the study area as presented in in below table.
16As per The Indian Road Congress Guideline for capacity of roads in urban Area. (IRC:1061990), Table2, Recommended
Design Service Volumes, page – 11.
Ground water samples were collected from Eight (8) different locations within the study area as shown below table.
Surface water samples were collected from four (4) different locations within the study area as shown in below
table.
The quality of Bewas River, Guda pond and Sidhguwan pond is matching with class C as per classification of
Inland Surface Water and it can be used for drinking Source after conventional treatment.
The quality of Bachlon pond is matching with class D as per classification of Inland Surface water. The DO is
very less at Bachlon pond and also BOD is slightly high which may be due to some anthropogenic sources like
washing and bathing etc. If there is no alternate source for potable water then it can be used for drinking
purpose with suitable treatment.
11.7.10 Soil
Soil samples were collected from Eight (8) different locations within the study area as shown in below table.
Flora
Core Zone
The core zone area is occupied with existing industry and green belt and expansion area is occupied with very few
shrubs and herbs. There is no tree species in expansion area at site. Overall 09 species of common flora including
04 shrubs, 04 herbs ans 01 grass were recorded from the core zone.
Buffer Zone
Total 228 plant species of flora were reported from the study area. Trees were dominant life form and reported
with maximum 91 species, followed by herbs with 62, shrubs 41 species while climbers with 15 species and 19
species of grasses and bamboos.
Fauna
Core Zone
Only 2 common species of birds were reported from the project site. While, No direct or indirect evidences of
mammals were reported from the core zone.
Buffer Zone
There is no evidence of presence of tiger, leopard, or other larger animals including specie of conservation
importance were encountered in area under study.
A total of 60 species were reported based on field observations and consultation with local people including 8
species of mammals, 47 species of birds and 3 species of lizards and 2 species of amphibians during the site visit. It
is further clarify that No ScheduleI species or endemic species were reported during site visit in buffer zone of 10
Km radius.
The project study area consists of 66villages /habitation falling in Sagar districtof which Sidhguwan, Nayakhera,
Khiria Tajkhan and Kerbana settlements falls within 03 kms within close proximity of the study area.
Impact Identification
Dispersion modeling (using “AERMOD” modelling software) was carried out for point sources which describes:
Maximum GLC’s for all parameters remain within 250 meters from the project site;
It is noted that the total predictive GLC including baseline concentration and incremental GLC due to the
proposed projectwill be within the permissible limits given by CPCB.
Air impact are not expected to cause any effect on vegetation and human settlements in the vicinity of the
project site.
Mitigation Measures
APC like Bag Filters, Scrubbers will be provided along with adequate heights;
Effective water spraying will be done on the access roads to control reentrained dust during dry season (if
required);
Proper operating procedures will be followed during startup and shutdown;
Proper PPE like dust masks will be provided to workers and its use ensured;
Regular Work place monitoring will be done.
11.8.2 Traffic
Impact Identification
Mitigation Measures
The trucks transporting raw materials and finished goods will be covered.
It will be assured that vehicles are PUC certified.
Adequate measures will be taken to avoid spillage or leak of raw material and drivers will be instructed to
control leakages and collection of spilled material.
Ensuring the availability of valid Pollution Under Control Certificates (PUCC) for all vehicles used on site.
Traffic management plan shall be made and implemented
Impact Identification
Generation of noise from the proposed project during operation will occur due to machinery, vehicle movement, DG
Set, boiler and pumps etc. However their effect will be localized and transient in nature and will principally affect
within the site premises.
Mitigation Measures
Acoustic Enclosures on all major equipment in the plant will have to be provided for noise attenuation
Workers should also be provided with suitable personal protective equipment (PPE) such as earmuffs and
earplugs.
Surface Water
Impact Identification
The main raw water source for the proposed project will be met from borewell as well as from MPAKVN. Total
water requirement will be 327 KLD after recycling of treated water. Due to use of surface water natural resources
will be depleted.
There is no wastewater discharge outside the plant premises. Hence impact on surface water quality will be
negligible.
Mitigation Measures
To reduce the fresh water demand and conserve the natural resource, proper mitigation measures will be proposed
by RSPL.
Recycling RO will be installed after ETP and treated water will be reused in plant.
Condensate recovery from boiler which will reduce the overall fresh water demand.
Separate drainage will be provided for wastewater and storm water to avoid runoff contamination during rainy
season.
All chemical and fuel storage and handling areas will be provided with proper bunds to avoid runoff
contamination.
Ground Water
Impact Identification
Resource depletion due to use of ground wateras the area falls under semi critical zone as per CGWA guideline.
Mitigation Measures
Rain water harvesting will be carried out to recharge underneath aquifer for improving the ground water condition.
Impact Identification
Soil contamination due to spillage of construction materials, spillage of oil, diesel etc.
During excavation there may increase in soil erosion.
Land contamination due to leakage of solid and hazardous waste.
Soil erosion due to excavation
Mitigation Measures
During excavation there may increase in soil erosion but by cutting and filling soil will be leveled.
Proper storage area with impervious flooring will be provided for storage of contruction materials and
hazardous waste to avoid soil and land contamination.
All solid and hazardous waste with be handled with proper PPEs ensuring safety of the individuals working with
the solid and hazardous waste handling.
The wastes will be stored in drums and HDPE bags and further transferred at the Solid cum Hazardous storage
area.
Adequate storage area will be proposed to store hazardous waste considering rainy season as during monsoon
waste cannot be dumped.
All solid and hazardous waste will be disposed as per the conditions /rules given by the SPCB.
As Though the concentrations of the emitted pollutants will be kept within permissible levels through the various
engineering controls, it is essential to have ecomanagement in the Likely Impact Zone (LIZ) for safeguard and
enhanced of ecological environment of the project area.
Impact Identification
Positive impact due to creation of temporary jobs and increase in indirect income.The plant does not have any
potential negative impact on the habitations.
Mitigation Measures
Health,
Hygiene,
Education Issue
Overall, the project would improve quality of life of the villages in the vicinity and also the surroundings.
The project proponent has earmarked INR 145 Lacs as Enterprise Social Commitment (ESC) for the next 5 years
which is 2.5 % of the cost of proposed project (Rs. 58.12 Crores) for the development of the villages in the
surrounding areas of the project site.
On the basis of the study of the chemical properties like flash point, phase of chemical, operating conditions and
total inventory etc following chemicals have been selected to carry out consequence analysis.
Aniline and Mono Ethanol Amine are considered as a hazardous chemicals based on their chemical properties.
Major failures selected for the analysis are 10 mm& 25mm leak as maximum credible scenario and catastrophic
rupture as worst case.
Mitigation Measures
Hand gloves of natural rubber, neoprene, and polyvinyl chloride will be used as and when required
Acoustic enclosures will be provided to DG sets and other noise generating equipment
RSPL will develop and implement a spill management plan to prevent risk of spill which may cause health
problem.
The Environment Management Plan (EMP) is prepared with a view to facilitate effective environmental management
of the project, in general and implementation of the mitigation measures in particular. The EMP provides a delivery
mechanism to address potential adverse impacts and to introduce standards of good practice to be adopted for all
project works. For each stage of the programme, the EMP lists all the requirements to ensure effective mitigation of
every potential biophysical and socioeconomic impact identified in the EIA. For each impact or operation, which
could otherwise give rise to impact, the following information is presented:
The parameters that shall be monitored to ensure effective implementation of the action;
The timing for implementation of the action to ensure that the objectives of mitigation are fully met.
Before the plant startup, the EMP for operation phase will be prepared incorporating various environmental
management aspects and requirements relevant to the plant operating processes and its impact on the
environment. This EMP would also be revised in accordance with the requirement of additional impact mitigation
measures due to change in site conditions, natural calamities, unforeseen eventuality, etc.
11.12Conclusion
It can be concluded from overall assessment of the impacts in terms of positive and negative effects on various
environmental components that the project activities will not have any significant adverse effect on the surrounding
environment. The following highlight emerges in the proposed project:
Project has various locational benefits like availability of raw water, power supply etc.
The project will add to the economic output of the study area in the form of additional taxes, jobs and other
ancillary activities Strict adherence to all the applicable regulatory requirements will be complied with;
Safety and environmental norms will be followed;
Recycle & Reuse scheme will be implemented to reduce water consumption;
Provision of air pollution control equipment, management of hazardous waste, will lead to minimum adverse
environmental impacts;
The project shall generate employment potential for skilled, semiskilled, unskilled people during construction &
operation phase.
12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS
12.1 Brief Resume and Nature of Consultancy Rendered by Kadam Environmental Consultants
Kadam Environmental Consultants (KEC) was established in 1981 and has more than 3 decades of varied
experience in the field of environment. The mission of company is providing sustainable solutions on “Environment
for Development”.
The company has a dedicated and experienced team of more than 200 technical staff. The team comprise of
Environmental Planners and Engineers, Chemical and Civil Engineers, Geologist, SocioEconomic Experts,
Microbiologists, Zoologists, Botanists and Industrial/Analytical Chemists. The company’s strength lies in Project
Management, Performing Risk Assessment, Formulating Environmental Disaster Plans, Use of Satellite Imagery in
Impact Assessment, Use of Mathematical Models for Air, Water and Soil Assessment and Expertise in Public
Consultation.
Consultancy services in the field of environmental impact assessment, environmental site assessment and due
diligence, Enviro legal services, statutory environmental audits/ statements, risk assessments and HAZOP,
energy audit, environmental health and safety management systems and waste management systems.
Engineering Services for collection and conveyance of liquid and solid wastes, designing and executing
effluent and sewage treatment plants, municipal solid waste studies and solid waste management systems, bio
gas plants, rain water harvesting systems and deep sea marine disposal systems.
Laboratory services in chemical and waste testing, microbiology, soil testing and Field sampling (we have
amongst the highest number of environmental field sampling equipment amongst environmental companies in
the country). The company has a wellequipped laboratory with modern instruments and experienced staff
catering to the need of statutory and advisory environmental testing for air, water and wastewater and
hazardous solid waste. Laboratory has received NABL Accreditation.
The group has a varied industrial clientele encompassing Indian and Multinational Companies covering the industrial
and services spectrum viz. Bulk Drugs and Pharmaceuticals, Paints, Chemicals, Oil and Gas, Real Estate, Hospitality
and Infrastructure sectors. Whilst the heart of our clientele encompasses the top 50/Blue Chip Indian companies (
Reliance Industries, ONGC, Infosys, ITC, ICICI, Indian Oil, GAIL, GSPC/GSPL, Sun Pharma, NTPC, Reliance
Energy/Reliance Power, Welspun and many others) who have placed implicit trust in us over the decades. We are
increasingly working with several multinationals (such as : ABB, Alstom , Areva , GM, Hindustan Lever, Honeywell,
Kohler, Sabic and Tyco amongst others) who value our deep rooted general domain and India centric functional
knowledge, reasonable costs and comparable services as those offered by our multinational competitors. Their
continued patronage is our biggest testimonial.
The Group has branch offices at Delhi and other places in Gujarat.
KEC has received ISO 9001:2008 certification for its Quality Management System.
The company is accredited EIA Consultant organization by NABET, Quality Council of India under EIA accreditation
scheme as per mandatory requirement of the MOEF, Govt. of India for carrying out Environmental Clearance
studies. It has approved EIA coordinators and Field Area Experts for undertaking Environmental and related studies
in eleven approved sectors.
Kadam’s laboratory is accredited with NABL and also gazetted by MoEF under EP Act.
ANNEXURES
Annexure 4: Toposheet of the project site with Demarcation of Nearest Habitation in 1: 50000 Scale
Annexure 6: Agreement Copy with Madhya Pradesh Waste Management Project (Ramky Group) for
Hazardous Waste Dispsoal
Annexure 7: Gazatte Notofication from MoEF for Recognition of Laboratory under Environmental
(Protection) Act, 1986
Application for Renewal of Recognition of Laboratory under Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986
Incremental Increase in GLC of PM10 (µg/m3) to Ambient Air PM10 Concentration from Proposed Units
Incremental Increase in GLC of SO2 (µg/m3) to Ambient Air SO2 Concentration from Proposed Units
Incremental Increase in GLC of NOx (µg/m3) to Ambient Air NOx Concentration from Proposed Units
Incremental Increase in GLC of HCl (µg/m3) to Ambient Air HCl Concentration from Proposed Units
Annexure 18: Undertaking by the Consultant – Kadam Environmental Consultants Regarding Compliance of
Prescribed TORs
Annexure 19: Undertacking for Company has not commenced any Construction Work in Proposed Site
Annexure 21: Declaration by Project Proponent Regarding Informations Given in Report are True
Annexure 23: Action Taken Report for Non Complied and Partly Complied Conditions of Existing EC
Environmentfor Development
CONTACT DETAILS
Vadodara (Head Office)
871/B/3, GIDC Makarpura, Vadodara, India – 390 010.
E: kadamenviro@kadamenviro.com; T:+912656131000
Delhi / NCR
Spaze IT Park, Unit No. 1124, 11th Floor, Tower B3, Sector 49, Near Omaxe
City Center Mall, Sohna Road, Gurgaon, India – 122 002
E: delhi@kadamenviro.com; T: 0124424 2430436