Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Poultrysci86 1372
Poultrysci86 1372
ABSTRACT In this study, broiler embryos were ex- crease in the CO2-incubated group, demonstrating that
posed during the second half of incubation [embryonic chicken embryos can tolerate high (4%) concentrations of
INTRODUCTION When turkey eggs were exposed to 0.3% CO2 during the
first 10 d of incubation, Gildersleeve and Boeschen (1983)
Carbon dioxide is an important gas in embryonic devel- found lower embryo mortality, lower malpositioning,
opment and the incubation of bird eggs. However, partial and higher hatchability. However, they found decreased
pressure of CO2 (pCO2) in the incubator higher than 1% hatchability when these eggs were exposed to CO2 only
is often considered to be deleterious (Owen, 1991). Several during the first 5 d of incubation. All these experiments
older studies contradict this statement and show that the revealed an increasing tolerance to CO2 with increasing
timing of high CO2 exposure and the level of CO2 play
embryonic age, although no recent studies exist on the
a crucial role in determining the tolerance of the embryo
tolerance threshold for CO2 during the second phase of
for CO2. In several studies, Taylor et al. (1956, 1971) and
Taylor and Kreutziger (1965, 1966, 1969) investigated the incubation. The physiological mechanisms behind this
CO2 threshold during several short periods of incubation time-dependent tolerance are not yet understood but are
of White Leghorn eggs. When eggs were exposed to CO2 hypothesized to be related to the increasing buffering
during the first 4 d of incubation, no decrease in hatchabil- capacity of the embryo with age against acidosis caused
ity was found until 1% CO2 (Taylor et al., 1956). When by high levels of dissolved CO2 (Taylor and Kreutziger,
hatching eggs were exposed to CO2 between d 9 and 12 1966). This was shown in an additional study by Everaert
of incubation, Taylor and Kreutziger (1966) observed a et al. (our unpublished data).
reduced hatchability in excess of 5% CO2. Hogg (1997) The objectives of this study were to determine the effect
found an increased hatchability of 2% when Ross Breeder of high CO2 levels during the second half of incubation
eggs were exposed to CO2 up to 1.5% on embryonic day in a modern commercial broiler line on embryonic devel-
(ED) 10. Results of De Smit et al. (2006) also showed opment, time to internal pipping (IP), external pipping
beneficial effects of a gradual increase of CO2 until ED10 (EP), and hatching. In addition, air cell gases, thyroid
(to 1.5%) on embryonic growth and hatching parameters. hormone, and corticosterone levels were measured be-
cause these are major players in the hatching process
(Visschedijk, 1968; Decuypere et al., 1983; Darras et al.,
©2007 Poultry Science Association Inc. 1996). Chicks were raised until d 7 to look for possible
Received December 21, 2006.
Accepted March 7, 2007. persistent effects of chronic CO2 exposure during incuba-
1
Corresponding author: nadia.everaert@biw.kuleuven.be tion on posthatch performance.
1372
TOLERANCE OF BROILER EMBRYOS TO HIGH CARBON DIOXIDE DURING INCUBATION 1373
MATERIALS AND METHODS hatching. The time interval between EP-IP, hatch-IP, and
hatch-EP was calculated. Hatched chicks were weighed.
Equipment Setup The hatching percentage was calculated as hatched chicks
to fertile eggs. Chicks were numbered and kept until d
Two experiments were conducted with fertile Cobb- 7. Chicks were weighed after hatching and on d 7 to
500 eggs from different flocks of 39-wk-olds for each ex- calculate their individual relative growth.
periment. During the first 9 d, 2 incubators (Pas Reform,
Zeddam, the Netherlands) were set at standard condi- Experiment 1
tions (37.8°C; wet bulb temperature of 29°C; turning of
90°/h). On d 10, the experimental group was placed in A total of 450 Cobb-500 eggs were put in an incubator
a closed incubator with CO2 input. The CO2 was pro- under standard conditions. On ED10, 300 eggs were trans-
grammed to rise gradually until 2% CO2 on ED11, and ferred to the closed incubator, where CO2 was gradually
to reach 4% by the 12th incubation day. This percentage increased to reach 4% CO2 by the 12th incubation day.
Experiment 1 Experiment 2
Embryo weight (g) Relative embryo weight (%) Embryo weight (g) Relative embryo weight (%)
Means between experimental groups differ (P < 0.05) per embryonic day.
a,b
1
CO2 group: on ED10, eggs were transferred to a closed incubator where CO2 was gradually increased to reach 4% CO2 by the 12th incubation
day. This 4% CO2 was continued until ED18. Control group: a continued normal incubation.
2
Wet embryo weight (g) and relative embryo weight (%): (wet embryo weight/initial egg weight) × 100.
All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. Variances of (relative) embryo weight, air cell pCO2, and pO2:pCO2 (P
hatching time were compared with the Levene test. A < 0.05). Absolute embryo weight differed between the 2
logistic regression model was developed to analyze the groups on ED13 and ED18, being significantly higher in
hatching percentage. The incubation treatment (normal the control group (Table 1). A higher relative embryo
incubation vs. CO2 incubation) served as a categorical weight of the control group compared with the CO2 group
explanatory variable in the model. was seen on ED18. The pCO2 in the air cell was signifi-
cantly higher in the CO2-incubated eggs compared with
RESULTS the control eggs from ED11 until ED14. A lower pO2 in
the air cell of the CO2 group was observed only on ED12
Incubation Conditions and ED13. The ratio of pO2:pCO2 was significantly differ-
ent from ED11 until ED14, with a higher ratio in the
The mean egg weight of all eggs was 65.02 ± 0.13 g in control group (Figure 2, panel A). In the second experi-
the first experiment, and 68.01 ± 0.15 g in the second ment, none of the measured parameters showed a signifi-
experiment. Between the 10th and 18th incubation day, cant incubation treatment effect.
the O2 concentration decreased in the CO2 incubator but
did not fall below 19.7% O2. Because humidity was Hatching Parameters
matched, relative egg weight loss increased with embry-
onic age in both groups in both experiments in a similar
and Posthatch Growth
way. In the first experiment, mean relative egg weight Table 2 shows the results of the hatching parameters,
loss at ED18 was 8.07 ± 0.096% (n = 113) and 7.70 ± 0.067% chick weight at d 7, relative growth, and hatchability of
(n = 246) for the control and CO2 group, respectively, and the chicks of both experiments. In the first experiment,
was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). In the second the hatching percentage was 95 and 96% for the control
experiment, the relative egg weight loss at ED18 between and CO2 group, respectively (not significantly different;
the 2 groups did not differ and was 7.57 ± 0.076% (n = Table 2). The times of IP, EP, and hatching were signifi-
221) and 7.72 ± 0.083% (n = 211) of the control group and cantly advanced in the CO2 group compared with the
the CO2 group, respectively. control group. Time intervals (EP-IP, hatch-EP, hatch-IP)
did not differ between the groups. The Levene test
Egg Weight Loss, (Relative) Embryo showed no difference in the variance of the hatching time,
Weight, and Partial Pressure which is a measure for spread of hatching. Chick weight
of Gases in the Air Cell at hatching and on d 7, and relative growth from hatching
until d 7 did not differ between groups.
In both experiments, a significant increase in (relative) In the second experiment, the hatching percentage was
embryo weight was seen with increasing development 89% in the control group and 87% in the CO2 group, which
(Table 1). The air cell pCO2 increased significantly, were not significantly different. There was no difference
whereas the pO2 decreased significantly with embryonic between the 2 groups in time of onset of IP, EP, and
age in both groups in both experiments (Figure 1, panel hatching, or in duration of time from IP until EP (Table
A: experiment 1; Figure 1, panel B: experiment 2). 2). However, the interval between hatch-IP and hatch-EP
In the first experiment, there was a significant overall was significantly shorter in the CO2 group (P-value of
effect of incubation treatment over incubation time for 0.0007 and 0.0071, respectively). Variances of hatching
TOLERANCE OF BROILER EMBRYOS TO HIGH CARBON DIOXIDE DURING INCUBATION 1375
Hormone Levels
on that day. At EP, hatching, and d 7, corticosterone levels
Figure 3 shows the corticosterone concentrations of tended to be higher in the CO2 chicks, and were significant
both groups of the second experiment per embryonic day at d 7. For T4, there were significant age (P < 0.0001),
from ED14, at IP, EP and hatching and on d 7 of the group, (P = 0.0462), and interaction effects (P = 0.0273;
chick’s life. There was no general age effect (P = 0.1247), Figure 4). In both groups, T4 levels decreased from IP
but there was a significant effect of incubation treatment until d 7. However, this decrease was more gradual in
(0.0021; significant interaction age × treatment; P = the CO2 group, resulting in a significant higher T4 at d 7
0.0041). In the control group, the corticosterone increased compared with the control group. There was no effect of
from ED14 onward to reach a first maximum level at age or treatment, and no interaction for levels of T3 from
ED16 (17.11 ± 1.31 ng/mL). Thereafter, the level decreased IP until d 7 (Figure 5).
but reached a second peak of 15 ng/mL at ED18, and
declined again to levels of approximately 7 to 8 ng/mL DISCUSSION
at IP. In the CO2 group, a similar but more smoothed
age-related pattern was observed without a peak at ED16, The most striking observation of this study was the
resulting in a significant higher level in the control group remarkable embryonic tolerance for CO2 in the incuba-
1376 EVERAERT ET AL.
Table 2. Hatching parameters of the first and second experiment for both groups1: time (h) of internal pipping
(IP), external pipping (EP), and hatching; chick weight at hatching (g); duration (h) of IP (EP-IP), duration of
EP (hatch-EP), duration of hatching (hatch-IP); chick weight on d 7 (g); relative growth after 1 wk2 (%); and
hatchability (%)3
Experiment 1 Experiment 2
Item Control CO2 Control CO2
tor—up to 4% between ED10 and ED18 by the embryos embryos of a layer type line to hypercapnia. In these
of a modern commercial broiler line. This was supported studies, we demonstrated that a progressive increase in
by the normal embryonic growth and hatching of these tolerance to higher levels of CO2 occurs in the chicken
CO2-incubated embryos. Moreover, there was no signifi- embryo toward the end of d 16 of incubation.
cantly higher embryonic mortality, thereby confirming Based on the research of Taylor and Kreutziger (1966),
the conclusions of Taylor and Kreutziger (1966, 1969) for a we can assume that the small decrease in O2 concentration
modern broiler line; there was a high resistance of chicken to reach 19.7%, as observed in our experiment, most prob-
ably did not have an effect on embryonic development.
When changing the oxygen percentage between 15 and
50% O2 in the incubator between d 9 and 12, normal
hatchabilities were found. Moreover, synergistic effects
were obtained when either high or low O2 levels were
combined with high CO2 (Taylor and Kreutziger, 1966).
Moreover, relative egg weight losses between d 11 and
18 were not different (experiment 1), or were very small
(0.3% on ED18; experiment 2), between the control and
CO2 groups. Thus, the observed differences between the
control and CO2 groups for a number of parameters can
most likely be ascribed to CO2 differences alone and not
differences in O2 or humidity in the incubator.
During embryonic development, the pO2 in the air cell
decreases and the pCO2 increases because of the increased
O2 consumption and CO2 production, together with a
limitation in the diffusion of these gases through the egg-
shell. The course of the pO2 and pCO2 in the air cell has
been described by Romijn and Roos (1938) and Tazawa
et al. (1980). Our results during normal development are
in agreement with these findings, hence resulting in a
decreased ratio of pO2:pCO2 as development progresses.
The exchange of both gases increases until the maximum
exchange rate through the porous eggshell is achieved.
Figure 3. Concentration of plasma corticosterone (ng/mL) from em- Thereafter, the ratio remains unchanged (called the pla-
bryos on embryonic day (ED) 14 until ED18, at internal pipping (IP),
external pipping (EP), and hatching, and from chicks on d 7 from the teau phase; Bamelis, 2003), and was reached at ED16. A
CO2-incubated group and control group (experiment 2). CO2 in the significant increase of pCO2 in the air cell (experiment 1)
incubator increased gradually from ED10 to reach 4% at ED12. This was seen during the first days of exposure to high CO2,
level was continued until ED18. Solid bars: CO2 group; hatched bars:
control group; asterisk: means between experimental groups differ (P but it disappeared thereafter. At this stage of develop-
< 0.05) per embryonic day. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM. ment, the embryo itself produces a considerable amount
TOLERANCE OF BROILER EMBRYOS TO HIGH CARBON DIOXIDE DURING INCUBATION 1377
group between the 2 experiments from ED11 until ED14. nation in pre- and post-hatching chickens. Horm. Metab. Res.
Another reason for the difference in partial pressure of 15:233–236.
Decuypere, E., K. Tona, V. Bruggeman, and F. Bamelis. 2001.
O2 and CO2 between the 2 experiments could be due to The day-old chick: A crucial hinge between breeders and
the different eggshell permeabilities between the 2 flocks broilers. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 57:127–138.
(experiments 1 and 2). Chick weight at hatching was De Smit, L., V. Bruggeman, J. K. Tona, M. Debonne, O. Onagbe-
higher in the second experiment, as was egg weight at san, L. Arckens, J. De Baerdemaeker, and E. Decuypere. 2006.
the start of incubation. Because there is a strong positive Embryonic developmental plasticity of the chick: Increased
CO2 during early stages of incubation changes the develop-
correlation between egg weight and chick weight (Suarez mental trajectories during prenatal and postnatal growth.
et al., 1997), the difference in egg weight explains the Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 145:166–175.
chick weight difference. Because both groups in the first Dewil, E., N. Buys, G. A. A. Albers, and E. Decuypere. 1996.
experiment hatched early, we considered ED20 as d 0 of Different characteristics in chick embryos of two broiler lines
the chick’s life. In the second experiment, ED21 was d 0 differing in susceptibility to ascites. Br. Poult. Sci. 37:1003–
1013.
for the hatched chick. This means that d 7 was about 1