Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal

Interpretive Sociology and Management Accounting Research — A Critical Review

Wai Fong Chua,
Article information:
To cite this document:
Wai Fong Chua, (1988) "Interpretive Sociology and Management Accounting Research — A Critical Review", Accounting,
Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 1 Issue: 2, pp.59-79, doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000004624
Permanent link to this document:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000004624
Downloaded on: 26 May 2017, At: 19:40 (PT)
References: this document contains references to 0 other documents.
To copy this document: permissions@emeraldinsight.com
The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 3175 times since 2006*
Users who downloaded this article also downloaded:
(1992),"Field Research in Management Accounting and Control: A Review and Evaluation", Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal, Vol. 5 Iss 4 pp. - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513579210019503
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)

(1989),"The Sociopolitical Paradigm in Financial Accounting Research", Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Vol. 2 Iss 1 pp. - http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513578910134671

Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:600462 []
For Authors
If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service
information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit
www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.
About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com
Emerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of
more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online
products and additional customer resources and services.
Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.

*Related content and download information correct at time of download.

Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)
 This article has been cited by:

1. Andrea Whittle, Frank Mueller, Chris Carter. 2016. The ‘Big Four’ in the spotlight: Accountability and professional legitimacy
in the UK audit market: Table 1. Journal of Professions and Organization 3:2, 119-141. [CrossRef]
2. Mia Kaspersen, Thomas Riise Johansen. 2016. Changing Social and Environmental Reporting Systems. Journal of Business
Ethics 135:4, 731-749. [CrossRef]
3. Bill DoolinInformation Technology as Disciplinary Technology: Being Critical in Interpretive Research on Information
Systems 19-39. [CrossRef]
4. Abeid Francis Gaspar Department of Accounting and Finance, Institute of Finance Management (IFM), Dar es Salaam,
Tanzania Tausi Ally Mkasiwa Department of Accounting and Finance, Institute of Finance Management (IFM), Dar es
Salaam, Tanzania . 2015. Managing performance or legitimacy? A case study of the Tanzanian Local Government Authorities.
Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 5:4, 424-456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
5. Syarifuddin. 2015. The Dramaturgy of Politics and Power in Determining Budget Problem in District Jembrana, Bali. Procedia
- Social and Behavioral Sciences 211, 375-382. [CrossRef]
6. Latifa Mbelwa Factors Influencing the Use of Accounting Information in Tanzanian Local Government Authorities (LGAs):
An Institutional Theory Approach 143-177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]
7. Gillian Maree Vesty School of Accounting , RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia Abby Telgenkamp Department of
Accounting , University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Philip J Roscoe Management department, University of
St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Scotland . 2015. Creating numbers: carbon and capital investment. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal 28:3, 302-324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)

8. Gloria Agyemang, Cheryl R. Lehman. 2013. Adding critical accounting voices to migration studies. Critical Perspectives on
Accounting 24:4-5, 261-272. [CrossRef]
9. Robin Roslender. 2013. Stuck in the middle with who? (Belatedly) engaging with Laughlin while becoming re-acquainted
with Merton and middle range theorising. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 24:3, 228-241. [CrossRef]
10. Sonja Gallhofer, Jim Haslam, Akira Yonekura. 2013. Further critical reflections on a contribution to the methodological issues
debate in accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 24:3, 191-206. [CrossRef]
11. Ranjani Krishnan, Jamshed J. Mistry, V. G. Narayanan. 2012. A Field Study on the Acceptance and Use of a New Accounting
System. Journal of Management Accounting Research 24:1, 103-133. [CrossRef]
12. Garry D. CarnegieCheryl LehmanDepartment of Accounting, Taxation and Legal Studies in Business, Hofstra University,
Hempstead, New York, USA. 2012. We've come a long way! Maybe! Re‐imagining gender and accounting. Accounting, Auditing
& Accountability Journal 25:2, 256-294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
13. Lee D. Parker. 2012. Qualitative management accounting research: Assessing deliverables and relevance. Critical Perspectives
on Accounting 23:1, 54-70. [CrossRef]
14. Robert H. Chenhall, David Smith. 2011. A review of Australian management accounting research: 1980-2009. Accounting
& Finance 51:1, 173-206. [CrossRef]
15. C. Richard Baker and Eve ChiapelloBertrand MalschFaculté des sciences de l'administration, Université Laval, Québec
City, Canada Yves GendronFaculté des sciences de l'administration, Université Laval, Québec City, Canada Frédérique
GrazziniUniversité Pierre Mendès France, CERAG (UMR 5820 CNRS‐UPMF), Grenoble, France. 2011. Investigating
interdisciplinary translations. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 24:2, 194-228. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
16. Junaid Ashraf, Shahzad UddinReview of Management Control hange Research with Special Reference to the Public Sector
and Less Developed Countries: A Critical Evaluation 415-449. [CrossRef]
17. Glen Lehman. 2010. Interpretive accounting research. Accounting Forum 34:3-4, 231-235. [CrossRef]
18. Mussa J. AssadUniversity of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Andrew R. GoddardSchool of Management, University
of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 2010. Stakeholder salience and accounting practices in Tanzanian NGOs. International
Journal of Public Sector Management 23:3, 276-299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
19. Mohammad HudaibEssex Business School, University of Essex, Colchester, UK Roszaini HaniffaBradford University School
of Management, Bradford, UK. 2009. Exploring auditor independence: an interpretive approach. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal 22:2, 221-246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
20. Elizabeth Daniel, Andrew Myers, Keith DixonDon't Blame the Tools 1-44. [CrossRef]
21. Thomas Ahrens, Albrecht Becker, John Burns, Christopher S. Chapman, Markus Granlund, Michael Habersam, Allan
Hansen, Rihab Khalifa, Teemu Malmi, Andrea Mennicken, Anette Mikes, Fabrizio Panozzo, Martin Piber, Paolo Quattrone,
Tobias Scheytt. 2008. The future of interpretive accounting research—A polyphonic debate. Critical Perspectives on Accounting
19:6, 840-866. [CrossRef]
22. Hugh Willmott. 2008. Listening, interpreting, commending: A commentary on the future of interpretive accounting research.
Critical Perspectives on Accounting 19:6, 920-925. [CrossRef]
 23. Patty McNicholas, Mereana Barrett. 2005. Answering the emancipatory call: an emerging research approach ‘on the margins’
of accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16:4, 391-414. [CrossRef]
24. Tony TinkerBaruch College, City University of New York, New York, USA School of Accounting and Information Systems,
University of South Australia, Australia. 2005. The withering of criticism. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 18:1,
100-135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
25. Alan Lowe, Joanne Locke. 2005. Perceptions of journal quality and research paradigm: results of a web-based survey of British
accounting academics. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30:1, 81-98. [CrossRef]
26. Keith Dixon *. 2004. Experiences of an accounting educator in Kiribati. Accounting Education 13:3, 311-327. [CrossRef]
27. Mark Christensen. 2004. Accounting by words not numbers: the handmaiden of power in the academy. Critical Perspectives
on Accounting 15:4-5, 485-512. [CrossRef]
28. Alan Lowe. 2004. Methodology choices and the construction of facts: some implications from the sociology of scientific
knowledge. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 15:2, 207-231. [CrossRef]
29. Alan Lowe. 2004. The spacing and timing of [a chic] critique. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 15:2, 279-291. [CrossRef]
30. Anthony J. Berry, David T. OtleyCase-Based Research in Accounting 231-255. [CrossRef]
31. C.J McNair, Lidija Polutnik, Holly H Johnston, Jason Augustyn, Charles R Thomas SHIFTING PERSPECTIVES:
ACCOUNTING, VISIBILITY, AND MANAGEMENT ACTION 1-38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PDF]
32. Alnoor Bhimani. 2002. European management accounting research: traditions in the making. European Accounting Review
11:1, 99-117. [CrossRef]
33. Colin DeyDepartment of Accountancy and Business Finance, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK. 2002. Methodological
issues. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15:1, 106-121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
Downloaded by Universitas Brawijaya At 19:40 26 May 2017 (PT)

34. Natalie Buckmaster Captured within masculine accounting: Accountability of non-profit organizations 31-44. [Abstract]
[Enhanced Abstract] [PDF] [PDF]
35. Paul M. Collier. 2001. The power of accounting: a field study of local financial management in a police force. Management
Accounting Research 12:4, 465-486. [CrossRef]
36. M. ShotterSchool of Accountancy, University of Pretoria. 2001. Is management accounting theory breaking free from the
shackles of neo‐classical economics? A South African perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research 9:1, 257-284. [Abstract]
[PDF]
37. TONY TINKER. 2001. PAPER PROPHETS: AN AUTOCRITIQUE. The British Accounting Review 33:1, 77-89.
[CrossRef]
38. Alan S. DunkSchool of Accounting, University of Western Sydney, Nepean, Australia. 1999. An examination of the role
of financial investment appraisal methods in the context of international environmental regulation. Accounting, Auditing &
Accountability Journal 12:2, 188-205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
39. Sue LlewellynThe Department of Accounting and Business Method, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. 1999.
Narratives in accounting and management research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 12:2, 220-237. [Abstract]
[Full Text] [PDF]
40. Tony TinkerBaruch College, New York, NY, USA. 1998. Hamlet without the prince: the ethnographic turn in information
systems research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 11:1, 13-33. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
41. Alan S. DunkUniversity of Western Sydney, Nepean, Australia Hector PereraMassey University, Palmerston North, New
Zealand. 1997. The incidence of budgetary slack: a field study exploration. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 10:5,
649-664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
42. Sten Jönsson, Norman B. Macintosh. 1997. CATS, RATS, AND EARS: Making the case for ethnographic accounting
research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22:3-4, 367-386. [CrossRef]
43. Keith Dixon, David Coy, Greg Tower. 1995. Perceptions and experiences of annual report preparers. Higher Education 29:3,
287-306. [CrossRef]
44. Robin Roslender. 1995. Accounting for Strategic Positioning: Responding to the Crisis in Management Accounting1. British
Journal of Management 6:1, 45-57. [CrossRef]
45. Walter Aerts. 1994. On the use of accounting logic as an explanatory category in narrative accounting disclosures. Accounting,
Organizations and Society 19:4-5, 337-353. [CrossRef]
46. Robin Roslender. 1990. Sociology and management accounting research. The British Accounting Review 22:4, 351-372.
[CrossRef]
47. Marilyn Neimark. 1990. The king is dead. Long live the king!. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1:1, 103-114. [CrossRef]