Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mitch Ivy G
Mitch Ivy G
Edillor
BSMA-2A
1. Are there current scientific developments- for example, in biology—that challenge the
understanding of nature presented by Aquinas?
2. Is it possible to maintain a natural law theory without believing in the divine source? Why
or why not?
In my opinion, it’s impossible to maintain natural law theory without believing in the
divine source because the two always stick together wherein when a person killed other
person it violated both sides; the natural law and divine law and therefore unethical to take
one’s life. The same as same sex marriage wherein the Church opposes the same sex
having an affair or kissing in public, people think it is disgusting because they are in the
same sex or whichever it is, it is still wrong in the Church. Church doesn’t support same
sex marriage because God only made man for woman, not man for man.
Mitch Ivy G. Edillor
BSMA-2A
1. How does the method called universalizability work? What are the steps to test if an action
is rationally permissible?
The universalizability will work if everyone is doing the right thing to do in which
everyone could do it. It is the duty to do good for the benefit of one another or returning
the favor after doing something which benefit the other side.
An action is permissible if someone has the commands that every maxim you act
on must be such that you are willing to make it the case that everyone always act on that
maxim when in a similar situation. For example, if I wanted to lie to get something I
wanted, I would have to be willing to make it the case that everyone always lied to get
what they wanted - but if this were to happen no one would ever believe you, so the lie
would not work and you would not get what you wanted. So, if you willed that such a
maxim (of lying) should become a universal law, then you would thwart your goal - thus, it
is impermissible to lie, according to the categorical imperative. It is impermissible because
the only way to lie is to make an exception for yourself.
4. Workplace Romance
Having a romantic relationship in a work place is not bad as long as they are set a
siding their relationship to their work. They must prioritize their work inside their work place
and they can do whatever they want outside the work place. It is also important to consider
the rules of the company it there is a rule that is not allowed for having to must affection
toward each other to the point that they cannot concentrate to their work.